Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2015

01.08.2015 | Discussion

“Impact Engineering” or Social Responsibility?

A Debate on the Responsibilities of Academics and Ways to Combine Scientific with Practice Impact

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Frank, Prof. Dr. Robert Winter, Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. mult. Peter Mertens, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang König, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. August-Wilhelm Scheer, Prof. Dr. Hans Ulrich Buhl, Prof. Dr. Peter Buxmann, Prof. Dr. Christine Legner, Prof. Dr. Leena Suhl

Erschienen in: Business & Information Systems Engineering | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

In recent years, our discipline has been subject to a development that affects its core and has already triggered clearly perceptible changes. This development is characterized by two main aspects. The undoubtedly legitimate demand for internationalization – scientific competition does not stop at country or language barriers – creates a need to publish in English. At the same time, Business and Information Systems Engineering is also confronted with increasing and more complex justification challenges. In the early days of the discipline, legitimacy and reputation were achieved primarily through “practice impact” (e.g., successful application projects) and high numbers of students. Under the influence of international conventions, another reputation mechanism has gained significance in recent years, namely “scientific impact”. Since scientific impact is a multidimensional construct, more or less simplistic metrics have been proposed to capture it. These are mainly based on the result of scientific work most easily quantifiable, namely publications. Even worse, the evaluation of publications itself is often reduced to the assessment of its publication outlet’s reputation. Top-rated journals are mainly found in the Information Systems discipline (i.e., not in the more “technical” sub-disciplines of BISE), as the Information Systems discipline has undergone considerable pressure to justify its scientific significance at business schools for more than 30 years. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Buhl HU (2013) Triple strategy revisited and upcoming changes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(6):373–376CrossRef Buhl HU (2013) Triple strategy revisited and upcoming changes. Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(6):373–376CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Müller G, Röglinger M (2012a) On dinosaurs, measurement ideologists, separatists, and happy souls. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(6):307–315CrossRef Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Müller G, Röglinger M (2012a) On dinosaurs, measurement ideologists, separatists, and happy souls. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(6):307–315CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buhl HU, Müller G, Fridgen G, Röglinger M (2012b) Business and information systems engineering: a complementary approach to information systems – what we can learn from the past and may conclude from present reflection on the future. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(4):236–253 Buhl HU, Müller G, Fridgen G, Röglinger M (2012b) Business and information systems engineering: a complementary approach to information systems – what we can learn from the past and may conclude from present reflection on the future. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(4):236–253
Zurück zum Zitat Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) (2014) Monitoring-Report Digitale Wirtschaft 2014. Innovationstreiber IKT. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi), Berlin Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) (2014) Monitoring-Report Digitale Wirtschaft 2014. Innovationstreiber IKT. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi), Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Buxmann P, Diefenbach H, Hess T (2015) Die Softwareindustrie, 3rd edn. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef Buxmann P, Diefenbach H, Hess T (2015) Die Softwareindustrie, 3rd edn. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lyytinen K, Baskerville R, Iivari J, Te’eni D (2007) Why the old world cannot publish? Overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. Europ J Inf Syst 16(4):317–326CrossRef Lyytinen K, Baskerville R, Iivari J, Te’eni D (2007) Why the old world cannot publish? Overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. Europ J Inf Syst 16(4):317–326CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schubert P, Kilian T, Bjørn-Andersen N (2014) I am an engaged scholar: A typology of IS researchers’ engagement in research with industry. In: Proc CENTERIS 2014/ProjMAN 2014/HCIST 2014. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 138–149 Schubert P, Kilian T, Bjørn-Andersen N (2014) I am an engaged scholar: A typology of IS researchers’ engagement in research with industry. In: Proc CENTERIS 2014/ProjMAN 2014/HCIST 2014. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 138–149
Zurück zum Zitat Singer S, Amorós JE, Arreola DM (2014) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2014 Global report. London Business School Singer S, Amorós JE, Arreola DM (2014) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2014 Global report. London Business School
Zurück zum Zitat Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Spann M et al (2014) Business models – An information systems research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53CrossRef Veit D, Clemons E, Benlian A, Buxmann P, Hess T, Spann M et al (2014) Business models – An information systems research agenda. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):45–53CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
“Impact Engineering” or Social Responsibility?
A Debate on the Responsibilities of Academics and Ways to Combine Scientific with Practice Impact
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Frank
Prof. Dr. Robert Winter
Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. mult. Peter Mertens
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang König
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. August-Wilhelm Scheer
Prof. Dr. Hans Ulrich Buhl
Prof. Dr. Peter Buxmann
Prof. Dr. Christine Legner
Prof. Dr. Leena Suhl
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Erschienen in
Business & Information Systems Engineering / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 2363-7005
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-0202
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0392-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Business & Information Systems Engineering 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe