nach oben

TechTrends

Erschienen in:

07.10.2022 | Original Paper

Implementing Personalized Reading Plans with an E-Book Library to Support First-Grade Students’ Reading Engagement and Comprehension

verfasst von: Hannah Miles, Fatih Ari

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This action research aimed to evaluate the impact of personalized reading plans on first-grade students’ reading engagement and comprehension. Personalized reading plans were created for each student based on their interests and reading abilities within an e-book library. Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered from 10 first-grade students before and during the implementation of personalized reading plans. Overall, students showed an increase in reading engagement and spent less time engaging in off-task behaviors during the implementation of personalized reading plans. Additionally, system log data revealed an increase in the amount of time students spent reading e-books. However, there was a considerable decrease in the number of quizzes taken during the implementation, and students’ reading comprehension scores did not improve after implementing the personalized reading plans.

Vorheriger Artikel The Rise and Fall of the HyFlex Approach in Mexico

Nächster Artikel Drone Club: Exploring Engineering and Employability Skills Outside the Classroom

Akyol, H., & Kayabaş, Z. E. K. (2018). Improving the reading skills of a student with reading disability: An action research. Education & Science, 42(193), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7240CrossRef

Allington, R. L. (2014). How reading volume affects both reading fluency and reading achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 13–26. Retreived September 30, 2018, from https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/61

Arslan-Ari, I., & Ari, F. (2021). The effect of visual cues in e-books on pre-K children’s visual attention, word recognition, and comprehension: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1938763

Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084CrossRef

Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Action Research, 1(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503030011002CrossRef

Cassidy, J., Ziv, Y., Mehta, T. G., & Feeney, B. C. (2003). Feedback seeking in children and adolescents: Associations with self-perceptions, attachment representations, and depression. Child Development, 74(2), 612–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402019CrossRef

Catapano, S., Fleming, J., & Elias, M. (2009). Building an effective classroom library. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 5(1), 59–73.

Cervetti, G. N., & Hiebert, E. H. (2015). The sixth pillar of reading instruction: Knowledge development. Reading Teacher, 68(7), 548–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1343CrossRef

Ciampa, K. (2012). Electronic storybooks: A constructivist approach to reading motivation in primary-grade students. Journal of Literacy & Technology, 13(2), 81–148.

Ciampa, K. (2016). Motivating grade 1 children to read: Exploring the role of choice, curiosity, and challenge in mobile e-books. Reading Psychology, 37(5), 665–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1105337CrossRef

Clayton, V. (2019). Build balanced readers: Phonics makes a comeback as reading teachers strive for a more comprehensive approach. District Administration, 55(6), 39–41.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crisp, T., Knezek, S. M., Quinn, M., Bingham, G. E., Girardeau, K., & Starks, F. (2016). What’s on our bookshelves? The diversity of children’s literature in early childhood classroom libraries. Journal of Children’s Literature, 42(2), 29–42. Retrieved April 22, 2020 from https://www.childrensliteratureassembly.org/journal.html

de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2002). Quality of book-reading matters for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.145CrossRef

Duke, N. K. (2000). For the rich it’s richer: Print experiences and environments offered to children in very low-and very high-socioeconomic status first-grade classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 441–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163530CrossRef

Fitch, V. (2013). Further fostering intrinsic motivation in the Montessori elementary classroom (ED540068). ERIC. Retrieved November 2, 2020, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540068

Fractor, J., Woodruff, M., Martinez, M., & Teale, W. (1993). Let’s not miss opportunities to promote voluntary reading: Classroom libraries in the elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 46(6), 476–484. Retrieved October 14, 2018 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20201114

Fresch, M. J. (2016). Strategies for balanced literacy. Shell Education.

Frey, B. B., Lee, S. W., Tollefson, N., Pass, L., & Massengill, D. (2005). Balanced literacy in an urban school district. Journal of Educational Research, 98(5), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.5.272-280CrossRef

Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01024CrossRef

Gardiner, S. (2001). Ten minutes a day for silent reading. Educational Leader, 59(2), 32–35. Retrieved October 13, 2018, from http://www.educationalleader.com/subtopicintro/read/ASCD/ASCD_314_1.pdf

Gebhard, J. G. (2005). Awareness of teaching through action research: Examples, benefits, limitations. JALT Journal, 27(1). Retrieved August 30, 2021, from http://www.jalt-publications.org/jj

Gonzalez, M. (2010). The effect of interactive eBooks on the reading comprehension of struggling readers and students with reading disabilities (Publication No. 3426078) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C. F., Marsh, H., Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 711–735. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X499084CrossRef

Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_2CrossRef

Jones, T., & Brown, C. (2011). Reading engagement: A comparison between e-books and traditional print books in an elementary classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5–22. Retrieved September 22, 2018, from https://www.e-iji.net/

Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers and Education, 55(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.014CrossRef

Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2008). The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children’s emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups. Computers and Education, 50(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.002CrossRef

Kragler, S., & Martin, L. (2012). Learning to read in first grade: Developing effective programs in urban schools. The Educational Forum, 76(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.653095CrossRef

Kucirkova, N., & Cremin, T. (2018). Personalised reading for pleasure with digital libraries: Towards a pedagogy of practice and design. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(5), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1375458CrossRef

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947CrossRef

Locher, F., & Pfost, M. (2020). The relation between time spent reading and reading comprehension throughout the life course. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12289CrossRef

Macdonald, A. (2013). Researching with young children: Considering issues of ethics and engagement. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2013.14.3.255CrossRef

Marchand, G. C., & Furrer, C. J. (2014). Formative, informative, and summative assessment: The relationship among curriculum-based measurement of reading, classroom engagement, and reading performance. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21779CrossRef

Marinak, B. A. (2013). Courageous reading instruction: The effects of an elementary motivation intervention. Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.658455CrossRef

McGeown, S. P., Osborne, C., Warhurst, A., Norgate, R., & Duncan, L. G. (2016). Understanding children’s reading activities: Reading motivation, skill and child characteristics as predictors. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12060CrossRef

McKeown, M. G. (2019). Effective vocabulary instruction fosters knowing words, using words, and understanding how words work. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-VOIA-18-0126CrossRef

McKim, C. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096CrossRef

McVicker, C. (2017). Last child in the library? A survey of use of e-books versus traditional books. Children and Libraries, 15(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.5860/cal.15.4.4CrossRef

Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (5th ed.). SAGE.CrossRef

Moody, A. K., Justice, L. M., & Cabell, S. Q. (2010). Electronic versus traditional storybooks: Relative influence on preschool children’s engagement and communication. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410372162CrossRef

Moore, J. (1980). Guidelines for secondary SSR. The Reading Teacher, 33(4), 445–450. Retrieved October 13, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED195955.pdf

Mosito, C. P., Warnick, A. M., & Esambe, E. E. (2017). Enhancing reading abilities of learners with intellectual impairments through computer technology. African Journal of Disability, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v6i0.206CrossRef

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). U.S. Government Printing Office.

Purvis, J. S. (2016). The relationship between reading fluency and Lexile measures (Publication No. 10259026) [Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084CrossRef

Rickenbrode, R., & Walsh, K. (2013). Lighting the way: The Reading Panel report ought to guide teacher preparation. American Educator, Summer, 30–35.

Roskos, K., Burstein, K., & You, B.-K. (2012). A typology for observing children’s engagement with eBooks at preschool. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(2), 47–66.

Roskos, K. A., Sullivan, S., Simpson, D., & Zuzolo, N. (2016). E-books in the early literacy environment: Is there added value for vocabulary development? Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2016.1143895CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sanden, S. (2012). Independent reading: Perspectives and practices of highly effective teachers. The Reading Teacher, 66(3), 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01120CrossRef

Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031CrossRef

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840CrossRef

Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2012). The roles of competence beliefs and goal orientations for change in intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028115CrossRef

Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9133-yCrossRef

Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved October 13, 2018, from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745/162

Tennessee State Department of Education (2017). Building the framework: A report on elementary grades reading in Tennessee. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/reports/rpt_bldg_the_framework.pdf

Truby, D. (2012). 10 questions about independent reading. Instructor, 122(2), 29–31. Retrieved October 13, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=independent+reading&id=EJ993189

Watts, T. W., Bailey, D. H., & Li, C. (2019). Aiming further: Addressing the need for high-quality longitudinal research in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(4), 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1644692CrossRef

Weber, S. (2018). How teachers can guide library book selection to maximize the value of independent reading time. The Language and Literacy Spectrum, 28(1). Retrieved October 13, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1186117.pdf

Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Lutz Klauda, S., Mcrae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating the effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20307

Young, C., Durham, P., & Rosenbaum-Martinez, C. (2018). A stacked approach to reading intervention: Increasing 2nd- and 3rd-graders’ independent reading levels with an intervention program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2017.1418771CrossRef

Titel: Implementing Personalized Reading Plans with an E-Book Library to Support First-Grade Students’ Reading Engagement and Comprehension
verfasst von: Hannah Miles
Fatih Ari
Publikationsdatum: 07.10.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: TechTrends / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00791-0

Introducing the November 2022 Special Issue

Column: Editor’s Notes

A Design-Based Research Study Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Instructional Design Decision-Making for Technology Integration

Original Paper

Orlando 2023: Reflections and Transformations

Column: Conference Planning

Teachers’ Experiences with and Perceptions of Virtual Manipulatives Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Original Paper

Stats Kwon Do: a Case Study in Instructional Design, Multimedia and Gamification of Instruction

Original Paper

Drone Club: Exploring Engineering and Employability Skills Outside the Classroom

Original Paper

Springer Professional

Implementing Personalized Reading Plans with an E-Book Library to Support First-Grade Students’ Reading Engagement and Comprehension

Abstract

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Introducing the November 2022 Special Issue

A Design-Based Research Study Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Instructional Design Decision-Making for Technology Integration

Orlando 2023: Reflections and Transformations

Teachers’ Experiences with and Perceptions of Virtual Manipulatives Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Stats Kwon Do: a Case Study in Instructional Design, Multimedia and Gamification of Instruction

Drone Club: Exploring Engineering and Employability Skills Outside the Classroom

Premium Partner

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Introducing the November 2022 Special Issue

A Design-Based Research Study Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Instructional Design Decision-Making for Technology Integration

Orlando 2023: Reflections and Transformations

Teachers’ Experiences with and Perceptions of Virtual Manipulatives Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Stats Kwon Do: a Case Study in Instructional Design, Multimedia and Gamification of Instruction

Drone Club: Exploring Engineering and Employability Skills Outside the Classroom