1 Introduction
2 3D scene reconstruction basics
2.1 Structured-light 3D scanner
2.2 “U-depth” representation
2.3 Ground plane estimation
2.4 Depth map preprocessing
-
regions of the ground plane,
-
regions in the background (\(z>5\) m),
-
regions for which the distance from the ground plane is larger than the pre-selected value (i.e. higher than user’s height).
3 The system and its multimodal interface
3.1 Multimodal user interface
3.2 Interactive sonification mode
3.3 Proximity mode
3.4 Verbal mode: distance detector
4 Mobility tests of the system: results and discussion
4.1 Test participants and test plan
4.2 Walking along an empty corridor: Test 1
No | Question | Tester | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Q1 | I do not need much training to complete the task successfully | 4 | 3 | 5 |
Q2 | I am satisfied with the ease of completing this tasks while using the device | 4 | 4 | 5 |
Q3 | The system is a helpful tool in solving this type of task | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q4 | I am satisfied with the amount of time it took me to complete the task | 4 | 5 | 5 |
Average score | 3.75 | 4.00 | 5.00 |
No | Question | Tester | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Q1 | I do not need much training to complete the task successfully | 4 | 2 | 5 |
Q2 | I am satisfied with the ease of completing this tasks while using the device | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Q3 | The system is a helpful tool in solving this type of task | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Q4 | I am satisfied with the amount of time it took me to complete the task | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Average score | 3.25 | 3.50 | 4.75 |
4.3 Walking along a corridor with obstacles: Test 2
No | Question | Tester | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Q1 | I do not need much training to complete the task successfully | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Q2 | I am satisfied with the ease of completing this tasks while using the device | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Q3 | The system is a helpful tool in solving this type of task | 3 | 5 | 5 |
Q4 | I am satisfied with the amount of time it took me to complete the task | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Average score | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.75 |
Tester Id | Test time [s] | Modes | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interactive | Proximity | Verbal | ||||
Time [s] | Share [%] | Time [s] | Share [%] | Readings [pcs] | ||
Test 1: empty corridor | ||||||
Tester 1 | 269 | 242 | 90.14 | 26 | 9.86 | 1 |
Tester 2 | 176 | 80 | 45.68 | 96 | 54.32 | 22 |
Tester 3 | 104 | 91 | 87.34 | 13 | 12.66 | 5 |
Test 2: corridor with boxes | ||||||
Tester 1 | 102 | 78 | 76.65 | 23 | 23.35 | 12 |
Tester 2 | 70 | 39 | 55.69 | 31 | 44.31 | 12 |
Tester 3 | 67 | 55 | 82.22 | 11 | 17.78 | 7 |
Test 3: door finding | ||||||
Tester 1 | 30 | 19 | 64.90 | 10 | 35.10 | 1 |
Tester 2 | 54 | 32 | 59.97 | 21 | 40.03 | 6 |
Tester 3 | 28 | 26 | 94.38 | 1 | 5.62 | 1 |
4.4 Locating an open space and walking through it: Test 3
No | Question | Tester | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Q1 | I think that I would like to use this system frequently | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Q2 | I found the system unnecessarily complex | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Q3 | I thought the system was easy to use | 4 | 5 | 5 |
Q4 | I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Q5 | I found the various functions in this system were well integrated | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Q6 | I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Q7 | I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly | 4 | 5 | 4 |
Q8 | I found the system very cumbersome to use | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Q9 | I felt very confident using the system | 3 | 3 | 5 |
Q10 | I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Overall score | 67.5% | 72.5% | 95.0% |
-
the testers find the system easy to use and conclude that it does not require any long and specialised training or a dedicated person support (note that the blind test participants are familiar with mobile phones with touch screens),
-
system ergonomic properties were highly graded by the testers (the testers did not complain about the weight of the depth camera placed on the head),
-
the testers noted that the system functions were well integrated and easily accessible,
-
only Tester 3 felt very confident while using the system, the other testers ranked the system functionality as satisfactory,
-
the best system usability score was given by Tester 3, i.e. the congenitally blind participant of the conducted tests.