Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Practice and Development of Digital Inclusive Finance in China Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Insight on Hybrid Organizational Performance: A Systematic Review

verfasst von : Yuting Wu, Yonghong Long

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the First International Forum on Financial Mathematics and Financial Technology

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The development of the hybrid organization, especially social enterprises (SEs), is widely concerned by the world. Although abundant researches focused on hybrid strategy and performance improvement, the hybrid organizational performance evaluation has not been well defined. Moreover, review from the site of performance, especially the systematic review, remains sparse. Performance assessment is important to know the productivity of the hybrid organizations strategy and operation. Therefore the article aims to find an answer for the assessment of hybrid organizational performance and to find a path for further study. The authors utilized a systematic review approach to find the answer and possible study path for the future. After a strict literature selection procedure, 41 articles were adopted to form the research. By answering 5 research questions, the authors conclude that balance dual gaol is critical for the hybrid organization to achieve satisfying performance. However, accountability for dual performance objectives is one of the most challenges for hybrid organizational governance. The authors suggest that mathematically understanding the quality of performance is necessary for the performance assessment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Survey of Lattice-Based Group Signature
Nächstes Kapitel The Complex Systems’ Methods in Financial Science and Technology
Literatur
1.
Fossestol, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T.A., Klemsdal, L.: Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Adm. 93(2), 290–306 (2015)CrossRef
2.
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M.: Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. Voluntas 28(6), 2469–2497 (2017)CrossRef
3.
Battilana, J., Dorado, S.: Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53(6), 1419–1440 (2010)CrossRef
4.
Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., Birkholz, C.: Making hybrids work: aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. Calif. Manag. Rev. 57(3), 36–58
5.
Luke, B.G., Chu, V.: Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: an examination of the ‘why’ and ‘how’ in pursuing social change. Int. Small Bus. J. 31(7), 764–784 (2013)CrossRef
6.
Jay, J.: Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 56(1), 137–159 (2013)CrossRef
7.
Khieng, S., Dahles, H.: Commercialization in the non-profit sector: the emergence of social enterprise in Cambodia. J. Soc. Entrep. 6(2), 218–243 (2015)
8.
Mikolajczak, P.: Becoming business-like: the determinants of NGOs? marketization turning into social enterprises in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana 10(3), 537–559 (2019)CrossRef
9.
Meyer, M., Buber, R., Aghamanoukjan, A.: In search of legitimacy: managerialism and legitimation in civil society organizations. Voluntas 24(1), 167–193 (2013)CrossRef
10.
Zhao, M., Han, J.: Tensions and risks of social enterprises? scaling strategies: the case of microfinance institutions in china. J. Soc. Entrep. 1–21 (2019)
11.
Raisiene, A.G., Urmanaviciene, A.: Mission drift in a hybrid organization: how can social business combine its dual goals? Ekonomski Vjesnik 30(2), 301–310 (2017)
12.
Boitier, M., Riviere, A., Wenzlaff, F., Hattke, F.: Hybrid organizational responses to institutional complexity: a cross-case study of three European universities. Manag. Int. 22(4), 121–135 (2018)
13.
Ciambotti, G., Pedrini, M.: Hybrid harvesting strategies to overcome resource constraints: evidence from social enterprises in Kenya. J. Bus. Ethics (1) (2019)
14.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., Lounsbury, M.: Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5(1), 317–371 (2011)CrossRef
15.
Ismail, A., Johnson, B.: Managing organizational paradoxes in social enterprises: case studies from the Mena region. Voluntas 30(3), 516–534 (2019)CrossRef
16.
Pache, A., Santos, F.M.: When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35(3), 455–476 (2010)
17.
Pache, A., Santos, F.M.: Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Manag. J. 56(4), 972–1001 (2013)CrossRef
18.
Perkmann, M., Mckelvey, M., Phillips, N.: Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: how organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics. Organ. Sci. 30(2), 298–318 (2019)CrossRef
19.
Zoogah, D.B., Peng, M.W., Woldu, H.: Institutions, resources, and organizational effectiveness in Africa. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 29(1), 7–31 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Puspadewi, I., Soetjipto, B.W., Wahyuni, S., Wijayanto, S.H.: Managing paradox for the sustainability of social enterprises: an empirical study of forestry community cooperatives in Indonesia. J. Soc. Entrep. 10(2), 177–192 (2019)
21.
School, H.B.: Keeping a foot in both camps: understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev
22.
Bhattarai, C., Kwong, C., Tasavori, M.: Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: an empirical study from the United Kingdom. J. Bus. Res. 96, 47–60 (2019)CrossRef
23.
Tracey, P., Phillips, N., Jarvis, O.: Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1), 60–80 (2011)CrossRef
24.
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G.S.: Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: innovation and differentiation. J. Public Policy Mark. 31(1), 91–101
25.
Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., Austin, M.J.: Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 43(6), 1014–1032 (2013)CrossRef
26.
Powell, M., Gillett, A., Doherty, B.: Sustainability in social enterprise: hybrid organizing in public services. Public Manag. Rev. 21(2), 159–186 (2019)CrossRef
27.
Lashitew, A.A., Lydia, B., van Tulder, R.: Inclusive business at the base of the pyramid: the role of embeddedness for enabling social innovations. J. Bus. Ethics
28.
Zhang, D.D., Swanson, L.A.: Social entrepreneurship in nonprofit organizations: an empirical investigation of the synergy between social and business objectives. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 25(1), 105–125
29.
Liu, G., Takeda, S., Ko, W.W.: Strategic orientation and social enterprise performance. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 43(3), 480–501 (2014)CrossRef
30.
Liu, G., Eng, T.-Y., Takeda, S.: An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrep. Theory Pract. 39(2), 267–298
31.
Cornforth, C.: Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Soc. Enterp. J. 10(1), 3–20 (2014)CrossRef
32.
Bagnoli, L., Megali, C.: Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 40(1), 149–165 (2011)CrossRef
33.
Taysir, E.A., Taysir, N.K.: Measuring effectiveness in nonprofit organizations: an integration effort. J. Transnatl. Manag. 17(3), 220–235
34.
Florin, J., Schmidt, E.: Creating shared value in the hybrid venture arena: a business model innovation perspective. J. Soc. Entrep. 2(2), 165–197 (2011)
35.
Dacin, P.A., Dacin, M.T., Matear, M.: Social entrepreneurship: why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 24(3), 37–57 (2010)
36.
Ebrahim, A., Rangan, V.K.: The limits of nonprofit impact: a contingency framework for measuring social performance. Social Science Electronic Publishing (10-099) (2010)
37.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., Mair, J.: The governance of social enterprises: mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 34, 81–100 (2014)
38.
Davies, I.A., Bob, D.: Balancing a hybrid business model: the search for equilibrium at cafedirect. J. Bus. Ethics
39.
Catterall, M.: Research methods for business students 3(4), 215–218 (2003)
40.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. BMJ 339(7), 1006–1012 (2009)
41.
Soteri-Proctor, A.: Hybrid organizations and the third sector: challenges for practice, theory and policy ? edited by David Billis 45(3), 328–330
42.
Salamon, L.M.: The marketization of welfare: changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Soc. Serv. Rev. 67(1), 16–39 (1993)CrossRef
43.
Battilana, J., Lee, M.: Advancing research on hybrid organizing ? insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Manag. Ann. 8(1), 397–441 (2014)CrossRef
44.
Kinch, M.S.: The rise (and decline?) of biotechnology. Drug Discov. Today 19(11), 1686–1690 (2014)CrossRef
45.
Stark, D.: The Sense of Dissonance (2009)
46.
Mason, C., Doherty, B.: A fair trade-off? paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. J. Bus. Ethics 136(3), 451–469
47.
Riverasantos, M., Holt, D., Littlewood, D., Kolk, A.: Social entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 29(1), 72–91 (2015)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Insight on Hybrid Organizational Performance: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Yuting Wu
Yonghong Long
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
Proceedings of the First International Forum on Financial Mathematics and Financial Technology

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8372-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-8373-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8373-5_6