Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Indian Metamorphosis Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. ‘Invasion’ of Educational Universe by Neo-Liberal Economic Thinking: A Global Casualty?

verfasst von : Arup Maharatna

Erschienen in: The Indian Metamorphosis

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the preceding part of the book, we have shown how a decided neglect on the part of Indian political leadership towards the importance of ideational and social revolutions in line with Western Enlightenment ideas and values has contributed to holding the country in a state of perpetual metamorphosis, and also how India’s school educational thinking during the prime formative decades after Independence laid a foundation of a distinct legacy of bypassing a crucial task of imparting—through inter alias suitably designed curriculum and textbooks—the core Enlightenment values including the supremacy of reason, rationality, secularity and universalistic humanism into young impressionable minds, outlook and attitudes.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel India’s Educational Thinking, Aims and School Curriculum: A Critical Look
Nächstes Kapitel Global Crisis in Higher Education: Is Merit Being Trampled by Marketing and Money?
Fußnoten
1
We would consciously avoid using such currently popular categories as ‘post-modernism’ or ‘post-structuralism’ for the sake of maintaining the steadfastness of our argument and exposition.
 
2
The growing and pervasive applications of mainstream neo-classical economic premises, approaches and methods of analysis since the late 1950s not only into the field of education but also into other social science branches such as sociology, anthropology and political science have been subsequently christened as ‘economic imperialism’: ‘The most aggressive economic imperialists aim to explain all social behavior by using the tools of economics’ (Lazear 1999: 6).
 
3
A key role that was played historically by the state in supporting and maintaining standard, quality and rigour in academies and higher educational institutions got reaffirmed in the late nineteenth century when Britain—though one of the pioneers in the Industrial Revolution—experienced relative declines in industrial economy and its international competiveness vis-a-vis other and newer industrial economies marked by far more extensive state involvement in higher education than in England (Hobsbawm 1999).
 
4
Indeed, even today the oldest and renowned universities of the world such as Harvard still announce, while seeking to attract prospective young minds/students, their zeal for liberal education—‘an education conducted in a spirit of free inquiry undertaken without concern for topical relevance or vocational utility. This kind of learning is not only one of the enrichments of existence; it is one of the achievements of civilization’ (italics added; see www.​admissions.​college.​harvard.​edu, accessed in 2012).
 
5
We are, of course, ignoring some (arguably) nebulous civilizational visions such as the one of launching a ‘new form of civilization’ virtually cut-off from the questions of what and how has our existing civilization been in place or how we have become what we presently are: ‘we may be on the threshold of the emergence of a new form of civilization, as billions of world citizens interact together, unconstrained by today’s monopolies on knowledge or learning opportunities’ (Duderstandt 2012: 594, emphasis added).
 
6
Taken from New York State Education Department (2009), Federal Education and the States, 1945–2009, Albany: New York State Archives; p. 7.
 
7
This field has, sometimes, also been called ‘economics of human capital’ seemingly in recognition of the fact that the notion and scope of education is much broader than the one connoted by the term ‘economics of education’, which is generally circumscribed by economic motives and calculations, economic benefits and costs alone (Tilak 2006). In fact, some authors initially preferred using the term ‘human wealth’ in place of ‘human capital’ (Teixeira 2000: 260).
 
8
Labaree (1997) calls this ‘social mobility’ goal of education, which does not mesh well with the two other major goals of education, namely ‘democratic equality’ and ‘social efficiency’.
 
9
A slightly revised version of this paper was subsequently brought out as a NBER Working Paper in 2010 and then published as an article in Review of Economics and Statistics in 2011.
 
10
For instance, marks are often not deducted for poor and wrong grammar and spelling (Green et al. 2005: 11).
 
11
Several studies that exist, or are being undertaken of late point to the similar educational trends in other developed and developing countries too (Pritchett 2013).
 
12
The situation has come to such a pass that the number of teachers, who even commit—in their bid to escape management’s frowning or a threat of job loss—such offences as giving pupils ‘inappropriate assistance’ on coursework and whispering advice during exams, is increasing exponentially even in country such as UK (Osborne 2017).
 
13
This refers to the following famous sentence written by Lord Chesterfield of the eighteenth century England in one of his innumerable letters to his son who was studying in a public school far away from home: ‘Due attention to the inside of books, and due contempt for the outside, is the proper relation between a man of sense and his books’.
 
Literatur
Arum, R., and J. Roksa. 2010. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Barber, B.R. 1972. Science, Salience and Comparative Education: Some Reflections on Social Scientific Inquiry. Comparative Education Review 16 (3): 424–436. CrossRef
Barnett, Ronald. 2003. Beyond All Reason: Living With Ideology in the University. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.
Blaug, M. 1968. Economics of Education, vol. 1. New York: Penguin Books.
Bloom, A. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Bowen, W.G. 2012. The “Cost Disease” in Higher Education: Is Technology the Answer? The Tanner Lectures, October, Stanford University.
Challahan, R.E. 1962. Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Chomsky, N., others. 1997. The War & The University. New York: New Press.
Cohen, D.K., and B. Neufeld. 1981. The Failure of High Schools and the Progress of Education. Daedalus 110 (3): 69–89.
Davis, R. 2007. “Whose Education Is It Anyway”: Why It Is Important That Teachers Understand and Question the Broader Contexts Shaping Curriculum. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 4 (1): 32–38.
Desai, Meghnad. 2002. Public Goods: A Historical Perspective. In Providing Public Goods, ed. UNDP. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Duderstandt, J. 2012. The Future of the University: A perspective from the Oort Cloud. Social Research 79 (3): 579–600.
Easterly, W. 2001. The Elusive Quest for Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gatto, J.T. 1992. Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling. Chicago: New Society Publishers.
Gibney, Elizabeth. 2013. Robbins: 50 Years Later. The Times Higher Education, 24 October.
Gilead, T. 2013. Educational Policy and the Methodology of Positive Economics: A Critical Examination. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference Organised by Philosophy of Education Society, New College, Oxford, UK.
Giroux, H. 1988. Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Giroux, H. 1998. Education Incorporated?. Educational Leadership 56 (2): 12–17.
GoI, MHRD. 1993. Learning Without Burden: Report of the National Advisory Committee Appointed by the Ministry of Human Resource Development. New Delhi: MHRD.
Grace, Gerald. 1989. Education: Commodity or Public Good. British Journal of Educational Studies 37 (3) (August): 207–221. CrossRef
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1999. Industry and Empire: The Birth of the Industrial Revolution. New York: The New Press.
Hyslop-Margison, E.J., and B. Graham. 2003. Principles for Democratic Learning in Career Education. Canadian Journal of Education 26 (3): 333–344.
Hyslop-Margison, E.J., and A.M. Sears. 2006. Neo-Liberalism, Globalization and Human Capital Learning: Reclaiming Education for Democratic Citizenship. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kazamias, A.M. 1963. History, Science, Comparative Education: A Study in Methodology. International Review of Education VIII: 383–398.CrossRef
Kazamias, A.M. 1972. Comparative Pedagogy: Assignment for the ‘70s. Comparative Education Review 16(3): 406–411. CrossRef
Kazamias, A.M., and K. Schwartz. 1977. Intellectual and Ideological Perspectives in Comparative Education. Comparative Education Review 21 (2/3): 153–176.CrossRef
Kirp, D.L. 2004. Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krassén, P. 2014. The Importance of the Signalling Mechanism in Higher Education. In Blue Skies: New Thanking About the Future of Higher Education, ed. L. Coiffait. London: Pearson.
Kuh, G. 1999. How Are We Doing? Tracking the Quality of the Undergraduate Experience, 1960s to Present. The Review of Higher Education 22 (2): 99–120.
Labaree, D.F. 1997. Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle Over Educational Goals. American Educational Research Journal 34 (1): 39–81.CrossRef
Lazear, E.P. 1999. Economic Imperialism. Hoover Institution and Graduate School of Business Stanford University (mimeo).
Machlup, F. 1970. Education and Economic Growth. Loncoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Maharatna, A. 2014. Invasion of Educational Universe by Neo-Liberal Economic Thinking: A Civilizational Casualty? Economic and Political Weekly 49 (37): 61–70.
Majumdar, M., and J. Mooij. 2012. The Marks Race: India’s Dominant Education Regime and New Segmentation. In School Education, Pluralism and Marginality: Comperative Perspectives, ed. C. Sleeter et al. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
McKernan, J. 2008. Curriculum and Imagination. London: Routledge.
Mulcahy, D.G. 2010. Praxis and Pedagogy as Related to the Arts and Humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9 (3): 305–321.CrossRef
Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian Drama, 3 Vols. London: Penguin Books.
Naussbaum, M. 2008. Education for Profit, Education for Freedom. Special Lecture No.1, Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata.
NCERT. 2005. National Curriculum Framework 2005. New Delhi: NCERT.
New York State Education Department. 2009. Federal Education and the States 1945–2009. Albany: New York State Archives.
OECD. 2011. Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. 2017. Number of Teachers Cheating to Get Better Exam Results Up Fourfold in Four Years, Finds Report. The Independent, 16 November.
Preece, P.F.W. 1971. The Laissez-Faire Finance of Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 19 (2): 154–162.CrossRef
Pritchett, L. 2001. Where Has All the Education Gone? World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 367–391.CrossRef
Pritchett, L. 2013. Rebirth of Education: Schooling Ain’t Learning. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
Roberts, P. 1998. The Politics of Curriculum Reform in New Zealand. Curriculum Studies 6 (1): 29–46.CrossRef
Russell, Bertrand. 1926. On Education. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Shaffer, B. 1993. The Blinding Torch: Modern British Fiction and the Discourse of Civilization. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Teixeira, P.N. 2000. A Portrait of the Economics of Education, 1960–1997. History of Political Economy 32 (suppl. 1): 257–288.CrossRef
The Conversation. 2013. New PISA Results Show Education Decline—It’s Time to Stop the Slide, 3 December.
The Independent. 2016. UK Schools Falling Behind Leading Countries, New Global Rankings Reveal, London, 6 December.
The Telegraph. 2016. UK Children Falling Behind in Maths Due to “Superficial” Learning, 13 March.
Tilak, J.B.G. 2006. Economics of Human Capital. Key-Note Address, 89th Annual Conference of the Indian Economic Association, Conference Volume, Indian Economic Journal.
UNESCO. 1968. Readings in the Economics of Education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. 1996. Learning: The Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO.
Vaizey, J. 1962. Introduction. International Social Science Journal XIV (4): 619–632.
West, E.G. 1964. Private Versus Public Education—A Classical Economic Dispute. Journal of Political Economy 72 (5) (October): 465–475. CrossRef
West, E.G. 1965. Education and the State: A Study in Political Economy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Wolf, A. 2002. Does Education Matter?: Myths About Education and Economic Growth. New York: Penguin.
Wolff, E.N. 2000. Human Capital Investment and Economic Growth: Exploring the Cross-Country Evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11: 433–472.CrossRef
Woodfill, B. 1963. The Economics of Education: A Survey, Technical Report No. 12, Centre for Research in Management Science, University of California.
World Bank. 2018. World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Metadaten
Titel
‘Invasion’ of Educational Universe by Neo-Liberal Economic Thinking: A Global Casualty?
verfasst von
Arup Maharatna
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
The Indian Metamorphosis

Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0796-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-13-0797-3

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0797-3_4