Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Legacy of Petroleum-Based Economy Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Implementing the Bioeconomy on the Ground: An International Overview

verfasst von : Mika Sillanpää, Chaker Ncibi

Erschienen in: A Sustainable Bioeconomy

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Bioeconomy is a holistic economic model developed and applied to manage the available raw materials from biomass and valorize the biowastes generated for the various agro-industrial activities. The implementation of this sustainable concept on the ground is based on a variety of green technologies related to the acquisition and conversion of biomass to produce a wide range of biofuels, biochemicals, and biomaterials, with little to no competition with food resources.
The decision to implement bioeconomy in any country is well justified and of strategic importance, especially if enough renewable raw materials could be made available to “fuel” the country’s economy and the major industrial activities. In this chapter various visions, strategies, resources, and opportunities, as well many industrial cases related to the implementation of bioeconomy, are presented and discussed in various leading countries in the world including the United States, several European countries, and China. A closer look on the Finnish bioeconomy and its related industrial achievements and prospects is also given.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Biorefineries: Industrial-Scale Production Paving the Way for Bioeconomy
Nächstes Kapitel Bioeconomy: Multidimensional Impacts and Challenges
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
Wesseler J, Spielman DJ, Demont M. The future of governance in the global bioeconomy: policy, regulation, and investment challenges for the biotechnology and bioenergy sectors. AgBioForum. 2010;13:288–90.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Villamil MB, Alexander M, Silvis AH, Gray ME. Producer perceptions and information needs regarding their adoption of bioenergy crops. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:3604–12.CrossRef
15.
Skevas T, Hayden NJ, Swinton SM, Lupi F. Landowner willingness to supply marginal land for bioenergy production. Land Use Policy. 2016;50:507–17.CrossRef
16.
Scheffran J, Bendor T. Bioenergy and land use: a spatial-agent dynamic model of energy crop production in Illinois. Int J Environ Pollut. 2009;39:4–27.CrossRef
17.
Kim S, Dale BE. Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;29:426–39.CrossRef
18.
Kim S, Dale BE. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;26:361–75.CrossRef
19.
Kocoloski M, Griffin WM, Matthews HS. Estimating national costs, benefits, and potential for cellulosic ethanol production from forest thinnings. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:2133–42.CrossRef
20.
Wu W, Davis RW. One-pot bioconversion of algae biomass into terpenes for advanced biofuels and bioproducts. Algal Res. 2016;17:316–20.CrossRef
21.
Venteris ER, Skaggs RL, Wigmosta MS, Coleman AM. A national-scale comparison of resource and nutrient demands for algae-based biofuel production by lipid extraction and hydrothermal liquefaction. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;64:276–90.CrossRef
22.
23.
Bi Z, Zhang J, Peterson E, et al. Biocrude from pretreated sorghum bagasse through catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction. Fuel. 2017;188:112–20.CrossRef
24.
Perez-Pimienta JA, Flores-Gómez CA, Ruiz HA, et al. Evaluation of agave bagasse recalcitrance using AFEXTM, autohydrolysis, and ionic liquid pretreatments. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:216–23.CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Lee CS, Aroua MK, Daud WMAW, et al. A review: Conversion of bioglycerol into 1,3-propanediol via biological and chemical method. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;42:963–72.CrossRef
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Bevan MW, Franssen MCR. Investing in green and white biotech. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:765–7.CrossRef
49.
Scarlat N, Dallemand JF, Monforti-Ferrario F, Nita V. The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environ Devel. 2015;15:3–34.CrossRef
50.
51.
Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC. Industrial enzyme applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13:345–51.CrossRef
52.
Jegannathan KR, Nielsen PH. Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production – a literature review. J Clean Prod. 2013;42:228–40.CrossRef
53.
McCormick K, Kautto N. The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview. Sustainability. 2013;5:2589–608.CrossRef
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
Asveld L, van Est R, Stemerding D. Getting to the core of the bio-economy: a perspective on the sustainable promise of biomass. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut; 2011.
62.
63.
64.
Bosman R, Rotmans J. Transition governance towards a bioeconomy: a comparison of Finland and the Netherlands. Sustainability. 2016;8:1017.CrossRef
65.
66.
Sanders J, van der Hoeven D. Opportunities for a bio-based economy in the Netherlands. Energies. 2008;1:105–19.CrossRef
67.
68.
AkzoNobel media release. AkzoNobel and Royal Cosun to develop sustainable cellulose products from sugar beet processing. Published 4 May 2016.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
Junginger M, Bolkesjø T, Bradley D, et al. Developments in international bioenergy trade. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32:717–29.CrossRef
85.
86.
Alexopoulou E, Zanetti F, Scordia D, et al. Long-term yields of switchgrass, giant reed, and Miscanthus in the Mediterranean basin. Bioenergy Res. 2015;8:1492.CrossRef
87.
