Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This study focuses on the allocation of politicians to cabinet offices in different institutional settings. We argue that cabinet ministers are appointed with the aim of minimizing the policy distance to the most important principal, which could be the Prime Minister, the coalition, or the individual parties that form the coalition. We advance this field of research by performing a comparative analysis of different coalition systems. We evaluate our hypotheses by estimating the policy positions of Austrian, German and Swedish politicians on the basis of a computerized content analysis of their speeches given in parliament. The results provide support for our argument and show that the policy distance towards the dominant principal is important for becoming a cabinet member.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Alexiadou, D. & Gunaydin, H. (2014). Selecting the right finance minister: The appointments, and policy effects of technocrat and expert finance ministers. Paper prepared for presentation at the ECPR General Conference, Glasgow, 3–6 Sept 2014.
Allern, E. H., & Aylott, N. (2009). Overcoming the fear of commitment: Preelectoral coalitions in Norway and Sweden. Acta Politica, 44(3), 259–285. CrossRef
Andeweg, R. (2000). Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministers. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 377–395.
Bäck, H., & Bergman, T. (2016). The parties in government formation. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics (pp. 206–223). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bäck, H., & Debus, M. (2016). Political parties, parliaments and legislative speechmaking. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bäck, H., Debus, M., & Dumont, P. (2011). Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50(4), 441–478. CrossRef
Bäck, H., Debus, M., & Müller, W. C. (2010). The ideological cohesion of political parties. an evaluation of the method of deriving MPs’ policy positions from parliamentary speeches. Paper presented at the 68th Annual MPSA Conference in Chicago, 22–25 April.
Bäck, H., Dumont, P., Meier, H. E., Persson, T., & Vernby, K. (2009). Does European integration lead to a presidentialization of executive politics? Ministerial selection in Swedish post-war cabinets. European Union Politics, 10(2), 226–252. CrossRef
Bäck, H., Meier, H. E., Persson, T., & Fischer, J. (2012). European integration and prime ministerial power: A differential impact on cabinet reshuffles in Germany and Sweden. German Politics, 21(2), 184–202. CrossRef
Baumann, M., Debus, M., & Müller, J. (2015). Personal characteristics of MPs and legislative behavior in moral policy making. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 179–210. CrossRef
Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. London: Routledge.
Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2008). Compared to what? A comment on “A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text” by Martin and Vanberg. Political Analysis, 16(1), 101–111. CrossRef
Bergman, T., Müller, W. C., Strøm, K., & Blomgren, M. (2003). Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies (pp. 109–220). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Bernauer, J. (2006). Party Unity in the 15th German Bundestag. Wordscoring Parliamentary Speeches to Locate MdBs in Policy Spaces. Diploma Thesis. Konstanz: University of Konstanz.
Bernauer, J., & Bräuninger, T. (2009). Intra-party preference heterogeneity and faction membership in the 15th German bundestag. A computational text analysis of parliamentary speeches. German Politics, 18(3), 385–402. CrossRef
Blondel, J., & Müller-Rommel, F. (Eds.). (1993). Governing together: The extent and limits of joint decision-making in Western European cabinets. London: Macmillan.
Bräuninger, T., Debus, M, & Müller, J. (2013). Estimating hand- and computer- coded policy positions of political actors across countries and time. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research Working Paper Nr. 153.
Browne, E. C., & Franklin, M. N. (1973). Aspects of coalition payoffs in European parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 67(2), 453–469. CrossRef
Budge, I., & Keman, H. (1990). Parties and democracy. Coalition formation and government functioning in twenty states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bynander, F., & Daléus, P. (2014). Swedish coalition governments and the quest for re- election. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Salamanca, 10–15 April 2014.
Carey, J. M. (2007). Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 92–107. CrossRef
Carrubba, C. J., Gabel, M., Murrah, L., Clough, R., Montgomery, E., & Schambach, R. (2006). Off the record: Unrecorded legislative votes, selection bias and roll-call vote analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 36(4), 691–704. CrossRef
Ceron, A. (2014a). Gamson rule not for all: patterns of portfolio allocation among Italian party factions. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 180–199. CrossRef
Ceron, A. (2014b). Inter-factional conflicts and government formation: Do party leaders sort out ideological heterogeneity? Party Politics. doi: 10.1177/1354068814563974.
De Winter, L. (1991). Parliamentary and party pathways to the cabinet. In J. Blondel & J.-L. Thiébault (Eds.), The profession of government minister in Western Europe (pp. 44–69). Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossRef
Debus, M., & Bäck, H. (2014). Der Einfluss von Mandatstyp und Wahlkreiseigenschaften auf die inhaltlichen Positionen in Parlamentsreden: Eine Untersuchung anhand der parlamentarischen Debatten im Deutschen Bundestag von 1998 bis 2002. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(2), 330–353. CrossRef
Debus, M., & Bräuninger, T. (2009). Intra-party factions and coalition bargaining in Germany. In D. Giannetti & K. Benoit (Eds.), Intra-party politics and coalition governments in parliamentary democracies (pp. 121–145). London: Routledge.
Dewan, T., & Dowding, K. (2005). The corrective effect of ministerial resignations on government popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 46–56. CrossRef
Dowding, K., & Dumont, P. (Eds.). (2009). The selection of ministers in Europe: Hiring and firing. London: Routledge.
Giannetti, D., & Benoit, K. (Eds.). (2009). Intra-party politics and coalition governments in parliamentary democracies. London: Routledge.
Giannetti, D., & Laver, M. (2005). Policy positions and jobs in the government. European Journal of Political Research, 44(1), 91–120. CrossRef
Giannetti, D., & Laver, M. (2009). Party cohesion, party discipline, and party factions in Italy. In D. Giannetti & K. Benoit (Eds.), Intra-party politics and coalition governments in parliamentary democracies (pp. 146–168). London: Routledge.
Greene, Z., & Haber, M. (2015a). The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies, 37(1), 15–27. CrossRef
Greene, Z., & Haber, M. (2015b). Leadership competition and disagreement at party national congresses. British Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000283.
Gross, D. A., & Sigelman, L. (1984). Comparing party systems: A multidimensional approach. Comparative Politics, 16(4), 463–479. CrossRef
Hallerberg, M., & Wehner, J. (2012). The educational competence of economic policymakers in the EU. Global Policy, 3(1), 9–15. CrossRef
Hansen, M. E. (2009). The positions of irish parliamentary parties 1937–2006. Irish Political Studies, 24(1), 29–44. CrossRef
Huber, J. D., & Martínez-Gallardo, C. (2008). Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 169–180. CrossRef
Indridason, I. H., & Kam, C. (2008). Cabinet reshuffles and ministerial drift. British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 621–656. CrossRef
Kam, C., Bianco, W. T., Sened, I., & Smyth, R. (2010). Ministerial selection and intraparty organization in the contemporary British parliament. American Political Science Review, 104(2), 289–306. CrossRef
King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361. CrossRef
Laver, M., & Benoit, K. (2002). Locating TDs in policy spaces: Wordscoring Dáil speeches. Irish Political Studies, 17(1), 59–73. CrossRef
Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331. CrossRef
Laver, M., & Schofield, N. (1998). Multiparty government. The politics of coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
Laver, M., & Shepsle, K. A. (1996). Making and breaking governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press.
Luebbert, G. M. (1986). Comparative democracy: Policymaking and governing coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York: Columbia University Press.
Marcinkiewicz, K., & Tosun, J. (2015). Contesting climate change: Mapping the political debate in Poland. East European Politics,. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1022648.
Martin, S. (2014). Policy, office, and votes: The electoral value of ministerial office. British Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1017/S0007123414000258.
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2005). Policing the bargain: Coalition government and parliamentary scrutiny. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 13–47. CrossRef
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2008a). A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text. Political Analysis, 16(1), 93–100. CrossRef
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2008b). Reply to Benoit and Laver. Political Analysis, 16(1), 112–114. CrossRef
Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2011). Parliaments and coalitions. The role of legislative institutions in multiparty government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Müller, W. C. (2000a). Political parties in parliamentary democracies: Making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 309–333.
Müller, W. C. (2000b). The Austrian election of October 1999: A shift to the right. West European Politics, 23(3), 191–200. CrossRef
Müller, W. C., & Meyer, T. M. (2010). Meeting the challenges of representation and accountability in multiparty governments. West European Politics, 33(5), 1065–1092. CrossRef
Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (Eds.). (2000). Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (2008). Coalition agreements and cabinet governance. In K. Strøm, W. C. Müller, & T. Bergman (Eds.), Cabinet governance: Bargaining and the cycle of democratic politics (pp. 159–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niclauß, K. (2004). Kanzlerdemokratie. Paderborn: Schöningh.
O’Malley, E. (2007). The power of Prime Ministers: Results of an expert survey. International Political Science Review, 28(1), 7–27. CrossRef
Proksch, S.-O., & Slapin, J. B. (2010). Position taking in European parliament speeches. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 587–611. CrossRef
Proksch, S.-O., & Slapin, J. B. (2012). Institutional foundations of legislative speech. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 520–537. CrossRef
Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2012). The Strain of representation: How parties represent diverse voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Saalfeld, T. (2000). Germany: Stable parties, Chancellor democracy, and the art of informal settlement. In W. C. Müller & K. Strøm (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 32–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. CrossRef
Strøm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–289.
Strøm, K., Müller, W. C., & Bergman, T. (Eds.). (2008). Cabinet governance: Bargaining and the democratic life cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2003). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. Available at http://gking.harvard.edu/.
Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I., McDonald, M. D., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2013). Mapping policy preferences from texts: statistical solutions for manifesto analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
Warwick, P. V., & Druckman, J. N. (2006). The portfolio allocation paradox: An investigation into the nature of a very strong but puzzling relationship. European Journal of Political Research, 45(4), 635–665. CrossRef
- Intra-party diversity and ministerial selection in coalition governments
Wolfgang C. Müller
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia