Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City: Smartness as Technologies and Innovation in Urban Contexts Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Innovation and Opportunities for Citizen Participation in Spanish Smart Cities

verfasst von : Xosé María Mahou-Lago, Enrique José Varela-Álvarez

Erschienen in: Smarter as the New Urban Agenda

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Smart cities are a social, political, administrative, and technological phenomenon. The growth and consolidation of smart cities depends on sociotechnical conditions that implement 2.0 virtual platforms in specific sociopolitical and organizational contexts. To determine whether Spanish smart city Web portals facilitate fluid interaction between local administrations and citizens, we designed a study using heuristic test techniques to analyze Web portal usability in 20 Spanish smart cities. The objective was to identify the type and development level of electronic participation features on selected municipal Web sites.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Privacy and Security in Smart Data Collection by Citizens
Fußnoten
1
This is in contrast with other methods such as the “accessibility test,” for which the main automatic research applications (Cynthia Says®, eXaminator®, hera®, Truwex®, Wave®, or Taw®) allow a more quantitative and objective analysis of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
 
2
Law 7/1985, of 2 April, regulating the Bases of the Local Regime (Bases del Régimen Local-articles 15, 25, and 26).
 
3
The cities of Bilbao and San Sebastian are not members of the Spanish Network of Smart Cities (Red Española de Ciudades Inteligentes or RECI). Yet we have included them in this study due to their significant level of smart initiatives (CGLU 2012; IDC 2012).
 
4
This is broken down into two categories (100,000–200,000 and 200,000–500,000 inhabitants), according to the classification of Spanish municipalities used by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE).
 
Literatur
AMETIC. (2013). Smart cities 2012. Madrid: Ministerio de Industria..
Batlle, J., Abadal, E., & Blat, J. (2011). Benchmarking del e-gobierno local: Limitaciones de los métodos de evaluación comparativa. El Profesional de la Información, 20(3), 251–259.CrossRef
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.CrossRef
Belissent, J. (2011). The core of a smart city must be smart governance. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc.
Beynon-Davies, P., & Williams, M. D. (2003). Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. Journal of Information Technology, 18(2), 137–149.CrossRef
Bouzas, R., & Mahou, X. (2013). The study of the functionality of government portals. A methodological proposal from the e-health. Gestión y Política Pública, temático, 261–308.
Buckley, J. (2003). E-service quality and the public sector. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 453–462.CrossRef
Byun, D., & Gavin, F. (2011). Evaluating usability, user satisfaction and intention to revisit for successful e-government websites. Electronic Government (An International Journal), 8(1), 1–19CrossRef
Calzada, I. (2013). Critical social innovation in the smart city era for a city-regional European Horizon 2020. P3T, Journal of Public Policies and Territories, Social Innovation and Territory, 6, 1–20.
Capgemini Consulting, & Fundación Orange. (2013). Estudio Comparativo 2013 de los Servicios Públicos online en 25 ayuntamientos españoles. Madrid: Capgemini Consulting & Fundación Orange.
Carrillo, E. (2002). Los gobiernos locales. In P. Román (coord) (Ed.), Sistema Político Español (pp. 315–338). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Chen, D.-Y., Huang, T.-Y., & Hsiao, N. (2004). Citizen participation, e-government, and public management: A case of Taipeu city mayor’s e-mail box. International Symposium of Digital Divide and Digital Opportunity, February 20–21, Taipei (Taiwan), 1–20.
Chourabi, H., Gil-García, J. R., Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., Melloili, S., Scholl, H. J., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
Christmas, L. (2011). A new age of transparency and let the public know. British Journalism Review, 22(4), 20–22.CrossRef
Criado, J. I. (2012). Redes sociales y Open Government. Hacia unas Administraciones locales en red y abiertas. Revista Democracia y Gobierno Local, 18–19.
Dhillon, G. S., Weerakkody, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2008). Realising transformational stage e-government: A UK local authority perspective. Electronic Government (An International Journal), 5(2), 162–180.CrossRef
Eschenfelder, K. R. (2004). Behind the web site: An inside look at the production of web-based textual government information. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 337–358.CrossRef
European Unión. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.
Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53, 789–817.CrossRef
Fernández, Y., Gutiérrez, C., & Fernández, J. M. (2011). E-gobierno en las entidades públicas: Conocimiento, utilidad y valoración de las páginas Web de los Ayuntamientos. Un caso de estudio. Auditoría Pública, 53, 109–119.
Frewer, L. J., & Rowe, G. (2005). Evaluating public participation exercises: Strategic and practical issues. In C. Joanne (Ed.), Evaluating public participation in policy making (pp. 85–106). Paris: OECD.
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics.
Granić, A., Mitrović y, I., & Marangunić, N. (2011). Exploring the usability of web portals: A Croatian case study. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 339–349.CrossRef
Hassan, Y., Martín, F. J., & Iazza, G. (2004). Diseño Web Centrado en el Usuario: Usabilidad y Arquitectura de la Información. Hipertext.net. 2.
Heeks, R., & Foster, C. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.19.
Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2007). Understanding e-government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 165–177. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000676.CrossRef
Hemment, D., & Townsend, A. (2013). Here come the smart citizens. Manchester: FutureEverything.
Hüller, T. (2010). Playground or democratisation? New participatory procedures at the European Commission. Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 77–107.CrossRef
Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852.
Iasulaitis, S., & Pineda, C. (2013). Una administración pública transparente, participativa y responsable: el uso de las TICs. IV Congreso Internacional en Gobierno, Administración Pública y Políticas Públicas (GIGAPP-IUIOG-INAP), Madrid, 23–24 September, pp. 1–33.
Janssen, M., Charalabidi, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.CrossRef
Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Park, H. W., Swar, B., & Rho, J. J. (2010). A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics, 1–20. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0322-5.
Karkin, N. (2013). Herramientas Web 2.0 para la participación pública a través de los sitios de Internet del gobierno. Gestión y Política Pública, temático, 307–331.
Kelder, T. (2011). I love it when a plan comes together: Urban agendas in EU2020. Eixo Atlántico. Revista da Eurorrexión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, 18, 31–42.
Kingston, R. (2002). The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. XVI AESOP Congress, Volos (Greece). July, 10–14 (2002), 1–14.
Lips, M. (2012). E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0. Information Polity, 17, 239–250.
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Hernández García, J. M., & Gil-García, R. (2009). Hacia un modelo de los determinantes de éxito de los portales de gobierno estatal en México. Gestión y Política Pública, XVIII(2), 307–340.
McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413.CrossRef
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29.CrossRef
Moro, G. (2005). Citizen’s evaluation of public participation. In OECD (Ed.), Evaluating public participation in policy making (pp. 109–126). Paris: OECD.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011a). Conceptualizing smart city with dimension of technology, people, and institutions. The proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on digital government research, pp. 282–291.
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011b). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ICEGOV2011, September 26–28, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 185–194.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack. (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
OECD. (2003). Engaging citizens online for better policy making. Paris: OECD.
Parrado, S. (2002). Sistemas administrativos comparados. Madrid: Tecnos y Universidat Pompeu Fabra.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. (MCB University Press).CrossRef
Ramió, C. (2004). E-Administración y nuevos modelos de gestión pública: Una propuesta de decálogo normativo. Revista Vasca de Administración Pública, 70, 321–338.
Ramió, C. (2009). Evaluación de la innovación institucional y gestión de las administraciones locales. Eixo Atlántico. Revista da Eurorrexión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, 15, 21–52.
Ramilo, M. C., & Fernández, R. (2012). Ciudadanía y Participación en la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento. Working Papers GIGAPP-IUIOG 1–30.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 72–81.CrossRef
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Schaffers, H., Komnimos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue, et al. (Eds.), Future internet assembly (pp. 431–446). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
Siddiqi, J., Akhgar, B., Gamble, T., & Zaefarian, G. (2006). A framework for increasing participation in e-Government. International Conference on e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, e-Government & Outsourcing (EEE’06), pp. 1–7.
SOCITM, & IDEA. (2002). Local e-government now: A worldwide view. London: SOCITM and IDEA.
Spyros, A., Kitsios, F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2010). New service development in e-government: Identifying critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 95–118.CrossRef
Stephens, R. T. (2011). Web 2.0: Integration model with electronic commerce. In K. Malik & P. Choudhary (Eds.), Business organizations and collaborative web: Practices, strategies and patterns (pp. 18–30). Hershey: igi Global.
Tan, C., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality. Journal MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 77–109.
Varela, E. 2011. Gobernanza urbana. Elementos de aprendizaje y estudios de casos. In M. Iglesias, M. Martí-Costa, J. Subirats, & M. Tomàs (Eds.), Políticas urbanas en España (pp. 363–386). Barcelona: Icaria.
Welle, D., DeJong, M., & Lentz, L. (2010). Usable guidelines for usable websites? An analysis of five e-government heuristics. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 254–263.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Innovation and Opportunities for Citizen Participation in Spanish Smart Cities
verfasst von
Xosé María Mahou-Lago
Enrique José Varela-Álvarez
Copyright-Jahr
2016
Buch
Smarter as the New Urban Agenda

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17619-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-17620-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_20