Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Examining classroom teachers’ use of electronic boards is crucial due to the rapid widespread replacement of traditional blackboards in schools. This study focuses on K-12 teachers’ use of electronic boards in the classroom, quantitatively in four subscales – presentation, motivation, engagement, and assessment, and teachers’ attributes – grade levels, ages, and years of teaching. The results reveal that correlation coefficients of presentation, motivation, engagement, and assessment, are significantly correlated. Elementary teachers tend to feel more comfortable in using electronic boards than middle school teachers. Teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards electronic board are significant factors in students’ motivation and engagement. Qualitative data present most teaching activities and their desires to improve their more efficient usage of electronic board. Limitation of study and recommendation for further research are provided.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Al-Qirim, N. (2011). Determinants of interactive white board success in teaching in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 56(3), 827–838. CrossRef
Amaro-Jimenez, C., & Beckett, G. (2010). Interactive Whiteboards: All-in-one Tool for ESL Teaching and Learning. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (pp. 2331–2337). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Cabus, S. J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). SMART in mathematics? Exploring the effects of in-class-level differentiation using SMARTboard on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 145–161. CrossRef
Chamblee, G. (2016). Interactive Whiteboards Research and the Mathematics Classroom: A LearnTechLib Review. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 2484–2489). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) https://www.learntechlib.org/p/172043/.
Chen, S. H., & Tsai, M. Y. (2013). Using the interactive whiteboards to teach picture books: The case of Taiwan. Online Submission, 6(11), 86–92.
ClassFlow. (2018). Retrieved from https://classflow.com/ July 30, 2018.
Deaney, R., Chapman, A., & Hennessy, S. (2009). A case-study of one teacher’s use of an interactive whiteboard system to support knowledge co-construction in the history classroom. Curriculum Journal, 20(4), 365–387. CrossRef
DeSantis, J. D. (2013). Exploring the effects of professional development for the interactive whiteboard on teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 12, 343–362. CrossRef
Essig, D. (2011). A Case Study of Interactive Whiteboard Professional Development for Elementary Mathematics Teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
Fekonja-Peklaj, U., & Marjanovic-Umek, L. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of the IWB and tablet computers in the first grade of primary school: A multiple-perspective approach. Early Child Development and Care, 185(6), 996–1015. CrossRef
Gillen, J., Littleton, K., Twiner, A., Staarman, J. K., & Mercer, N. (2008). Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 348–358. CrossRef
Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351–365. CrossRef
Ipek, I., & Sozcii, O. F. (2016). Preferences and attitudes for using interactive whiteboards in different courses and learning. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 15(1), 173–184.
Karsenti, T. (2016). The interactive whiteboard: Use, benefits, and challenges. A survey of 11,683 students and 1,131 teachers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(5), 1–22.
Kelley, G. P. (2014). Factors that have an effect on students’ scores on the Florida algebra 1 end-of-course assessment in algebra 1 classrooms using interactive whiteboard tools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.
Kuykendall, B., Janvier, M., Kempton, I., & Brown, D. (2012). Interactive Whiteboard Technology: Promise and Reality. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2012 (pp. 685–690). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) https://www.learntechlib.org/p/41669/.
Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Journal of Education & Information Technologies., 13(4), 291–303. CrossRef
Liang, T. H., Huang, Y. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An investigation of teaching and learning interaction factors for the use of the interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 356–367.
Link, T. (2012). The effect of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on mathematics performance of English learners. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). St. John's University, New York.
Lopez, O. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54, 901–915. CrossRef
Lopez, O., & Krockover, C. (2014). Contextual factors relevant to elementary teachers using interactive whiteboards in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 405–426.
McQuillan, K., Northcote, M., & Beamish, P. (2012). What matters most when students and teachers use interactive whiteboards in mathematics classrooms? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(4), 3–7.
Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: What's offered by interactive whiteboard technology? Teaching Science, 56(1), 23–29.
Murcia, K., & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417–431. CrossRef
Oigara, J. (2017). Teaching and learning with Smart Board technology in the elementary classroom. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (pp. 896–899). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Olsen, A., LeMire, S., & Baker, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy and peer support on student participation with interactive white boards in the middle school math class. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(2), 163–178.
Öz, H. (2014). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards in the English as a foreign language classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 156–177. MathSciNet
Park, J. (2014). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ perceptions toward white board system prior to actual experience. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 262–270.
Park, S., Kim, K., Everson, J., & Mushegan, A. (2011). The effect of interactive whiteboards on kindergarten students’ learning: Findings from two case studies. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (pp. 1630–1633). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) https://www.learntechlib.org/p/36530/.
Phelps, R. J. (2012). Perceptions of the effectiveness of interactive whiteboards on student engagement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edgewood College.
Rains, C. S. (2011). Effect of interactive whiteboard instruction on 5th grade standardized test scores in the area of mathematics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
Rosetti, J. (2012). Analyzing the perceptions and use of interactive whiteboards by prekindergarten teachers in presentation of classroom Lessons (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
Sad, S. N., & Ozhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students’ views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1184–1191. CrossRef
Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51, 1553–1568. CrossRef
Sheffield, C. C. (2015). Struggling to move beyond projection: A case study of instructional use of an interactive white board in elementary social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(4), 541–567.
SMART Board. (2018). Retrieved from https://home.smarttech.com/ July 30, 2018.
Šumak, B., Pušnik, M., Heričko, M., & Šorgo, A. (2017). Differences between prospective, existing, and former users of interactive whiteboards on external factors affecting their adoption, usage and abandonment. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 733–756. CrossRef
Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2008 (pp. 3290–3297). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) https://www.learntechlib.org/p/28842/.
Tunaboylu, C., & Demir, E. (2017). The effect of teaching supported by interactive whiteboard on Students’ mathematical achievements in lower secondary education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 81–94. CrossRef
Türel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers’ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381–394.
Wang, J., Cheon, J., Hamman, D., & Han, S. (2015). Identifying the relationships among teachers’ perceptions and the use of interactive whiteboard and students’ learning performance. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 3475–3482). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Whyburn, L., & Way, J. (2012). Student perceptions of the influence of IWBs on their learning in mathematics. Australian Educational Computing, 27(1), 23–27.
Xu, H., & Moloney, R. (2011). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 27(2), 307–325. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
Yang, J. Y., & Teng, Y. W. (2014). Perceptions of elementary school teachers and students using interactive whiteboards in English teaching and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(1), 125–154.
- Investigating K-12 teachers’ use of electronic board in the classroom in the Central South of United States
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA