Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
In this paper we investigate whether, and how, corporate management strategically uses disclosure to manage the perceptions of different organizational audiences. In particular, we examine the interactions between the FIAT Group and three of its key organizational audiences—the local press, the international press, and the financial analysts, which are characterized by different levels of salience for the company. We focus on both how management reacts to the optimism level existing within each audience and how the narrative disclosure tone adopted by FIAT influences the ex-post optimism in the local and international press or in the financial analyst community. We investigate the disclosure of the FIAT Group over a 6-year period (2004–2009), during which 70 price-sensitive press releases were published. On the basis of 1,887 (331) news articles published in Italian (international) newspapers and 411 analyst reports, we report evidence of different strategic patterns in the interaction processes between FIAT and its audiences. Our findings also indicate some differences in the way FIAT is affected by, and in turn, affects the sentiment of each audience, thus highlighting that the salience of the stakeholder is an important driver of the adoption of impression management techniques. Taken together, our findings point to issues related to setting the “tone at the top” and potential ethical matters.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Aerts, W. (1994). On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(4/5), 337–353. CrossRef
Amernic, J., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2010). Measuring and assessing tone at the top using annual report CEO letters. Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of legitimization. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. CrossRef
Baginski, S., Demers, E., Wang, C., & Yu, J. (2011). Understanding the role of language in management forecast press releases. INSEAD Working paper collection, 2011/28/AC.
Bansal, P., & Kistruck, G. (2006). Seeing is (not) believing: Managing the impressions of the firm’s natural commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 165–180. CrossRef
Beattie, V., & Jones, M. J. (1999). Australian financial graphs: An empirical study. Abacus, 35(1), 46–76. CrossRef
Beelitz, A., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2012). Using discourse to restore organisational legitimacy: ‘CEO-speak’ after an incident in a German nuclear power plant. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 101–120. CrossRef
Brennan, N. M., Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Beelitz, A. (2013). Dialogism in corporate social responsibility communications: Conceptualising verbal interaction between organisations and their audiences. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 665–679. CrossRef
Breton, G., & Côté, L. (2006). Profit and the legitimacy of the Canadian banking industry. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(2), 512–539. CrossRef
Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29. CrossRef
Cho, C. H. (2009). Legitimation strategies used in response to environmental disaster: A French case study of Total’s SA’s Erika and AZF incidents. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 33–62. CrossRef
Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organization and Society, 35(4), 431–443. CrossRef
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. (2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report reliability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(3), 311–326. CrossRef
CoSO (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission). (2011). Internal control—Integrated framework. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
Craig, R. J., & Brennan, N. M. (2012). An exploration of the relationship between language choice in CEO letters to shareholders and corporate reputation. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 166–177. CrossRef
Craig, R., Mortensen, T., & Iyer, S. (2012). Exploring top management language for signals of possible deceptions: The words of Satyam’s chair Ramalinga Raju. Journal of Business Ethics (available online: doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1307-5).
