Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This paper explores one organisation’s journey into non-financial reporting, initially motivated by a crisis in public confidence that threatened the organisation’s legitimacy to the present with the organisation embracing integrated reporting. The organisation’s journey is framed through a legitimation lens and is illustrated by aligning internal reflections with external outputs guided by predominant paradigms of good practice, such as the GRI guidelines and more recently integrated reporting 〈IR〉. We find that the organisation’s relationship with external guidelines has evolved from pragmatic adoption as a means of seeking external legitimation to the present position where those that prepare external reports are informed by the organisation’s strategic positioning and not constrained by the promulgation of voluntary guidelines. From the case study, we suggest that the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) may face two hurdles: First, organisations may define social norms based on a broader definition of stakeholders than the definition currently published by the IIRC. The second hurdle is to convince report preparers that adopting integrated reporting 〈IR〉 will positively impact on capital flows.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,15(2), 223–250. CrossRef
Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,17(5), 731–757. CrossRef
Adams, C. A. (2013). Understanding integrated reporting: The concise guide to integrated thinking and the future of corporate reporting: Dō Sustainability.
Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2007). Managing social and environmental performance: Do companies have adequate information? Australian Accounting Review,17(3), 2–11.
Adams, C. A., & Kuasirikun, N. (2000). A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on the ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies. The European Accounting Review,9(1), 53–79. CrossRef
Adams, C. A., & Larrinaga-González, C. (2007). Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,20(3), 333–355. CrossRef
Adams, C. A., & McNicholas, P. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,20(3), 382–402. CrossRef
Adams, S., & Simnett, R. (2011). Integrated reporting: An opportunity for Australia’s not-for-profit sector. Australian Accounting Review,21(3), 292–301. CrossRef
Aerts, W., & Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations and Society,34(1), 1–27. CrossRef
Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,25(3), 299–331. CrossRef
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K, I. I. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society,29(5), 447–471. CrossRef
Beattie, V., & Smith, S. J. (2012). Evaluating disclosure theory using the views of UK finance directors in the intellectual capital context. Accounting and Business Research,42(5), 471–494. CrossRef
Beck, A. C., Campbell, D., & Shrives, P. J. (2010). Content analysis in environmental reporting research: Enrichment and rehearsal of the method in a British–German context. The British Accounting Review,42(3), 207–222. CrossRef
Beets, S. D., & Souther, C. C. (1999). Corporate environmental reports: The need for standards and an environmental assurance service. Accounting Horizons,13(2), 129–145. CrossRef
Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A 1 GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,26(7), 1036–1071. CrossRef
Bouma, J. J., & Kamp-Roelands, N. (2000). Stakeholders’ expectations of an environmental management system: Some exploratory research. European Accounting Review,9(1), 131–144. CrossRef
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production,17, 571–580. CrossRef
Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—A dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research,29(1), 21–41. CrossRef
Buhr, N. (1998). Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: The case of acid rain and Falconbridge. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,11(2), 163–190. CrossRef
Campbell, D. J. (2000). Legitimacy theory or managerial reality construction? Corporate social disclosure in Marks and Spencer Plc corporate reports, 1969–1997. Accounting Forum,24(1), 80–100. CrossRef
Campbell, D. J., & Beck, C. (2004). Answering allegations: The use of the corporate website for restorative ethical and social disclosure. Business Ethics: A European Review,13(2–3), 100–116. CrossRef
Chapman, R., & Milne, M. J. (2004). The triple bottom line: How New Zealand companies measure up. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business,11(2), 2–37.
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society,32(7), 639–647. CrossRef
Chua, W. F. (2006). Extended performance reporting: A review of empirical studies. Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Abacus,47(1), 27–60. CrossRef
Cormier, D., Gordon, I. M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management’s perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics,49(2), 143–165. CrossRef
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1999). Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: Determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,14(4), 429–451.
Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review,14(1), 3–39. CrossRef
Davis-Walling, P., & Batterman, S. A. (1997). Environmental reporting by the Fortune 50 firms. Environmental Management,21(6), 865–875. CrossRef
Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society,31(4), 343–372. CrossRef
Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,9(2), 50–67. CrossRef
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997. A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,15(3), 312–343. CrossRef
Dierkes, M. (1979). Corporate social reporting in Germany: Conceptual developments and practical experience. Accounting, Organizations and Society,4(1/2), 87–107. CrossRef
Dobkowski-Joy, A., & Brockland, B. (2013). The state of integrated reporting: Innovation and experimentation in the merging of ESG and financial disclosure. Stamford, CT: Framework LLC.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review,18, 122–136. CrossRef
Dumay, J., Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2010). GRI sustainability reporting guidelines for public and third sector organisations: A critical review. Public Management Review,13(4), 531–548. CrossRef
Farneti, F., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report? Accounting Forum,33(1), 89–98. CrossRef
Freedman, M., & Wasley, C. (1990). The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting,3, 183–193.
Frost, G. R. (2007). The introduction of mandatory environmental reporting guidelines: Australian evidence. Abacus,43(2), 190–216. CrossRef
Frost, G., Jones, S., Loftus, J., & van der Laan, S. (2005). A survey of sustainability reporting practices of Australian reporting entities. Australian Accounting Review,15(35), 89–96. CrossRef
Frost, G. R., & Seamer, M. (2002). Adoption of environmental reporting and management practices: An analysis of New South Wales public sector entities. Financial Accountability & Management,18(2), 103–127. CrossRef
Gray, R. (2005). Taking a long view on what we now know about social and environmental accountability and reporting. Electronical Journal of Radical Organisation Theory,9(1), 6.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society,35(1), 47–62. CrossRef
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research,19(76), 343–352. CrossRef
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production,59, 5–21. CrossRef
Hogner, R. H. (1982). Corporate social reporting: Eight decades of development at US Steel. Research in Corporate Performance and Policy,4, 243–250.
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2011). Towards integrated reporting: Communicating value in the 21st century. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013, December 8). The international (IR) framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.
Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. (2012). Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment,21(5), 299–316. CrossRef
Joseph, G. (2012). Ambiguous but tethered: An accounting basis for sustainability reporting. Critical perspectives on Accounting,23(2), 93–106. CrossRef
Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development. European Management Journal,23(2), 228–236. CrossRef
KPMG. (2011). The KPMG survey of corporate social responsibility reporting. London: KPMG.
KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Amstelveen: KPMG International.
Krzus, M. P. (2011). Integrated Reporting: If not now, when? Zeitschrift für Internationale Rechnungslegung,6(June), 271–276.
Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance: The case of the global reporting initiative. Business and Society,49(1), 88–115. CrossRef
Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics,107(3), 363–377. CrossRef
Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Accounting Forum,30(2), 121–137. CrossRef
Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society,23(3), 265–282. CrossRef
O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review,37, 205–229. CrossRef
O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society,33(7–8), 801–824. CrossRef
O’Dwyer, B., Unerman, J., & Hession, E. (2005). User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review,14(4), 759–787. CrossRef
Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics,75(1), 1–23. CrossRef
Parker, L. D. (2005). Social and environmental accounting research. A view from the commentary box. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,18(6), 824–860. CrossRef
Patten, D. M., & Crampton, W. (2003). Legitimacy and the internet: An examination of corporate web page environmental disclosures. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management,2, 31–57. CrossRef
Pfarrer, M. D., Decelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review,39(3), 730–749. CrossRef
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield: Pitman.
Raar, J. (2007). Reported social and environmental taxonomies: A longer-term glimpse. Managerial Auditing Journal,22(8), 840–860. CrossRef
Rockness, J. W. (1985). An assessment of the relationship between US corporate environmental performance and disclosure. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,12(3), 339–354. CrossRef
Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectivenses of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 63–95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., & Kourmousis, F. (2010). Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: Evidence from Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production,18(5), 426–438. CrossRef
Solomon, J., & Maroun, W. (2012). Integrated reporting: The influence of King III on social, ethical and environmental reporting. London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.
Spence, C. (2007). Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,20(6), 855–882. CrossRef
Spence, C. (2009). Social and environmental reporting and the corporate ego. Business Strategy and the Environment,18(4), 254–265. CrossRef
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review,20(3), 571–610.
Tilt, C. A. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,7(4), 47–72. CrossRef
Tort, L. E. (2010). GRI reporting in government agencies. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Unerman, J. (2000). Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,13(5), 667–680. CrossRef
Wagner, M. (2009). Innovation and competitive advantages from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment,18(5), 291–306. CrossRef
Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,13(1), 10–26. CrossRef
Wiseman, J. (1982). An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society,7(1), 53–63. CrossRef
ZETA. (2004). Corporate social responsibility report.
ZETA. (2005). CSR report.
ZETA. (2012). Annual review.
- In Pursuit of a ‘Single Source of Truth’: from Threatened Legitimacy to Integrated Reporting
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, Wissenstransfer im Outsourcing/© WrightStudio | stock.adobe.com