nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

9. Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren

verfasst von : Peter M. Kappeler

Erschienen in: Verhaltensbiologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl moderne Geschlechterrollen berücksichtigen, dass die Mitglieder beider Geschlechter um Fortpflanzungspartner konkurrieren und diese auswählen, gibt es gute theoretische Gründe und zahlreiche empirische Belege für massive Geschlechtsunterschiede in diesen Bereichen. Daher fokussiert diese Übersicht über Mechanismen und Konsequenzen der intrasexuellen Selektion auf männliche Fortpflanzungsstrategien. Dabei werden Merkmale, welche die Wahrscheinlichkeit, zu einer Paarungsgelegenheit zu kommen, auch nur minimal erhöhen, von intrasexueller Selektion positiv bewertet. Sexuell selektierte Anpassungen finden sich dabei in ganz unterschiedlichen Merkmalen, wobei das Verhalten aber eine herausragende Rolle spielt. Die Präsentation dieser Anpassungen folgt dabei dem logischen zeitlichen Ablauf und unterscheidet zwischen prä- und postkopulatorischer Konkurrenz. Das grundlegende Konzept der Strategie, das auf beide Geschlechter zutrifft, wird dieser Diskussion vorangestellt.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Sexuelle Selektion: evolutionäre Grundlagen

Nächstes Kapitel Intersexuelle Selektion: wie Weibchen wählen

Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2001) Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13155–13160PubMed

Arak A (1983) Sexual selection by male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature 306:261–262

Arnold W, Dittami J (1997) Reproductive suppression in male alpine marmots. Anim Behav 53:53–66

Baeta R, Faivre B, Motreuil S, Gaillard M, Moreau J (2008) Carotenoid trade-off between parasitic resistance and sexual display: an experimental study in the blackbird (Turdus merula). Proc R Soc Lond B 275:427–434

Borries C (1997) Infanticide in seasonally breeding multimale groups of Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) in Ramnagar (South Nepal). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:139–150

Borries C, Launhardt K, Epplen C, Epplen JT, Winkler P (1999a) DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:901–904

Borries C, Launhardt K, Epplen C, Epplen JT, Winkler P (1999b) Males as infant protectors in Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) living in multimale groups – defence pattern, paternity and sexual behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:350–356

Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behav Ecol 15:872–882

Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) Roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69:145–170

Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behavior and ecology of two sexes. Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago

Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guiness FE (1997) Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1509–1516

Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

Davies NB (1983) Polyandry, cloaca-pecking and sperm competition in dunnocks. Nature 302:334–336

Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683–685

den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2010) Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327:1506–1509

Dominey WJ (1984) Alternative mating tactics and evolutionarily stable strategies. Integr Comp Biol 24:385–396

Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge

Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26:647–654PubMed

Emberts Z, St. Mary CM, Herrington TJ, Miller CW (2018) Males missing their sexually selected weapon have decreased fighting ability and mating success in a competitive environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72:81

Emlen DJ (2001) Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science 291:1534–1536PubMed

Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223PubMed

Fabiani A, Galimberti F, Sanvito S, Hoelzel AR (2004) Extreme polygyny among southern elephant seals on Sea Lion Island, Falkland Islands. Behav Ecol 15:961–969

Fischer J, Kitchen DM, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (2004) Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:140–148

Froman DP, Pizzari T, Feltmann AJ, Castillo-Juarez H, Birkhead TR (2002) Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:607–612

Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Univ of California Press, Berkely

Gowaty PA, Drickamer LC, Schmid-Holmes S (2003) Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Anim Behav 65:95–103

House CM, Simmons LW (2003) Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:447–455

Huck UW, Tonias BA, Lisk RD (1989) The effectiveness of competitive male inseminations in golden hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus, depends on an interaction of mating order, time delay between males, and the time of mating relative to ovulation. Anim Behav 37:674–680

Immler S, Pitnick S, Parker GA, Durrant KL, Lüpold S, Calhim S, Birkhead TR (2011) Resolving variation in the reproductive tradeoff between sperm size and number. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:5325–5330PubMed

Johnston SE, Gratten J, Berenos C, Pilkington JG, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM, Slate J (2013) Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 502:93–95PubMed

Joseph PN, Emberts Z, Sasson DA, Miller CW (2018) Males that drop a sexually selected weapon grow larger testes. Evolution 72:113–122PubMed

Kappeler PM (1997) Intrasexual selection in Mirza coquereli: evidence for scramble competition polygyny in a solitary primate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:115–127

Kempenaers B, Schlicht E (2010) Extra-pair behaviour. In: Kappeler PM (Hrsg) Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Springer, Heidelberg, S 359–411

Komdeur J (2001) Mate guarding in the Seychelles warbler is energetically costly and adjusted to paternity risk. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2103–2111

Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guiness FE (1999) Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1655–1661

Kutsukake N, Nunn CL (2006) Comparative tests of reproductive skew in male primates: the roles of demographic factors and incomplete control. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:695–706

Lemasson A, Palombit RA, Jubin R (2008) Friendships between males and lactating females in a free-ranging group of olive baboons (Papio hamadryas anubis): evidence from playback experiments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1027–1035

Lamichhaney S et al (2016) Structural genomic changes underlie alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Nat Genet 48:84–88

Lewis SM, Kobel A, Fedina T, Beeman RW (2005) Sperm stratification and paternity success in red flour beetles. Physiol Entomol 30:303–307

Ligon RA, McGraw KJ (2013) Chameleons communicate with complex colour changes during contests: different body regions convey different information. Biol Lett 9:20130892PubMedPubMedCentral

Lindenfors P, Gittleman JL, Jones KE (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in mammals. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T (Hrsg) Sex, size, and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, S 16–26

Lloyd JE (1981) Mimicry in the sexual signals of fireflies. Sci Am 245:138–145

Lüpold S, Fitzpatrick JL (2015) Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:20152122

Maggioncalda AN, Czekala NM, Sapolsky RM (2002) Male orangutan subadulthood: a new twist on the relationship between chronic stress and developmental arrest. Am J Phys Anthropol 118:25–32PubMed

Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, Novikov D, Stuart WT, Pitnick S (2010) Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328:354–357PubMed

Maynard Smith J (1994) Must reliable signals always be costly? Anim Behav 47:1115–1120

Maynard Smith J, Harper DGC (2003) Animal signals. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford

Mitoyen C, Quigley C, Fusani L (2019) Evolution and function of multimodal courtship displays. Ethology 125:503–515PubMedPubMedCentral

Moczek AP, Emlen DJ (2000) Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim Behav 59:459–466PubMed

Møller AP (1989) Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals. Funct Ecol 3:91–96

Moore FR, Shuker DM, Dougherty L (2016) Stress and sexual signaling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 27:363–371

Ono T, Siva-Jothy MT, Kato A (1989) Removal and subsequent ingestion of rivals’ semen during copulation in a tree cricket. Physiol Entomol 14:195–202

Orr TJ, Brennan PLR (2015) Sperm storage: distinguishing selective processes and evaluating criteria. Trends Ecol Evol 30:261–272PubMed

Parker GA (1990) Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:120–126

Parker GA (2001) Golden flies, sunlit meadows: a tribute to the yellow dungfly. In: Dugatkin LA (Hrsg) Model systems in behavioral ecology: integrating conceptual, theoretical, and empirical approaches. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, S 3–26

Parker GA, Pizzari T (2010) Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biol Rev 85:897–934PubMed

Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K (2003) Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:633–640

Ramm SA, Stockley P (2014) Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behav Ecol 25:660–667PubMedPubMedCentral

Reby D, McComb K (2003) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav 65:519–530

Roberts EK, Lu A, Bergman TJ, Beehner JC (2012) A Bruce effect in wild geladas. Science 335:1222–1225

Ryan KK, Altmann J (2001) Selection for male choice based primarily on mate compatibility in the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus rhoadsi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:436–440

Schneider JM, Elgar MA (2001) Sexual cannibalism and sperm competition in the golden orb-web spider Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): female and male perspectives. Behav Ecol 12:547–552

Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1996) Infanticidal male eresid spiders. Nature 381:655–656

Schwagmeyer PL (1979) The Bruce effect: an evaluation of male/female advantages. Am Nat 114:932–938

Setchell JM (2005) Do female mandrills prefer brightly colored males? Int J Primatol 26:715–735

Shen J-X, Feng AS, Xu Z-M, Yu Z-L, Arch VS, Yu X-J, Narins PM (2008) Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature 453:914–916PubMed

Short RV (1981) Sexual selection in man and the great apes. In: Graham CE (Hrsg) Reproductive biology of the great apes: comparative and biomedical perspectives. Academic Press, London, S 319–341

Shuster SM, Wade MJ (1991) Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350:608–610

Squires ZE, Wong BBM, Norman MD, Stuart-Fox D (2015) Last male sperm precedence in a polygamous squid. Biol J Linn Soc 116:277–287

Taborsky M, Brockmann HJ (2010) Alternative reproductive tactics and life history phenotypes. In: Kappeler PM (Hrsg) Animal behaviour: evolution and mechanisms. Springer, Heidelberg, S 537–586

Taborsky M, Schütz D, Goffinet O, van Doorn GS (2018) Alternative male morphs solve sperm performance/longevity trade-off in opposite directions. Sci Adv 4:eaap8563

van Schaik CP (2000a) Infanticide by male primates: the sexual selection hypothesis revisited. In: van Schaik CP, Janson CH (Hrsg) Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, S 27–60

van Schaik CP (2000b) Social counterstrategies against male infanticide in primates and other mammals. In: Kappeler PM (Hrsg) Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, S 34–52

van Schaik CP, Kappeler PM (1997) Infanticide risk and the evolution of male-female association in primates. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1687–1694

von Kuerthy C, Taborsky M (2016) Contest versus scramble competition among males pursuing fixed or plastic alternative reproductive tactics. Anim Behav 113:203–212

Vehrencamp SL (1983) A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31:667–682

Vihervaara H, Sundell J, Ylönen H (2010) Is mating alone enough to inhibit infanticide in male bank voles? Ethology 116:888–894

Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916–918PubMed

Wikelski M, Steiger SS, Gall B, Nelson KN (2005) Sex, drugs, and mating role: testosterone-induced phenotype-switching in Galapagos marine iguanas. Behav Ecol 16:260–268

Wrangham RW (1993) The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Hum Nat 4:47–79PubMed

Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection – a selection for handicap. J Theoret Biol 53:205–214

Titel: Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren
verfasst von: Peter M. Kappeler
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Verhaltensbiologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-60545-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-60546-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60546-2_9