Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2019

21.11.2018 | RESEARCH ARTICLE

In the Shadow of the Thucydides Trap: International Relations Theory and the Prospects for Peace in U.S.-China Relations

verfasst von: Oriana Skylar Mastro

Erschienen in: Journal of Chinese Political Science | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Rising powers and the consequent shifts in the balance of power have long been identified as critical challenges to the international order. What is the likelihood that China and the United States will fall into the Thucydides Trap, meaning that the two countries will fight a major war during a potential power transition? This article creates a framework of seven variables, derived from dominant international relations theories and Graham Allison’s “twelve clues for peace,” that predict the likelihood of major conflict between a rising and an established power: degree of economic interdependence, degree of institutional constraints, domestic political system, nature of relevant alliances, nature of nuclear weapons programs, the sustainability of the rising power’s growth, and its level of dissatisfaction. It then evaluates the values of these variables in the context of the U.S.-China relationship to determine whether pessimism about the prospects of peace is warranted. This analysis leads to more mixed conclusions about the prospects of peace than liberal international relations theory and Allison’s twelve clues would suggest. This research further operationalizes power transition theory and has practical implications for U.S. policy toward China.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Allison, Destined for War.
 
2
For example, see [35]. One exception is Kang, who argues that Asian case studies reveal that power transitions in Asia are rarely dictated by security dilemma action-reaction dynamics, but instead occur due to the voluntary retreat and internal decline of the current hegemon and external challenges from the smallest powers [6].
 
3
Glaser argues that if the United States did not support Taiwan, there would be no rationale for war, but this claim is controversial [7]. For criticism of Glaser’s argument, see [8]. Other work looks at whether the involvement of other countries can deter conflict [9].
 
4
[12, 13]. The former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd warns that the U.S.-China trade war could escalate into a broader conflict if either side is backed into a corner [14].
 
5
Heginbotham et al., The U.S.-China Military Scorecard, 26.
 
6
Heginbotham et al., The U.S.-China Military Scorecard, 26–27.
 
7
Heginbotham et al., The U.S.-China Military Scorecard, 26.
 
8
Allison, Destined for War, 187–213.
 
9
The declining power launches a preventive war as a last-ditch attempt to hold onto its position in the international system. See [30].
 
10
Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, 187.
 
11
Allison, Destined for War, 190.
 
12
For a glimpse of this debate, see [40].
 
13
Allison, Destined for War, 200.
 
14
Paul, The Accommodation of Rising Powers in World Politics, 13.
 
15
Christensen and Snyder, Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks, 140–142.
 
16
Allison, Destined for War, 211–212.
 
17
Allison, Destined for War, 206–210.
 
18
Allison, Destined for War, 208.
 
19
Mearsheimer, Tragedy of Great Power Politics.
 
21
Allison, Destined for War, 213.
 
23
Associated Press. May 13, 2016. China has reclaimed 3200 acres in the South China Sea, says Pentagon. https://​www.​theguardian.​com/​world/​2016/​may/​13/​pentagon-report-china-reclaimed-3200-acres-south-china-sea .​
 
24
The leadership transition may have exacerbated the issue. See [76].
 
25
USTR. U.S.-China Trade Facts.
 
26
World Investment Report 2017. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 2018, http://​unctad.​org/​en/​PublicationsLibr​ary/​wir2017_​en.​pdf.
 
27
Major foreign holders of Treasury Securities. Treasury.​gov, March 2018, http://​ticdata.​treasury.​gov/​Publish/​mfh.​txt.
 
28
Allison, Destined for War, 191.
 
29
Zhu, China, the International Criminal Court, and International Adjudication.
 
30
Liptak, U.S. Says It Has Withdrawn from World Judicial Body.
 
31
Johnston, Socialization in International Institutions: the ASEAN Way and International Relations Theory.
 
32
He, Institutional Balancing in the Asia Pacific: Economic interdependence and China’s rise.
 
33
Ikenberry and Lim, China’s emerging institutional statecraft: the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the prospects for counter-hegemony.
 
34
On the United States, see [94]. On China, see [95].
 
35
See [99].
 
36
For a dissenting opinion, see [103].
 
37
TRA 1979. Taiwan Relations Act. Pub. L. 96–8 Stat 14.
 
38
Collective Defense Arrangements. U.S. Department of State. https://​www.​state.​gov/​s/​l/​treaty/​collectivedefens​e/​.
 
39
For a summary and assessment of this debate, see [112].
 
40
Wu, Survivability of China’s Sea-Based Nuclear Forces.
 
41
Glaser and Fetter think it would be more difficult. Glaser and Fetter, Should the United States reject MAD?
 
42
While this debt-to-GDP ratio ranks with other developed economies such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy, China’s PPP-adjusted GDP per capita is just $15,400 (barely a fourth of the United States) [120].
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Allison, G. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Allison, G. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, J.C. 2017. China and the future of world politics. Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 486–494.CrossRef Weiss, J.C. 2017. China and the future of world politics. Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 486–494.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang, D.C., and X. Ma. 2018. Power transitions: Thucydides didn’t live in East Asia. The Washington Quarterly 41 (1): 137–154.CrossRef Kang, D.C., and X. Ma. 2018. Power transitions: Thucydides didn’t live in East Asia. The Washington Quarterly 41 (1): 137–154.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, C. 2015. A U.S.-China grand bargain? The hard choice between military competition and accommodation. International Security 39 (4): 49–90.CrossRef Glaser, C. 2015. A U.S.-China grand bargain? The hard choice between military competition and accommodation. International Security 39 (4): 49–90.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Easley, L.E., P. Kim, and C. Glaser. 2016. Correspondence: Grand bargain or bad idea? U.S. relations with China and Taiwan. International Security 40 (4): 178–191.CrossRef Easley, L.E., P. Kim, and C. Glaser. 2016. Correspondence: Grand bargain or bad idea? U.S. relations with China and Taiwan. International Security 40 (4): 178–191.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckley, M. 2017. The emerging military balance in East Asia: How China’s neighbors can check Chinese naval expansion. International Security 42 (2): 78–119.CrossRef Beckley, M. 2017. The emerging military balance in East Asia: How China’s neighbors can check Chinese naval expansion. International Security 42 (2): 78–119.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Talmadge, C. 2017. Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States. International Security 41 (4): 50–92.CrossRef Talmadge, C. 2017. Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States. International Security 41 (4): 50–92.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, T. 2012. The meaning of the nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and US-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies 35 (4): 447–487.CrossRef Christensen, T. 2012. The meaning of the nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and US-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies 35 (4): 447–487.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastro, O.S. 2014. The problems of the Liberal peace in Asia. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 56 (2): 129–158.CrossRef Mastro, O.S. 2014. The problems of the Liberal peace in Asia. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 56 (2): 129–158.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz, R. 2013. Mutual assured production. Foreign Affairs 92 (4): 18–24. Katz, R. 2013. Mutual assured production. Foreign Affairs 92 (4): 18–24.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanteigne, M. 2005. China and international institutions: Alternate paths to global power. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Lanteigne, M. 2005. China and international institutions: Alternate paths to global power. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, M. 2017. A bigger bang for a bigger Buck: What China’s changing attitude toward UN peacekeeping says about its evolving approach to international institutions. Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (2): 338–360.CrossRef Sun, M. 2017. A bigger bang for a bigger Buck: What China’s changing attitude toward UN peacekeeping says about its evolving approach to international institutions. Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (2): 338–360.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedberg, A. 2005. The future of U.S.-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security 30 (2): 7–45.CrossRef Friedberg, A. 2005. The future of U.S.-China relations: Is conflict inevitable? International Security 30 (2): 7–45.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedberg, A. 1993. 1994. Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security 18 (3): 5–33.CrossRef Friedberg, A. 1993. 1994. Ripe for rivalry: Prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia. International Security 18 (3): 5–33.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 2003. Is China a status quo power? International Security 27 (4): 5–56.CrossRef Johnston, A.I. 2003. Is China a status quo power? International Security 27 (4): 5–56.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Acharya, A. 2003. 2004. Will Asia’s past be its future? International Security 28 (3): 149–164.CrossRef Acharya, A. 2003. 2004. Will Asia’s past be its future? International Security 28 (3): 149–164.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang, D. 2003. Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytic frameworks. International Security 27 (4): 57–85.CrossRef Kang, D. 2003. Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytic frameworks. International Security 27 (4): 57–85.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang, D. 2003. 2004. Hierarchy, balancing and empirical puzzles in Asian international relations. International Security 28 (3): 165–180.CrossRef Kang, D. 2003. 2004. Hierarchy, balancing and empirical puzzles in Asian international relations. International Security 28 (3): 165–180.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Central Intelligence Agency. 2000. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 2000. The World Factbook.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Central Intelligence Agency. 2018. The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 2018. The World Factbook.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Heginbotham, E. et al. The U.S.-China Military Scorecard. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation: 26. Heginbotham, E. et al. The U.S.-China Military Scorecard. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation: 26.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Organski, A.F.K., and J. Kugler. 1980. The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilpin, R. 1981. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Gilpin, R. 1981. War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland, D.C. 2000. The constructivist challenge to structural realism: A review essay. International Security 25 (2): 187–212.CrossRef Copeland, D.C. 2000. The constructivist challenge to structural realism: A review essay. International Security 25 (2): 187–212.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, R. 1999. In the shadow of power: States and strategies in international politics, 115–148. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Powell, R. 1999. In the shadow of power: States and strategies in international politics, 115–148. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul, T.V. 2016. The accommodation of rising powers in world politics. In Accommodating rising powers: Past, present, and future, ed. T.V. Paul, 16–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Paul, T.V. 2016. The accommodation of rising powers in world politics. In Accommodating rising powers: Past, present, and future, ed. T.V. Paul, 16–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Neal, J.R., and B. Russett. 1999. Assessing the Liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 423–442.CrossRef O’Neal, J.R., and B. Russett. 1999. Assessing the Liberal peace with alternative specifications: Trade still reduces conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36 (4): 423–442.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderton, C.H., and J.R. Carter. 2001. The impact of war on trade: An interrupted times-series study. Journal of Peace Research 38 (4): 445–457.CrossRef Anderton, C.H., and J.R. Carter. 2001. The impact of war on trade: An interrupted times-series study. Journal of Peace Research 38 (4): 445–457.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosecrance, R. 1985. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books. Rosecrance, R. 1985. The rise of the trading state: Commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman, P. 1993. The spoils of conquest. International Security 18: 125–153.CrossRef Liberman, P. 1993. The spoils of conquest. International Security 18: 125–153.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks, S.G. 1999. The globalization of production and the changing benefits of conquest. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (5): 646–670.CrossRef Brooks, S.G. 1999. The globalization of production and the changing benefits of conquest. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (5): 646–670.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Mearsheimer, J.J. 1994. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRef Mearsheimer, J.J. 1994. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruggie, J.G. 1992. Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization 46 (3): 561–598.CrossRef Ruggie, J.G. 1992. Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization 46 (3): 561–598.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Keohane, R.O., and L.L. Martin. 1995. The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security 20 (1): 39–51.CrossRef Keohane, R.O., and L.L. Martin. 1995. The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security 20 (1): 39–51.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Keohane, R. 2005. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Keohane, R. 2005. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, L. 1992. Interests, power, and multilateralism. International Organization 46 (4): 765–792.CrossRef Martin, L. 1992. Interests, power, and multilateralism. International Organization 46 (4): 765–792.CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Koremenos, B., B. Lipson, and D. Snidal. 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization 55 (4): 761–799.CrossRef Koremenos, B., B. Lipson, and D. Snidal. 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International Organization 55 (4): 761–799.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin, L. 2017. International institutions: Weak commitments and costly signals. International Theory 9 (3): 353–380.CrossRef Martin, L. 2017. International institutions: Weak commitments and costly signals. International Theory 9 (3): 353–380.CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Pevehouse, J.C. 2003. Democracy from the outside-in? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56 (3): 515–549.CrossRef Pevehouse, J.C. 2003. Democracy from the outside-in? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56 (3): 515–549.CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortell, A.P. 1996. How do International institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451–478.CrossRef Cortell, A.P. 1996. How do International institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451–478.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Checkel, J.T. 2005. International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.CrossRef Checkel, J.T. 2005. International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization 59 (4): 801–826.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 2001. Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 487–515.CrossRef Johnston, A.I. 2001. Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 487–515.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Russett, B. The fact of democratic peace and why democratic peace? In Brown, M.E. et al. 1996. Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge: MIT Press. Russett, B. The fact of democratic peace and why democratic peace? In Brown, M.E. et al. 1996. Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedberg, A. 1998. The weary titan: Britain and the experience of relative decline, 1895–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Friedberg, A. 1998. The weary titan: Britain and the experience of relative decline, 1895–1905. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Kliman, D.M. 2014. Fateful transitions: How democracies manage rising powers, from the eve of World War I to China’s ascendance. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. Kliman, D.M. 2014. Fateful transitions: How democracies manage rising powers, from the eve of World War I to China’s ascendance. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, T.J., and J. Snyder. 1990. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting Alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization 44 (2): 137–168.CrossRef Christensen, T.J., and J. Snyder. 1990. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting Alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization 44 (2): 137–168.CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Gholz, E., D.G. Press, and H.M. Sapolsky. 1997. Come home, America: The strategy of restraint in the face of temptation. International Security 21 (4): 5–48.CrossRef Gholz, E., D.G. Press, and H.M. Sapolsky. 1997. Come home, America: The strategy of restraint in the face of temptation. International Security 21 (4): 5–48.CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Posen, B.R. 2013. Pull Back: The case of a less activist foreign policy. Foreign Affairs 92: 116. Posen, B.R. 2013. Pull Back: The case of a less activist foreign policy. Foreign Affairs 92: 116.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltz, K., and S.D. Sagan. 2012. The spread of nuclear weapons: An enduring debate. New York: W.W. Norton Press. Waltz, K., and S.D. Sagan. 2012. The spread of nuclear weapons: An enduring debate. New York: W.W. Norton Press.
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Foot, R. 2017. Power transitions and great power management: Three decades of China-Japan-US relations. The Pacific Review 30 (6): 834.CrossRef Foot, R. 2017. Power transitions and great power management: Three decades of China-Japan-US relations. The Pacific Review 30 (6): 834.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaddis, J.L. 1992. 93. International relations theory and the end of the cold war. International Security 17: 5–58.CrossRef Gaddis, J.L. 1992. 93. International relations theory and the end of the cold war. International Security 17: 5–58.CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Xinhua News Agency. 2017. Shenhua huli hezhuo, cujin gongtong fazhan, zai xingxin shichang 772 guojia yu fazhangzhong guojia duihuahui shangde fayan. [Deep-level cooperation, Pushes forward together the development of new market countries with developed China talks; remarks attached.] Xinhua. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-09/05/content_5222820.htm. Accessed 9 Nov 2018. Xinhua News Agency. 2017. Shenhua huli hezhuo, cujin gongtong fazhan, zai xingxin shichang 772 guojia yu fazhangzhong guojia duihuahui shangde fayan. [Deep-level cooperation, Pushes forward together the development of new market countries with developed China talks; remarks attached.] Xinhua. http://​www.​gov.​cn/​xinwen/​2017-09/​05/​content_​5222820.​htm. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
69.
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastro, O.S. 2014. The problems of Liberal peace in Asia. Survival 56 (2): 129–158.CrossRef Mastro, O.S. 2014. The problems of Liberal peace in Asia. Survival 56 (2): 129–158.CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 1999. China’s engagement with multilateral security institutions. In Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, ed. A.I. Johnston and R. Ross. London: Routledge. Johnston, A.I. 1999. China’s engagement with multilateral security institutions. In Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, ed. A.I. Johnston and R. Ross. London: Routledge.
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu, D. 2014. China, the international criminal court, and international adjudication. Netherlands International Law Review 61 (1): 44. Zhu, D. 2014. China, the international criminal court, and international adjudication. Netherlands International Law Review 61 (1): 44.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao, A. 2016. China and the South China Sea “Lawfare.” Issues and Studies 52 (2): 26.CrossRef Hsiao, A. 2016. China and the South China Sea “Lawfare.” Issues and Studies 52 (2): 26.CrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 2015. Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Johnston, A.I. 2015. Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 2003. Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN way and international relations theory. In International relations theory and the Asia Pacific, ed. J.G. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press. Johnston, A.I. 2003. Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN way and international relations theory. In International relations theory and the Asia Pacific, ed. J.G. Ikenberry and M. Mastanduno. New York: Columbia University Press.
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikenberry, G.J., and D.J. Lim. 2017. China’s emerging institutional statecraft: the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the prospects for counter-hegemony. The Brookings Institution. Ikenberry, G.J., and D.J. Lim. 2017. China’s emerging institutional statecraft: the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the prospects for counter-hegemony. The Brookings Institution.
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent, A.E. 2007. Beyond compliance: China, international organizations, and global security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kent, A.E. 2007. Beyond compliance: China, international organizations, and global security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanteigne, M. 2005. China and international institutions: Alternate paths to global power. Lanteigne, M. 2005. China and international institutions: Alternate paths to global power.
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Krisch, N. 2005. International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. The European Journal of International Law 16 (3): 384.CrossRef Krisch, N. 2005. International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. The European Journal of International Law 16 (3): 384.CrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastro, O.S. 2016. The vulnerability of rising powers: The logic behind China’s low military transparency. Asian Security 12 (2): 63–81.CrossRef Mastro, O.S. 2016. The vulnerability of rising powers: The logic behind China’s low military transparency. Asian Security 12 (2): 63–81.CrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha, V.D. 2010. Powerplay: Origins of the US alliance system in Asia. International Security 34 (3): 158–196.CrossRef Cha, V.D. 2010. Powerplay: Origins of the US alliance system in Asia. International Security 34 (3): 158–196.CrossRef
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Southern Weekend. 2014. Qinghuadaxue dangdai guojiguanxi yanjiuyuan yuanzhang Yan Xuetong: Zhonghan jiemeng shi shidai qushi. [Qinghua University sitting International Affairs Dean Gexuetong: China-ROK alliance is current trend.] Southern Weekend. http://www.infzm.com/content/104981. Accessed 9 Nov 2018. Southern Weekend. 2014. Qinghuadaxue dangdai guojiguanxi yanjiuyuan yuanzhang Yan Xuetong: Zhonghan jiemeng shi shidai qushi. [Qinghua University sitting International Affairs Dean Gexuetong: China-ROK alliance is current trend.] Southern Weekend. http://​www.​infzm.​com/​content/​104981. Accessed 9 Nov 2018.
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Bush, R.C. 2016. The United States Security Partnership with Taiwan. In Alliances & partnerships: U.S. commitments in the Asia-Pacific. The Brookings Institution. Bush, R.C. 2016. The United States Security Partnership with Taiwan. In Alliances & partnerships: U.S. commitments in the Asia-Pacific. The Brookings Institution.
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon K.H. 2016. The role of the U.S.-ROK alliance in the process of unification: A U.S. view. Brookings Institution. Moon K.H. 2016. The role of the U.S.-ROK alliance in the process of unification: A U.S. view. Brookings Institution.
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastro, O.S. 2018. Why China Won’t rescue North Korea. Foreign Affairs 97 (1). Mastro, O.S. 2018. Why China Won’t rescue North Korea. Foreign Affairs 97 (1).
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, T.J. 2012. The meaning of nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and U.S.-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies 25 (4): 447–487.CrossRef Christensen, T.J. 2012. The meaning of nuclear evolution: China’s strategic modernization and U.S.-China security relations. Journal of Strategic Studies 25 (4): 447–487.CrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis, J.G. 2008. Minimum Deterrence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 64 (3): 38–41. Lewis, J.G. 2008. Minimum Deterrence. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 64 (3): 38–41.
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, A.I. 1995. China’s new “old thinking”: The concept of limited deterrence. International Security 30 (3): 5–42.CrossRef Johnston, A.I. 1995. China’s new “old thinking”: The concept of limited deterrence. International Security 30 (3): 5–42.CrossRef
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristensen, H.M., and R.S. Norris. 2016. Chinese nuclear forces. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72 (4): 205–211.CrossRef Kristensen, H.M., and R.S. Norris. 2016. Chinese nuclear forces. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 72 (4): 205–211.CrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, C.L., and S. Fetter. 2016. Should the United States reject MAD? Damage limitation and US nuclear strategy toward China. International Security 41 (1): 63–74 71.CrossRef Glaser, C.L., and S. Fetter. 2016. Should the United States reject MAD? Damage limitation and US nuclear strategy toward China. International Security 41 (1): 63–74 71.CrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu, R. 2011. Survivability of China’s sea-based nuclear forces. Science and Global Security 19 (2): 91–120.CrossRef Wu, R. 2011. Survivability of China’s sea-based nuclear forces. Science and Global Security 19 (2): 91–120.CrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Li, B. 2007. Tracking Chinese strategic Mobile missiles. Science and Global Security 15 (1): 1–30.CrossRef Li, B. 2007. Tracking Chinese strategic Mobile missiles. Science and Global Security 15 (1): 1–30.CrossRef
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Oksenberg, M. 1998. Confronting a classic dilemma. Journal of Democracy 9 (1): 30–32.CrossRef Oksenberg, M. 1998. Confronting a classic dilemma. Journal of Democracy 9 (1): 30–32.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
In the Shadow of the Thucydides Trap: International Relations Theory and the Prospects for Peace in U.S.-China Relations
verfasst von
Oriana Skylar Mastro
Publikationsdatum
21.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Chinese Political Science / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1080-6954
Elektronische ISSN: 1874-6357
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9581-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Journal of Chinese Political Science 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe