nach oben

Education and Information Technologies

Erschienen in:

06.03.2020

Implementation of real-time online mouse tracking on overseas quiz session

From server administrator point of view

verfasst von: Fajar Purnama, Otgontsetseg Sukhbaatar, Lodoiravsal Choimaa, Tsuyoshi Usagawa

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Mouse tracking serves as an alternative to eye tracking in measuring the learning process in education because of its affordability. Moreover, mouse tracking does not require extra hardware, as in the case of eye tracking, because it is a feature in personal computers by default. Therefore, it is possible to implement mouse tracking in a massive open scale. However, mouse tracking has only been implemented in a laboratory setting to date, ostensibly because of the associated extremely high running costs. Nonetheless, there is no available data to support the claim of high resource costs, which has resulted in much speculation among implementers. In general, the implementation of mouse tracking in a non-laboratory environment is still rare. Therefore, the authors developed an application to investigate real-time mouse tracking online. It was implemented on the Moodle learning management system and tested on an online quiz session accessed abroad. Additionally, the application can handle tracking on mobile devices. In this work, the main resources that include CPU, network, RAM, and storage costs were measured when mouse tracking was used. These results can serve as a reference for network and server administrators during future implementation of this technique. It was determined that the characteristics of mouse activities were dynamic in that occasional surges and lulls were observed. Additionally, this article also discussed the advantage of real-time and online implementation to regular online implementation and showed that there is a possibility of implementing mouse tracking on a large scale if mouse tracking data are not aggregated and transmitted as a single data package.

Vorheriger Artikel Machine learning algorithm for grading open-ended physics questions in Turkish

Nächster Artikel Effects of microworld game-based approach on neuromuscular disabled students learning performance in elementary basic science courses

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alhasan, K., Chen, L., Chen, F. (2018). An experimental study of learning behaviour in an elearning environment. In 2018 IEEE 20th international conference on high performance computing and communications; IEEE 16th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 4th International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) (pp. 1398–1403): IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCC/SmartCity/DSS.2018.00231

Arapakis, I., & Leiva, L.A. (2016). Predicting user engagement with direct displays using mouse cursor information. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 599–608): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2911505

Arroyo, E., Selker, T., Wei, W. (2006). Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks. In CHI’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 484–489): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125557

Barrios, V.M.G., Gütl, C., Preis, A.M., Andrews, K., Pivec, M., Mödritscher, F., Trummer, C. (2004). Adele: a framework for adaptive e-learning through eye tracking. Proceedings of IKNOW, pp. 609–616.

Bluehost. (2016). Web analytics for beginners - presented by bluehost. https://youtu.be/PnVZ7_OA7Qo.

Buscher, G., Cutrell, E., Morris, M.R. (2009). What do you see when you’re surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 21–30): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518705

Busjahn, T., Schulte, C., Sharif, B., Begel, A., Hansen, M., Bednarik, R., Orlov, P., Ihantola, P., Shchekotova, G., Antropova, M., et al. (2014). Eye tracking in computing education. In Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research(pp. 3–10): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632320.2632344

Calvi, C., Porta, M., Sacchi, D. (2008). e5learning, an e-learning environment based on eye tracking. In Eighth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies, 2008. ICALT’08 (pp. 376–380): IEEE, DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2008.35, (to appear in print).

Canali, D., Bilge, L., Balzarotti, D. (2014). On the effectiveness of risk prediction based on users browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on information, computer and communications security (pp. 171–182): ACM, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2590296.2590347, (to appear in print).

Cantoni, V., Perez, C.J., Porta, M., Ricotti, S. (2012). Exploiting eye tracking in advanced e-learning systems. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on computer systems and technologies (pp. 376–383): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2383276.2383331

Chen, M.C., Anderson, J.R., Sohn, M.H. (2001). What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. In CHI’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 281–282): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634234

Chivu, R., Turlacu, L., Stoica, I., Radu, A. (2018). Identifying the effectiveness of e-learning platforms among students using eye-tracking technology. In 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAD’18). https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAD18.2018.8046 (pp. 621–628): Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.

Chourishi, D., Buttan, C.K., Chaurasia, A., Soni, A. (2011). Effective e-learning through moodle. International Journal of Advance Technology & Engineering Research (IJATER), 1(1), 34–38.

Cooke, L. (2006). Is the mouse a "poor man’s eye tracker”?. In Annual conference-society for technical communication, (Vol. 53 p. 252).

Demšar, U, & Çöltekin, A. (2017). Quantifying gaze and mouse interactions on spatial visual interfaces with a new movement analytics methodology. PloS one, 12(8), e0181818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181818.CrossRef

Dentzel, Z. (2013). How the internet has changed everyday life. BBVA OpenMind:” Ch@ nge.

Dragunova, M., Moro, R., Bielikova, M. (2017). Measuring visual search ability on the web. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on intelligent user interfaces companion (pp. 97–100): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3030024.3038272

Drake, J.R., O’Hara, M., Seeman, E. (2015). Five principles for mooc design: With a case study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14(14), 125–143.

Duggan, G.B., & Payne, S.J. (2011). Skim reading by satisficing: evidence from eye tracking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1141–1150): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979114

Eger, L. (2018). How people acquire knowledge from a web page: an eye tracking study. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 10(3), 350.

Ehmke, C., & Wilson, S. (2007). Identifying web usability problems from eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: HCI... but not as we know it-Volume 1 (pp. 119–128): British Computer Society.

Foundation, J. (2019). jquery write less, do more. https://jquery.com/.

Fungai, A., & Usagawa, T. (2016). Isolating hidden recurring patterns on unlabeled access log data in learning management systems to identify drop out risk students. In 11th international student conference on advanced science and technology (pp. 9–11): Kumamoto University.

Guo, Q., & Agichtein, E. (2008). Exploring mouse movements for inferring query intent. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 707–708 ): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390462

Guo, Q., & Agichtein, E. (2010). Towards predicting web searcher gaze position from mouse movements. In CHI’10 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3601–3606): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754025

Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051.CrossRef

HarvardX. (2014). HarvardX Person-Course academic year 2013 de-identified dataset, version 3.0. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26147.

Henrie, C.R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K.C., Graham, C.R. (2015). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015.

Holmqvist, K., & Wartenberg, C. (2005). The role of local design factors for newspaper reading behaviour-an eye-tracking perspective. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 127, 1–21.

Holsanova, J., Rahm, H., Holmqvist, K. (2006). Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication, 5(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357206061005.CrossRef

Hsu, T.C., Chang, S.C., Liu, N.C. (2018). Peer assessment of webpage design: Behavioral sequential analysis based on eye tracking evidence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 305–321.

Hu, J., Zeng, H.J., Li, H., Niu, C., Chen, Z. (2007). Demographic prediction based on user’s browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 151–160 ): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1242572.1242594

Huang, J., White, R.W., Dumais, S. (2011). No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1225–1234 ): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979125

Huang, J., White, R., Buscher, G. (2012). User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1341–1350): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208591

Hyönä, J., Lorch, Jr R.F., Kaakinen, J.K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.44.CrossRef

Ivanović, M., Klašnja-Milićević, A., Ivković, J., Porta, M. (2017). Integration of eye tracking technologies and methods in an e-learning system. In Proceedings of the 8th Balkan conference in informatics (p. 29): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136273.3136278

Jarodzka, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2017). Tracking the reading eye: towards a model of real-world reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12189.CrossRef

Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K., Gruber, H. (2017). Eye tracking in educational science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas Journal of Eye Movement Research 10(1). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.1.3.

Johnson, A., Mulder, B., Sijbinga, A., Hulsebos, L. (2012). Action as a window to perception: measuring attention with mouse movements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 802–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2862.CrossRef

Kakasevski, G., Mihajlov, M., Arsenovski, S., Chungurski, S. (2008). Evaluating usability in learning management system moodle. In ITI, (Vol. 2008 p. 30).

Khan, S., Singh, Y., Sharma, K. (2018). Role of web usage mining technique for website structure redesign. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology 3(1).

Kim, N.W., Bylinskii, Z., Borkin, M.A., Gajos, K.Z., Oliva, A., Durand, F., Pfister, H. (2017). Bubbleview: an interface for crowdsourcing image importance maps and tracking visual attention. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(5), 36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131275.CrossRef

Koh, K.H., Fouh, E., Farghally, M.F., Shahin, H., Shaffer, C.A. (2018). Experience: Learner analytics data quality for an etextbook system. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 9(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148240.CrossRef

Kumar, R., & Tomkins, A. (2010). A characterization of online browsing behavior. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 561–570): ACM., https://doi.org/10.1109/ITI.2008.4588480

Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., Zdrahal, Z. (2017). Open university learning analytics dataset. Sci Data, 4, 170171. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.171.CrossRef

Lagun, D., & Agichtein, E. (2011). Viewser: Enabling large-scale remote user studies of web search examination and interaction. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. (pp. 365–374 ): ACM.

Lagun, D., Ageev, M., Guo, Q., Agichtein, E. (2014). Discovering common motifs in cursor movement data for improving web search. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 183–192): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556195.2556265

Lai, M.L., Tsai, M.J., Yang, F.Y., Hsu, C.Y., Liu, T.C., Lee, S.W.Y., Lee, M.H., Chiou, G.L., Liang, J.C., Tsai, C.C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001.CrossRef

Lee, R.S., Liu, J.N., Yeung, K.S., Sin, A.H., Shum, D.T. (2009). Agent-based web content engagement time (wcet) analyzer on e-publication system. In Ninth international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, 2009. ISDA’09 (pp. 67–72): IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2009.189

Leiva, L.A., & Huang, J. (2015). Building a better mousetrap: Compressing mouse cursor activity for web analytics. Information Processing & Management, 51 (2), 114–129. 10.1016/j.ipm.2014.10.005.CrossRef

Li, L.Y., & Tsai, C.C. (2017). Accessing online learning material: Quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Computers & Education, 114, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.007.CrossRef

Liebling, D.J., & Dumais, S.T. (2014). Gaze and mouse coordination in everyday work. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing: adjunct publication(pp. 1141–1150): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641692

Linawati, L., Wirastuti, N.D., Sukadarmika, G. (2017). Survey on lms moodle for adaptive online learning design. Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Informatics, 1(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.24843/JEEI.2017.v01.i01.p03.CrossRef

Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040.CrossRef

Lupu, R.G., & Ungureanu, F. (2013). A survey of eye tracking methods and applications. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din Iasi, Automatic Control and Computer Science Section, 3, 72–86.

Manson, S.M., Kne, L., Dyke, K.R., Shannon, J., Eria, S. (2012). Using eye-tracking and mouse metrics to test usability of web mapping navigation. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1559/1523040639148.CrossRef

Martín-Albo, D., Leiva, L.A., Huang, J., Plamondon, R. (2016). Strokes of insight: User intent detection and kinematic compression of mouse cursor trails. Information Processing & Management, 52(6), 989–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.005.CrossRef

Maruya, K., Watanabe, J., Takahashi, H., Hashiba, S. (2015). A learning system utilizing learners’ active tracing behaviors. In Proceedings of the Fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 418–419): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723655

Mind, S. (2019). The top 10 best web analytic tools. https://www.sparringmind.com/best-web-analytics/.

Moodle. (2016). Logs. https://docs.moodle.org/36/en/Logs.

Mueller, F., & Lockerd, A. (2001). Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling. In CHI’01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 279–280): ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.634233

Nakano, H., Iriguchi, N., Sugitani, K., Kita, T., Musashi, Y., Migita, M., Matsuba, R., Ohta, Y., Gobayashi, T., Tsuji, K., et al. (2005). The instructional effects of on-line tests on the large-scale it courses. In 6th international conference on information technology based higher education and training, 2005. ITHET 2005 (pp. F4B–7): IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2005.1560304

Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., Harland, J., Warburton, G. (2011). How active are students in online discussion forums?. In Proceedings of the thirteenth australasian computing education conference-volume, (Vol. 114 pp. 125–134): Australian Computer Society Inc.

Natividad, J. (2018). Monthly page views for city archives digital repository. Data.world, Inc.

Navalpakkam, V., & Churchill, E. (2012). Mouse tracking: measuring and predicting users’ experience of web-based content. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2963–2972): ACM, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208705, (to appear in print).

NT, B. (2015). Top 10 heatmap analytics tools for marketers. https://bigdata-madesimple.com/top-10-heatmap-analytics-tools-for-marketers/.

Parikh, S., & Kalva, H. (2018). Eye gaze feature classification for predicting levels of learning. In Kravcik, M., Santos, OC, Boticario, JG, Bielikova, M., Horvath, T., Torre I. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th workshop on personalization approaches in learning environments (PALE 2018). 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018), CEUR workshop proceedings, this volume, pp 1–6.

Paturusi, S.D., Chisaki, Y., Usagawa, T. (2012). Development and evaluation of the blended learningcourses at sam ratulangi university in Indonesia. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(3), 242.

Pernice, K. (2017). F-shaped pattern of reading on the web: Misunderstood, but still relevant (even on mobile). Nielsen Norman Group.

Pivec, M., Trummer, C., Pripfl, J. (2006). Eye-tracking adaptable e-learning and content authoring support. Informatica, 30(1).

Poon, L.K., Kong, S.C., Yau, T.S., Wong, M., Ling, M.H. (2017). Learning analytics for monitoring students participation online: Visualizing navigational patterns on learning management system. In International conference on blended learning (pp. 166–176): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_15

Purnama, F. (2019). 0fajarpurnama0/real-time-online-mouse-tracking-animation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2589338. https://github.com/0fajarpurnama0/Real-Time-Online-Mouse-Tracking-Animation.

Purnama, F., Fungai, A., Do, T.M., Siagian, A.H.A.M., Annas, A., Susanto, H., Hendarmawan, Usagawa, T., Nakano, H. (2016a). Introductory work on section based page view of web contents: Towards the idea of how a page is viewed. In 11Th international student conference on advanced science and technology (ICAST) (pp. 9–11): Kumamoto University.

Purnama, F., Fungai, A., Usagawa, T. (2016b). Demonstration on extending the pageview feature to page section based: Towards identifying reading patterns of users. In 7th International conference on science and engineering (pp. 304–307): Yangon Technological University.

Purnama, F., Sukhbaatar, O., Choimaa, L., Usagawa, T. (2020). Data for: Implementation of real-time online mouse tracking case study in a small online quiz. https://doi.org/10.17632/vznyfcx9xk.4, mendeley Data, v3.

Rakoczi, G., & Pohl, M. (2012). Visualisation and analysis of multiuser gaze data: Eye tracking usability studies in the special context of e-learning. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 738–739): IEEE, DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2012.15, (to appear in print).

Ramakrisnan, P., Jaafar, A., Razak, F.H.A., Ramba, D.A. (2012). Evaluation of user interface design for leaning management system (lms): Investigating student’s eye tracking pattern and experiences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.357.CrossRef

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.CrossRef

Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461.CrossRef

Reynolds, S. (2018). Nasa website data 1995. Data.world, Inc.

Rheem, H., Verma, V., Becker, D.V. (2018). Use of mouse-tracking method to measure cognitive load. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, (Vol. 62 pp. 1982–1986). Sage: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621449

Rodden, K., & Fu, X. (2007). Exploring how mouse movements relate to eye movements on web search results pages. In SIGIR Workshop on Web information seeking and interaction (pp. 29–32).

Rodden, K., Fu, X., Aula, A., Spiro, I. (2008). Eye-mouse coordination patterns on web search results pages. In CHI’08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2997–3002): ACM.

Rodrigues, M., Gonçalves, S, Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Fdez-Riverola, F. (2013). Keystrokes and clicks: Measuring stress on e-learning students. In Management intelligent systems (pp. 119–126 ): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00569-0_15

Salmeron-Majadas, S., Santos, O.C., Boticario, J.G. (2014). An evaluation of mouse and keyboard interaction indicators towards non-intrusive and low cost affective modeling in an educational context. Procedia Computer Science, 35, 691–700.CrossRef

Sin, K., & Muthu, L. (2015). Application of big data in education data mining and learning analytics–a literature review. ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 5(4).

Sopu, H.T., Chisaki, Y., Usagawa, T. (2016). Use of facebook by secondary school students at nuku’alofa as an indicator of e-readiness for e-learning in the kingdom of tonga. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2333.

Sungkur, R.K., Antoaroo, M.A., Beeharry, A. (2016). Eye tracking system for enhanced learning experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1785–1806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9418-0.CrossRef

Tarasewich, P., Pomplun, M., Fillion, S., Broberg, D. (2005). The enhanced restricted focus viewer. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1901_4.CrossRef

Tsai, M.J., Hou, H.T., Lai, M.L., Liu, W.Y., Yang, F.Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: an eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375–385.CrossRef

Tzafilkou, K., & Protogeros, N. (2017). Diagnosing user perception and acceptance using eye tracking in web-based end-user development. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.035.CrossRef

Usagawa, T., Sugitani, K., Kita, T., Iriguchi, N., Migita, M., Matsuba, R., Musashi, Y., Nakano, H. (2006). Assuring the basic it literacy levels for every student by the university-wide blended learning. In Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, 2006. ITHET’06. 7th International Conference on (pp. 647–651): IEEE, DOI https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2006.339680, (to appear in print).

Voßkühler, A., Nordmeier, V., Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A.M. (2008). Ogama (open gaze and mouse analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (4), 1150–1162. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1150.CrossRef

Wagner, E. (2019). Internet data usage guide. https://www.whistleout.com/Internet/Guides/Internet-usage-guide.

Wang, H., Chignell, M., Ishizuka, M. (2006). Empathic tutoring software agents using real-time eye tracking. In Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (pp. 73–78): ACM, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/1117309.1117346, (to appear in print).

Wei, H., Moldovan, A.N., Muntean, C. (2009). Sensing learner interest through eye tracking. Technology 22:23rd.

Wen, M., & Rosé, C.P. (2014). Identifying latent study habits by mining learner behavior patterns in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 1983–1986): ACM, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2661829.2662033, (to appear in print).

Yang, F.Y., Tsai, M.J., Chiou, G.L., Lee, S.W.Y., Chang, C.C., Chen, L.L. (2018). Instructional suggestions supporting science learning in digital environments based on a review of eye tracking studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 28–45.

Zheng, C., & Usagawa, T. (2018). A rapid webcam-based eye tracking method for human computer interaction. In 2018 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS) (pp. 133–136): IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIS.2018.8570532

Zushi, M., Miyazaki, Y., Norizuki, K. (2012). Web application for recording learners’ mouse trajectories and retrieving their study logs for data analysis. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2012.04.004.CrossRef

Titel: Implementation of real-time online mouse tracking on overseas quiz session
From server administrator point of view
verfasst von: Fajar Purnama
Otgontsetseg Sukhbaatar
Lodoiravsal Choimaa
Tsuyoshi Usagawa
Publikationsdatum: 06.03.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10141-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

LPR: A bio-inspired intelligent learning path recommendation system based on meaningful learning theory

Exploring EFL pre-service teachers’ adoption of technology in a CALL program: obstacles, motivators, and maintenance

Cognitive optimism of distinctive initiatives to foster self-directed and self-regulated learning skills: A comparative analysis of conventional and blended-learning in undergraduate studies

The impact of preservice teachers’ cognitive and technological perceptions on their continuous intention to use flipped classroom

The effectiveness of using interactive white boards in improving the Arabic listening skills of undergraduates majoring in Arabic language at Kuwaiti universities

Participatory design of persuasive technology in a blended learning course: A qualitative study