Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Intelligent Interaction Modelling: Game Theory

verfasst von : Laobing Zhang, Genserik Reniers

Erschienen in: Game Theory for Managing Security in Chemical Industrial Areas

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Game theory is a mathematical tool for supporting decision making in a multiple players situation where one player’s utility will be determined not only by his own decision, but also by other players’ decisions. An illustrative example of this situation is the Rock/Scissors/Paper game (“RSP” game). In an RSP game, whether a player wins or loses depends on both what he plays and what his opponent plays. This is a well-known game between mostly children with very simple rules. Two ‘players’ hold their right hands out simultaneously at an agree signal to represent a rock (closed fist), a piece of paper (open palm), or a pair of scissors (first and second fingers held apart). If the two symbols are the same, it’s a draw. Otherwise rock blunts scissors, paper wraps rock, and scissors cut paper, so the respective winners for these three outcomes are rock, paper and scissors. The RSP game is what is called a ‘two-player zero-sum non-cooperative’ game. There are obviously many other types of game and the field of game theory is very powerful to provide (mathematical) insights into strategic decision-making.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nash JF. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1950;36(1):48–9.CrossRef Nash JF. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1950;36(1):48–9.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Harsanyi JC. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, i–iii: part i. the basic model. Manag Sci. 2004;50((12_suppl)):1804–17.CrossRef Harsanyi JC. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, i–iii: part i. the basic model. Manag Sci. 2004;50((12_suppl)):1804–17.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemke CE, Howson J, Joseph T. Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. J Soc Ind Appl Math. 1964;12(2):413–23.CrossRef Lemke CE, Howson J, Joseph T. Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. J Soc Ind Appl Math. 1964;12(2):413–23.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Deng X, editors. Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. Foundations of Computer Science, 2006 FOCS’06 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on; 2006: IEEE. Chen X, Deng X, editors. Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium. Foundations of Computer Science, 2006 FOCS’06 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on; 2006: IEEE.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV. Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.CrossRef Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV. Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rios J, Insua DR. Adversarial risk analysis for counterterrorism modeling. Risk Anal. 2012;32(5):894–915.CrossRef Rios J, Insua DR. Adversarial risk analysis for counterterrorism modeling. Risk Anal. 2012;32(5):894–915.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly A. Decision making using game theory: an introduction for managers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.CrossRef Kelly A. Decision making using game theory: an introduction for managers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman M. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1953. Friedman M. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1953.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne MJ. An introduction to game theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004. Osborne MJ. An introduction to game theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pita J, Jain M, Tambe M, Ordóñez F, Kraus S. Robust solutions to Stackelberg games: addressing bounded rationality and limited observations in human cognition. Artif Intell. 2010;174(15):1142–71.CrossRef Pita J, Jain M, Tambe M, Ordóñez F, Kraus S. Robust solutions to Stackelberg games: addressing bounded rationality and limited observations in human cognition. Artif Intell. 2010;174(15):1142–71.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaperdas S. Contest success functions. Econ Theory. 1996;7(2):283–90.CrossRef Skaperdas S. Contest success functions. Econ Theory. 1996;7(2):283–90.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tambe M. Security and game theory: algorithms, deployed systems, lessons learned. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef Tambe M. Security and game theory: algorithms, deployed systems, lessons learned. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J. Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal. 2012;32(5):930–43.CrossRef Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J. Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal. 2012;32(5):930–43.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Stengel B, Zamir S. Leadership with commitment to mixed strategies. In: CDAM Research Report LSECDAM-2004-01. London School of Economics; 2004. Von Stengel B, Zamir S. Leadership with commitment to mixed strategies. In: CDAM Research Report LSECDAM-2004-01. London School of Economics; 2004.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guikema SD. Game theory models of intelligent actors in reliability analysis: an overview of the state of the art. Game theoretic risk analysis of security threats. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 13–31. Guikema SD. Game theory models of intelligent actors in reliability analysis: an overview of the state of the art. Game theoretic risk analysis of security threats. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 13–31.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang R. A game-theoretical model to improve process plant protection from terrorist attacks. Risk Anal. 2016;36(12):2285–97.CrossRef Zhang R. A game-theoretical model to improve process plant protection from terrorist attacks. Risk Anal. 2016;36(12):2285–97.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng Q, Cai H, Chen Z, Zhao X, Chen Y. Using game theory to optimize allocation of defensive resources to protect multiple chemical facilities in a city against terrorist attacks. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2016;43:614–28.CrossRef Feng Q, Cai H, Chen Z, Zhao X, Chen Y. Using game theory to optimize allocation of defensive resources to protect multiple chemical facilities in a city against terrorist attacks. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2016;43:614–28.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, Reniers G, Chen B, Qiu X. Integrating the API SRA methodology and game theory for improving chemical plant protection. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2018;51(Suppl C):8–16.CrossRef Zhang L, Reniers G, Chen B, Qiu X. Integrating the API SRA methodology and game theory for improving chemical plant protection. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2018;51(Suppl C):8–16.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intelligent Interaction Modelling: Game Theory
verfasst von
Laobing Zhang
Genserik Reniers
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92618-6_2