Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen für Industrieunternehmen hinsichtlich Industrie 4.0 aus ökonomischer, ökologischer und sozialer Perspektive der Nachhaltigkeit. Die Grundlage bilden Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie, in der Vertreter 46 deutscher Industrieunternehmen aus den drei Branchen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau, Elektrotechnik und Automobilindustrie mittels Experteninterviews befragt wurden. Als Ergebnis werden unterschiedliche Nutzenpotenziale und Herausforderungen im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeit dargelegt, die um die Kategorien Daten und Informationen, technische Integration sowie Handlungsbedarf des Staates als übergeordnete, sich auf mehrere Dimensionen der Nachhaltigkeit auswirkende Kategorien, ergänzt werden. Abschließend zeigt der Beitrag übergeordnete Handlungsempfehlungen für Industrieunternehmen bei der Umsetzung einer nachhaltigen Wertschöpfung durch Industrie 4.0 auf.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. A review and research agenda. J Manage 38(4):932–968
Al-Najjar B, Anfimiadou A (2012) Environmental policies and firm value. Bus Strateg Environ 21(1):49–59
CrossRef
Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manage Perspect 22(4):45–62
CrossRef
Arnold C, Kiel D, Voigt KI (2016) How the industrial Internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int J Innov Manag 20(8):1640015-1–1640015-25
CrossRef
Bauer W, Schlund S, Marrenbach D, Ganschar O (2014) Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. BITKOM/Fraunhofer IAO, Berlin/Stuttgart
Beckmann M, Hielscher S, Pies I (2014) Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes. Bus Strateg Environ 23(1):18–37
CrossRef
Blomgren A (2011) Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corp Soc Resp Env Manage 18(5):263–274
CrossRef
Bonekamp L, Sure M (2015) Consequences of industry 4.0 on human labour and work organisation. J Bus Media Psychol 6(1):33–40
Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Eng 8(1):37–44
Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11(2):130–141
CrossRef
Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J 50(1):25–32
CrossRef
Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation. Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(2):90–100
CrossRef
Elkington J (1998) Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51
CrossRef
Fullerton RR, Wempe WF (2009) Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 29(3):214–240
CrossRef
Gabriel M, Pessel E (2016) Industry 4.0 and sustainability impacts: critical discussion of sustainability aspects with a special focus on future of work and ecological consequences. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara Int J Eng 1(16):131–136
Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ Res Meth 16(1):15–31
CrossRef
Glavas A, Mish J (2015) Resources and capabilities of triple bottom line firms: going over old or breaking new ground? J Bus Ethics 127(3):623–642
CrossRef
Glavič P, Lukman R (2007) Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J Clean Prod 15(18):1875–1885
CrossRef
Herrmann C, Schmidt C, Kurle D, Blume S, Thiede S (2014) Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 1(4):283–292
CrossRef
Holsti OR (1968) Content analysis. In: Lindzey G, Aronson E (Hrsg) The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hubbard G (2009) Measuring organizational performance. Beyond the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 18(3):177–191
CrossRef
Jick T (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611
CrossRef
Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0 – final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance, acatech, Frankfurt am Main
Kiel D, Arnold C, Collisi M, Voigt K-I (2016) The impact of the industrial Internet of things on established business models. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) conference, Orlando, S 673–695
Krippendorff K (2013) Content analysis. Sage, Los Angeles
MATH
Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(4):239–242
CrossRef
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao H-A (2015) A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf Lett 3(1):18–23
CrossRef
Lehtonen M (2004) The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecol Econ 49(2):199–214
CrossRef
Liao Y, Deschamps F, de Loures E, Ramos LFP (2017) Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 – a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int J Prod Res 55(12):3609–3629
CrossRef
Littig B, Griessler E (2005) Social sustainability. A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1/2):65–78
CrossRef
Markley MJ, Davis L (2007) Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(9):763–774
CrossRef
McWilliams A, Parhankangas A, Coupet J, Welch E, Barnum DT (2016) Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Bus Strateg Environ 25(3):193–204
CrossRef
Miles MB, Huberman MA (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Milne MJ, Gray R (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J Bus Ethics 118(1):13–29
CrossRef
Norman W, MacDonald C, Arnold DG (2004) Getting to the bottom of „triple bottom line“. Bus Ethics Q 14(2):243–262
CrossRef
Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24(3):403–441
CrossRef
Ozanne LK, Phipps M, Weaver T, Carrington M, Luchs M, Catlin J (2016) Managing the tensions at the intersection of the triple bottom line: a paradox theory approach to sustainability management. J Public Policy Mark 35(2):249–261
CrossRef
Peloza J (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J Manage 35(6):1518–1541
Peukert B, Benecke S, Clavell J, Neugebauer S, Nissen NF, Uhlmann E (2015) Addressing sustainability and flexibility in manufacturing via smart modular machine tool frames to support sustainable value creation. Procedia CIRP 29:514–519
CrossRef
Pfeffer J (2010) Building sustainable organizations. The human factor. Acad Manage Perspect 24(1):34–45
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy & society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92
Schlechtendahl J, Keinert M, Kretschmer F, Lechler A, Verl A (2015) Making existing production systems Industry 4.0-ready. Prod Eng 9(1):143–148
CrossRef
Schulz SA, Flanigan RL (2016) Developing competitive advantage using the triple bottom line: a conceptual framework. J Bus Ind Mark 31(4):449–458
CrossRef
Seow C, Jamali D (2006) Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Bus Process Manage J 12(6):809–821
CrossRef
Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541
CrossRef
Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance. A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol Econ 69(7):1553–1560
CrossRef
Wan J (2011) Advances in cyber-physical systems research. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 5(11):1891–1908
Weston C, Gandell T, Beauchamp J, McAlpine L, Wiseman C, Beauchamp C (2001) Analyzing interview data: the development and evolution of a coding system. Qual Sociol 24(3):381–400
CrossRef
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Über dieses Kapitel
Titel
Industrie 4.0 aus Perspektive der nachhaltigen industriellen Wertschöpfung
