Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Introduction

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study analyses the potentials and consequences of a change from the current system of a production-based policy orientation in international climate policy to one that is consumption-based. Such a change has been suggested by some authors as a way to improve the global effectiveness of unilateral climate policies followed by industrialized countries. The central research question of this study is whether this indeed is the case. In this introductory chapter, four arguments for adopting consumption-based policies are introduced: such policies currently include a larger share of global emissions; they bring the export sector of emerging economies, which often still offers opportunities for comparatively cheap abatement, into the scope of the policy; they may reduce carbon leakage; and they may help to overcome political opposition to an ambitious climate policy. Then the methodology, structure, and the research objectives of the study are laid out: The first part of the study reviews the economic, legal, and political background and the often contradictory findings on consumption-based approaches in the current literature. The second part investigates—with the help of an analytical model—the effects of different policy variants on environmental effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, carbon leakage, competitiveness and the global distribution of income. The third part attempts to answer the question whether consumption-based approaches are a concept that only works in the idealized setting of stylized analytical models, or whether such policies could prove useful also under “real-world” circumstances. Several criteria and options for practical policy design are discussed.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
For an explanation of the difference between the terms “territorial” and “production-based” emissions accounting see Footnote 2 of Chap. 2.
 
2
There exist other forms of border adjustments apart from taxes—see Sect. 2.​2.​3. The expression “taxes” is used—without loss of generality—merely to keep the discussion simple.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett S (1998) Political economy of the Kyoto protocol. Oxf Rev Econ Pol 14(4):20–39CrossRef Barrett S (1998) Political economy of the Kyoto protocol. Oxf Rev Econ Pol 14(4):20–39CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bastianoni S, Pulselli FM, Tiezzi E (2004) The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 49:253–257CrossRef Bastianoni S, Pulselli FM, Tiezzi E (2004) The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 49:253–257CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boehringer C, Balistreri E, Rutherford T (2012) The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: overview of an Energy Modelling Forum study (EMF29). Energy Econ 34(Suppl 2):S97–S110CrossRef Boehringer C, Balistreri E, Rutherford T (2012) The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: overview of an Energy Modelling Forum study (EMF29). Energy Econ 34(Suppl 2):S97–S110CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cosbey A, Droege S, Fischer C, Reinaud J, Stephenson J, Weischer L, Wooders P (2012) A guide for the concerned: guidance on the elaboration and implementation of border carbon adjustment. Policy Report 03 (November). Entwined, Stockholm. Available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/bca_guidance.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2013 Cosbey A, Droege S, Fischer C, Reinaud J, Stephenson J, Weischer L, Wooders P (2012) A guide for the concerned: guidance on the elaboration and implementation of border carbon adjustment. Policy Report 03 (November). Entwined, Stockholm. Available at: http://​www.​iisd.​org/​pdf/​2012/​bca_​guidance.​pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2013
Zurück zum Zitat Davis SJ, Caldeira K (2010) Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5687–5692CrossRef Davis SJ, Caldeira K (2010) Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:5687–5692CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Droege S (2011) Using border measures to address carbon flows. Clim Pol 11:1191–1201CrossRef Droege S (2011) Using border measures to address carbon flows. Clim Pol 11:1191–1201CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferng J-J (2003) Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecol Econ 46:121–141CrossRef Ferng J-J (2003) Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecol Econ 46:121–141CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grubb MJ (2011) International climate finance from border carbon cost levelling. Clim Pol 11(3):1050–1057CrossRef Grubb MJ (2011) International climate finance from border carbon cost levelling. Clim Pol 11(3):1050–1057CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hoel M (1996) Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors? J Public Econ 59:17–32CrossRef Hoel M (1996) Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors? J Public Econ 59:17–32CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H (1998) CO2 emissions in Japan: influences of imports and exports. Appl Energy 59(2–3):163–174CrossRef Kondo Y, Moriguchi Y, Shimizu H (1998) CO2 emissions in Japan: influences of imports and exports. Appl Energy 59(2–3):163–174CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T (2007) Shared producer and consumer responsibility – theory and practice. Ecol Econ 61:27–42CrossRef Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T (2007) Shared producer and consumer responsibility – theory and practice. Ecol Econ 61:27–42CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Markusen JR (1975) International externalities and optimal tax structures. J Int Econ 5:15–29CrossRef Markusen JR (1975) International externalities and optimal tax structures. J Int Econ 5:15–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Munksgaard J, Pedersen K (2001) CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Pol 21:327–334CrossRef Munksgaard J, Pedersen K (2001) CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Pol 21:327–334CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nakano S, Okamura A, Sakurai N, Suzuki M, Tojo I, Yamano N (2009) The measurement of CO2 embodiments in international trade: evidence from the harmonised input–output and bilateral trade database. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2009/3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris Nakano S, Okamura A, Sakurai N, Suzuki M, Tojo I, Yamano N (2009) The measurement of CO2 embodiments in international trade: evidence from the harmonised input–output and bilateral trade database. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2009/3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Zurück zum Zitat Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2006) Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Glob Environ Chang 16:379–387CrossRef Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2006) Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian case. Glob Environ Chang 16:379–387CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008a) CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 42(5):1401–1407CrossRef Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008a) CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol 42(5):1401–1407CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008b) Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Clim Chang 86(1–2):51–66CrossRef Peters GP, Hertwich EG (2008b) Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption. Clim Chang 86(1–2):51–66CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(21):8903–8908CrossRef Peters GP, Minx JC, Weber CL, Edenhofer O (2011) Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(21):8903–8908CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Steininger KW, Lininger C, Droege S, Roser D, Tomlinson L, Meyer L (2014) Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies. Glob Environ Chang 24:75–87CrossRef Steininger KW, Lininger C, Droege S, Roser D, Tomlinson L, Meyer L (2014) Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies. Glob Environ Chang 24:75–87CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change – the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change – the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat UNEP (2013) The emissions gap report 2013. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi UNEP (2013) The emissions gap report 2013. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Nairobi
Zurück zum Zitat UNFCCC (1998a) Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, New York, NY UNFCCC (1998a) Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations, New York, NY
Zurück zum Zitat UNFCCC (1998b) Decision 2/CP.3. Methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol. FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn UNFCCC (1998b) Decision 2/CP.3. Methodological issues related to the Kyoto Protocol. FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn
Zurück zum Zitat Van Asselt H, Brewer T (2010) Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: an analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU. Energy Pol 38:42–51CrossRef Van Asselt H, Brewer T (2010) Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: an analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU. Energy Pol 38:42–51CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat WBGU (2009) German Advisory Council on Global Change. Solving the climate dilemma: the budget approach. Special Report, Berlin WBGU (2009) German Advisory Council on Global Change. Solving the climate dilemma: the budget approach. Special Report, Berlin
Zurück zum Zitat Weyant JP, Hill JN (1999) Introduction and overview. Energy J 20, Special Issue (The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a multi-model evaluation):vii–xliv Weyant JP, Hill JN (1999) Introduction and overview. Energy J 20, Special Issue (The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a multi-model evaluation):vii–xliv
Zurück zum Zitat Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222CrossRef Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Winchester N (2012) The impact of border carbon adjustments under alternative producer responses. Am J Agric Econ 94:354–359CrossRef Winchester N (2012) The impact of border carbon adjustments under alternative producer responses. Am J Agric Econ 94:354–359CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Introduction
verfasst von
Christian Lininger
Copyright-Jahr
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15991-1_1