Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden.
powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden.
powered by
Abstract
This chapter, by synthesizing the results of previous chapters, analyzes Japanese history of the relationship between economy and the environment.
In the 1960s, the economy-environment nexus, characterized by consuming an increasing amount of environmental resources with low costs, contributed to the growth regime of the high-growth era.
In the 1970s, driven by local residents’ campaigns and the oil crisis, institutions for pollution abatement and energy-saving were formulated. In spite of their costs, they positively impacted growth by reducing energy importation, inducing investments, and enhancing technological competitiveness. This can be considered as an example of Green Growth.
After that, the powers of actors requesting environmental measures became weaker as damages went temporally and spatially afar. Moreover, global competition took priority over other domains of institutional coordination.
In the 1990s, public awareness and international movements led to progress in the formulation of environmental institutions, although most of them emphasized voluntariness and flexibility and did not involve a significant increase in production costs.
After 2008, institutions, such as stimulus measures aiming at Green Growth, began to be introduced under cooperation between actors on the economic and environmental sides. Stimulus measures cannot last long under budgetary constraints. Policies involving an increase in costs can form stable institutions, and would probably impact the growth positively, though the introduction of such policies depends on how the scope of cooperation between actors can be extended.
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.
It should be noted that there are various views on the Fordist regime in Japan as to whether it was working, and if so, what type it was (Yamada 2008).
Behind this political leadership were said to be not only a personal awareness of high levels of environmental problems, but also an intention to extend their political powers into emerging policy areas and potential businesses (Murai 2001).
For example, Greenpeace ran a campaign in 2010 calling for a boycott on Nestlé products, saying that the palm oil used therein was causing deforestation in Indonesia. This made Nestlé establish a procurement policy to use sustainable resources. They also urged other global companies using palm oil to take appropriate actions and evaluated them in a ranking.
For example, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment has been promoting locally led renewable energy projects by various policies, including the establishment of a fund (the Green Fund) to invest in such projects.
Motani et al. (2013) introduced various locally led projects generating values by utilizing natural resources in countryside forest areas (“Satoyama” in Japanese), calling them “Satoyama capitalism.”
More precisely, there was a short period of an unstable regime of “intensive accumulation without mass-consumption” after the First World War (Boyer 1986).