nach oben

Small Business Economics

Erschienen in:

26.07.2016

Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study

verfasst von: Riccardo Fini, Kun Fu, Marius Tuft Mathisen, Einar Rasmussen, Mike Wright

Erschienen in: Small Business Economics | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The creation of spin-off firms from universities is seen as an important mechanism for the commercialization of research, and hence the overall contribution from universities to technological development and economic growth. Governments and universities are seeking to develop framework conditions that are conductive to spin-off creation. The most prevalent of such initiatives are legislative changes at national level and the establishment of technology transfer offices at university level. The effectiveness of such initiatives is debated, but empirical evidence is limited. In this paper, we analyze the full population of universities in Italy, Norway, and the UK; three countries adopting differing approaches to framework conditions, to test whether national- and university-level initiatives have an influence on the number of spin-offs created and the quality of these spin-offs. Building on institutional theory and using multilevel analysis, we find that changes in the institutional framework conditions at both national and university levels are conductive to the creation of more spin-offs, but that the increase in quantity is at the expense of the quality of these firms. Hence, the effect of such top–down changes in framework conditions on the economic impact from universities seems to be more symbolic than substantive.

Vorheriger Artikel The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs

Nächster Artikel Do micro start-ups fuel job creation? Cross-country evidence from the DynEmp Express database

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The significantly larger number of spin-offs per university in Norway is primarily driven by the country´s centralized university structure, comprising four relatively large research universities at the start of our observation period.

Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.

Aldridge, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Does policy influence the commercialization route? Evidence from National Institutes of Health funded scientists. Research Policy, 39(5), 583–588. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.005.CrossRef

Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–1447.CrossRef

Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: Is policy formulation to blame? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639–659. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9554-8.CrossRef

Baldini, N., Fini, R., & Grimaldi, R. (2014a). The transition towards entrepreneurial universities: An assessment of academic entrepreneurship in Italy. In A. Link, D. Siegel, & M. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of university technology transfer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baldini, N., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2014b). Organisational change and the institutionalisation of university patenting activity in Italy. Minerva, 52(1), 27–53.CrossRef

Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35(4), 518–532.CrossRef

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.CrossRef

Bliese, P. D., Chan, D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10(4), 551–563.CrossRef

Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2014a). Fifteen years of academic entrepreneurship in Italy: Evidence from the TASTE Project. Technical Report, University of Bologna.

Bolzani, D., Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2014b). University Spin-Offs and Their Impact: Longitudinal Evidence from Italy. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 41, 181–205.

Borlaug, S. B., Grünfeld, L., Gulbrandsen, M., Rasmussen, E., Rønning, L., Spilling, O. R., et al. (2009). Between entrepreneurship and technology transfer: Evaluation of the FORNY programme. In Report 19 (pp. 160). Oslo: NIFU STEP.

Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x.CrossRef

Carpenter, R. E., & Petersen, B. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal, 112(477), F54–F72.CrossRef

Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384. doi:10.1016/J.Respol.2005.01.007.CrossRef

Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084–1093. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010.CrossRef

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Mustar, P., & Knockaert, M. (2007). Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 609–640. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm019.CrossRef

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.004.CrossRef

Complete University Guide (2014). http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings. Accessed 20/8 2014.

CWTS (2014). Leiden Ranking. http://www.leidenranking.com/. Accessed 8/7 2014.

Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38(1), 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001.CrossRef

Damsgaard, E. F., & Thursby, M. C. (2013). University entrepreneurship and professor privilege. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 183–218. doi:10.1093/icc/dts047.CrossRef

Database for Statistics on Higher Education (2014). dbh.nsd.uib.no. Accessed 8/7 2014.

Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef

European Commission (2010). Feasibility study for creating a European university data collection. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/docs/en/eumida-final-report.pdf. Accessed 15/5 2014.

Eurostat (2014). Eurostat Statistics Database. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 20/08/2014 and 24/01/2016.

FAME (2014). https://fame.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed 20/8 2014.

Fini, R., & Grimaldi, R. (2016). Process approach to academic entrepreneurship: evidence from the globe. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013.CrossRef

Fini, R., Lacetera, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Inside or outside the IP system? Business creation in academia. Research Policy, 39(8), 1060–1069. doi:10.1016/j.respo1.2010.05.014.CrossRef

Garnsey, E., & Heffernan, P. (2005). High-technology clustering through spin-out and attraction: The Cambridge case. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1127–1144. doi:10.1080/00343400500328289.CrossRef

Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The governance of university knowledge transfer: A critical review of the literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93–114. doi:10.1007/S11024-009-9118-2.CrossRef

Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.008.CrossRef

Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. (2002). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32(4), 639–658.CrossRef

Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.005.CrossRef

Gulbrandsen, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2012). The use and development of indicators for the commercialisation of university research in a national support programme. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(5), 481–495.CrossRef

Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo institution or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1241–1262.CrossRef

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127. doi:10.1162/003465398557221.CrossRef

Heritage Foundation. (2014). Index of Economic Freedom. http://www.heritage.org/index/download Accessed 20/8 2014.

Higher Education Information Database for Institutions (HEIDI). (2014). https://heidi.hesa.ac.uk/Home.aspx. Accessed 20/8 2014.

Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 138–160. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3.CrossRef

Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2014). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 289–307.CrossRef

Italian Companies House Database. (2013). Infocamere Telemaco. https://telemaco.infocamere.it/. Accessed 17/11 2013.

Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professional entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 679–844.CrossRef

Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2011). Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison. Research Policy, 40(8), 1100–1112. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.012.CrossRef

Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: a review of academic literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 407–429.CrossRef

Lawton Smith, H., & Ho, K. (2006). Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories’ spin-off companies. Research Policy, 35(10), 1554–1568.CrossRef

Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2011). Regulatory burden, rule of law, and entry of strategic entrepreneurs: An international panel study. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1392–1419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01006.x.CrossRef

Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006.CrossRef

Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Wild, A. (2015). The institutionalization of third stream activities in UK higher education: The role of discourse and metrics. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 78–92. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12069.CrossRef

Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.CrossRef

Mason, C. (2012). Handbook of research on venture capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9369-9.CrossRef

Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 345–362. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9721-1.CrossRef

MIUR. (2013). Italian Ministry of instruction, university and research. http://nuclei.miur.it/sommario/ Accessed 17/11 2013.

Mowery, D. C. (2011). Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university-industry technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1827–1853. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr063.CrossRef

Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6.CrossRef

Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., & Villani, E. (2015). Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: A cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9448-1.

Murphy, G. B., Trailer, J. W., & Hill, R. C. (1996). Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15–23. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00159-X.CrossRef

Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Ramaciotti, L. (2016). The effects of university rules on spinoff creation: The case of academia in Italy. Research Policy, 45(7), 1386–1396.CrossRef

Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113–143. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt057.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (the political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRef

O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011.CrossRef

O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R & D Management, 37(1), 1–16.

Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13–24.CrossRef

Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J. M., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., & Tartari, V. (2015). Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 380-391.CrossRef

Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311.CrossRef

Rasmussen, E. (2008). Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation, 28(August), 506–517.CrossRef

Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.CrossRef

Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2011). The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin-off venture emergence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1314–1345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.CrossRef

Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2014). The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007.CrossRef

Rasmussen, E., Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2015). The transformation of network ties to develop entrepreneurial competencies for university spin-offs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(7–8), 430–457.CrossRef

Repubblica. (2013). Grande Guida dell’Università. http://temi.repubblica.it/guide-universita-2013-2014/. Accessed 17/11 2013.

Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Müller, V. (2013). Does acquiring venture capital pay off for the funded firms? A meta-analysis on the relationship between venture capital investment and funded firm financial performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 335–353. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.002.CrossRef

Salvador, E. (2009). Evolution of Italian universities' rules for spin-offs: The usefulness of formal regulations. Industry and Higher Education, 23(6), 445-462.CrossRef

Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371–1390. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0.CrossRef

Savva, N., & Taneri, N. (2015). The role of equity, royalty, and fixed fees in technology licensing to university spin-offs. Management Science, 61(6), 1323–1343. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2000.CrossRef

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. London: Sage Publications.

Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Shane, S. (Ed.). (2004). Academic entrepreneurship -University spinoffs and wealth creation (New horizons in entrepreneurship). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.

Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.CrossRef

Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1), 154–170. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280.CrossRef

Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.CrossRef

Spinouts UK Survey. (2014). http://www.spinoutsuk.co.uk/. Accessed 20/8 2014.

Stevens, A. J. (2004). The enactment of Bayh-Dole. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 93–99.CrossRef

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.

Tartari, V., Perkmann, M., & Salter, A. (2014). In good company: The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists. Research Policy, 43(7), 1189-1203.CrossRef

The Research Council of Norway. (2013). Det Norske Forsknings-og Innovasjonssystemet—Statistikk og Indikatorer. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd.

Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of University Licensing: A survey of major U.S. Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 59–72.CrossRef

Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109–124. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00160-8.CrossRef

Tolbert, P. S., David, R. J., & Sine, W. D. (2011). Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22(5), 1332–1344. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0601.CrossRef

UNICO, & NUBS. (2002). Annual UNICO-NUBS-AURIL survey on university commercialization activities. Nottingham: Nottingham University Business School.

Urbano, D., & Alvarez, C. (2014). Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: An international study. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 703–716. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9523-7.CrossRef

Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553–564. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001.CrossRef

van Praag, M., & van Stel, A. (2013). The more business owners, the merrier? The role of tertiary education. Small Business Economics, 41(2), 335–357. doi:10.1007/s11187-012-9436-x.CrossRef

Vincett, P. S. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6), 736–747. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.001.CrossRef

Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0.CrossRef

Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00317.x.CrossRef

World Bank. (2014a). Doing business project of the world bank. http://www.doingbusiness.org/. Accessed 20/8 2014.

World Bank. (2014b). World Bank database. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 20/8 2014.

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205–1223. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.021.CrossRef

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (Eds.). (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005.CrossRef

Zephyr. (2014). https://zephyr.bvdinfo.com/. Accessed 20/8 2014.

Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

Titel: Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study
verfasst von: Riccardo Fini
Kun Fu
Marius Tuft Mathisen
Einar Rasmussen
Mike Wright
Publikationsdatum: 26.07.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Small Business Economics / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

ICT as facilitator of internationalisation in small- and medium-sized firms

The impact of habitual entrepreneurial experience on new firm closure outcomes

The private financial gains to entrepreneurship: Is it a good use of public money to encourage individuals to become entrepreneurs?

R&D profitability: the role of risk and Knightian uncertainty

The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs

What do firms know? What do they produce? A new look at the relationship between patenting profiles and patterns of product diversification