Davis, K. A., Piger, J. M., & Sedor, L. M. (2012). Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 845–868. CrossRef
Davis, A. K., & Tama-Sweet, I. (2011). Managers’ use of language across alternative disclosure outlets: Earnings press releases versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(10), 1–34.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. CrossRef
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. CrossRef
Driscoll, C., & Crombie, A. (2001). Stakeholder legitimacy management and the qualified good neighbor: The case of Nova Nada and JDI. Business & Society, 40(4), 442–471. CrossRef
Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57–88. CrossRef
Elsbach, K. D., & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738. CrossRef
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Text analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Feldman, R., Govindaraj, S., Livnat, J., & Segal, B. (2010). Management’s tone change, post earnings announcement drift and accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 915–953. CrossRef
Fogarty, T. J., & Rogers, R. K. (2005). Financial analysts’ reports: An extended institutional theory valuation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(4), 331–356. CrossRef
Fombrun, C. J. (2002). Corporate reputations as economic assets. In M. Hitt, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Gabbioneta, C., Ravasi, D., & Mazzola, P. (2007). Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: A study of Italian security analysts. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 99–123. CrossRef
Garcìa Osma, B., & Guillamón-Saorín, E. (2011). Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4–5), 187–208. CrossRef
Giacalone, R. A., & Pollard, H. G. (1987). The efficacy of accounts for a breach of confidentiality by management. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 393–397. CrossRef
Ginzel, L. E., Kramer, R. M., & Sutton, R. I. (2004). Organizational impression management as reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organisational audience. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational identity (pp. 223–261). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organisational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Micro-studies of the public order. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Gray, E. R., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695–702. CrossRef
Hart, R. P. (2001). Redeveloping DICTION: Theoretical considerations. In M. D. West (Ed.), Theory, method, and practice of computer content analysis (pp. 43–60). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Henry, E. (2008). Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written? Journal of Business Communication, 45(4), 367–407. CrossRef
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154. CrossRef
Hirst, D. E., Koonce, L., & Venkataraman, S. (2008). Management earnings forecasts: A review and framework. Accounting Horizons, 22(3), 315–338. CrossRef
Hutton, J. E., Hoitash, R., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2011). The relationship between perceived tone at the top and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Review, 28(4), 1190–1224. CrossRef
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–245. CrossRef
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kuperman, J. C. (2003). Using cognitive schema theory in the development of public relations strategy: Exploring the case of firms and financial analysts following acquisition announcement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 117–150. CrossRef
Lang, M. H., & Lundholm, R. J. (2000). Voluntary disclosure and equity offerings: Reducing information asymmetry or hyping the stock? Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(4), 623–662. CrossRef
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(3), 49–77.
Lindbolm, C. K. (1993). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
Livesey, S., & Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? Organization & Environment, 15(3), 233–258. CrossRef
Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.
Maat, H. P. (2007). How promotional language in press releases is dealt with by journalists: Genre mixing or genre conflict. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 59–95.
Merkl-Davies, D., & Brennan, N. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116–196.
Merkl-Davies, D., & Brennan, N. (2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: New insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, 41(5), 415–437. CrossRef
Merkl-Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M., & McLeay, S. J. (2011). Impression management and retrospective sense-making in corporate narratives: A social psychology perspective. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(3), 315–344. CrossRef
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Moberg, D. J. (1989). The ethics of impression management. In R. A. Giacolone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 171–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Mobus, J. L. (2011). Developing collective intentionality and writing the rules of the game for environmental reporting: A content analysis of SOP 96-1 comment letters. Accounting and the Public Interest, 11(1), 68–95. CrossRef
Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. CrossRef
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 15, 145–179.
Price, M. S., Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., & Bliss, B. B. (2012). Earnings conference calls and stock returns: the incremental informativeness of textual tone. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 992–1011. CrossRef
Rogers, R., Dillard, J., & Yuthas, K. (2005). The accounting profession: Substantive change and/or image management. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1/3), 159–176. CrossRef
Rogers, J. L., Van Buskirk, A., & Zechman, S. L. (2010). Disclosure tone and shareholder litigation. Working paper.
Rutherford, B. A. (2003). Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 187–210. CrossRef
Schleicher, T., & Walker, M. (2010). Bias in the tone of forward-looking narratives. Accounting and Business Research, 40(4), 371–390. CrossRef
Schwarz, M. S., Dunfee, T. W., & Kline, M. J. (2005). Tone at the top: An ethics code for directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 79–100. CrossRef
Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (2000). The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13(5), 624–646. CrossRef
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
Sydserff, R., & Weetman, P. (2002). Development in content analysis: A transitivity index and DICTION scores. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(4), 523–545. CrossRef
Weber, J. (2010). Assessing the “tone at the top”: The moral reasoning of CEOs in the automobile industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 167–182. CrossRef
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yuthas, K., Rogers, R., & Dillard, J. (2002). Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1–2), 141–157. CrossRef
- Impression Management and Organizational Audiences: The Fiat Group Case
Charles H. Cho
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia