Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Justice Research 3/2019

08.05.2019

(In)-Equality in the Allocation of R&D Resources for Rare Diseases

verfasst von: Setti Raïs Ali, Sandy Tubeuf

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper analyses the allocation of R&D investments within rare diseases and identifies the characteristics of rare diseases that appear to lead R&D resources. Rare diseases affect less than 1 in 2000 citizens. With over 7000 recognised rare diseases and 350 million people affected worldwide, rare diseases are not so rare when considered collectively. Rare diseases are generally underserved by drug development because pharmaceutical industries consider R&D investments in rare diseases too costly and risky in comparison with the low expected returns due to the small population involved. We use data on rare diseases research from Orphanet along with academic publications per rare disease from bibliographic databases. We test the existence of inequalities in R&D investments within rare diseases and identify the disease characteristics that appear to lead R&D investments using dominance tools and bilateral tests. We show that rare diseases in children and with a smaller prevalence, such as ultra-rare diseases, are underserved by R&D. R&D investments appear to be concentrated in more profitable research areas with potentially larger sample size and adult population.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ L 18, 22.1.2000, p.1), last amended by Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 (OJ L 188, 18.07.2009, p. 14).
 
7
The Cramer’s V statistics indicates how strongly two categorical variables are associated (Sheskin, 2003). The statistics is ranging between 0 and 1, the maximum value indicating perfect relationship.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Murtin, F. (2010). The relationship between health and growth: When Lucas meets Nelson-Phelps (Working Paper No. 15813). National Bureau of Economic Research. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., & Murtin, F. (2010). The relationship between health and growth: When Lucas meets Nelson-Phelps (Working Paper No. 15813). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Anell, A. (2004). Priority setting for pharmaceuticals. The European Journal of Health Economics, Formerly: HEPAC, 5(1), 28–35.CrossRef Anell, A. (2004). Priority setting for pharmaceuticals. The European Journal of Health Economics, Formerly: HEPAC, 5(1), 28–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bavisetty, S., Grody, W. W., & Yazdani, S. (2013). Emergence of pediatric rare diseases. Rare Diseases, 1, e23579.CrossRef Bavisetty, S., Grody, W. W., & Yazdani, S. (2013). Emergence of pediatric rare diseases. Rare Diseases, 1, e23579.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (2004). Utilitarianism and other essays. UK: Penguin. Bentham, J., & Mill, J. S. (2004). Utilitarianism and other essays. UK: Penguin.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Murkuria, C., Whyte, S., Keetharuth, A., Rise Hole, A., et al. (2013). Eliciting societal preferences for burden of illness, therapeutic improvement and end of life for value based pricing: A report of the main survey. Sheffield, York: Report for the Department of Health EEPRU. Brazier, J., Rowen, D., Murkuria, C., Whyte, S., Keetharuth, A., Rise Hole, A., et al. (2013). Eliciting societal preferences for burden of illness, therapeutic improvement and end of life for value based pricing: A report of the main survey. Sheffield, York: Report for the Department of Health EEPRU.
Zurück zum Zitat Cookson, R., & Dolan, P. (2000). Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(5), 323–329.CrossRef Cookson, R., & Dolan, P. (2000). Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(5), 323–329.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond, M., & Towse, A. (2014). Orphan drugs policies: A suitable case for treatment: Editorial. European Journal of Health Economics, 15(4), 335–340.CrossRef Drummond, M., & Towse, A. (2014). Orphan drugs policies: A suitable case for treatment: Editorial. European Journal of Health Economics, 15(4), 335–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dubois, P., De Mouzon, O., Scott-Morton, F., & Seabright, P. (2015). Market size and pharmaceutical innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(4), 844–871.CrossRef Dubois, P., De Mouzon, O., Scott-Morton, F., & Seabright, P. (2015). Market size and pharmaceutical innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(4), 844–871.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Field, M. J., & Boat, T. F. (2010). Profile of rare diseases. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Field, M. J., & Boat, T. F. (2010). Profile of rare diseases. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gericke, C. A., Riesberg, A., & Busse, R. (2005). Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(3), 164–168.CrossRef Gericke, C. A., Riesberg, A., & Busse, R. (2005). Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(3), 164–168.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giannuzzi, V., Conte, R., Landi, A., Ottomano, S. A., Bonifazi, D., Baiardi, P., et al. (2017). Orphan medicinal products in Europe and United States to cover needs of patients with rare diseases: An increased common effort is to be foreseen. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 12(1), 64.CrossRef Giannuzzi, V., Conte, R., Landi, A., Ottomano, S. A., Bonifazi, D., Baiardi, P., et al. (2017). Orphan medicinal products in Europe and United States to cover needs of patients with rare diseases: An increased common effort is to be foreseen. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 12(1), 64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes, D. A., Tunnage, B., & Yeo, S. T. (2005). Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: Do they deserve special status for funding? QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 98(11), 829–836.CrossRef Hughes, D. A., Tunnage, B., & Yeo, S. T. (2005). Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: Do they deserve special status for funding? QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 98(11), 829–836.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Joseph, P. D., Craig, J. C., & Caldwell, P. H. Y. (2015). Clinical trials in children. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 79(3), 357–369.CrossRef Joseph, P. D., Craig, J. C., & Caldwell, P. H. Y. (2015). Clinical trials in children. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 79(3), 357–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lathyris, D., Panagiotou, O. A., Baltogianni, M., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G. (2014). Safety of medical interventions in children versus adults. Pediatrics, 133(3), e666–e673.CrossRef Lathyris, D., Panagiotou, O. A., Baltogianni, M., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Contopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G. (2014). Safety of medical interventions in children versus adults. Pediatrics, 133(3), e666–e673.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2008). Inequality of opportunities vs. inequality of outcomes: Are Western societies all alike? Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 513–546.CrossRef Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2008). Inequality of opportunities vs. inequality of outcomes: Are Western societies all alike? Review of Income and Wealth, 54(4), 513–546.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2009). Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11–12), 1189–1207.CrossRef Lefranc, A., Pistolesi, N., & Trannoy, A. (2009). Equality of opportunity and luck: Definitions and testable conditions, with an application to income in France. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11–12), 1189–1207.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lefranc, A., & Trannoy, A. (2016). Equality of opportunity: How to encompass fifty shades of luck, ECINEQ Working Paper Series. Lefranc, A., & Trannoy, A. (2016). Equality of opportunity: How to encompass fifty shades of luck, ECINEQ Working Paper Series.
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenberg, F. R. (2003). The effect of new drug approvals on HIV mortality in the US, 1987–1998. Economics & Human Biology, 1(2), 259–266.CrossRef Lichtenberg, F. R. (2003). The effect of new drug approvals on HIV mortality in the US, 1987–1998. Economics & Human Biology, 1(2), 259–266.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenberg, F. R. (2013). The impact of new (orphan) drug approvals on premature mortality from rare diseases in the United States and France, 1999–2007. European Journal of Health Economics, 14(1), 41–56.CrossRef Lichtenberg, F. R. (2013). The impact of new (orphan) drug approvals on premature mortality from rare diseases in the United States and France, 1999–2007. European Journal of Health Economics, 14(1), 41–56.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenberg, F. R. (2014). Pharmaceutical innovation and longevity growth in 30 developing and high-income countries, 2000–2009. Health Policy and Technology, 3(1), 36–58.CrossRef Lichtenberg, F. R. (2014). Pharmaceutical innovation and longevity growth in 30 developing and high-income countries, 2000–2009. Health Policy and Technology, 3(1), 36–58.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtenberg, F. R. (2016). The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on premature cancer mortality in Switzerland, 1995–2012. The European Journal of Health Economics, 17(7), 833–854.CrossRef Lichtenberg, F. R. (2016). The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on premature cancer mortality in Switzerland, 1995–2012. The European Journal of Health Economics, 17(7), 833–854.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, D. K., Giacomini, M., & Singer, P. A. (2002). Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy, 61(3), 279–290.CrossRef Martin, D. K., Giacomini, M., & Singer, P. A. (2002). Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision-makers. Health Policy, 61(3), 279–290.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe, C., Claxton, K., & Tsuchiya, A. (2005). Orphan drugs and the NHS: Should we value rarity? BMJ, 331(7523), 1016–1019.CrossRef McCabe, C., Claxton, K., & Tsuchiya, A. (2005). Orphan drugs and the NHS: Should we value rarity? BMJ, 331(7523), 1016–1019.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKie, J., & Richardson, J. (2003). The rule of rescue. Social Science and Medicine, 56(12), 2407–2419.CrossRef McKie, J., & Richardson, J. (2003). The rule of rescue. Social Science and Medicine, 56(12), 2407–2419.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mossialos, E., & King, D. (1999). Citizens and rationing: Analysis of a European survey. Health Policy, 49(1–2), 75–135.CrossRef Mossialos, E., & King, D. (1999). Citizens and rationing: Analysis of a European survey. Health Policy, 49(1–2), 75–135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Otsuka, M. (2013). Prioritarianism and the measure of utility. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 1–22.CrossRef Otsuka, M. (2013). Prioritarianism and the measure of utility. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 1–22.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paulden, M. (2017). Recent amendments to NICE’s value-based assessment of health technologies: Implicitly inequitable? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 17(3), 239–242.CrossRef Paulden, M. (2017). Recent amendments to NICE’s value-based assessment of health technologies: Implicitly inequitable? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 17(3), 239–242.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Paulden, M., O’Mahony, J. F., Culyer, A. J., & McCabe, C. (2014). Some inconsistencies in NICE’s consideration of social values. PharmacoEconomics, 32(11), 1043–1053.CrossRef Paulden, M., O’Mahony, J. F., Culyer, A. J., & McCabe, C. (2014). Some inconsistencies in NICE’s consideration of social values. PharmacoEconomics, 32(11), 1043–1053.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roemer, J. E. (1998). Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press. Roemer, J. E. (1998). Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogge, J., & Kittel, B. (2016). Who shall not be treated: Public attitudes on setting health care priorities by person-based criteria in 28 nations. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157018.CrossRef Rogge, J., & Kittel, B. (2016). Who shall not be treated: Public attitudes on setting health care priorities by person-based criteria in 28 nations. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157018.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schieppati, A., Henter, J. I., Daina, E., & Aperia, A. (2008). Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. The Lancet, 371, 2039–2041.CrossRef Schieppati, A., Henter, J. I., Daina, E., & Aperia, A. (2008). Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. The Lancet, 371, 2039–2041.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scott Morton, F., & Kyle, M. (2011). Chapter twelve—Markets for pharmaceutical. In M. V. Pauly, T. G. Mcguire, & P. P. Barros (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 2, pp. 763–823). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Scott Morton, F., & Kyle, M. (2011). Chapter twelve—Markets for pharmaceutical. In M. V. Pauly, T. G. Mcguire, & P. P. Barros (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 2, pp. 763–823). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafinski, T., Menon, D., Philippon, D. J., & McCabe, C. (2011). Health technology funding decisionmaking processes around the world. Pharmacoeconomics, 29(6), 475–495.CrossRef Stafinski, T., Menon, D., Philippon, D. J., & McCabe, C. (2011). Health technology funding decisionmaking processes around the world. Pharmacoeconomics, 29(6), 475–495.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Temkin, L. S. (2003). Equality, priority or what? Economics & Philosophy, 19(1), 61–87.CrossRef Temkin, L. S. (2003). Equality, priority or what? Economics & Philosophy, 19(1), 61–87.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thébaut, C., & Wittwer, J. (2017). L’évaluation économique en santé au prisme de l’économie normative: Principes allocatifs et règles de priorisation, Taking redistributive principles into account in the economic evaluation of health care: A review of available methods. Revue française des affaires sociales, 3, 169–191. Thébaut, C., & Wittwer, J. (2017). L’évaluation économique en santé au prisme de l’économie normative: Principes allocatifs et règles de priorisation, Taking redistributive principles into account in the economic evaluation of health care: A review of available methods. Revue française des affaires sociales, 3, 169–191.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, A. (1997a). Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Economics, 6(2), 117–132.CrossRef Williams, A. (1997a). Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the ‘fair innings’ argument. Health Economics, 6(2), 117–132.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, A. (1997b). The rationing debate: Rationing health care by age: The case for. BMJ, 314(7083), 820.CrossRef Williams, A. (1997b). The rationing debate: Rationing health care by age: The case for. BMJ, 314(7083), 820.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, A., & Cookson, R. (2000). Equity in health. In A. J. Culyer, & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Chap. 35, Vol. 1, pp. 1863–1910). Elsevier. Williams, A., & Cookson, R. (2000). Equity in health. In A. J. Culyer, & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Chap. 35, Vol. 1, pp. 1863–1910). Elsevier.
Metadaten
Titel
(In)-Equality in the Allocation of R&D Resources for Rare Diseases
verfasst von
Setti Raïs Ali
Sandy Tubeuf
Publikationsdatum
08.05.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-019-00332-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Social Justice Research 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe