Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Introduction

verfasst von : Yue Wang, Fumin Zhang

Erschienen in: Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Human–robot interaction (HRI) has spanned almost every aspect in our daily life including aerospace, transportation, manufacturing, healthcare, agriculture, etc. As the first chapter of the book, we seek to provide an overview of the field of HRI, and in particular the recent trends in the modeling, control, and decision-making of human–robot collaboration (HRC) systems. HRC systems synergize humans’ advantages (e.g., high-level decision-making, dexterity, etc.) and robots’ capabilities (e.g., performing repetitive, dangerous tasks) and may positively impact human experience and trust in the robotic systems and hence improve the overall task performance. Although significant progress has been made in the field of HRI from an interdisciplinary perspective, extant works lack quantitative analysis and performance guarantees for HRC systems. To fill this gap, the book provides a detailed presentation of recent HRI developments in control and decision-making community. We also provide a detailed taxonomy in order to frame the contributions included in the book.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Nächstes Kapitel Robust Shared-Control for Rear-Wheel Drive Cars
Literatur
1.
Kevin G (2012) Connected and automated vehicle research in the united states. Technical report, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, July 2012. Task Force Report
2.
Ro-Man IEEE (2012) The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. France, Paris
3.
Ali KS, Arkin R (2000) Multiagent teleautonomous behavioral control. Mach Intell Robot Control 1(1)
4.
Ali KS (1999) Multiagent telerobotics: matching systems to tasks. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology
5.
Allen JE, Guinn CI, Horvtz E (1999) Mixed-initiative interaction. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 14(5):14–23CrossRef
6.
Sengstacken A, DeLaurentis D, Akbarzadeh-T M (2010) Optimization of shared autonomy vehicle control architectures for swarm operations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 40(4):1145–1157CrossRef
7.
Argall BD (2015) Turning assistive machines into assistive robots. In: SPIE OPTO. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 93701Y–93701Y
8.
Arkin R, Ali KS (1994) Integration of reactive and telerobotic control in multi-agent robotic systems. In: From animals to animats 3: Proceedings Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp 473–478
9.
Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) Fan-out: measuring human control of multiple robots. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 701–706
10.
Bates J (1994) The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun ACM 37(7):122–125CrossRef
11.
Bernhardson CS (1975) Type I error rates when multiple comparison procedures follow a significant F test of anova. Biometrics, 229–232
12.
Bisantz AM, Seong Y (2001) Assessment of operator trust in and utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions. Int J Ind Ergonomics 28(2):85–97CrossRef
13.
Bolton ML, Bass EJ, Siminiceanu RI (2013) Using formal verification to evaluate human-automation interaction: a review. CSL Tech Rep 43(3)
14.
Bradshaw JM, Feltovich PJ, Jung H, Kulkarni S, Taysom W, Uszok A (2004) Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. Agents and computational autonomy. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–39CrossRef
15.
Cynthia B (2004) Social interactions in HRI: the robot view. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 34(2):181–186CrossRef
16.
Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) The ANOVA and multiple comparisons for data with heterogeneous variances. Biometrics, 719–724
17.
Bruemmer DJ, Dudenhoeffer DD, Marble JL (2002) Dynamic-autonomy for urban search and rescue. In: AAAI mobile robot competition, pp 33–37
18.
Bruemmer DJ, Marble DJ, Dudenhoeffer DD (2002) Mutual initiative in human-machine teams. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th conference on human factors and power plants 2002. IEEE, New Jersey, pp 7–22
19.
Burke JL, Murphy RR, Rogers E, Lumelsky VJ, Scholtz J (2004) Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 34(2):103–112CrossRef
20.
Calvo RA, D’Mello S (2010) Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Trans Affective Comput 1(1):18–37CrossRef
21.
Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188(4):2–15CrossRef
22.
Cao M, Stewart A, Leonard NE (2008) Integrating human and robot decision-making dynamics with feedback: models and convergence analysis. In: 47th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1127–1132
23.
Charalambous G (2013) Human-automation collaboration in manufacturing: identifying key implementation factors. In: Contemporary Ergonomics and human factors 2013: proceedings of the international conference on Ergonomics and human factors 2013. Cambridge, UK, p 59
24.
Chipalkatty R (2012) Human-in-the-loop control for cooperative human-robot tasks. PhD dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology
25.
Clare AS (2013) Modeling real-time human-automation collaborative scheduling of unmanned vehicles. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
26.
Clough BT (2002) Metrics, schmetrics! How do you track a UAV’s autonomy? In: AIAA’s 1st technical conference and workshop on unmanned aerospace vehicles
27.
Conway L, Volz RA, Walker MW (1990) Teleautonomous systems: projecting and coordinating intelligent action at a distance. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6(2):146–158CrossRef
28.
Coppin G, Legras F (2012) Autonomy spectrum and performance perception issues in swarm supervisory control. Proc IEEE 100(3):590–603CrossRef
29.
Cummings ML (2004) Human supervisory control of swarming networks. In: 2nd annual swarming: autonomous intelligent networked systems conference
30.
Cummings ML, Mitchell PJ (2008) Predicting controller capacity in supervisory control of multiple UAVs. IEEE Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 38(2):451–460CrossRef
31.
Desai M (2012) Modeling trust to improve human-robot interaction
32.
Dey KC, Yan L, Wang X, Wang Y, Shen H, Chowdhury M, Yu L, Qiu C, Soundararaj V (2015) A review of communication, driver characteristics, and controls aspects of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC). IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17(2):491–509CrossRef
33.
Endsley MR (1988) Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 national aerospace and electronics conference, 1988. NAECON 1988, IEEE, New Jersey, pp 789–795
34.
Esser B, Pelczarski N, Huston D, Arms S (2000) Wireless inductive robotic inspection of structures. Proc IASTED Int Conf Roboot Appl 8:14–16
35.
Feng L, Wiltsche C, Humphrey L, Topcu U (2015) Controller synthesis for autonomous systems interacting with human operators. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE sixth international conference on cyber-physical systems. ACM, New York, pp 70–79CrossRef
36.
Ferguson G, Allen JF, Miller BW (1996) Trains-95: towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. In: AIPS, pp 70–77
37.
Fong T, Provencher C, Micire M, Diftler M, Berka R, Bluethmann B, Mittman D (2012) The human exploration telerobotics project: objectives, approach, and testing. 2012 IEEE aerospace conference. IEEE, New Jersey, pp 1–9CrossRef
38.
Fong T, Zumbado JR, Currie N, Mishkin A, Akin DL (2013) Space telerobotics unique challenges to human-robot collaboration in space. Rev Hum Factors Ergonomics 9(1):6–56CrossRef
39.
Gage A (2004) Multi-robot task allocation using affect. PhD dissertation, University of South Florida
40.
Gassert R, Moser R, Burdet E, Bleuler H (2006) MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 11(2):216–224CrossRef
41.
Ge S, Khatib O, Cabibihan J, Simmons R, Williams MA (2012) In: Proceedings of the social robotics: 4th international conference, ICSR 2012, (Lecture notes in computer science/Lecture notes in artificial intelligence). Chengdu, China
42.
Göhring D, Latotzky D, Wang M, Rojas R (2013) Semi-autonomous car control using brain computer interfaces. In: Intelligent autonomous systems, vol 12. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 393–408CrossRef
43.
Goodrich MA, Schultz AC (2007) Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found Trends Hum Comput Interact 1(3):203–275CrossRefMATH
44.
Graves S, Volz R (1995) Action selection in teleautonomous systems. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, ‘human robot interaction and cooperative robots’, vol 3. IEEE, New Jersey, pp 14–19
45.
Guizzo E, Ackerman E (2012) How rethink robotics built its new baxter robot worker. IEEE spectrum
46.
Hancock PA, Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JYC, de Visser EJ, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergonomics Soc 53:517–527CrossRef
47.
Hanheide M, Lohse M, Zender H (2012) Special issue on expectations, intentions and actions in human-robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 4(2)
48.
Hart SG (2006) NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 50. Sage Publications, London, pp 904–908
49.
Hayes B, Scassellati B (2013) Challenges in shared-environment human-robot collaboration. Learning 8:9
50.
Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2009) Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit. In: The 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, pp 528–533
51.
Hirche S, Buss M (2012) Human-oriented control for haptic teleoperation. Proc IEEE 100(3):623–647CrossRef
52.
Horvitz E (1999) Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 159–166
53.
Huang H, Messina E, Albus J (2007) Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) framework. NIST Spec Publ 1011-II-1.0
54.
Huston D, Esser B, Miller J, Wang X (2003) Robotic and mobile sensor systems for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on structural health monitoring, vol 1517. Stanford, CA
55.
Serena Ivaldi, Salvatore M Anzalone, Woody Rousseau, Olivier Sigaud, and Mohamed Chetouani. Robot initiative in a team learning task increases the rhythm of interaction but not the perceived engagement. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 8, 2014
56.
Jokinen K, Wilcock G (2013) User experience in human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the fourth workshop on perceptual quality of systems (PQS 2013), FTW-TECHREPORT-128, FTW, Vienna, Austria
57.
Jubien A, Gautier M, Janot A (2014) Dynamic identification of the kuka LWR robot using motor torques and joint torque sensors data. In: World congress of the international federation of automatic control (IFAC), pp 1–6
58.
