Skip to main content
Erschienen in: NanoEthics 1/2017

24.02.2017 | Original Paper

Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering

verfasst von: Niklas Gudowsky, Mahshid Sotoudeh

Erschienen in: NanoEthics | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Expectations play a distinctive role in shaping emerging technologies and producing hype cycles when a technology is adopted or fails on the market. To harness expectations, facilitate and provoke forward-looking discussions, and identify policy alternatives, futures studies are required. Here, expert anticipation of possible or probable future developments becomes extremely arbitrary beyond short-term prediction, and the results of futures studies are often controversial, divergent, or even contradictory; thus they are contested. Nevertheless, such socio-technical imaginaries may prescribe a future that seems attainable to those involved in the visioneering process, and other futures may thus become less likely and shaping them could become more difficult. This implies a need to broaden the debate on socio-technological development, creating spaces where policy, science, and society can become mutually responsive to each other. Laypeople’s experiential and value-based knowledge is highly relevant for complementing expertise to inform socially robust decision-making in science and technology. This paper presents the evolution of a transdisciplinary, forward-looking co-creation process—a demand-side approach developed to strengthen needs-driven research and innovation governance by cross-linking knowledge of laypeople, experts, and stakeholders. Three case studies serve as examples. We argue that this approach can be considered a method for adding social robustness to visioneering and to responsible socio-technical change.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
As a policy concept, RRI aims at aligning research and innovation with the values, needs and expectations of society; public engagement being one of the concepts’ major elements. This is implemented as a crosscutting theme throughout Horizon 2020.
 
2
CIMULACT—Citizen and Multi-actor engagement on Horizon2020, 2015–2017, www.​cimulact.​eu.
CASI—Public Participation in Developing a Common Framework for Assessment and Management of Sustainable Innovation, 2014–2017, www.​casi2020.​eu.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Geels FW, Schot JW (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417CrossRef Geels FW, Schot JW (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Geels FW, Kern F, Fuchs G, Hinderer N, Kungl G, Mylan J, Neukirch M, Wassermann S (2016) The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res Policy 45:896–913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015 CrossRef Geels FW, Kern F, Fuchs G, Hinderer N, Kungl G, Mylan J, Neukirch M, Wassermann S (2016) The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: a reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res Policy 45:896–913. doi:10.​1016/​j.​respol.​2016.​01.​015 CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K, Van Lente H (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Tech Anal Strat Manag 18:285–298CrossRef Borup M, Brown N, Konrad K, Van Lente H (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Tech Anal Strat Manag 18:285–298CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbong G, Geels F, Raven R (2008) Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970-2006). Tech Anal Strat Manag 20:555–573CrossRef Verbong G, Geels F, Raven R (2008) Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970-2006). Tech Anal Strat Manag 20:555–573CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldstein D, Gigerenzer G (2009) Fast and frugal forecasting. Int J Forecast 25:760–772CrossRef Goldstein D, Gigerenzer G (2009) Fast and frugal forecasting. Int J Forecast 25:760–772CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Makridakis S, Taleb N (2009) Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability. Int J Forecast 25:716–733CrossRef Makridakis S, Taleb N (2009) Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability. Int J Forecast 25:716–733CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon R, Fye S, Charbonneau M, Hay J, Mullins C (2013) An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80:1222–1231CrossRef Shannon R, Fye S, Charbonneau M, Hay J, Mullins C (2013) An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 80:1222–1231CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nennen HU, Garbe D (1996) Das Expertendilemma: Zur Rolle wissenschaftlicher Gutachter in der öffentlichen Meinungsbildung. Springer, Berlin Nennen HU, Garbe D (1996) Das Expertendilemma: Zur Rolle wissenschaftlicher Gutachter in der öffentlichen Meinungsbildung. Springer, Berlin
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald A (2003) ‘Experts’ dilemma’: technology assessment at the German Bundestag. ‘Expertising’ democracy for ‘democratising’ expertise. Sci Public Policy 30:193–198 Grunwald A (2003) ‘Experts’ dilemma’: technology assessment at the German Bundestag. ‘Expertising’ democracy for ‘democratising’ expertise. Sci Public Policy 30:193–198
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff S, Kim S (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47:119–146CrossRef Jasanoff S, Kim S (2009) Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47:119–146CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt U, Barben D, Irwin A, Joly PB, Rip A, Stirling A, Stöckelová T (2013) Science in society: caring for our futures in turbulent times. In: De La Hoz Del Hoyo (ed) Science Policy Brief 50. EuropeanScience Foundation, Strasbourg Felt U, Barben D, Irwin A, Joly PB, Rip A, Stirling A, Stöckelová T (2013) Science in society: caring for our futures in turbulent times. In: De La Hoz Del Hoyo (ed) Science Policy Brief 50. EuropeanScience Foundation, Strasbourg
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39:751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093 CrossRef Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J (2012) Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy 39:751–760. doi:10.​1093/​scipol/​scs093 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan Assoc 35:216–224 Arnstein S (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plan Assoc 35:216–224
