Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

04.06.2023 | Original research

Inferencing in Reading Comprehension: Examining Variations in Definition, Instruction, and Assessment

verfasst von: Marianne Rice, Kausalai Wijekumar, Kacee Lambright, Abigail Bristow

Erschienen in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Ausgabe 3/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Inferencing is an important and complex process required for successful reading comprehension. Previous research has suggested instruction in inferencing is effective at improving reading comprehension. However, varying definitions of inferencing is likely impacting how inferencing instruction is implemented in practice and inferencing ability is measured. The goal of this study was, first, to systematically review the literature on inference instruction to compile a list of definitions used to describe inferences, and second, to review textbooks used in instruction and assessments used in research and practice to measure inferencing skills. A systematic literature search identified studies that implemented inferencing instruction with learners across all ages from preschool to adults. After screening and elimination, 75 studies were identified and reviewed for inference definitions, instructional practices, and assessments used. A widely-used reading textbook and two reading comprehension assessments were reviewed for grade 4 (elementary school) and grade 7 (middle school) to connect inferences taught and measured with the identified definitions. Reviewing the 75 studies suggested 3 broad categories of inferences and 9 definitions of specific inference types. Textbook and assessment review processes revealed differences between the types of inference questions practiced and tested. The large variation in inference types and definitions may create difficulties in schools implementing inference instruction and/or attempting to measure students’ inference abilities. More alignment between research studies on inference instruction and the textbooks and assessments used in schools to teach and assess inference skills is needed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. (2002). Levels of thinking required by comprehension questions in informal reading inventories. The Reading Teacher, 56, 174–180. Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. (2002). Levels of thinking required by comprehension questions in informal reading inventories. The Reading Teacher, 56, 174–180.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 2223–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2CrossRef Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33, 2223–2248. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11145-020-10044-2CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2017). Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension 2nd ed. (pp. 427–451). Routledge. Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2017). Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension 2nd ed. (pp. 427–451). Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 4th ed. Riverside Publishing. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2002). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 4th ed. Riverside Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (2012). Inequality for all. Teachers College Press. Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (2012). Inequality for all. Teachers College Press.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Inferencing in Reading Comprehension: Examining Variations in Definition, Instruction, and Assessment
verfasst von
Marianne Rice
Kausalai Wijekumar
Kacee Lambright
Abigail Bristow
Publikationsdatum
04.06.2023
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Ausgabe 3/2024
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Elektronische ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09660-y

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.