Julia B, Aaron H, Allison T (2014) Advancing safe human-robot interactions with robonaut 2. In: Proceeding of the 12th In-ternational symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space, vol 17, p 19
59.
Karwowski W, Rahimi M, (eds) Human-robot interaction. Taylor and Francis, Milton Park
60.
Kasderidis S, Taylor JG (2003) Attention-based robot control. In: Knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, vol 2774, Lecture notes in computer scienceSpringer, Heidelberg, pp 615–621
61.
Kidwell B, Calhoun GL, Ruff HA, Parasuraman R (2012) Adaptable and adaptive automation for supervisory control of multiple autonomous vehicles. In: Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 56. Sage Publications, London, pp 428–432
62.
Kirlik A (1993) Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: why an “aid” can (and should) go unused. Hum Factors 35(2):221–242
63.
Klein G (2004) Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intell Syst 19(6):91–95
64.
Koelstra S, Muhl C, Soleymani M, Lee JS, Yazdani A, Ebrahimi T, Pun T, Nijholt A, Patras I (2012) Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. IEEE Trans Affective Comput 3(1):18–31CrossRef
65.
Kortenkamp D, Burridge R, Bonasso P, Schrenkenghost D, Hudson M (1999) An intelligent software architecture for semiautonomous robot control. In: Autonomy control software workshop, autonomous agents
66.
Kuzuoka H, Evers V, Imai M, Forlizzi J (2013) In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. Tokyo, Japan
67.
Lamers MH, Verbeek FJ (2010) In: Human-robot personal relationships third international conference, HRPR 2010, Revised selected papers series: Lecture notes of the Institute for computer sciences, social-informatics and telecommunications engineering, vol 59. Leiden, The Netherlands
68.
Lang S, Kleinehagenbrock M, Hohenner S, Fritsch J, Fink GA, Sagerer G (2003) Providing the basis for human-robot-interaction: a multi-modal attention system for a mobile robot. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on multimodal interfaces, pp 28–35
69.
Laschi C, Breazeal C, Nakauchi Y (2007) Guest editorial special issue on human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5)
70.
71.
Lewis B, Sukthankar G (2011) Two hands are better than one: Assisting users with multi-robot manipulation tasks. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 2590–2595
72.
Loewenstein G, Lerner J (2003) The role of emotion in decision making. In: Davidson RJ, Goldsmith HH, Scherer KR (eds) The handbook of affective science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, pp 619–642
73.
Mackay WE, Brewster S, Bødker S (2013) In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Paris, France
74.
Majji M, Rai R (2013) Autonomous task assignment of multiple operators for human robot interaction. In: American control conference, pp 6454–6459
75.
McLachlan S, Arblaster J, Liu O, Miro J, Chenoweth L (2005) A multistage shared control method for an intelligent mobility assistant. In: 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 426–429
76.
Michaud F, Prijanian P, Audet J, Letourneau D (2000) Artificial emotions and social robotics. In: Proceedings of the distributed autonomous robotic systems
77.
Michelucci P (ed) The Springer handbook of human computation. Springer, Heidelberg
78.
Murphy RR, Sprouse J (1996) Strategies for searching an area with semi-autonomous mobile robots. In: Proceedings of robotics for challenging environments. Citeseer, pp 15–21
79.
Nehme CE (2009) Modeling human supervisory control in heterogeneous unmanned vehicle systems. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
80.
Norman, DA Draper SW (1986) User centered system design; new perspectives on human-computer interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.,
81.
Oleson KE, Billings DR, Kocsis V, Chen JYC, Hancock PA (2011) Antecedents of trust in human-robot collaborations. In: IEEE first international multi-disciplinary conference on cognitive methods in situation awareness and decision support (CogSIMA), pp 175–178
82.
Ortony A (2002) On making believable emotional agents believable. In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (eds) Emotions in humans and artifacts, Chap 6. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 189–211
83.
Ostergaard EH (2012) Lightweight robot for everybody [industrial activities]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag, 19(4):17–18, 2012
84.
Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD (2000) A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 30(3):286–297CrossRef
85.
Parker L, Howard A (2009) Assistive formation maintenance for human-led multirobot systems. EEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern, 2350–2355
86.
Picard RW Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge
87.
Picard RW (2010) Affective computing: from laughter to IEEE. IEEE Trans Affective Comput 1(1):11–17CrossRef
88.
Rahman SM, Sadrfaridpour B, Wang Y (2015) Trust-based optimal subtask allocation and model predictive control for human-robot collaborative assembly in manufacturing. In: ASME 2015 dynamic systems and control conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. V002T32A004–V002T32A004
89.
90.
Riley V (1989) A general model of mixed-initiative human-machine systems. Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 33. Sage Publications, London, pp 124–128
91.
Hayley R, Bruce M, Elizabeth B (2014) The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Soc Robot 6(4):575–591CrossRef
92.
Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente J (2004) Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl Psychol 53(1):61–86CrossRef
93.
Sadrfaridpour B, Saeidi H, Burke J, Madathil K, Wang Y (2015) Modeling and control of trust in human-robot collaborative manufacturing. In: The intersection of robust intelligence (RI) and trust in autonomous systems. Springer, Heidelberg
94.
Saeidi H, McLane F, Sadrfaidpour B, Sand E, Fu S, Rodriguez J, Wagner J, Wang Y (2016) Trust-based mixed-initiative bilateral teleoperation control of mobile robotic systems. In: American control conference (ACC)
95.
Saeidi H, Wang Y (2015) Trust and self-confidence based autonomy allocation of robotic systems. In: Conference on decision and control
96.
Sanders T, Oleson KE, Billings DR, YC Chen J, Hancock PA, (2011) A model of human-robot trust theoretical model development. In: Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 55. Sage Publications, London, pp 1432–1436
97.
Savla K, Frazzoli E (2012) A dynamical queue approach to intelligent task management for human operators. Proc IEEE 100(3):672–686CrossRef
98.
Sellner B, Heger FW, Hiatt LM, Simmons R, Singh S (2006) Coordinated multi-agent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly. Proc IEEE Spec Issue Multi-Robot Syst 94(7):1425–1444
99.
Shah D, Schneider J, Campbell M (2012) A sketch interface for robust and natural robot control. Proc IEEE 100(3):604–622CrossRef
100.
Sheridan TB (1983) Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicles and dynamic processes: experiments in command and display aiding. Technical report, DTIC Document
101.
Sheridan TB (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. The MIT Press, Cambridge
102.
Sheridan TB (ed) (2002) Humans and automation: system design and research issues. Wiley, New Jersey
103.
Sheridan TB (2011) Adaptive automation, level of automation, allocation authority, supervisory control, and adaptive control: distinctions and modes of adaptation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 41(4):662–667CrossRef
104.
Sheridan TB, Parasuraman R (2006) Human-automation interaction. In: Nickerson RS (ed) Reviews of human factors and ergonomics, vol 1. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp 89–129
105.
Sheridan TB, Verplank WL (1978) Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Technical report, MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
106.
Shi J, Jimmerson G, Pearson T, Menassa R (2012) Levels of human and robot collaboration for automotive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems, PerMIS ’12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 95–100
107.
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C, Cohen M, Jacobs S (2009) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 5/e, New edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
108.
Sholes E (2006) Evolution of a UAV autonomy classification taxonomy. IEEEAC paper, (1538)
109.
Sloman A, Croucher M (1981) Why robots will have emotions. Proc IJCAI
110.
Smith BW (2014) Automated vehicles are probably legal in the united states
111.
Srivastava V (2012) Stochastic search and surveillance strategies for mixed human-robot teams. PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara
112.
Trivedi MM, Hall B, Kogut G, Roche S (2000) Web-based teleautonomy and telepresence. In: International symposium on optical science and technology. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 81–85
113.
Velásquez JD (1998) When robots weep: emotional memories and decision-making. In: AAAI proceedings
114.
Wagner AR (2009) The role of trust and relationships in human-robot social interaction. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology
115.
Wang X, Shi Z, Zhang F, Wang Y (2015) Dynamic real-time scheduling for human-agent collaboration systems based on mutual trust. In: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Taylor and Francis, Milton Park, 2015
116.
Wang Y (2016) Regret-based automated decision-making aids for domain search tasks using human-agent collaborative teams. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 99:1–16
117.
Wegner R, Anderson J (2006) Agent-based support for balancing teleoperation and autonomy in urban search and rescue. Int J Robot Autom 21(2):120–128
118.
Whetten J, Goodrich M, Guo Y (2010) Beyond robot fan-out: towards multi-operator supervisory control. In: IEEE international conference on systems man and cybernetics (SMC), pp 2008–2015
119.
Wickens CD, Gordon SE, Liu Y (2004) An introduction to human factors engineering. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
120.
Wilcox R, Nikolaidis S, Shah J (2012) Optimization of temporal dynamics for adaptive human-robot interaction in assembly manufacturing. In: Proceedings of robotics science and systems, Sydney, Australia
121.
Yagoda RE (2010) Development of the human robot interaction workload measurement tool (HRI-WM). In: Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics society annual meeting, vol 54. Sage Publications, London, pp 304–308
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction
verfasst von
Yue Wang
Fumin Zhang
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Trends in Control and Decision-Making for Human–Robot Collaboration Systems

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40532-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-40533-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40533-9_1

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise