Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The purpose of this case study is to delve into the complexities of how preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientations, viewed as an interrelated set of beliefs, interact with the other components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Eight preservice science teachers participated in the study. Qualitative data were collected in the form of content representation, responses to an open-ended instrument, and semi-structured interviews. Preservice teachers’ orientation and PCK were analyzed deductively. Constant comparison analysis of how their orientation interacted with other PCK components revealed three major themes: (1) one’s purpose for science teaching determines the PCK component(s) with which it interacts, (2) a teacher’s beliefs about the nature of science do not directly interact with his/her PCK, unless those beliefs relate directly to the purposes of teaching science, and (3) beliefs about science teaching and learning mostly interact with knowledge of instructional strategies. Implications for science teacher education and research are discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1151). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Alonzo, A. C., & Kim, J. (2015). Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi: 10.1002/tea.21271
Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Tarkın, A., Kutucu, S., Ekiz, B., Akın, F. N., … Uzuntiryaki, E. (2013). Providing a set of research-based practices to support preservice teachers’ long-term professional development as learners of science teaching. Science Education, 97, 903–935. doi: 10.1002/sce.21080 CrossRef
Boesdorfer, S. (2015). Using teachers’ choice of representations to understand the translation of their orientation towards science teaching to their practice. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 19(1). Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/13871/9357
Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121–139. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<121:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-U CrossRef
Campbell, T., Zuwallack, R., Longhurst, M., Shelton, B. E., & Wolf, P. G. (2014). An examination of the changes in science teaching orientations and technology-enhanced tools for student learning in the context of professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 1815–1848. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.879622 CrossRef
Cochran, K. F., King, R. A., & De Ruiter, J. A. (1991). Pedagogical content knowledge: A tentative model for teacher preparation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Cooper, R., Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2015). Understanding sophisticated practice. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 60–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Hug, B., Nelson, M., Beyer, C., Schwarz, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). MoDeLS: Designing supports for teachers using scientific modeling. Paper presented at the Association for Science Teacher Education, St. Louis, MO.
Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Köseoğlu, F. (2015b). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-015-9472-z. (Advance online publication).
Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 357–383. doi: 10.1002/tea.20283 CrossRef
Friedrichsen, P. M., Lankford, D., Brown, P., Pareja, E., Volkmann, M., & Abell, S. K. (2007). The PCK of future science teachers in an alternative certification program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kember, D., & Gow, L. (1994). Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(1), 58–74. CrossRef
Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., & Upson, L. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 287–308. CrossRef
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of the nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034 CrossRef
Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners’ understandings about scientific inquiry—The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 65–83. doi: 10.1002/tea.21125 CrossRef
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). New York, NY: Sage.
Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2). Retrieved from http://www.scholarlyexchange.org/ojs/index.php/EJSE/article/download/7794/5561
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
Marshall, G. B., & Rossman, C. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). London: Sage.
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Musikul, K., & Abell, S. K. (2009). Professional development for elementary teachers of science in Thailand: A holistic examination. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove, CA.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Putnam, T. R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views on cognition. In B. Biddle, T. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. CrossRef
Roberts, D. A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemma in science education (pp. 27–54). Barcecome: Falmer Press.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2008). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Baltimore, MD.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. CrossRef
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and training: Foundations of the new reform. Hardward Educational Review, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673:AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J CrossRef
Walter, E. M. (2013). The influence of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for teaching macroevolution on student outcomes in a general education biology course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Interaction Between Science Teaching Orientation and Pedagogical Content Knowledge Components
- Springer Netherlands
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia