2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Introduction
verfasst von : Maximilian Eberl
Erschienen in: Organizational Routines Meet Experimental Psychology
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.
Wählen Sie Textabschnitte aus um mit Künstlicher Intelligenz passenden Patente zu finden. powered by
Markieren Sie Textabschnitte, um KI-gestützt weitere passende Inhalte zu finden. powered by
Organizational routines evolved into a central concept in organizational research and represent a fundamental idea of how organizations accomplish their work (Felin and Foss, 2009; Salvato and Rerup, 2010; Parmigiani and Howard-Grenville, 2011; Felin et al., 2012). In the past decades, research on organizational routines yielded major results (e.g., Nelson and Winter, 1982; Feldman and Pentland, 2003) and strengthened the understanding of the concept. Scholars proved routines to be essential for organizations and to be an integral part of organizations (Becker, 2008; Hodgson, 2008). Although scholars are aware of the importance of this concept, to date literature lacks a commonly accepted definition of routines and suffers from numerous ambiguities as well as inconsistencies (Cohen et al., 1996; Jones and Craven, 2001; Reynaud, 2005).