Nowadays using a robust simulator is very important to support an organization in its first step to consolidate in the market, in this research we make a challenging organizational tool based on different components to make an adequate strategic planning methodology, unlike current applications, it is focused on an environment that goes beyond simple numerical forecasts and statistical processes. It is based on advanced components to optimize the strategies and stratagems to be followed within the company, helping businesses to achieve competitive advantage in the market. A business simulator is flexible, adaptive, has learning ability, is robust and fault tolerant. Our intelligent tool uses different methodologies to provide optimal strategies to improve competitiveness of a company, the ability of the model can provide strategies that are not obvious because they can find no obvious relationship among variables that can help the manager or leader of an organization to realize a better decision. This tool is an aid in the process of improving competitiveness because it supports the strategic decisions made in an organizational level.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Barnes, J. (1984). Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 129.
2.
Kanooni, A. (2009). Organizational factors affecting business and information technology alignment: A structural equation modeling analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Capella University, United States -- Minnesota.
3.
Klayman, J. & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Thinking about the future: A cognitive perspective. Journal of Forecasting, 12(2), 161.
4.
Laudon K. & Laudon J. (2002). Management Information Systems Managing the Digital Firm. (7ª Ed). E.U.A. Pearson Prentice-Hall. (pp 401- 465).
5.
Peyrefitte J., Golden P., & Brice J. Jr. (2002). Vertical integration and economic performance: A managerial capability framework. Management Decision, 40(3), 217-226.
6.
Philip, G. (2007). IS Strategic Planning for Operational Efficiency. Information Systems Management, 24(3), 247-264.
7.
Porter, M. (1998). Estrategia Competitiva: Técnicas para el Análisis de los Sectores Industriales y de la Competencia. México: Continental.
8.
Pretorius, M. (2008). When Porter’s generic strategies are not enough: complementary strategies for turnaround situations. The Journal of Business Strategy, 29(6), 19-28.
9.
Salem, M. (2005). The Use of Strategic Planning Tools and Techniques in Saudi Arabia: An Empirical study. International Journal of Management, 22(3), 376-395,507.
10.
Sundin S., & Braban-Ledoux C. (2001). Artificial Intelligence–Based Decision Support Technologies in Pavement Management. Computer-Aided Civil & Infrastructure Engineering, 16(2), 143.
Über dieses Kapitel
Titel
Improving Decision-Making in a Business Simulator Using TOPSIS Methodology for the Establishment of Reactive Stratagems
Die B2B-Firmensuche für Industrie und Wirtschaft: Kostenfrei in Firmenprofilen nach Lieferanten, Herstellern, Dienstleistern und Händlern recherchieren.
Unternehmen haben das Innovationspotenzial der eigenen Mitarbeiter auch außerhalb der F&E-Abteilung erkannt. Viele Initiativen zur Partizipation scheitern in der Praxis jedoch häufig. Lesen Sie hier - basierend auf einer qualitativ-explorativen Expertenstudie - mehr über die wesentlichen Problemfelder der mitarbeiterzentrierten Produktentwicklung und profitieren Sie von konkreten Handlungsempfehlungen aus der Praxis. Jetzt gratis downloaden!
