nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015

Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes

verfasst von: Sanja Peršić, Asja Čelebić

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The aim was to assess influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on improvement of orofacial esthetics, chewing function (CF) and oral health-related quality of life.

Methods

Patients treated with 70 conventional complete dentures (CDs), 38 implant-supported mandibular complete dentures opposed to maxillary CDs, 56 conventional removable partial dentures, 15 implant-supported removable partial dentures, 25 conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and 59 implant-supported fixed partial dentures (IFPDs) were included. The survey was conducted using the three questionnaires: the OHIP-CRO14, the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-CRO) and the Chewing Function Questionnaire (CFQ), and administrated twice: at the baseline prior the therapy and 3 months after prosthodontic rehabilitation had been finished.

Results

The after-treatment scores were significantly better than the baseline scores (p < 0.001) for the OES, OHIP14 and CF questionnaires in all types of treatments. The two-factor ANOVA showed no significant difference for the OES after-treatment scores between different rehabilitation options and implant presence, but the OHIP14 and CFQ after-treatment scores were significantly better in FPD and IFPDs than in removable implant and conventional denture wearers. The score change was significantly higher in all implant removable denture patients for the OES, OHIP and CFQ. The lowest score change was registered in the FPD wearers. (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Removable denture implant patients most benefited from implant support, but IFPD and FPD had the best after-treatment scores. The assessed clinical parameters may help dentists in choice of the best rehabilitation option with the highest treatment effect.

Vorheriger Artikel Common patterns of morbidity and multi-morbidity and their impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from a national survey

Nächster Artikel Living with orofacial conditions: psychological distress and quality of life in adults affected with Treacher Collins syndrome, cherubism, or oligodontia/ectodermal dysplasia—a comparative study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Brennan, D. S., Spencer, A. J., & Roberts-Thomson, K. F. (2008). Tooth loss, chewing ability and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 17, 227–235.CrossRefPubMed

Inukai, M., John, M. T., Igarashi, Y., & Baba, K. (2010). Association between perceived chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life in partially dentate patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 118.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Montero, J., López, J. F., Galindo, M. P., Vicente, P., & Bravo, M. (2009). Impact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: A cross-sectional cohort study. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 36, 592–600.CrossRefPubMed

Spalj, S., Lajnert, V., & Ivankovic, L. (2014). The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire—translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Quality of Life Research, 23(4), 1267–1271.CrossRefPubMed

Yoshizumi, D. T. (1964). An evaluation of factors pertinent to the success of complete denture service. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 14, 866–878.CrossRef

Zlatarić, D. K., & Celebić, A. (2008). Factors related to patients’ general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: A stepwise multiple regression analysis. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 21, 86–88.PubMed

Carlsson, G. E. (1998). Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 79, 17–23.CrossRefPubMed

Čelebić, A., Knezović-Zlatarić, D., Papić, M., Carek, V., Baucić, I., & Stipetić, J. (2003). Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 58(10), M948–M953.CrossRef

Allen, P. F., & McMillan, A. S. (2003). A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14, 173–179.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Assunção, W. G., Barão, V. A., Delben, J. A., Gomes, E. A., & Tabata, L. F. (2009). A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: A literature review. Gerodontology, 27, 154–162.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Strassburger, C., Kerchbaum, T., & Heydecke, G. (2006). Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 19, 339–348.PubMed

12.

Cordaro, L., di Torresanto, V. M., Petricevic, N., Jornet, P. R., & Torsello, F. (2013). Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 536–542.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Persic, S., Palac, A., Vojvodic, D., & Celebic, A. (2014). Initial effects of a treatment by fixed partial dentures supported by mini dental implants from a patient’s point of view. Collegium Antropologicum, 38(1), 275–278.PubMed

14.

Naert, I., Alsaadi, G., & Quirynen, M. (2004). Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two implant-retained mandibular overdentures: A 10-year randomized clinical study. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17, 401–410.PubMed

15.

Fueki, K., Kimoto, K., Ogawa, T., & Garrett, N. R. (2007). Effect of implant-supported or retained dentures on masticatory performance: A systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 98, 470–477.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Yu, S. J., Chen, P., & Zhu, G. X. (2013). Relationship between implantation of missing anterior teeth and oral health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 22, 1613–1620.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Singh, B. P., Pradhan, K. N., Tripathi, A., Tua, R., & Tripathi, S. (2012). Effect of sociodemographic variables on complete denture satisfaction. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 4, 43–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

18.

Lee, I. C., Yang, Y. H., Ho, P. S., & Lee, I. C. (2012). Exploring the quality of life after denture-wearing within elders in Kaohsiung. Gerodontology, 29, e1067–e1077.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Slade, G. D., & Spencer, A. J. (1994). Development and the evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health, 11, 3–11.PubMed

20.

John, M. T. (2007). Exploring dimensions of oral health-related quality of life using experts-opinions. Quality of Life Research, 16, 697–704.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Zlataric, D. K., & Celebic, A. (2001). Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: A comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14, 423–426.PubMed

22.

John, M. T., Reißmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Factor analyses of the Oral Health Impact Profile—overview and studied population. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 58(1), 26–34.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

23.

John, M. T., Reissmann, D. R., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., et al. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.1111/joor.12192.

24.

John, M. T., Feuerstahler, L., Waller, N., Baba, K., Larsson, P., Celebić, A., et al. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. doi:10.1111/joor.12191.

25.

Bimbashi, V., Celebić, A., Islami, A., Asllani-Hoxha, F., & Petricević, N. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Albanian language version of the OHIP-ALB49 Questionnaire in the Republic of Kosovo. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 1189–1195.PubMed

26.

Rener-Sitar, K., Celebić, A., Petricević, N., Papić, M., Sapundzhiev, D., Kansky, A., et al. (2009). The Slovenian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (OHIP-SVN): Translation and psychometric properties. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 1177–1183.PubMed

27.

Peršić, S., Milardović, S., Mehulić, K., & Čelebić, A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(6), 523–533.PubMed

28.

Larsson, P., John, M. T., Nilner, K., Bondemark, L., & List, T. (2010). Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 23, 249–256.PubMed

29.

Peršić, S., Palac, A., Bunjevac, T., & Čelebić, A. (2013). Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 41(6), 565–573.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hsu, K. J., Lee, H. E., Wu, Y. M., La, S. J., Huang, S. T., & Yen, Y. Y. (2014). Masticatory factors as predictors of oral health-related quality of life among elderly people in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1395–1405.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Chen, P., & Yu, S. (2012). Zhu. The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients. British Dental Journal, 213(11), E20.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Knezović Zlatarić, D., Celebić, A., Valentić-Peruzović, M., Jerolimov, V., & Pandurić, J. (2003). A survey of treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 30(8), 847–854.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Petričević, N., Čelebić, A., Papić, M., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2009). The Croatian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire. Collegium Antropologicum, 33, 841–847.PubMed

34.

Rener-Sitar, K., Petricević, N., Celebić, A., & Marion, L. (2008). Psychometric properties of Croatian and Slovenian short form of oral health impact profile questionnaires. Croatian Medical Journal, 49, 536–544.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

35.

Reissmann, D. R., Sierwald, I., Heydecke, G., & John, M. T. (2013). Interpreting one oral health impact profile point. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 12.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

36.

Celebic, A., & Knezović-Zlataric, D. (2003). A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. Journal of Dentistry, 31, 445–451.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kovac, Z., Troskot, Z., Uhac, I., Cabov, T., Lajnert, V., Pavicić, D. K., et al. (2012). Multivariate analysis of different factors affecting the patient general satisfaction with complete dentures. Collegium Antropologicum, 36, 791–794.PubMed

38.

Bellini, D., Dos Santos, M. B., De Paula Prisco Da Cunha, V., & Marchini, L. J. (2009). Patients’ expectations and satisfaction of complete denture therapy and correlation with locus of control. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 36, 682–686.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Locker, D., Clarke, M., & Payne, B. (2000). Self-perceived oral health status, psychological well-being and life satisfaction in an older adult population. Journal of Dental Research, 79, 970–975.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Kovacic, I., Badrov, J., Vidovic, N., & Celebic, A. (2011). Preliminary clinical report of satisfaction with prosthodontic rehabilitation of intellectually disabled young adults provided by parents or caregivers. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 24(4), 303–305.PubMed

41.

Petricevic, N., Celebic, A., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2012). A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology, 29(2), e956–e963.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Swelem, A. A., Gurevich, K. G., Fabrikant, E. G., Hassan, M. H., & Aqou, S. (2014). Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients treated with removable, fixed, fixed-removable, and implant-supported prostheses. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 338–347.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Fillion, M., Aubazac, D., Bessadet, M., Allègre, M., & Nicolas, E. (2013). The impact of implant treatment on oral health related quality of life in a private dental practice: A prospective cohort study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 197.CrossRef

44.

Wolfart, S., Moll, D., Hilgers, R. D., Wolfart, M., & Kern, M. (2013). Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on oral health-related quality of life. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 1354–1359.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Duvernay, E., Srinivasan, M., Legrand, L. D., Herrmann, F. R., von Steinbüchel, N., & Müller, F. (2014). Dental appearance and personality trait judgment of elderly persons. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 27, 348.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Kranjcic, J., Mikus, A., Mehulic, K., & Vojvodic, D. (2014). Knowledge and awareness of dental implants among elderly people in Croatia. Journal of Prosthodontics. doi:10.1111/jopr.12172.PubMed

Titel: Influence of different prosthodontic rehabilitation options on oral health-related quality of life, orofacial esthetics and chewing function based on patient-reported outcomes
verfasst von: Sanja Peršić
Asja Čelebić
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0817-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

A new computerized adaptive test advancing the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children: the Kids-CAT

Measuring changes in health over time using the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: a head-to-head comparison of measurement properties and sensitivity to change in a German inpatient rehabilitation sample

Correlation of PROMIS scales and clinical measures among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with and without exacerbations

Glycaemic control and quality of life among ethnically diverse Malaysian diabetic patients

Association of sleep patterns with psychological positive health and health complaints in children and adolescents

Living with orofacial conditions: psychological distress and quality of life in adults affected with Treacher Collins syndrome, cherubism, or oligodontia/ectodermal dysplasia—a comparative study