Market based and fiscal instruments have long been proposed by the economists for tackling environmental degradation; however, India for some reason has till date remained largely elusive to these instruments and has focused on the command and control (CAC) measures which could not bring effective control in the CO2 emissions in India. The concern for using ecotaxes to reign pollution emerges primarily from the failure and inefficiency of the command and control measures on one hand and market price-based instruments on the other in curbing the unabated pollution. As the opening chapter, the concept of ecotaxes/other measures have been explored through the understanding of its brief history in the Indian context. An attempt is undertaken here to comprehend this in the context of the theoretical foundations of these instruments with Prof. A. C. Pigou’s arguments and thereafter exploring the critical issues pertinent to these instruments by categorising them into descriptive, economic and fiscal issues. The issues to be considered for effective design of ecotaxes have been distilled down to the issue of non-existence of a comprehensive definition and thereafter the issue pertaining to base and optimal rates of ecotaxes and issues of incidence, double dividend and competitiveness.
Anzeige
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
MoEF has been renamed as the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). MoEF and MoEFCC have been used interchangeably at various places in the book.
This section uses some portions from one of my previously published work, Verma, R. (2016). Ecotaxes: A Comparative Study of India and China. ISEC Working Paper Series, Working Paper-353. Also accessible at: http://www.isec.ac.in/WP%20353%20-%20Rajat%20Verma.pdf. Portions re-used here with permission. Please check and cite accordingly.
This section uses some portions from one of my previously published work, Verma, R. (2016). Ecotaxes: A Comparative Study of India and China. ISEC Working Paper Series, Working Paper-353. Also accessible at: http://www.isec.ac.in/WP%20353%20-%20Rajat%20Verma.pdf.
Ecotaxes emerge from the strong fundamentals of neo-classical economics which rests on the principle that mismanagement of the natural resources is caused due to inappropriate pricing of the good. Hence, it tries to correct the price of a resource by taxing it so as to internalise the externality caused by it in its price.
Optimum rate of per-unit tax = Marginal External Damage (MED), where MED is the cost on the society due to overexploitation of an additional unit of the resource. Please refer to Fig. 1.1.
Direct budget share means directly consumed fuel (excluding indirect consumption through consumption of commodities using fuel as input) as a percentage of total expenditure. Consumption reported in the household consumption survey is treated to be direct consumption (Datta, 2010).
Budget share of a decile is the ratio of the average (weighted) fuel expenditure and average (weighted) total expenditure for that decile (Datta, 2010).
Non-point or non-stationary sources of pollution are those polluting sources which are not stationary such as vehicles, vis-à-vis point source such as industries.
OECD/EEA database terms the ecotaxes in the wider umbrella of environmentally related taxes. An extensive discussion regarding this could be traced in chapter II.