Skip to main content

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Argentina

verfasst von : María Blanca Noodt Taquela

Erschienen in: Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The Convention has not been the subject of much criticism in Argentina. The principal difficulty surrounding the application of the Convention concerns the lack of uniformity in its application. That is to say, a great number of Argentine courts are not aware of the need to interpret the Convention in light of its international character, and have shown a certain homeward trend. Argentine courts often compare the Convention’s provisions against domestic law, and apply either the rules of the Convention or domestic law accordingly. Yet on occasions, Argentine courts do not consistently apply the Convention or its provisions correctly. In general, however, Argentine courts have applied the Convention in a satisfactory way, and with a favorable trend to recognition of foreign arbitral awards.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Act No 23.619, 28 September 1988, available at www.​infoleg.​gob.​ar.
 
2
Some commercial matters are defined by special provisions, such as Article 8 of the Commercial Code (adopted in 1862, with amendments in 1889) available in Spanish at www.​infoleg.​gov.​ar, while many other commercial matters are scattered across the Argentine legal system. See MB Noodt Taquela, El Arbitraje en Argentina (Montevideo, Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje de la Bolsa de Comercio de Uruguay, 2000) 3–37.
 
3
HA Grigera Naon, “Ratificación por la Argentina de la Convención de Nueva York de 1958 sobre reconocimiento y ejecución de laudos arbitrales y extranjeros” in La Ley, vol 1989-C, 881.
 
4
Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación v Tribunal Arbitral, National Contentious-Administrative Court of Appeals, Chamber II, 25 October 2011 (Arbitration No 12364 CCI-Exp 111-195270/95) in La Ley (26 April 2012). Commentary by RJ Caivano in La Ley, vol 2012-C, 35.
 
5
Papel Tucuman SA (en quiebra) v Estado Nacional (República Argentina), International Arbitration Court of the International Commercial Chamber (Case No 12364/KGA/CCA/JRF); Papel del Tucumán SA v Banade s ordinario, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber A, 29 April 2010, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2011/​08/​papel-del-tucuman-sa-c-banade.​html.
 
6
Forever Livings Products Argentina SRL v Beas, Juan s/sumario, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber B, 11 April 2002 (Dictamen Fiscal No 87899) in La Ley, vol 2003-C, 676, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2007/​03/​forever-living-products-argentina-srl.​html.
 
7
RJ Caivano, “La Convención de Nueva York y la ejecución de las medidas cautelares” in S Coaguila and C Alberto (directors), Comercial Arbitration and Investment Arbitration—New York Convention of 1958. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards (Peruvian Arbitration Institute, Ed Magna, 2009) 25–59.
 
8
Law No 24.322, 11 May 1994 (approving the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration) available at www.​infoleg.​gob.​ar/​infolegInternet/​anexos/​0-4999/​724/​norma.​htm.
 
10
Reef Exploration Inc v Compañía General de Combustibles SA, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber D, 5 November 2002 in La Ley, vol 2003-E, 937, and also in El Derecho (19 June 2003) 5. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela, DeCita 1.2004, Buenos Aires, 344–46.
 
11
Basf Argentina SA v Capdeville & Kay y Cía SA, National Supreme Court of Justice, 11 May 2004, available in www.​csjn.​gov.​ar. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela and JC Córdoba, AV Villa “Crónica de jurisprudencia sobre arbitraje en Argentina” (2005) 1 Revista Latinoamericana de Mediación y Arbitraje 72, available at www.​med-arb.​net/​archives.​html.
 
12
Compañía Naviera Pérez Companc SA y otro v Ecofisa SA y otro, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber B, 21 December 1990 (General Secretary Opinion) in La Ley, vol 1994-A, 139. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela, El arbitraje en Argentina (Montevideo, Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje—Corte de Arbitraje Internacional para el Mercosur, Bolsa de Comercio, 2000) 27–33.
 
13
Akzo Nobel Coating SA v Cámara Argentina de Comercio, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber C, 11 March 2003, in El Derecho, vol 205, 162. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela, Reseña de jurisprudencia sobre arbitraje comercial internacional”, DeCita 03.2005, Buenos Aires, 377–78.
 
14
R Fernandez and OR Gomez Leo, Tratado teórico-práctico de derecho comercial, T.1 (Buenos Aires, Ed Depalma, 1993). Commentary by RJ Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje (Buenos Aires, Ed Abeledo Perrot, 2011) 332.
 
15
Pagano, Gerardo v Gobierno de la Nación, National Supreme Court of Justice, 12 November 1920, Fallos 133:61; SA Puerto del Rosario v Gobierno Nacional, National Supreme Court of Justice, 25 September 1928, Fallos 152:347; Compañia Argentina de Navegacion Nicolas Mihanovich Ltda v Fisco, Nacional National Supreme Court of Justice, 18 March 1931, Fallos 160:133; Compañía Italo Argentina de Electricidad v Nacion Argentina, National Supreme Court of Justice, 16 August, 1937, Fallos 178:293; Empresa Constructora FH Schmidt SA v Provincia de San Juan, National Supreme Court of Justice, 24 August 1938, Fallos 181:306. All judgments cited by Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 334.
 
16
Provincia de Buenos Aires v Otto Franke y Cia, National Supreme Court of Justice, 18 August 1922, Fallos 137:33. Judgment cited by Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 336.
 
17
Armada Holland Bv Schiedam Denmark v Inter Fruit SA, National Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals, Chamber 2, 8 May 2007, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2008/​04/​armada-holland-bv-schiedam-denmark-c.​html. Commentary by Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 339–40. See also MB Noodt Taquela and C Gonzalez Johansen, “Reseña de jurisprudencia sobre arbitraje”, DeCita 09.2003, Buenos Aires, 335.
 
18
Reef Exploration Inc v Compañía General de Combustibles SA, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber D, 5 November 2002, in La Ley, vol 2003-E, 937, and also in El Derecho (19 June 2003) 5. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela, DeCita 1.2004, Buenos Aires, 344–46.
 
19
Galapesca SA s/conc Prev s/exequatur por Kkerchrybprom, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber A, 31 October 2002. Commentary in Latin American Journal for Mediation and Arbitration, vol V, no 1, 98, and also by Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 345.
 
20
Forever Livings Products Argentina SRL v Beas Juan s/sumario, National Commercial Court of Appeals, Buenos Aires, Chamber B, 11 April 2002 (Fiscal Judgment No 87899) available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2007/​03/​forever-living-products-argentina-srl.​html.
 
21
Reef Exploration Inc v Compañía General de Combustibles SA, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber D, 5 November 2002, in La Ley, vol 2003-E, 937, also in El Derecho (19 June 2003) 5. Commentary by MB Noodt Taquela, DeCita 1.2004, Buenos Aires, 344–46, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2007/​03/​reef-exploration-inc-c-compaa-general.​html.
 
22
American Restaurantes Inc v Outback Steakhouse Int, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber C, 14 May 2010, in El Derecho, no 12.725 (4 July 2011). Commentary by Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 363.
 
23
Papel de Tucumán SA v Banade, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber A, 29 April 2010. Commentary by R Caivano, “El plazo para laudar y el carácter supletorio de las normas legales en el arbitraje institucional”, 2008-A Revista de Derecho Comercial y de las Obligaciones 813. See also Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 361.
 
24
Schnabel, Gaumer & Co v Sepselon E, National Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires, Chamber B, 21 April 1971, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2007/​03/​schnabel-gaumer-co.​html.
 
25
Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 367.
 
26
MB Noodt Taquela and J Cordoba, Guia práctica para la ejecución de laudos en America Latina in Crimonology and Law School; see also E Zuleta Jaramillo and A Zuleta Londoño, “El artículo VI de la Convención de Nueva York” in GS Tawil and E Zuleta (directors), El arbitraje comercial internacional: Estudio de la Convención de Nueva York con motivo de su 50° aniversario (Buenos Aires, Ed Abeledo Perrot, 2008) 627.
 
27
Otondo Cesar v Cortina Beruatto SA, National Commercial Court of Appeals of the Buenos Aires, Chamber E, 6 November 2003, in Jurisprudencia Argentina Report, vol 2003-IV, 73. See also KCK Tissue Sa v Citibank NA Nassau, National Commercial Court of Appeals of the Buenos Aires, Chamber A, 28 July 2005, in Lexis Nexis Online, no 11/39943. Commentary for the former case by MB Noodt Taquela, “Reseña de jurisprudencia sobre arbitraje comercial internacional”, DeCita 01.2004, Buenos Aires, 393–95.
 
28
Jose Cartellone Construcciones Civiles SA v Hidroeléctrica Norpatagónica SA o Hidronor SA, National Supreme Court of Justice, 1 June 2004, in La Ley (8 April 2004) 5–6, and also in Jurisprudencia Argentina Report, vol 2004-III, Fascicle 7.
 
29
Ogden Entertainment Services Inc v Eijo, Néstor E, National Commercial Court of Appeals, Buenos Aires, Chamber E, 20 September 2004, in La Ley, vol 2005-B, 21, available at fallos.diprargentina.​com/​2006/​12/​ogden-entertainment-services-inc-c-eijo.​html. See also Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje, 392–94.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat R Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje (Abeledo Perrot, 2011). R Caivano, Control judicial en el arbitraje (Abeledo Perrot, 2011).
Zurück zum Zitat R Caivano, Arbitraje (2nd. Ed., Ad Hoc. 2000). R Caivano, Arbitraje (2nd. Ed., Ad Hoc. 2000).
Zurück zum Zitat M B Noodt Taquela, El arbitraje en la Argentina (Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje de la Bolsa de Comercio de Uruguay, 2000). M B Noodt Taquela, El arbitraje en la Argentina (Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje de la Bolsa de Comercio de Uruguay, 2000).
Zurück zum Zitat J C Rivera, Arbitraje Comercial, internacional y doméstico (2nd. Ed., Abeledo Perrot, 2014). J C Rivera, Arbitraje Comercial, internacional y doméstico (2nd. Ed., Abeledo Perrot, 2014).
Zurück zum Zitat G Tawil, E Zuleta, El arbitraje comercial internacional: Estudio de la Convención de Nueva York con motivo de su 50º aniversario (Abeledo Perrot, 2008). G Tawil, E Zuleta, El arbitraje comercial internacional: Estudio de la Convención de Nueva York con motivo de su 50º aniversario (Abeledo Perrot, 2008).
Metadaten
Titel
Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Argentina
verfasst von
María Blanca Noodt Taquela
Copyright-Jahr
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0_2