Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Impact Investments Measurement: Bridging Research and Practice

verfasst von : Eugenia Strano, Alessandro Rizzello, Annarita Trotta

Erschienen in: Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Intentionality and measurable impact are the key characteristics that allow the differentiation of impact investing from conventional forms of investment. Over the past decade, impact measurement has become a common method for evaluating the financial and social return generated by impact investments, and it is relevant for all impact stakeholders, such as impact investors and intermediaries, investees and social enterprises, public administrations and governments. This study was performed to provide an empirical analysis of some practices useful for improving the consistency, effectiveness and applicability of impact measurement. Using a qualitative approach based on a case study analysis, the paper investigates two measurement tools: Social Return on Investment (SROI) and balanced scorecard (BSC). The analysis performed uses various perspectives and concepts, and based on the evidence found, it opens interesting future research directions into the impact measurement field. The findings of this study add to the existing body of knowledge with “insights” for bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel How to Scale Impact Measurement? Evaluating the Application of the Synthetic Control Method in Impact Measurement
Nächstes Kapitel ESG Ratings, Scores, and Opinions: The State of the Art in Literature
Literatur
Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Asiaei, K., & Bontis, N. (2019). Using a balanced scorecard to manage corporate social responsibility. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(4), 371–379.CrossRef
Bolis, M., Sahan, E., West, C., Irani, I., & Nash, R. (2017). Impact investing: Who are we serving? A case of mismatch between supply and demand.
Boyd, J. (2004). Measuring social impact: The foundation of social return on investment (SROI). New Economics Foundation/London Business School.
Caseau, C., & Grolleau, G. (2020). Impact investing: Killing two birds with one stone? Financial Analysts Journal, 76(4), 40–52.CrossRef
Chen, S., & Harrison, R. (2020). Beyond profit vs. purpose: Transactional-relational practices in impact investing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00182.
Costa, E. (2021). Challenges for social impact measurement in the non-profit sector. In A research agenda for social finance (pp. 127–152). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Davies, L. E., Taylor, P., Ramchandani, G., & Christy, E. (2019). Social return on investment (SROI) in sport: A model for measuring the value of participation in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(4), 585–605.CrossRef
Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2017). Measuring and improving social impacts: A guide for nonprofits, companies, and impact investors. Routledge.
Gębczyńska, A., & Brajer-Marczak, R. (2020). Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 99.CrossRef
Gianoncelli, A., & Gaggiotti, G. (2021). Managing for impact: The role of investors’ networks in enhancing appropriate impact measurement and management practices. In Generation Impact (pp. 219–233). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Gibbon, J., & Dey, C. (2011). Developments in social impact measurement in the third sector: Scaling up or dumbing down? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 63–72.
Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? (pp. 13–15). Springer.CrossRef
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.CrossRef
Islam, S. M. (2021). Impact investing in social sector organisations: A systematic review and research agenda. Accounting & Finance.
Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: A systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal.
Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 353–370.CrossRef
Kaplan, R. S., & McMillan, D. (2020). Updating the balanced scorecard for triple bottom line strategies (Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper), 21–28.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organisation: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2015). Balanced scorecard success: The Kaplan-Norton Collection (4 Books). Harvard Business Review Press.
Kročil, O., & Pospíšil, R. (2018). Comprehensive measurement of social enterprise impact. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(5), 571–593.CrossRef
Lall, S. (2017). Measuring to improve versus measuring to prove: Understanding the adoption of social performance measurement practices in nascent social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 28(6), 2633–2657.
Lall, S. A. (2019). From Legitimacy to learning: how impact measurement perceptions and practices evolve in social enterprise–social finance organisation relationships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non profit Organisations, 30(3), 562–577.
Mäkelä, H. (2021). Roles of accounting for the contested Terrain of social enterprises. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 1–22.
Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87.CrossRef
Moody, M., Littlepage, L., & Paydar, N. (2015). Measuring social return on investment: Lessons from organizational implementation of SROI in the Netherlands and the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 19–37.CrossRef
O’Flynn, P., & Barnett, C. (2017). Evaluation and impact investing: A review of methodologies to assess social impact.
Perrini, F., Costanzo, L. A., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2020). Measuring impact and creating change: A comparison of the main methods for social enterprises. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
Reeder, N., Jones, G. R., Loder, J., & Colantonio, A. (2014). Measuring impact: preliminary insights from interviews with impact investors.
Reisman, J., & Olazabal, V. (2016). Situating the next generation of impact measurement and evaluation for impact investing. Rockefeller Foundation.
Rohm, H., Halbach, L., Giannetto, D. F., Cannon, T., Bowyer, S., Brown, M. G., & Allen, J. R. (2006). A balancing act: Sustaining new directions. Balanced Scorecard Institute, PERFORM Magazine, 2(3), 1–8.
Ruiz-Lozano, M., Tirado-Valencia, P., Sianes, A., Ariza-Montes, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & López-Martín, M. (2020). SROI methodology for public administration decisions about financing with social criteria. A case study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1070.CrossRef
Ryan, P. W., & Lyne, I. (2008). Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: Methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment. Education, Knowledge & Economy, 2(3), 223–237.CrossRef
Strano, E., Rizzello, A., & Trotta, A. (2022). Evaluation in impact investing: Where we are and where we are going. In Handbook of research on global aspects of sustainable finance in times of crises (pp. 46–76). IGI Global.
Verrinder, N. B., Zwane, K., Vaca, S., & Nixon, D. (2018). Evaluative tools in impact investing: Three case studies on the use of theories of change. African Evaluation Journal, 6(2), 1–9.CrossRef
Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2017). Applying Social Return on Investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research & Information, 45(8), 875–891.CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
Metadaten
Titel
Impact Investments Measurement: Bridging Research and Practice
verfasst von
Eugenia Strano
Alessandro Rizzello
Annarita Trotta
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Buch
Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22538-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-22539-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22539-0_3