88.
89.
90.
Bacenetti J, Bergante S, Facciotto G, Fiala M. Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;94:209–19.CrossRef
91.
Sustainable conversion of Pinus pinaster wood into biofuel precursors: a biorefinery approach. Fuel. 2016;164:51–8.
92.
Olsson O, Hillring B. The wood fuel market in Denmark – Price development, market efficiency and internationalization. Energy. 2014;78:141–8.CrossRef
93.
Ranta T. Logging residues from regeneration fellings for biofuel production–a GIS-based availability analysis in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;28:171–82.CrossRef
94.
Mangoyana RB. Bioenergy from forest thinning: carbon emissions, energy balances and cost analyses. Renew Energy. 2011;36:2368–73.CrossRef
95.
Linden M. Forecasting forest chip energy production in Finland 2008–2014. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:590–9.CrossRef
96.
Holm-Nielsen J, Ehimen EA. Biomass supply chains for bioenergy and biorefining. Sawston, Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2016.
97.
Sambusiti C, Licari A, Solhy A, et al. One-Pot dry chemo-mechanical deconstruction for bioethanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol. 2015;181:200–6.CrossRef
98.
Wiinikka H, Johansson AC, Wennebro J, Carlsson P, Öhrman OGW. Evaluation of black liquor gasification intended for synthetic fuel or power production. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;139:216–25.CrossRef
99.
Kudahettige-Nilsson RL, Helmerius J, Nilsson RT, et al. Biobutanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum using xylose recovered from birch Kraft black liquor. Bioresour Technol. 2015;176:71–9.CrossRef
100.
Pleissner D, Qi Q, Gao C, et al. Valorization of organic residues for the production of added value chemicals: a contribution to the bio-based economy. Biochem Eng J. 2016;116:3–16.CrossRef
101.
García-Torreiro M, López-Abelairas M, Lu-Chau TA, Lema JM. Fungal pretreatment of agricultural residues for bioethanol production. Ind Crop Prod. 2016;89:486–92.CrossRef
102.
Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crop Prod. 2016;93:2–25.CrossRef
103.
Colantoni A, Evic N, Lord R, et al. Characterization of biochars produced from pyrolysis of pelletized agricultural residues. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;64:187–94.CrossRef
104.
Hagenkamp-Korth F, Ohl S, Hartung E. Effects on the biogas and methane production of cattle manure treated with urease inhibitor. Biomass Bioenergy. 2015;75:75–82.CrossRef
105.
Tsapekos P, Kougias PG, Treu L, Campanaro S, Angelidaki I. Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. Appl Energy. 2017;185:126–35.CrossRef
106.
Cotana F, Coccia V, Petrozzi A, et al. Energy valorization of poultry manure in a thermal power plant: experimental campaign. Energy Proc. 2014;45:315–22.CrossRef
107.
De Filippis P, Scarsella M, Verdone N, Zeppieri M. Poultry litter valorization to energy. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2008;109:261–7.
108.
Plaza M, Santoyo S, Jaime L, et al. Screening for bioactive compounds from algae. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;51:450–5.CrossRef
109.
Lardon L, Hélias A, Sialve B, Steyer JP, Bernard O. Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:6475–81.CrossRef
110.
Herrero M, Sánchez-Camargo AP, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E. Plants, seaweeds, microalgae and food by-products as natural sources of functional ingredients obtained using pressurized liquid extraction and supercritical fluid extraction. Trends Anal Chem. 2015;71:26–38.CrossRef
111.
112.
113.
Ståhls M, Mayer AL, Tikka PM, Kauppi PE. Disparate geography of consumption, production, and environmental impacts: forest products in Finland 1991-2007. J Ind Ecol. 2010;14:576–85.CrossRef
114.
Kotilainen J, Rytteri T. Transformation of forest policy regimes in Finland since the 19th century. J Hist Geogr. 2011;37:429–39.CrossRef
115.
Chambost V, Stuart PR. Selecting the most appropriate products for the forest biorefinery. Ind Biotechnol. 2007;3:112–9.CrossRef
116.
Janssen M, Chambost V, Stuart PR. Successful partnerships for the forest biorefinery. Ind Biotechnol. 2008;4:352–62.CrossRef
117.
Lamberg JA, Näsi J, Ojala J, Sajasalo P. The evolution of competitive strategies in global forestry industries: comparative perspectives. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
118.
Thorp B. Biorefinery offers industry leaders business model for major change. Pulp Pap. 2005;79:35–9.
119.
Ragauskas AJ, Nagy M, Kim DH, et al. From wood to fuels: integrating biofuels and pulp production. Ind Biotechnol. 2006;2:55–65.CrossRef
120.
Hämäläinen S, Näyhä A, Pesonen HL. Forest biorefineries - A business opportunity for the Finnish forest cluster. J Clean Prod. 2011;19:1884–91.CrossRef
121.
122.
123.
124.
Ahlgren S, Di Lucia L. Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – A review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:35–44.CrossRef
125.
Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science. 2008;319:1238–40.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
Mikkola JP, Sklavounos E, King AWT, Virtanen P. The biorefinery and green chemistry. In: Bogel-Lukasik R, editor. Ionic liquids in the biorefinery concept: challenges and perspectives. London, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015.
147.
148.
149.
Song L, Wing TW, editors. China’s dilemma: economic growth, the environment and climate change. Canberra: ANU Press; 2008.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
161.
162.
Xian M. Recent development of bioenergy and biorefinery in China. Trans Renew Energy. 2015;1:129–30.
163.
164.
165.
166.
Li JF, Hu RQ, Song YQ, Shi JL, Bhattacharya SC, Salam PA. Assessment of sustainable energy potential of non-plantation biomass resources in China. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;29:167–77.CrossRef
167.
Chen YH, Li ZH, Shen T. The actuality and development measure in using biomass energy in China. J Agric Mech Res. 2006;1:25–8.
168.
169.
Wang W, Liu Y, Zhang L. The spatial distribution of cereal bioenergy potential in China. GCB Bioenergy. 2013;5:525–35.CrossRef
170.
Han LJ, Yan QJ, Liu XY, Hu JY. Straw resources and their utilization in China. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng. 2002;18:87–91.
171.
Yanli Y, Peidong Z, Wenlong Z, Yongsheng T, Yonghong Z, Lisheng W. Quantitative appraisal and potential analysis for primary biomass resources for energy utilization in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:3050–8.CrossRef
172.
Tan T, Shang F, Zhang X. Current development of biorefinery in China. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:543–55.CrossRef
173.
Liu H, Jiang GM, Zhuang HY, Wang KJ. Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: with special references of crop residues. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;12:1402–18.CrossRef
174.
Qiu H, Sun L, Xu X, Cai Y, Bai J. Potentials of crop residues for commercial energy production in China: a geographic and economic analysis. Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;64:110–23.CrossRef
175.
Niu W, Han L, Liu X, et al. Twenty-two compositional characterizations and theoretical energy potentials of extensively diversified China’s crop residues. Energy. 2016;100:238–50.CrossRef
176.
Chen X. Economic potential of biomass supply from crop residues in China. Appl Energy. 2016;166:141–9.CrossRef
177.
Li K, Liu R, Sun C. A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:857–65.CrossRef
178.
Yang J, Wang X, Ma H, Bai J, Jiang Y, Yu H. Potential usage, vertical value chain and challenge of biomass resource: evidence from China’s crop residues. Appl Energy. 2014;114:717–23.CrossRef
179.
180.
Sun Z, Peng S, Li X, Guo Z, Piao S. Changes in forest biomass over China during the 2000s and implications for management. For Ecol Manage. 2015;357:76–83.CrossRef
181.
Zhang C, Zhang L, Xie G. Forest biomass energy resources in China: quantity and distribution. Forests. 2015;6:3970–84.CrossRef
182.
Chen Y, Hu W, Feng Y, Sweeney S. Status and prospects of rural biogas development in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;39:679–85.CrossRef
183.
Qian MY, Li RH, Li J, et al. Industrial scale garage-type dry fermentation of municipal solid waste to biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2016;217:82–9.CrossRef
184.
Chadwick D, Wei J, Yan’an T, Guanghui Y, Qirong S, Qing C. Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable agricultural intensification in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2015;209:34–46.CrossRef
185.
Wang FH, Ma WQ, Dou ZX, Liu XL, Xu JX, Zhang FS. The estimation of the production amount of animal manure and its environmental effect in China. China Environ Sci. 2006;26:614–7.
186.
Zhang T, Yang Y, Xie D. Insights into the production potential and trends of China’s rural biogas. Int J Energy Res. 2015;39:1068–82.CrossRef
187.
Shen X, Huang G, Yang Z, Han L. Compositional characteristics and energy potential of Chinese animal manure by type and as a whole. Appl Energy. 2015;160:108–19.CrossRef
188.
Zhou X, Wang F, Hu H, Yang L, Guo P, Xiao B. Assessment of sustainable biomass resource for energy use in China. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:1–11.CrossRef
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
Tsao GT, Ouyang P, Chen J. Biotechnology in China II: chemicals, energy and environment. Berlin: Springer; 2010.CrossRef
195.
196.
197.
198.
Metadaten
Titel
Implementing the Bioeconomy on the Ground: An International Overview
verfasst von
Mika Sillanpää
Chaker Ncibi
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
A Sustainable Bioeconomy

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55635-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-55637-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6_8