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizens’ participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244CrossRef Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizens’ participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25:3–29CrossRef Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25:3–29CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 57:239–251CrossRef Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP (2003) Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med 57:239–251CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieczka M, Escobar O (2013) Dialogue and science: innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK. Sci Public Policy 40:113–126CrossRef Pieczka M, Escobar O (2013) Dialogue and science: innovation in policy-making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK. Sci Public Policy 40:113–126CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Voß JP, Amelung N (2016) Innovating public participation methods: technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Soc Stud Sci:1–24 Voß JP, Amelung N (2016) Innovating public participation methods: technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Soc Stud Sci:1–24
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dryzek JS, Tucker A (2008) Deliberative innovation to different effect: consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States. Public Adm Rev 68:864–876 Dryzek JS, Tucker A (2008) Deliberative innovation to different effect: consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States. Public Adm Rev 68:864–876
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 48:319–338CrossRef Felt U, Fochler M (2010) Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 48:319–338CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat EC Expert Group (2013) Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. European Commission, Brussels EC Expert Group (2013) Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. European Commission, Brussels
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Delgado A, Lein Kjølberg K, Wickson F (2010) Public engagement coming of age: from theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20:826–845CrossRef Delgado A, Lein Kjølberg K, Wickson F (2010) Public engagement coming of age: from theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public Underst Sci 20:826–845CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin A, Jensen TE, Jones KE (2013) The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice. Soc Stud Sci 43:118–135CrossRef Irwin A, Jensen TE, Jones KE (2013) The good, the bad and the perfect: criticizing engagement practice. Soc Stud Sci 43:118–135CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wynne B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 1:99–110 Wynne B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 1:99–110
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10:1–18CrossRef Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Underst Sci 10:1–18CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogner A (2012) The paradox of participation experiments. Sci Technol Hum Values 37:506–527CrossRef Bogner A (2012) The paradox of participation experiments. Sci Technol Hum Values 37:506–527CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hennen L (2002) Impacts of participatory technology assessment on its social environment. In: Joss S, Bellucci S (eds) Participatory technology assessment—European perspectives. University of Westminster Press, London, pp 257–275 Hennen L (2002) Impacts of participatory technology assessment on its social environment. In: Joss S, Bellucci S (eds) Participatory technology assessment—European perspectives. University of Westminster Press, London, pp 257–275
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Decker M, Ladikas M (2004) Bridges between science, society and policy. Technology assessment—methods and impacts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkCrossRef Decker M, Ladikas M (2004) Bridges between science, society and policy. Technology assessment—methods and impacts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodin R (2008) Innovating democracy: democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef Goodin R (2008) Innovating democracy: democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Stilgoe LSJ, Wilsdon J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Underst Sci 23:4–15CrossRef Stilgoe LSJ, Wilsdon J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Underst Sci 23:4–15CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgess MM (2014) From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy. Public Underst Sci 23:48–52CrossRef Burgess MM (2014) From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: deliberative publics and science policy. Public Underst Sci 23:48–52CrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom E, Parks RB, Whitaker GP, Percy SL (1978) The public service production process: a framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal 7:381–389CrossRef Ostrom E, Parks RB, Whitaker GP, Percy SL (1978) The public service production process: a framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal 7:381–389CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science and Policy 3:305–310CrossRef Glicken J (2000) Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls. Environmental Science and Policy 3:305–310CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Veen SC, Bunders JFG, Regeer BJ (2013) Mutual learning for knowledge co-creation about disability inclusive development: experiences with acommunity of practice. Knowl Manag Dev J 9:105–124 Van Veen SC, Bunders JFG, Regeer BJ (2013) Mutual learning for knowledge co-creation about disability inclusive development: experiences with acommunity of practice. Knowl Manag Dev J 9:105–124
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Scott L, Szerszynsky B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. SAGE, London, pp 44–83 Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Scott L, Szerszynsky B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology. SAGE, London, pp 44–83
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham and London Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham and London
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Joss S, Bellucci S (2002) Participatory technology assessment—European perspectives. University of Westminster, London Joss S, Bellucci S (2002) Participatory technology assessment—European perspectives. University of Westminster, London
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins H, Evans R (2007) Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonCrossRef Collins H, Evans R (2007) Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431CrossRef Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Peschl MF, Bottaro G, Hartner-Tiefenthaler M, Rötzer K (2014) Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation: towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation. Constructivist Foundations 9:421–433 Peschl MF, Bottaro G, Hartner-Tiefenthaler M, Rötzer K (2014) Learning how to innovate as a socio-epistemological process of co-creation: towards a constructivist teaching strategy for innovation. Constructivist Foundations 9:421–433
57.
Zurück zum Zitat McClean S, Shaw A (2005) From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge—an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 15:729–749. doi:10.1177/1049732304273927 CrossRef McClean S, Shaw A (2005) From schism to continuum? The problematic relationship between expert and lay knowledge—an exploratory conceptual synthesis of two qualitative studies. Qual Health Res 15:729–749. doi:10.​1177/​1049732304273927​ CrossRef
59.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Myskja BK (2007) Lay expertise: why involve the public in biobank governance? Genomics, Society and Policy 2007:1–16CrossRef Myskja BK (2007) Lay expertise: why involve the public in biobank governance? Genomics, Society and Policy 2007:1–16CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Pidgeon N, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or “upstream engagement”? Health Risk and Society 9:191–210CrossRef Pidgeon N, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or “upstream engagement”? Health Risk and Society 9:191–210CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar O (2014) Upstream public engagement, downstream policy-making? The brain imaging dialogue as a community of inquiry. Sci Public Policy 41:480–492CrossRef Escobar O (2014) Upstream public engagement, downstream policy-making? The brain imaging dialogue as a community of inquiry. Sci Public Policy 41:480–492CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. St. Martin's Press, New York Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. St. Martin's Press, New York
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Bogner A (2015) From Invited Participation to Blue Sky Engagement. In: Scherz C, Michalek T, Hennen L, Hebáková L, Hahn J (eds) The Next Horizon of Technology Assessment. Proceedings from the PACITA 2015 Conference in Berlin. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR, pp. 127–132 Bogner A (2015) From Invited Participation to Blue Sky Engagement. In: Scherz C, Michalek T, Hennen L, Hebáková L, Hahn J (eds) The Next Horizon of Technology Assessment. Proceedings from the PACITA 2015 Conference in Berlin. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR, pp. 127–132
72.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Helm R (2009) The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures 41:96–104CrossRef van der Helm R (2009) The vision phenomenon: towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning. Futures 41:96–104CrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloch E (1986) The principle of hope. Blackwell, London Bloch E (1986) The principle of hope. Blackwell, London
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Mannheim K (1979) Ideology and utopia. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London Mannheim K (1979) Ideology and utopia. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitas R (2013) Utopia as method: the imaginary reconstitution of society. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRef Levitas R (2013) Utopia as method: the imaginary reconstitution of society. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat List D (2006) Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives. Futures 38:673–684CrossRef List D (2006) Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives. Futures 38:673–684CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson Klein J (2004) Discourses of transdisciplinarity: looking back to the future. Futures 63:68–74CrossRef Thompson Klein J (2004) Discourses of transdisciplinarity: looking back to the future. Futures 63:68–74CrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawrence RJ (2015) Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures 65:1–9CrossRef Lawrence RJ (2015) Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures 65:1–9CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2013) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 9:497–512CrossRef Wiek A, Iwaniec D (2013) Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 9:497–512CrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Shipley R (2002) Vision in planning: is the practice based on sound theory? Environment and Planning A 34:7–22CrossRef Shipley R (2002) Vision in planning: is the practice based on sound theory? Environment and Planning A 34:7–22CrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Dierkes M, Hoffmann U, Marz L (1992) Leitbild und Technik. Zur Genese und Steuerung technischer Innovationen. edition sigma, Berlin Dierkes M, Hoffmann U, Marz L (1992) Leitbild und Technik. Zur Genese und Steuerung technischer Innovationen. edition sigma, Berlin
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Constanza R (2000) Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conserv Ecol 4:5–22CrossRef Constanza R (2000) Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conserv Ecol 4:5–22CrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Beers PJ, Veldkamp A, Hermans F, van Apeldoorn D, Vervoort JM, Kok K (2010) Future sustainability and images. Futures 42:723–732CrossRef Beers PJ, Veldkamp A, Hermans F, van Apeldoorn D, Vervoort JM, Kok K (2010) Future sustainability and images. Futures 42:723–732CrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Dierkes M, Hoffmann U, Marz L (1996) Visions of technology, social and institutional factors shaping the development of new technologies. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, New York Dierkes M, Hoffmann U, Marz L (1996) Visions of technology, social and institutional factors shaping the development of new technologies. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, New York
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Eames M, McDowall W, Hodson M, Marvin S (2006) Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 18:361–374CrossRef Eames M, McDowall W, Hodson M, Marvin S (2006) Negotiating contested visions and place-specific expectations of the hydrogen economy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 18:361–374CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Shipley R, Michela JL (2006) Can vision motivate planning action? Plan Prac Res 21:223–244CrossRef Shipley R, Michela JL (2006) Can vision motivate planning action? Plan Prac Res 21:223–244CrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat McCray P (2012) The visioneers: how a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies and a limitless future. Princeton University Press, Princeton McCray P (2012) The visioneers: how a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies and a limitless future. Princeton University Press, Princeton
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Simakova E, Coenen C (2013) Visions, hype, and expectations: a place for responsibility. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–266CrossRef Simakova E, Coenen C (2013) Visions, hype, and expectations: a place for responsibility. In: Owen R, Bessant JR, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester, pp 241–266CrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari A, Marin F (2014) Responsibility and visions in the new and emerging technologies. In: Arnaldi S, Ferrari A, Magaudda P et al (eds) Responsibility in nanotechnology development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–36 Ferrari A, Marin F (2014) Responsibility and visions in the new and emerging technologies. In: Arnaldi S, Ferrari A, Magaudda P et al (eds) Responsibility in nanotechnology development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–36
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudowsky N, Sotoudeh M (2015) Citizens’ visions on active assisted living. In: Hayn D, Schreier G, Ammenwerth E, Hörbst A (eds) eHealth2015—health informatics meets eHealth. Studies in health technology and informatics 212. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 43–49. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-524-1-43 Gudowsky N, Sotoudeh M (2015) Citizens’ visions on active assisted living. In: Hayn D, Schreier G, Ammenwerth E, Hörbst A (eds) eHealth2015—health informatics meets eHealth. Studies in health technology and informatics 212. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 43–49. doi:10.​3233/​978-1-61499-524-1-43
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudowsky N, Sotoudeh M, Drott F (2015) Future foods—a transdisciplinary prospect of the (Austrian) food system. In: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture (Zagreb) (eds) Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, pp. 1–8 Gudowsky N, Sotoudeh M, Drott F (2015) Future foods—a transdisciplinary prospect of the (Austrian) food system. In: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture (Zagreb) (eds) Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, pp. 1–8
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudowsky N, Bechtold U, Capari L, Sotoudeh M (2015) Participatory foresight. Experiences with a qualitative demand-side approach. In: Scherz C, Michalek T, Hennen L, Hebáková L, Hahn J (eds) The next horizon of technology assessment. Proceedings from the PACITA 2015 conference in Berlin. Technology Centre ASCR, Prague, pp 139–143 Gudowsky N, Bechtold U, Capari L, Sotoudeh M (2015) Participatory foresight. Experiences with a qualitative demand-side approach. In: Scherz C, Michalek T, Hennen L, Hebáková L, Hahn J (eds) The next horizon of technology assessment. Proceedings from the PACITA 2015 conference in Berlin. Technology Centre ASCR, Prague, pp 139–143
105.
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development UNEP (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development
Metadaten
Titel
Into Blue Skies—a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering
verfasst von
Niklas Gudowsky
Mahshid Sotoudeh
Publikationsdatum
24.02.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
NanoEthics / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0284-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

NanoEthics 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe