Zum Inhalt

1. Introduction

  • Open Access
  • 2025
  • OriginalPaper
  • Buchkapitel
Erschienen in:

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Dieses Kapitel bewertet den Fortschritt der Ziele Nachhaltiger Entwicklung (SDGs) zur Halbzeit der Agenda 2030 und hebt erhebliche Datendefizite und die Notwendigkeit verbesserter Möglichkeiten zur Datenerfassung hervor. Es untersucht die Integration von Big-Earth-Daten aus verschiedenen Quellen, einschließlich Satellitenbeobachtungen und Online-Medien, um den Mangel an statistischen Daten auszugleichen und reichhaltige raumzeitliche Informationen bereitzustellen. Das Kapitel konzentriert sich auf die Fortschritte bei umweltbezogenen Indikatoren, insbesondere innerhalb Chinas und der Länder der Seidenstraßeninitiative (BRI). Sie befasst sich auch mit den Herausforderungen bei der Vergleichbarkeit von Daten, Bewertungsstandards und der Erfassung räumlicher Daten für bestimmte SDG-Indikatoren. Das Kapitel schließt mit der Empfehlung, dass Länder ihre Fähigkeit zur Berechnung von Indikatoren unter Verwendung von Big Data stärken und dass die UN Indikatoreinstellungen anpassen, um global konsistente Big Data besser zu nutzen und einen gerechteren und zugänglicheren Rahmen zu schaffen.
The year 2023 marks the midterm of the “2030 Agenda”. It is imperative to assess the progress of current SDGs with more precise data to gain a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced globally and by individual nations. This assessment will facilitate the exploration of scientifically feasible solutions and provide direction for the implementation phase of the agenda.
However, based on the analysis of the 17 goals in the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 and research results from over 230 indicators, it is evident that approximately half of the countries worldwide still severely lack progress data for these indicators. Additionally, the data updates are not timely, there is a lack of geospatial information, and these deficiencies significantly impede the monitoring of indicators and informed decision-making (United Nations 2022, 2023). The midterm evaluation of the SDGs presents an opportunity to assess the progress in implementing the SDGs and identify shortcomings, as well as to enhance data acquisition capabilities. According to the project team, out of the currently over 230 SDG indicators, 35% remain at Tier II, where methodologies exist but data are unavailable. Moreover, for those indicators with available data, their distribution across different countries and sectors is highly uneven. This is particularly challenging for many developing and underdeveloped countries, which find it difficult to achieve large-scale data computation in the short term and urgently require high-quality global data products.
The UN has promoted a “Digital Cooperation Roadmap” aimed at accelerating sustainable development through digital technologies (United Nations 2020). Big data is a crucial method and tool within digital technologies. In this report, we integrate Big Earth Data from multiple sources, including satellite observations, station records, survey statistics, online media, and foundational geographic data, to compensate for the absence of statistical data. This integration also provides rich spatiotemporal information, illustrating the spatial disparities and progress of indicators. The “Sustainable Development Science Satellite 1” (SDGSAT-1), launched in November 2021, is dedicated to serving the “2030 Agenda”. Currently, satellite data are being shared globally to further enhance the acquisition and service capabilities of SDG data.
From 2019 to 2022, we have continuously published the “Big Earth Data in Support of the Sustainable Development Goals” (http://​www.​cbas.​ac.​cn/​en/​publications/​reports/​), aiding the realization of the SDGs in China and along the BRI countries. This report continues to focus on the progress of indicators at the scales of China and the BRI countries from the perspectives of data products, methods and models, and decision support. Additionally, this report emphasizes the midterm progress assessment of indicators within China and the BRI countries. Among the more than 230 SDG indicators, over one-third are related to the environment (UNEP 2021). These environment-related indicators are also the areas where Big Earth Data’s spatiotemporal advantages are most evident. As Earth Big Data research deepens, the data available for indicator computation are continuously increasing and being updated.
At the scale of BRI countries, we have primarily provided public data products from 2019 to 2023 related to SDG 2, SDG 6, SDG 7, SDG 11, SDG 13, SDG 14, and SDG 15. These include global arable land data products, global lake and reservoir water quality products, global electrification rate products, global urban impermeable surface and global urban public space products, global greenhouse gas emissions and natural disaster impact products, global marine aquaculture and mangrove distribution products, global forest cover and land degradation products, as well as SDGSAT-1 data products. These products are at the forefront in terms of resolution, timeliness and accuracy, and can directly support the assessment of global SDGs. Additionally, we have developed a Big Earth Data sharing platform and an online data visualization platform aimed at the sharing, display, and online computation of indicators.
Big data offers advantages such as rapid updates, repeatability, and extensive coverage in the computation of globally consistent indicators, playing a crucial role in addressing data deficiencies in certain countries (Guo 2020, 2021a, 2021b, 2022). However, during the long-term research and monitoring of indicators, from the perspective of big data analysis and computation, there remain three areas where the definitions and evaluation standards of some SDG indicators can be further refined and improved.
(1)
Limited data comparability for certain indicators: Some indicators’ data do not account for differences in population size, development levels, and geographical environments between countries. For instance, SDG 13.2.2, which measures annual greenhouse gas emissions, does not consider variations in population and economic scale across nations.
 
(2)
Unclear evaluation standards for certain indicators: The criteria for some indicators lack quantifiability, making it challenging to assess progress and determine whether targets have been achieved. For example, SDG 14.a.1, which pertains to the proportion of the budget allocated to marine research activities, does not specify the threshold required to consider the goal as achieved. Furthermore, increasing the budget proportion for marine research may result in reduced allocations for other research areas such as agriculture and climate change.
 
(3)
Difficulty in obtaining spatial data for certain indicators: Some indicators require differentiation based on gender, disability status, etc., such as SDG 11.2.1 (the proportion of the population with convenient access to public transportation) and SDG 11.7.1 (the proportion of urban public open spaces). While the intention may be to emphasize the protection of vulnerable populations, obtaining spatial distribution data for different genders and disabled populations within cities is challenging. Relying solely on statistical data fails to capture spatial disparities effectively.
 
In response to the current disparities in data acquisition capabilities among countries and the issues in indicator settings, we recommend that, on the one hand, countries strengthen support to continue enhancing their ability to compute indicators using Big Data. On the other hand, the UN should adjust the indicator settings by clarifying definitions and standards and increasing considerations for data accessibility. These measures will better leverage the role of globally consistent big data, advancing towards a framework that is “more equitable and accessible”.
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc-nd/​4.​0/​), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this license to share adapted material derived from this chapter or parts of it.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Titel
Introduction
Verfasst von
Huadong Guo
Copyright-Jahr
2025
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-3178-3_1
Zurück zum Zitat Guo HD (2020) Big earth data in support of the sustainable development goals (2019). Science Press and EDP Sciences, Beijing
Zurück zum Zitat Guo HD (2021a) Big earth data in support of the sustainable development goals (2020): the belt and road. Science Press and EDP Sciences, BeijingCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guo HD (2021b) Big earth data in support of the sustainable development goals (2020): China. Science Press and EDP Sciences, BeijingCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guo HD (2022) Big earth data in support of the sustainable development goals (2021): the belt and road. Science Press and EDP Sciences, Beijing
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations (2020) Road map for digital cooperation: implementation of the recommendations of the high-level panel on digital cooperation. https://​digitallibrary.​un.​org/​record/​3864685/​files/​A_​74_​821-EN.​pdf