Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Review of Black Political Economy 1/2011

01.03.2011

Inter-group Disparities in the Distributional Analysis of Human Development: Concepts, Measurement, and Illustrative Applications

verfasst von: Sreenivasan Subramanian

Erschienen in: The Review of Black Political Economy | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An important feature of most segmented societies is that deprivations and well-being achievements are unequally distributed across well-defined sub-groups of the population, when the latter is partitioned according to a variety of social or geographical categories, such as gender, caste, ethnicity, religion, occupation, sector of origin, or region of domicile. Group disparities are a matter of both instrumental interest in assessing the nature of a society (such as in terms of its propensity for conflict) and intrinsic concern in evaluations of a society’s record of ‘horizontal’ distributive justice. One aspect of a study of population heterogeneity would reside in the measurement of inter-group inequalities in the distribution of a society’s burdens and benefits. It is this aspect of the problem that is reviewed in the present paper. It is useful to note that group inequality can be categorized into different types (which are nevertheless mutually linked by certain commonalities of purpose and motivation), and a particularly instructive taxonomy is available in a recent paper by Arjun Jayadev and Sanjay Reddy (‘Inequalities and Identities’, which is available on the website of the Social Science Research Network, at http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​1162275). The present paper also presents taxonomy of alternative approaches to reckoning group inequality, and discusses a number of real-valued measures of group disparity, mainly based on work in which this author has earlier engaged, by himself or in collaboration.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anand S, Sen A. Gender inequality in human development: theories and measurement. Occasional Paper, 19, Human Development Report Office. New York: UNDP; 1995. Anand S, Sen A. Gender inequality in human development: theories and measurement. Occasional Paper, 19, Human Development Report Office. New York: UNDP; 1995.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson AB. On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory. 1970;2(3):244–63.CrossRef Atkinson AB. On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory. 1970;2(3):244–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bardhan K, Klasen S. UNDP’s gender-related indices: a critical review. World Dev. 1999;27(6):985–1010.CrossRef Bardhan K, Klasen S. UNDP’s gender-related indices: a critical review. World Dev. 1999;27(6):985–1010.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Basu K, Foster JE. On measuring literacy. Econ J. 1998;108(451):1733–49.CrossRef Basu K, Foster JE. On measuring literacy. Econ J. 1998;108(451):1733–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Basu K, Lee T. A new and easy-to-use measure of literacy, its axiomatic properties and an application. Soc Choice Welf. 2009;32(2):181–96.CrossRef Basu K, Lee T. A new and easy-to-use measure of literacy, its axiomatic properties and an application. Soc Choice Welf. 2009;32(2):181–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Basu K, Foster JE, Subramanian S. Isolated and proximate illiteracy and why these concepts matter in measuring literacy and designing education programmes. Econ Polit Wkly. 2000;35(1–2):35–9. Basu K, Foster JE, Subramanian S. Isolated and proximate illiteracy and why these concepts matter in measuring literacy and designing education programmes. Econ Polit Wkly. 2000;35(1–2):35–9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brent RJ. An axiomatic basis for the three objective social welfare function with a poverty context. Econ Lett. 1986;20(1):89–94.CrossRef Brent RJ. An axiomatic basis for the three objective social welfare function with a poverty context. Econ Lett. 1986;20(1):89–94.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowell FA. On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud. 1980;47(3):521–31.CrossRef Cowell FA. On the structure of additive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud. 1980;47(3):521–31.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cowell FA, Kuga K. Additivity and the entropy concept: an axiomatic approach to inequality measurement. J Econ Theory. 1981;25(1):131–43.CrossRef Cowell FA, Kuga K. Additivity and the entropy concept: an axiomatic approach to inequality measurement. J Econ Theory. 1981;25(1):131–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Deshpande A. Caste at birth? Redefining disparity in India. Rev Dev Econ. 2001;5(1):130–44.CrossRef Deshpande A. Caste at birth? Redefining disparity in India. Rev Dev Econ. 2001;5(1):130–44.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan O, Duncan B. A methodological analysis of segregation indices. Am Sociol Rev. 1955;20(2):210–7.CrossRef Duncan O, Duncan B. A methodological analysis of segregation indices. Am Sociol Rev. 1955;20(2):210–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta I. Generalized measures of literacy. Math Soc Sci. 2004;48(1):69–80.CrossRef Dutta I. Generalized measures of literacy. Math Soc Sci. 2004;48(1):69–80.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gibson J. Literacy and intrahousehold externalities. World Dev. 2001;29(1):155–66.CrossRef Gibson J. Literacy and intrahousehold externalities. World Dev. 2001;29(1):155–66.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hicks DA. The inequality-adjusted human development index: a constructive proposal. World Dev. 1997;25(8):1283–98.CrossRef Hicks DA. The inequality-adjusted human development index: a constructive proposal. World Dev. 1997;25(8):1283–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Poverty and discrimination: measurement, and evidence from rural India. In: Harriss-White B, Subramanian S, editors. Illfare in India: essays on India’s social sector in honour of S. Guhan. Delhi: Sage Publishers; 1999. Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Poverty and discrimination: measurement, and evidence from rural India. In: Harriss-White B, Subramanian S, editors. Illfare in India: essays on India’s social sector in honour of S. Guhan. Delhi: Sage Publishers; 1999.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Assessing the “Femaleness” of a population. J Dev Econ. 2000;61(1):271–89.CrossRef Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Assessing the “Femaleness” of a population. J Dev Econ. 2000;61(1):271–89.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Horizontal and vertical inequality: some interconnections and indicators. Soc Indic Res. 2006;75(1):123–39.CrossRef Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Horizontal and vertical inequality: some interconnections and indicators. Soc Indic Res. 2006;75(1):123–39.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Comparing the age structures of populations. Appl Econ Lett. 2007;14(7):533–7.CrossRef Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Comparing the age structures of populations. Appl Econ Lett. 2007;14(7):533–7.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Adjusting headcount deprivation for horizontal and spatial inequality: some illustrative examples using census housing data. Indian J Hum Dev. 2009;2(2):425–34. Jayaraj D, Subramanian S. Adjusting headcount deprivation for horizontal and spatial inequality: some illustrative examples using census housing data. Indian J Hum Dev. 2009;2(2):425–34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins SP, Lambert PJ. Three I’s of poverty curves, with an analysis of UK poverty trends. Oxf Econ Pap. 1997;49:317–27. Jenkins SP, Lambert PJ. Three I’s of poverty curves, with an analysis of UK poverty trends. Oxf Econ Pap. 1997;49:317–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakwani NC. Performance in living standard: an international comparison. J Dev Econ. 1993;41(2):307–36.CrossRef Kakwani NC. Performance in living standard: an international comparison. J Dev Econ. 1993;41(2):307–36.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kanbur R. The policy significance of inequality decompositions. J Econ Inequal. 2006;4(3):367–74.CrossRef Kanbur R. The policy significance of inequality decompositions. J Econ Inequal. 2006;4(3):367–74.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klasen S. UNDP’s gender-related measures: some conceptual problems and possible solutions. J Hum Dev. 2006; 7(2):243–74. Klasen S. UNDP’s gender-related measures: some conceptual problems and possible solutions. J Hum Dev. 2006; 7(2):243–74.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee T. Benchmarking the effective literacy rate. Math Soc Sci. 2008;56(2):233–9.CrossRef Lee T. Benchmarking the effective literacy rate. Math Soc Sci. 2008;56(2):233–9.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Majumdar M, Subramanian S. Capability failure and group disparities: some evidence from India for the 1980s. J Dev Stud. 2001;37(5):104–40.CrossRef Majumdar M, Subramanian S. Capability failure and group disparities: some evidence from India for the 1980s. J Dev Stud. 2001;37(5):104–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra S. On measuring group-differentials displayed by socio-economic indicators: an extension. Appl Econ Lett. 2007;5(12):935–8. Mishra S. On measuring group-differentials displayed by socio-economic indicators: an extension. Appl Econ Lett. 2007;5(12):935–8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra US, Subramanian S. On measuring group-differentials displayed by socio-economic indicators. Appl Econ Lett. 2006;13(8):519–21.CrossRef Mishra US, Subramanian S. On measuring group-differentials displayed by socio-economic indicators. Appl Econ Lett. 2006;13(8):519–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roche JM. Monitoring inequality among social groups: a methodology combining Fuzzy set theory and principal component analysis. J Hum Dev. 2008;9(3):427–52.CrossRef Roche JM. Monitoring inequality among social groups: a methodology combining Fuzzy set theory and principal component analysis. J Hum Dev. 2008;9(3):427–52.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica. 1980;48(3):613–25.CrossRef Shorrocks AF. The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica. 1980;48(3):613–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica. 1984;52(6):1369–85.CrossRef Shorrocks AF. Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica. 1984;52(6):1369–85.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Aggregation issues in inequality measurement. In: Eichhorn W, editor. Measurement in economics: theory and applications in economic indices. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 1988. Shorrocks AF. Aggregation issues in inequality measurement. In: Eichhorn W, editor. Measurement in economics: theory and applications in economic indices. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 1988.
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Revisiting the Sen poverty index. Econometrica. 1995;63(5):1225–30.CrossRef Shorrocks AF. Revisiting the Sen poverty index. Econometrica. 1995;63(5):1225–30.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Deprivation profiles and deprivation indices. In: Jenkins S, Kapteyn A, Vaan Praag B, editors. The distribution of welfare and household production: international perspectives. London: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Shorrocks AF. Deprivation profiles and deprivation indices. In: Jenkins S, Kapteyn A, Vaan Praag B, editors. The distribution of welfare and household production: international perspectives. London: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the shapley value. Mimeo. University of Essex and Institute for Fiscal Studies; 1999. Shorrocks AF. Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the shapley value. Mimeo. University of Essex and Institute for Fiscal Studies; 1999.
Zurück zum Zitat Shorrocks AF. Inequality and welfare evaluation of heterogeneous income distributions. J Econ Inequal. 2004;2(3):193–218.CrossRef Shorrocks AF. Inequality and welfare evaluation of heterogeneous income distributions. J Econ Inequal. 2004;2(3):193–218.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Silber J. On the measurement of employment segregation. Econ Lett. 1989;30(3):237–43.CrossRef Silber J. On the measurement of employment segregation. Econ Lett. 1989;30(3):237–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart F. Horizaontal inequalities: a neglected dimension of development. In: UNU-WIDER: WIDER perspectives on global development. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. Stewart F. Horizaontal inequalities: a neglected dimension of development. In: UNU-WIDER: WIDER perspectives on global development. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. On an index of discrimination. J Soc Econ Dev. 2001;3(2):199–207. Subramanian S. On an index of discrimination. J Soc Econ Dev. 2001;3(2):199–207.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. Measuring literacy: some extensions of the Basu-Foster framework. J Dev Econ. 2004;73(1):453–63.CrossRef Subramanian S. Measuring literacy: some extensions of the Basu-Foster framework. J Dev Econ. 2004;73(1):453–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. Social groups and economic poverty: a problem in measurement. In: McGillivray M, editor. Inequality, poverty, and wellbeing. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006. Subramanian S. Social groups and economic poverty: a problem in measurement. In: McGillivray M, editor. Inequality, poverty, and wellbeing. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. Externality and literacy: a note. J Dev Stud. 2008;44(6):839–48 [Has also appeared in K. Basu, B. Maddox and A. Robinson-Pant (eds.): Interdisciplinary Approaches to Literacy and Development, Routledge, 2009].CrossRef Subramanian S. Externality and literacy: a note. J Dev Stud. 2008;44(6):839–48 [Has also appeared in K. Basu, B. Maddox and A. Robinson-Pant (eds.): Interdisciplinary Approaches to Literacy and Development, Routledge, 2009].CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. Reckoning sub-group poverty differentials in the measurement of aggregate poverty. Pac Econ Rev. 2009a;14(1):46–55.CrossRef Subramanian S. Reckoning sub-group poverty differentials in the measurement of aggregate poverty. Pac Econ Rev. 2009a;14(1):46–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S. Poverty measurement in the presence of a “group affiliation externality”. J Hum Dev. 2009b;10(1):63–76.CrossRef Subramanian S. Poverty measurement in the presence of a “group affiliation externality”. J Hum Dev. 2009b;10(1):63–76.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S, Jayaraj D. The distribution of household wealth in India. In: Davies J, editor. Personal wealth from a global perspective. Clarendon: Oxford University Press; 2008. Subramanian S, Jayaraj D. The distribution of household wealth in India. In: Davies J, editor. Personal wealth from a global perspective. Clarendon: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S, Majumdar M. On measuring deprivation adjusted for group disparities. Soc Choice Welf. 2002;19(2):265–80.CrossRef Subramanian S, Majumdar M. On measuring deprivation adjusted for group disparities. Soc Choice Welf. 2002;19(2):265–80.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Valenti PM. Should we be concerned about the distribution of literacy across households? An axiomatic investigation. CAE Working Paper. Ithaca: Cornell University; 2002. Valenti PM. Should we be concerned about the distribution of literacy across households? An axiomatic investigation. CAE Working Paper. Ithaca: Cornell University; 2002.
Metadaten
Titel
Inter-group Disparities in the Distributional Analysis of Human Development: Concepts, Measurement, and Illustrative Applications
verfasst von
Sreenivasan Subramanian
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The Review of Black Political Economy / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0034-6446
Elektronische ISSN: 1936-4814
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-010-9060-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

The Review of Black Political Economy 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe