Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Multi-criteria Fusion of Heterogeneous Information for Improving Situation Awareness on Emergency Management Systems Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Improving Knowledge Management in Patient Safety Reporting: A Semantic Web Ontology Approach

verfasst von : Chen Liang, Yang Gong

Erschienen in: Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge in Context

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Patient safety reporting system is in an imperative need for reducing and learning from medical errors. Presently, a great number of the reporting systems are suffering low quality of data and poor system performance associated with data quality. For improving the quality of data and the system performance towards reducing harm in healthcare, we introduce an ontological approach with the scope of establishing a comprehensive knowledgebase. A semantic web ontology plays a crucial role to facilitate the knowledge transformation ranging from human-to-computer data entry to computer-to-human knowledge retrieval. The paper describes the theoretical foundation, design, implementation, and evaluation of the prototype ontology. Based on W3C open standard Web Ontology Language (OWL), the proposed ontology was designed and implemented in Protégé 4.3. We envision that utilizing semantic web ontology would serve as a uniformed knowledgebase facilitating information retrieval and clinical decision making.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Design of Framework for Students Recommendation System in Information Technology Skills
Nächstes Kapitel Human Error and e-Navigation: Developing the Nautical Chart as Resilient Decision Support
Literatur
1.
Gong, Y.: Data consistency in a voluntary medical incident reporting system. J. Med. Syst. 35, 609–615 (2011)CrossRef
2.
Thompson, D.A., et al.: Integrating the intensive care unit safety reporting system with existing incident reporting systems. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. / Jt. Comm. Resour. 31, 585–593 (2011)
3.
Itoh, K., Andersen, H.B.: Analysing medical incident reports by use of a human error taxonomy. In: Spitzer, C., et al. (eds.) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Probabilistic safety assessment and management, pp. 2714–2719. Springer, London (2004)CrossRef
4.
Zhan, C., Miller, M.R.: Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review. Qual. Saf. Heal. Care 12, ii58–ii63 (2003)CrossRef
5.
Miller, M.R., Elixhauser, A., Zhan, C., Meyer, G.S.: Patient safety indicators: using administrative data to identify potential patient safety concerns. Health Serv. Res. 36, 110–132 (2001)
6.
Gong, Y.: Terminology in a voluntary medical incident reporting system: a human-centered perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium. ACM, pp. 2–7 (2010)
7.
Pronovost, P.J., Morlock, L.L., Sexton, J.B., Miller, M.R., Holzmueller, C.G., Thompson, D.A., Lubomski, L.H., Wu, A.W.: Improving the value of patient safety reporting systems. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Assessment vol. 1, pp. 1–9 (2008)
8.
McDonald, C.J.: The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4, 213–221 (1997)CrossRef
9.
Sager, N., Friedman, C.: M.S.L.: Review of “medical language processing: computer management of narrative data”. Comput. Linguist. 15, 195–198 (1989)
10.
Friedman, C., Johnson, S.B.: Natural language and text processing in biomedicine. In: Shortliffe, E.H., Cimino, J.J. (eds.) Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Health Informatics, pp. 312–343. Springer, New York (2006)CrossRef
11.
Spigelman, A.D., Swan, J.: Review of the Australian incident monitoring system. ANZ J. Surg. 75, 657–661 (2005)CrossRef
12.
Battles, J.B., Kaplan, H., Van der Schaaf, T., Shea, C.: The attributes of medical event-reporting systems. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 122, 132–138 (1998)
13.
Sherman, H., et al.: Towards an international classification for patient safety: the conceptual framework. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 21, 2–8 (2009)CrossRef
14.
O’Leary, D.E.: Using AI in knowledge management: knowledge bases and ontologies. IEEE Intell. Syst. Their Appl. 13, 34–39 (1998)CrossRef
15.
McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview
16.
Maynard, D., Li, Y., Peters, W.: NLP techniques for term extraction and ontology population. In: Proceeding of the 2008 conference on Ontology Learning and Population: Bridging the Gap between Text and Knowledge, pp. 107–127 (2008)
17.
Ananiadou, S., McNaught, J.: Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine. Artech House, London (2006)
18.
Gilchrist, A.: Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies – an etymological note. J. Doc. 59, 7–18 (2003)CrossRef
19.
Burton-Jones, A., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V., Ahluwalia, P.: A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data Knowl. Eng. 55, 84–102 (2005)CrossRef
20.
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: a practical owl-dl reasoner. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web. 5, 51–53 (2007)CrossRef
21.
Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 292–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRef
22.
Zhang, J., Patel, V.L., Johnson, T.R., Shortliffe, E.H.: A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors. J. Biomed. Inform. 37, 193–204 (2004)CrossRef
23.
Chang, A., Schyve, P.M., Croteau, R.J., O’Leary, D.S., Loeb, J.M.: The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int. J. Qual. Heal. Care. 17, 95–105 (2005)CrossRef
24.
Brixey, J., Johnson, T.R., Zhang, J.: Evaluating a medical error taxonomy. In: Proceedings AMIA Symposium, pp. 71–75 (2002)
25.
Suresh, G., et al.: Voluntary anonymous reporting of medical errors for neonatal intensive care. Pediatr. 113, 1609–1618 (2004)CrossRef
26.
Woods, D.M., Johnson, J., Holl, J.L., Mehra, M., Thomas, E.J., Ogata, E.S., Lannon, C.: Anatomy of a patient safety event: a pediatric patient safety taxonomy. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 14, 422–427 (2005)CrossRef
27.
Dovey, S.M., Meyers, D.S., Phillips, R.L., Green, L.A., Fryer, G.E., Galliher, J.M., Kappus, J., Grob, P.: A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care 11(3), 233–238 (2002)CrossRef
28.
Woods, A., Doan-Johnson, S.: Executive summary: toward a taxonomy of nursing practice errors. Nurs. Manage. 33, 45–48 (2002)CrossRef
29.
Greens, R.A.: Clinical Decision Support: The Road Ahead. Academic Press, San Diego (2006)
30.
Tuttle, D., Holloway, R., Baird, T., Sheehan, B., Skelton, W.K.: Electronic reporting to improve patient safety. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 13, 281–286 (2004)CrossRef
31.
Kaplan, B.: Reducing barriers to physician data entry for computer-based patient records. Top. Health Inf. Manage. 15, 24–34 (1994)
32.
Walsh, S.H.: The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ 328, 1184–1187 (2004)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Improving Knowledge Management in Patient Safety Reporting: A Semantic Web Ontology Approach
verfasst von
Chen Liang
Yang Gong
Copyright-Jahr
2015
Buch
Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge in Context

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20617-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-20618-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20618-9_12

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise