Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Introduction: Douglass North’s NIEH in Context

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The economic historian Douglass North is most famous for developing a theory that interprets the causes of economic change by explaining them in terms of social institutions. This theory, the New Institutionalist Economic History, has had a far-reaching influence. In this chapter, Krul explains how this theory originated in existing institutionalist ideas within economics, how it built on these ideas and developed them further, and how it contributed to the rise of a new way of thinking across the fields of social science concerned with economic thought. Krul also discusses the reception of North’s theory, both by its supporters and its critics. As shown here, for understanding North’s approach it is important to distinguish the specifics of his theory from other forms of New Institutionalist Economics.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Often the approach is called by its practitioners the New Institutional Economics (e.g. North 1986; Alston 2008) instead. However, in the philosophy of social science literature reference to ‘(new) institutionalism’ is more prevalent, and it is also so used in comparative context (Nee 2005). I follow here the philosophical convention (see Mäki 1993), which also has the advantage of distinguishing it from the adjectival derivation ‘belonging to an institution’. The terms are in any case entirely equivalent.
 
2
I shall throughout distinguish ‘economics’ as a discipline from ‘economic thought’. The latter will be used for convenience as an umbrella term for all fields of social science concerned with economic structures and behavior as their primary subject matter, including economic history, economic sociology, economic anthropology, and so forth.
 
3
Another element she identifies is the debate about public goods and free riding, to which I will also return later in the context of North’s NIEH. However, to avoid category mistakes this is best seen as a subject matter rather than a component school of theory.
 
4
Much of the material of this book was prepared before the recent death of Douglass North, on November 3, 2015. In order to emphasize the ongoing relevance of his work, I have not changed the tense used. Discussions of past phases of North’s NIEH will be in past tense, while his arguments as formulated in the final phase, most notably his last two monographs, will be in present tense.
 
5
As Robert Bates has put it, “If anyone can lay claim to being the founder of the new institutionalism, it would be Douglass North” (Bates 2014).
 
6
A lengthier treatment of the origins of the term “NIE” and “NIEH” and their relation to differences between North and other NIE authors can be found in Richter (2005).
 
7
For a discussion of this term, see Weintraub (1979).
 
8
Another early contributor to this theoretical line of thought was Allen Barton, who however did not publish it (Harcourt et al. 2016: 271). I thank Geoff Harcourt for this reference.
 
9
The decisive step here for North was the abandonment of the assumption that institutional arrangements are necessarily efficient in some sense, which inaugurated the second stage of his NIEH (North 1981).
 
10
However, the relationship between game theoretical approaches and North’s analysis of individual strategic behavior, given rules-as-constraints, will come up again when I discuss North’s concept of the ‘rules of the game’ in depth. See chap. 3.
 
11
The only other book-length discussion specifically devoted to North’s work is, by my knowledge, the honorary collection of essays published as Galiani and Sened (2014). I refer to some of its contributions here.
 
12
This means that the present work does not deal in any detail with North’s earliest, purely Cliometric work. As it is unconnected to the NIEH project until the point that North becomes dissatisfied with it, it does not properly belong to a discussion of North’s NIEH. It should certainly be part of an intellectual biography of North, which I do not here intend to write.
 
13
A point also noted by Boldizzoni (2011: 19–22).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Acemoglu, Daron. 2010. Institutions, Factor Prices and Taxation: Virtues of Strong States?, NBER Working Paper 15693. Acemoglu, Daron. 2010. Institutions, Factor Prices and Taxation: Virtues of Strong States?, NBER Working Paper 15693.
Zurück zum Zitat Acemoglu, Daron, Francisco Gallego, and James A. Robinson. 2014. Institutions, Human Capital and Development, NBER Working Paper 19933. Acemoglu, Daron, Francisco Gallego, and James A. Robinson. 2014. Institutions, Human Capital and Development, NBER Working Paper 19933.
Zurück zum Zitat Alston, L.J. 2008. New Institutional Economics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Alston, L.J. 2008. New Institutional Economics. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Bates, Robert H. 2014. The New Institutionalism. The Work of Douglass North. In Institutions, Economic Growth, and Property Rights: The Legacy of Douglass North, ed. Sebastian Galiani and Itai Sened, 50–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Bates, Robert H. 2014. The New Institutionalism. The Work of Douglass North. In Institutions, Economic Growth, and Property Rights: The Legacy of Douglass North, ed. Sebastian Galiani and Itai Sened, 50–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boldizzoni, Francesco. 2011. The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Boldizzoni, Francesco. 2011. The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burki, Shahid Javed, and Guillermo E. Perry. 1998. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. In World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies: Viewpoints. Washington, DC: World Bank. Burki, Shahid Javed, and Guillermo E. Perry. 1998. Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. In World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies: Viewpoints. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zurück zum Zitat Coase, Ronald H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4 (16): 386–405.CrossRef Coase, Ronald H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4 (16): 386–405.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Colander, David. 2000. The Death of Neoclassical Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143.CrossRef Colander, David. 2000. The Death of Neoclassical Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Colander, David, Richard Holt, and J. Barkley Rosser. 2004. The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499.CrossRef Colander, David, Richard Holt, and J. Barkley Rosser. 2004. The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eggertsson, Thráinn. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Eggertsson, Thráinn. 1990. Economic Behavior and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fine, Ben. 2000. Economics Imperialism and Intellectual Progress: The Present as the History of Economic Thought? History of Economics Review 32 (1): 10–35.CrossRef Fine, Ben. 2000. Economics Imperialism and Intellectual Progress: The Present as the History of Economic Thought? History of Economics Review 32 (1): 10–35.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2002. Economics Imperialism: A View from the Periphery. Review of Radical Political Economics 34 (2): 187–201. ———. 2002. Economics Imperialism: A View from the Periphery. Review of Radical Political Economics 34 (2): 187–201.
Zurück zum Zitat Fine, Ben, and Dimitris Milonakis. 2003. From Principle of Pricing to Pricing of Principle: Rationality and Irrationality in the Economic History of Douglass North. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45 (3): 546–570.CrossRef Fine, Ben, and Dimitris Milonakis. 2003. From Principle of Pricing to Pricing of Principle: Rationality and Irrationality in the Economic History of Douglass North. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45 (3): 546–570.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries Between Economics and Other Social Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge. ———. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries Between Economics and Other Social Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Galiani, Sebastian, and Itai Sened, eds. 2014. Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Galiani, Sebastian, and Itai Sened, eds. 2014. Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRef Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greif, Avner. 1998. Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis. The American Economic Review 88 (2): 80–84. Greif, Avner. 1998. Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis. The American Economic Review 88 (2): 80–84.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRef ———. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Greif, Avner, and Chris Kingston. 2011. Institutions: Rules or Equilibria? In Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy, and Voting, ed. Gonzalo Caballero and Norman Schofield, 13–44. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Greif, Avner, and Chris Kingston. 2011. Institutions: Rules or Equilibria? In Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy, and Voting, ed. Gonzalo Caballero and Norman Schofield, 13–44. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Groenewegen, John, Frans Kerstholt, and Ad Nagelkerke. 1995. On Integrating Old and New Institutionalism: Douglass North Building Bridges. Journal of Economic Issues 29 (2): 467–475.CrossRef Groenewegen, John, Frans Kerstholt, and Ad Nagelkerke. 1995. On Integrating Old and New Institutionalism: Douglass North Building Bridges. Journal of Economic Issues 29 (2): 467–475.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt, Geoff, et al. 2016. Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Vol. III: Essays on Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Harcourt, Geoff, et al. 2016. Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Vol. III: Essays on Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Heiner, Ronald A. 1983. The Origin of Predictable Behavior. The American Economic Review 73 (4): 560–595. Heiner, Ronald A. 1983. The Origin of Predictable Behavior. The American Economic Review 73 (4): 560–595.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge.CrossRef Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2007. Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2): 211–226.CrossRef ———. 2007. Meanings of Methodological Individualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 14 (2): 211–226.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Langlois, Richard N. 1990. Bounded Rationality and Behavioralism: A Clarification and Critique. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 146 (4): 691–695. Langlois, Richard N. 1990. Bounded Rationality and Behavioralism: A Clarification and Critique. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 146 (4): 691–695.
Zurück zum Zitat Mäki, Uskali. 1993. Social Theories of Science and the Fate of Institutionalism in Economics. In Rationality, Institutions, and Economic Methodology, ed. Bo Gustafsson, Christian Knudsen, and Uskali Mäki, 76–109. London: Routledge.CrossRef Mäki, Uskali. 1993. Social Theories of Science and the Fate of Institutionalism in Economics. In Rationality, Institutions, and Economic Methodology, ed. Bo Gustafsson, Christian Knudsen, and Uskali Mäki, 76–109. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2009. Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3): 351–380.CrossRef ———. 2009. Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3): 351–380.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matthews, R.C.O. 1986. The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth. The Economic Journal 96 (384): 903–918.CrossRef Matthews, R.C.O. 1986. The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth. The Economic Journal 96 (384): 903–918.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ménard, Claude, and Mary M. Shirley. 2014. The Contribution of Douglass North to New Institutional Economics. In Institutions, Economic Growth, and Property Rights: The Legacy of Douglass North, ed. Sebastian Galiani and Itai Sened, 11–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Ménard, Claude, and Mary M. Shirley. 2014. The Contribution of Douglass North to New Institutional Economics. In Institutions, Economic Growth, and Property Rights: The Legacy of Douglass North, ed. Sebastian Galiani and Itai Sened, 11–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Milonakis, Dimitris, and Ben Fine. 2007. Douglass North’s Remaking of Economic History: A Critical Appraisal. Review of Radical Political Economics 39 (1): 27–57.CrossRef Milonakis, Dimitris, and Ben Fine. 2007. Douglass North’s Remaking of Economic History: A Critical Appraisal. Review of Radical Political Economics 39 (1): 27–57.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nee, Victor. 2005. The New Institutionalisms in Economics and Sociology. In Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 49–74. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Nee, Victor. 2005. The New Institutionalisms in Economics and Sociology. In Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 49–74. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2008. Economic Sociology and New Institutional Economics. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, ed. Claude Ménard and Mary M. Shirley, 789–818. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef ———. 2008. Economic Sociology and New Institutional Economics. In Handbook of New Institutional Economics, ed. Claude Ménard and Mary M. Shirley, 789–818. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Belknap. Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Belknap.
Zurück zum Zitat North, Douglass C. 1977. Markets and Other Allocation Systems in History: The Challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History 6 (3): 703–716. North, Douglass C. 1977. Markets and Other Allocation Systems in History: The Challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History 6 (3): 703–716.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1986. The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 142 (1): 230–237. ———. 1986. The New Institutional Economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 142 (1): 230–237.
Zurück zum Zitat North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. Challenges and Growth: The Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics 3 (3): 239–264.CrossRef Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. Challenges and Growth: The Development of the Interdisciplinary Field of Institutional Analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics 3 (3): 239–264.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrom, Elinor, and Vincent Ostrom. 2004. The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63 (1): 105–147.CrossRef Ostrom, Elinor, and Vincent Ostrom. 2004. The Quest for Meaning in Public Choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63 (1): 105–147.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peukert, Helge. 2001. Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North, Seen with Old Institutionalists’ Eyes. European Journal of Law and Economics 11 (2): 91–130.CrossRef Peukert, Helge. 2001. Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North, Seen with Old Institutionalists’ Eyes. European Journal of Law and Economics 11 (2): 91–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richter, Rudolf. 2005. The New Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects. European Business Organization Law Review 6 (2): 161–200.CrossRef Richter, Rudolf. 2005. The New Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects. European Business Organization Law Review 6 (2): 161–200.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2015. Essays on New Institutional Economics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef ———. 2015. Essays on New Institutional Economics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2004. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2): 131–165.CrossRef Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2004. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2): 131–165.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2001. Institutional Economics: Then and Now. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 173–194.CrossRef ———. 2001. Institutional Economics: Then and Now. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (3): 173–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schotter, Andrew. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Schotter, Andrew. 1981. The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vanberg, Viktor. 1988. Rules and Choice in Economics and Sociology. Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 7: 1–22. Vanberg, Viktor. 1988. Rules and Choice in Economics and Sociology. Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 7: 1–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Weintraub, E. Roy. 1979. Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Weintraub, E. Roy. 1979. Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson, Oliver E. 1973. Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. American Economic Review 63 (2): 316–325. Williamson, Oliver E. 1973. Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations. American Economic Review 63 (2): 316–325.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press. ———. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.CrossRef ———. 1981. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ———. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.CrossRef ———. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595–613.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Williamson, Oliver E., and Sidney G. Winter. 1991. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Williamson, Oliver E., and Sidney G. Winter. 1991. The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction: Douglass North’s NIEH in Context
verfasst von
Matthijs Krul
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94084-7_1