nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

13.04.2020

Increasing Student Use of a Learner Dashboard

verfasst von: Rebecca L. Sansom, Robert Bodily, Caroline O. Bates, Heather Leary

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Use of online learning systems, such as learner dashboards, is increasing in university chemistry courses. Learning analytics can support student learning by providing feedback on concept mastery. This paper investigated how student use of a chemistry learner dashboard might be increased through class structure, instructor practice, and dashboard design changes across three iterations in a general chemistry course. Once acceptable levels of student dashboard use were achieved, further investigation of how students interacted with the dashboard, including accessing the variety of available resources, was conducted. Survey data and clickstream data from the dashboard were collected and analyzed in a convergent mixed methods design. This study found that changes in course structure, teacher practice, and dashboard design increased use of the dashboard and utilization of the variety of materials offered in it. Recommendations for instructors to effectively utilize a learner dashboard and increase student trust in the system are provided.

Vorheriger Artikel Understanding K-12 STEM Education: a Framework for Developing STEM Literacy

Nächster Artikel Students’ Context-Specific Epistemic Justifications, Prior Knowledge, Engagement, and Socioscientific Reasoning in a Mobile Augmented Reality Learning Environment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aguilar, S. J. (2018). Examining the relationship between comparative and self-focused academic data visualizations in at-risk college students' academic motivation. J Res Technol Educ, 50(1), 84–103.CrossRef

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: tracking online education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium. http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/survey-reports-2014/. Accessed July 2019.

Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self-determination theory perspective. Sci Educ, 84(6), 740–756.CrossRef

Bodily, R., & Verbert, K. (2017a). Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2740172.

Bodily, R., & Verbert, K. (2017b). Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK ‘17) (pp. 309–318). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027403.

Bodily, R., Ikahihifo, T. K., Mackley, B., & Graham, C. R. (2018a). The design, development, and implementation of student-facing learning analytics dashboards. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 572–598.

Bodily, R., Kay, J., Aleven, V., Davis, D., Jivet, I., Xhakaj, F., & Verbert, K. (2018b). Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the Eight International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 1–10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170409.

Chamala, R. R., Ciochina, R., Grossman, R. B., Finkel, R. A., Kannan, S., & Ramachandran, P. (2006). EPOCH: an organic chemistry homework program that offers response-specific feedback to students. J Chem Educ, 83(1), 164.CrossRef

Chemistry LibreTexts (2019). Home – Chemistry LibreTexts. LibreTexts. https://chem.libretexts.org. Accessed 1 August 2019.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2013). Online homework put to the test: a report on the impact of two online learning systems on student performance in general chemistry. J Chem Educ, 90(9), 1137–1143.CrossRef

Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: the effective visual communication of data. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

Gibbons, A. S. (2014). An architectural approach to instructional design. New York: Routledge.

Grabe, M., & Christopherson, K. (2008). Optional student use of online lecture resources: resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance. J Comput Assist Learn, 24(1), 1–10.CrossRef

Grann, J., & Bushway, D. (2014). Competency map: visualizing student learning to promote student success. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK ‘14) (pp. 168–172). New York, NY: ACM.CrossRef

Hatziapostolou, T., & Paraskakis, I. (2010). Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. Electron J E-Learn, 8(2), 111–122.

Holanda, O., Ferreira, R., Costa, E., Bittencourt, I. I., Melo, J., Peixoto, M., et al. (2012). Educational resources recommendation system based on agents and semantic web for helping students in a virtual learning environment. Int J Web Based Commun, 8(3), 333–353.CrossRef

Kerlyl, A., Hall, P., & Bull, S. (2007). Bringing chatbots into education: towards natural language negotiation of open learner models. In R. Ellis, T. Allen, & A. Tuson (Eds.), Applications and innovations in intelligent systems XIVI (pp. 179–192). Bari, Italy: Springer.CrossRef

Kim, J., Jo, I. H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Educ Rev, 17(1), 13–24.CrossRef

Kuosa, K., Distante, D., Tervakari, A., Cerulo, L., Fernandez, A., Koro, J., et al. (2016). Interactive visualization tools to improve learning and teaching in online learning environments. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 14(1), 1–21.CrossRef

Liberatore, M. W. (2011). Improved student achievement using personalized online homework for a course in material and energy balances. Chem Eng Educ, 45(3), 184–190.

Malik, K., Martinez, N., Romero, J., Schubel, S., & Janowicz, P. A. (2014). Mixed-methods study of online and written organic chemistry homework. J Chem Educ, 91(11), 1804–1809.CrossRef

Mampadi, F., Chen, S. Y., Ghinea, G., & Chen, M.-P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: a cognitive style approach. Comput Educ, 56(4), 1003–1011.CrossRef

Maull, K., Saldivar, M. G., & Sumner, T. (2011). Understanding digital library adoption: a use diffusion approach. In Proceedings of ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 121–130). New York, NY: ACM.

Muldner, K., Wixon, M., Rai, D., Burleson, W., Woolf, B., & Arroyo, I. (2015). Exploring the impact of a learning dashboard on student affect. In Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) (pp. 307–317). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRef

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRef

Ott, C., Robins, A., Haden, P., & Shephard, K. (2015). Illustrating performance indicators and course characteristics to support students’ self-regulated learning in CS1. Comput Sci Educ, 25(2), 174–198.CrossRef

Own, Z. (2010). The application of an adaptive, web-based learning environment on oxidation-reduction reactions. Int J Sci Math Educ, 8(1), 1–23.

Parker, L. L., & Loudon, G. M. (2013). Case study using online homework in undergraduate organic chemistry: results and student attitudes. J Chem Educ, 90(1), 37–44.CrossRef

Peng, J. C. (2009). Using an online homework system to submit accounting homework: role of cognitive need, computer efficacy, and perception. J Educ Bus, 84(5), 263–268.CrossRef

Pennington, M. C. (2004). Cycles of innovation in the adoption of information technology: a view for language teaching. Comput Assist Lang Learn, 17(1), 7–33.CrossRef

Richards-Babb, M., Drelick, J., Henry, Z., & Robertson-Honecker, J. (2011). Online homework, help or hindrance? What students think and how they perform. J Coll Sci Teach, 40(4), 81–93.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, England: Sage.

Santos, J. L., Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., & Duval, E. (2013). Addressing learner issues with StepUp!: an evaluation. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK ‘13) (pp. 14–22). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef

Santos, O. C., Boticario, J. G., & Pérez-Marín, D. (2014). Extending web-based educational systems with personalised support through user centred design recommendations along the e-learning life cycle. Science of Computer Programming, 88, 92–109.

Schwendimann, B. A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L. P., Boroujeni, M. S., Holzer, A., et al. (2017). Perceiving learning at a glance: a systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Trans Learn Technol, 10(1), 30–41.CrossRef

Shih, C.-F., & Venkatesh, A. (2004). Beyond adoption: development and application of a use-diffusion model. J Mark, 68(1), 59–72.CrossRef

Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Almerich, G., Orellana, N., & Díaz-García, I. (2018). A basic model of integration of ICT by teachers: competence and use. Educ Technol Res Dev, 66(5), 1165–1187.CrossRef

Tervakari, A. M., Silius, K., Koro, J., Paukkeri, J., & Pirttilä, O. (2014). Usefulness of information visualizations based on educational data. In IEEE global engineering education conference, EDUCON (pp. 142–151). New York, NY: IEEE. Retrieved from.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educ Technol Res Dev, 65(3), 555–575.CrossRef

Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. L. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am Behav Sci, 57(10), 1500–1509.CrossRef

Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., et al. (2014). Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Pers Ubiquit Comput, 18(6), 1499–1514.

Wood, S., Seawright, L., Trevor, G., Macfarlane, D., & Stacey, S. (2010, August). ChemCompanion, a digital text for the first-year college chemistry course. In Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society Volume 240. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Xu, Z., & Makos, A. (2015). Investigating the impact of a notification system on student behaviors in a discourse-intensive hybrid course. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK ‘15) (pp. 402–403). New York, NY: ACM.

Titel: Increasing Student Use of a Learner Dashboard
verfasst von: Rebecca L. Sansom
Robert Bodily
Caroline O. Bates
Heather Leary
Publikationsdatum: 13.04.2020
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09824-w

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Students’ Context-Specific Epistemic Justifications, Prior Knowledge, Engagement, and Socioscientific Reasoning in a Mobile Augmented Reality Learning Environment

Infusing Humanities in STEM Education: Student Opinions of Disciplinary Connections in an Introductory Chemistry Course

Determining the Views of the Secondary School Science Teachers about the Use of Social Media in Education

Development and Validation of the ICT-TPACK-Science Scale

Operationalizing Optimization in a Middle School Virtual Engineering Internship

Understanding K-12 STEM Education: a Framework for Developing STEM Literacy

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten