nach oben

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in:

Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

11. Interweaving Incentives and Disincentives for Construction Dispute Negotiation Settlement

verfasst von : Sen Lin

Erschienen in: Construction Incentivization

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Abstract

What incentives and disincentives motivate negotiators to settle or not in a construction dispute negotiation (CDN)? A thorough literature review is conducted on this subject to identify the antecedents of negotiators’ intention to settle (ITS) in CDN. Three relevant constructs are identified: motivation (i.e., prosocial and proself motive), cognition (i.e., justice and power), and psychological bonding (i.e., trust and shared vision). Categorically, this study finds that in the negotiation context, negotiators having a prosocial motive and perceiving justice about the negotiation process and outcome can stimulate negotiators’ ITS, which can be seen as incentives; however, the proself motive and perceived power advantage would serve the opposite, thus can be classified as disincentives. In addition, cumulated trust and shared vision during the project collaboration can also play an incentive role in promoting negotiators’ intention. As a result, this study develops a link between the incentive/disincentive (I/D) and negotiators’ intention to settle through the literature review. A better understanding of these agents of I/D can help explain negotiation conditions and negotiators’ decisions whereby appropriate negotiation strategies can be devised.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel The Role of Incentivization to Mitigate the Negative Impact of COVID-Related Disputes

Nächstes Kapitel Voluntary Participation as an Incentive of Construction Dispute Mediation—A Reality Check

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experiment Social Psychology, 2(C), 267–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2.

Aibinu, A. A., Ling, F. Y. Y., & Ofori, G. (2011). Structural equation modelling of organizational justice and cooperative behaviour in the construction project claims process: Contractors’ perspectives. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.564195 CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n22 CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995 CrossRef

Al-Zu’bi, H. A. (2010). A Study of relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Internationa of Journal Business Management, 5(12), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n12p102

Anderson, C., & Thompson, L. L. (2004). Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals’ positive affect shapes negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.05.002 CrossRef

Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022814 CrossRef

Arcadis. (2021). 2021 Global Construction Disputes Report The road to early resolution.

Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining: Power, tactics, and outcomes.

Bankvall, L., Bygballe, L. E., Dubois, A., & Jahre, M. (2010). Interdependence in supply chains and projects in construction. Supply Chain Management, 15(5), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541011068314 CrossRef

Bayles, M. E. (2012). Procedural justice: Allocating to individuals. Springer Science & Business Media.

Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 279–314. CrossRef

Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. 2(002). Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule, and social motive. Organization Behaviour and Human Decision Processess, 87(2), 227–252. Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2964.

Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2005). Conflict’s consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.358 CrossRef

Bies, R. J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negot. Organ., 1, 43–55.

Blau, P. (2017). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge. CrossRef

Brett, J. M. (2000). Culture and negotiation. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2015-0230 CrossRef

Brett, J., & Thompson, L. (2016). Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.003 CrossRef

Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2006). The effects of cognitive appraisal and emotion on social motive and negotiation behavior: The critical role of agency of negotiator emotion. Human Performance, 19(4), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1904_1 CrossRef

Caniëls, M. C. J., & Gelderman, C. J. (2007). Power and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships: A purchasing portfolio approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.08.012 CrossRef

Caputo, A. (2013). A literature review of cognitive biases in negotiation processes. International Journal of Conflict Management.

Carnevale, P. J., & Lawler, E. J. (1986). Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(4), 636–659. CrossRef

Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300–1309. CrossRef

Casady, C. B., & Baxter, D. (2020). Pandemics, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and force majeure | COVID-19 expectations and implications. Construction Managament Economics, 38(12), 1077–1085. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2020.1817516.

Cheung, S. (1999). Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00027-1 CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., & Chow, P. T. (2011). Withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000388 CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., Chow, P. T., & Yiu, T. W. (2009). Contingent use of negotiators’ tactics in construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(6), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2009)135:6(466) CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., & Pang, K. H. Y. (2013). Anatomy of construction disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000532 CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. H., & Lam, T. I. (2002). Fundamentals of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(409) CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., Wong, W. K., Yiu, T. W., & Pang, H. Y. (2011). Developing a trust inventory for construction contracting. International Journal Project Management, 29(2): 184–196. Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.007.

Cheung, S. O., & Yiu, T. W. (2006). Are construction disputes inevitable? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.877445 CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., & Lam, M. C. (2013). Interweaving trust and communication with project performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000681 CrossRef

Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., & Yeung, S. F. (2006). A study of styles and outcomes in construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), 871–881. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132 CrossRef

Chi, M., Chong, H.-Y., & Xu, Y. (2022). The effects of shared vision on value co-creation in megaprojects: A multigroup analysis between clients and main contractors. International Journal Project Management, (January). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.01.008.

Chinowsky, P., Taylor, J. E., & Di Marco, M. (2011). Project network interdependency alignment: New approach to assessing project effectiveness. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(3), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000048 CrossRef

Christen, C. T. (2004). Predicting willingness to negotiate: The effects of perceived power and trustworthiness in a model of strategic public relations. Journal Public Relations Research, 16(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1532-754X.2004.11925129 CrossRef

Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2013). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. Handbook of Organizational Justice, 3–56. Psychology Press.

Converse, S., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual Group Decision Market Current Issues, 221, 221–246.

Cuevas, J. M., Julkunen, S., & Gabrielsson, M. (2015).“Power symmetry and the development of trust in interdependent relationships: The mediating role of goal congruence. Industrial Market Management, 48, 149–159. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.015.

Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283. CrossRef

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Hum. Relations, 2(2), 129–152. CrossRef

Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. Yale University Press.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 CrossRef

De Dreu, C. K., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 889–905. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35I4.78.5.889 CrossRef

De Dreu, C. K. W. (1995). Coercive power and concession making in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(4), 646–670. CrossRef

De Dreu, C. K. W. (2004). Motivation in negotiation: A social psychological analysis. Handbook Negotiation Culture, 114–135.

De Dreu, C. K. W., & Carnevale, P. J. (2003). Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 235–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(99)00465-6 CrossRef

De Dreu, C. K. W., Giebels, E., & Van De Vliert, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.408 CrossRef

Druckman, D., & Wagner, L. M. (2016). Justice and negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(August), 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033308 CrossRef

Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.57.12806 CrossRef

Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependency relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41. CrossRef

Emerson, R. M. (1964). Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 282–298.

Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin.

Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.5465/256422 CrossRef

Ganesan, S., & Hess, R. (1997). Dimensions and Levels of Trust: For Implications to a Relationship Commitment. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 439–448. CrossRef

Gelfand, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2845 CrossRef

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3c203::AID-SMJ102%3e3.0.CO;2-K CrossRef

Gunia, B. C., Brett, J. M., Nandkeolyar, A. K., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Paying a price: Culture, trust, and negotiation consequences. Journal Application Psychology, 96 (4), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/2Fa0021986.

Guo, W., Lu, W., Hao, L., & Gao, X. (2021). Interdependence and information exchange between conflicting parties: The role of interorganizational trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3047499

Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: An examination of predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal Sport Exercise Psychology, 24(1), 3–32. 20.500.11937/10206.

Hartman, F. T. (2002). The role of trust in project management. Front. Project Management Research Square, Pennsylvania, PMI, 225–235.

Jacobson, C., & Choi, S. O. (2008). Success factors: Public works and public-private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(6), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810896514 CrossRef

Jagannathan, M., & Delhi, V. S. K. (2020). Litigation in construction contracts: Literature review. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(1), 03119001. CrossRef

Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macaulay, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Green, L. W., Herbert, C. P., & Pluye, P. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1–11. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.

Johari, S., & Jha, K. N. (2020). Interrelationship among belief, intention, attitude, behavior, and performance of construction workers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000851 CrossRef

Jordan, J., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Something to lose and nothing to gain: The role of stress in the interactive effect of power and stability on risk taking. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 530–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212441928 CrossRef

Kadefors, A. (2005). Fairness in interorganizational project relations: Norms and strategies. Construction Management and Economics, 23(8), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184238 CrossRef

Karlsen, J. T., Grae, K., & Massaoud, M. J. (2008). The role of trust in project-stakeholder relationships: A study of a construction project. International Journal Project Organization Management, 1(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2008.020031 CrossRef

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265. CrossRef

Kim, P. H., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Choosing the path to bargaining power: An empirical comparison of BATNAs and contributions in negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.373 CrossRef

Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.320 CrossRef

Kleiman, T., Sher, N., Elster, A., & Mayo, R.(2015). Accessibility is a matter of trust: Dispositional and contextual distrust blocks accessibility effects. Cognition, 142, 333–344. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.001.

Koh, T. Y., & Rowlinson, S. (2012). Relational approach in managing construction project safety: A social capital perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 134–144. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.020.

Kwon, I. W. G., & Suh, T. (2005). Trust, commitment and relationships in supply chain management: A path analysis. Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510578351 CrossRef

Lawler, E. J. (1986). Bilateral deterrence and conflict spiral: A theoretical analysis. Graphical Processes, 3, 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0882-6145_2014_0000031014 CrossRef

Lawler, E. J., Ford, R. S., & Blegen, M. A. (1988). Coercive capability in conflict: A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 93–107. CrossRef

Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., Minton, J. W., Roy, J., & Lewicki, N. (2011). Essentials of negotiation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Li, B., Gao, Y., Zhang, S., & Wang, C. (2021). Understanding the effects of trust and conflict event criticality on conflict resolution behavior in construction projects: Mediating role of social motives. Journal Management Engineering, 37(6): 04021066. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000962.

Li, L. (2005). The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries’ intra- and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review, 14(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.12.005 CrossRef

Lin, S., & Cheung, S. O. (2021). Analyzing intention to settle in construction dispute negotiation. Creation Construction Conference 2021. Opatija.

Lind, E. A., Ambrose, M., & Park, M. V. D. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution : using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 224–251.

Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.

Liu, J., Geng, L., Xia, B., & Bridge, A. (2017). Never let a good crisis go to waste: Exploring the effects of psychological distance of project failure on learning intention. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000513 CrossRef

Liu, J., Lin, S., & Feng, Y. (2018). Understanding why Chinese contractors are not willing to purchase construction insurance. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 25(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2016-0186 CrossRef

Loosemore, M. (1999). A grounded theory of construction crisis management. Construction Management and Economics, 17(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371781 CrossRef

Love, P., Davis, P., Ellis, J., & Cheung, S. O. (2010). Dispute causation: Identification of pathogenic influences in construction. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 17(4), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011056592 CrossRef

Love, P. E. D., Davis, P. R., Cheung, S. O., & Irani, Z. (2011). Causal discovery and inference of project disputes. IEEE Transactions Engineering Management, 58(3), 400–411. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2010.2048907.

Lu, W., Li, Z., & Wang, S. (2017). The role of justice for cooperation and contract’s moderating effect in construction dispute negotiation. Engineering Construction Architcture Management, 24 (1): 133–153. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2015-0002.

Lu, W., Zhang, L., & Li, Z. (2015). Influence of negotiation risk attitude and power on behaviors and outcomes when negotiating construction claims. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000927 CrossRef

Luo, Y. (2007). The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25526452 CrossRef

Macfarlane, J. (2001). Why do people settle? McGill Law J., 46(3), 663–711.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). The self-reinforcing nature of social hierarchy: Origins and consequences of power and status. IACM 21st Annual Conference Paper.

Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (1993). Power imbalance and the pattern of exchange in dyadic negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01884767 CrossRef

Maqsoom, A., Wazir, S. J., Choudhry, R. M., Thaheem, M. J., & Zahoor, H. (2020). Influence of perceived fairness on contractors’ potential to dispute: moderating effect of engineering ethics. Journal Construction Engineering Management, 146(1): 04019090. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001740.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. CrossRef

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727 CrossRef

McClintock, C. (1977). Social motives in settings of outcome interdependence. Negotional Social Psychology Perspective, 49–77.

Mitropoulos, P., & Howell, G. (2001). Model for understanding, preventing and resolving project disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:3(223) CrossRef

Molm, L. D. (2015). Power-dependence theory. Blackwell Encyclogy Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp082.pub2.

Nahapiet, J., & Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. CrossRef

Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Jossey-Bass.

Newell, W. J., Ellegaard, C., & Esbjerg, L. (2019). The effects of goodwill and competence trust on strategic information sharing in buyer–supplier relationships. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2017-0035 CrossRef

Parkhill, K. A., Shirani, F., Butler, C., Henwood, K. L., Groves, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2015). We are a community [but] that takes a certain amount of energy’: Exploring shared visions, social action, and resilience in place-based community-led energy initiatives. Environment Science Policy, 53, 60–69. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014.

Patton, C., & Balakrishnan, P. V. S. (2010). The impact of expectation of future negotiation interaction on bargaining processes and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 63(8), 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.07.002.

Pearce, C. L., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.235 CrossRef

Pinto, J. K., Slevin, D. P., & English, B. (2009). Trust in projects: An empirical assessment of owner/contractor relationships. International Journal Project Management, 27(6): 638–648. Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.09.010.

Piskorski, M. J., & Casciaro, T. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. CrossRef

Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Strategic choice in negotiation. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(2), 167–194. MathSciNetCrossRef

Qu, Y., & Cheung, S. O. (2012). Logrolling ‘win-win’ settlement in construction dispute mediation. Automation in Construction, 24, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.010 CrossRef

Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Acadmics Journal Management, 26(2), 368–376.

Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Harvard University Press.

RICS. (2021). More common, more costly: Is COVID-19 causing conflict in the construction sector? https://www.rics.org/es/wbef/megatrends/markets-geopolitics/more-common-more-costly-is-covid-19-causing-conflict-in-the-construction-sector/.

Ring, P. S. (1996). Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in economic exchange. Business & Society, 35(2), 148–175. CrossRef

Rodríguez, C. M., & Wilson, D. T. (2002). Relationship bonding and trust as a foundation for commitment in U.S.-Mexican strategic alliances: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Marketing, 10(4), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.10.4.53.19553 CrossRef

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. CrossRef

Rupp, D. E., & Spencer, S. (2006). When customers lash out: The effects of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 971. CrossRef

Senescu, R. R., Aranda-Mena, G., & Haymaker, J. R. (2013). Relationships between project complexity and communication. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(2), 183–197. CrossRef

Shaver, K. G. (2012). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer Science & Business Media.

Shenhar, A., & Holzmann, V. (2017). The three secrets of megaproject success: Clear strategic vision, total alignment, and adapting to complexity. Project Management Journal, 48(6), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281704800604 CrossRef

Sondak, H., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90031-N CrossRef

Tajima, M., & Fraser, N. M. (2001). Logrolling procedure for multi-issue negotiation. Graphical Decision Negotiation, 10(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011262625052 CrossRef

Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 241–260.

Tatum, B. C., & Eberlin, R. J. (2008). The relationship between organizational justice and conflict style. Business Strategy Series, 9(6), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515630810923603 CrossRef

Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.

Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.515 CrossRef

Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458 CrossRef

Thoms, P., & Greenberger, D. B. (1995). Training business leaders to create positive organizational visions of the future: Is it successful? Acad. Manag., 1, 212–216.

Tost, L. P. (2015). When, why, and how do powerholders ‘feel the power’? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility. Research Organication Behaviour, 35, 29–56. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.004.

Treacy, T. B. (1995). Use of alternative dispute resolution in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 11(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203859926.ch125 CrossRef

Trötschel, R., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2007). Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.002 CrossRef

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1985). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Behaviour Decision Market, 25–41. Spring, Boston.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365 CrossRefMATH

Tyler, T., & Blader, S. (2013). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Routledge. CrossRef

Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830 CrossRef

Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (2015). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. Application Social Psychology Organization settings, 77–98. Psychology Press.

Wang, G., Locatelli, G., Wan, J., Li, Y., & Le, Y. (2021). Governing behavioral integration of top management team in megaprojects: A social capital perspective. International Journal Project Management, 39(4), 365–376. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.11.005.

Wei, Q., & Luo, X. (2012). The impact of power differential and social motivation on negotiation behavior and outcome. Public Personal Management, 41(5), 47–58. CrossRef

Wolfe, R. J., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Perceived relative power and its influence on negotiations. Group Decision Negotiation, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-3873-8 CrossRef

Wong, P. S. P., & Cheung, S. O. (2004). Trust in construction partnering: Views from parties of the partnering dance. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.001 CrossRef

Wong, R. S. (2014). Same power but different goals: how does knowledge of opponents’ power affect negotiators’ aspiration in power-asymmetric negotiations? Global Journal Business Research, 8(3), 77–89.

Woolthuis, R. K., Hillebrand, B., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Trust, contract and relationship development. Organization Studies, 26(6), 813–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054594 CrossRef

Wu, M. Y., Weng, Y. C., & Huang, I. C. (2012). A study of supply chain partnerships based on the commitment-trust theory. Asia Pacific Journal Market Logistics, 24(4), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555851211259098 CrossRef

Yiu, T. W., Cheung, S. O., & Chow, P. T. (2008). Logistic regression modeling of construction negotiation outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(3), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.922630 CrossRef

Yiu, T. W., Cheung, S. O., & Lok, C. L. (2015). A fuzzy fault tree framework of construction dispute negotiation failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2407369 CrossRef

Yiu, T. W., Liu, T., & Kwok, L. C. (2018). Explicating the role of relationship in construction claim negotiations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001431 CrossRef

Youngblood, S. A., Trevino, L. K., & Favia, M. (1992). Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party dispute resolution: A justice framework. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 5(4), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01388306 CrossRef

Yousefi, S., Hipel, K. W., & Hegazy, T. (2010). Attitude-based negotiation methodology for the management of construction disputes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26(3), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000013 CrossRef

Yuan, H., Wu, H., & Zuo, J. (2018). Understanding factors influencing project managers’ behavioral intentions to reduce waste in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(6), 04018031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000642 CrossRef

Zhang, L., Fu, Y., & Lu, W. (2021). Contract enforcement for claimants’ satisfaction with construction dispute resolution: moderating role of shadow of the future, fairness perception, and trust. Journal Construction Engineering Management, 147(2), 04020168. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001981.

Zhang, S. B., Fu, Y. F., Gao, Y., & Zheng, X. D. (2016). Influence of trust and contract on dispute negotiation behavioral strategy in construction subcontracting. Journal of Management in Engineering, 32(4), 04016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000427 CrossRef

Zhang, Z. X., & Han, Y. L. (2007). The effects of reciprocation wariness on negotiation behavior and outcomes. Group Decision Negotiation, 16(6), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9070-6 CrossRef

Titel: Interweaving Incentives and Disincentives for Construction Dispute Negotiation Settlement
verfasst von: Sen Lin
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Construction Incentivization
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28958-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-28959-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28959-0_11

Springer Professional

Tipp

Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"