nach oben

Erschienen in:

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Is Privacy Controllable?

verfasst von : Yefim Shulman, Joachim Meyer

Erschienen in: Privacy and Identity Management. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in the Age of Big Data

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

One of the major views of privacy associates privacy with the control over information. This gives rise to the question how controllable privacy actually is. In this paper, we adapt certain formal methods of control theory and investigate the implications of a control theoretic analysis of privacy. We look at how control and feedback mechanisms have been studied in the privacy literature. Relying on the control theoretic framework, we develop a simplistic conceptual control model of privacy, formulate privacy controllability issues and suggest directions for possible research.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel chownIoT: Enhancing IoT Privacy by Automated Handling of Ownership Change

Nächstes Kapitel Assessing Theories for Research on Personal Data Transparency

See [50] for a case of American consumers being resigned to giving up their data in exchange for commercial offers, rather than engaging in cost-benefit analyses.

In this paper, we are not concerned with formal definitions of privacy used in cryptography and privacy-enhancing technologies (i.e., differential privacy [15], l-diversity and (n,t)-closeness [29], etc.).

The observed effect could be an artefact of their literature sample (which was not focused on- and, thus, might not be representative of privacy research), and (or) sampling method (picking selected journals in computer and information ethics without attending to the geographical and authorship scope of those journals).

In reality, “privacy” is directly translated as “privateness”, while the latter corresponds to a “degree of inviolability of private life”, whereas, in fact, “privacy” corresponds to several control-, protection- or jurisprudence-related terms in the Russian language (confidentiality being one).

Originates in [39].

From this point on, for the sake of convenience, we may use the term “privacy” as a shorthand for “personal information” and its disclosure.

Both in dynamic systems (e.g., [4, 14] and [30]) and human factors (e.g., [21] and [42]) block diagrams are used for concise depictions of systems.

Or \(Output'\), if any disturbance is introduced into the system after a certain Output is achieved.

We invite our readers to explore independently the world of patents on privacy controls.

feedback | feed-back, n.: OED Online. Oxford University Press, July 2018. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/68965

Acquisti, A., et al.: Nudges for privacy and security: understanding and assisting users’ choices online. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(3), 44:1–44:41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3054926CrossRef

Angulo, J., Wästlund, E., Högberg, J.: What would it take for you to tell your secrets to a cloud? In: Bernsmed, K., Fischer-Hübner, S. (eds.) NordSec 2014. LNCS, vol. 8788, pp. 129–145. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11599-3_8CrossRef

Aström, K.J., Murray, R.M.: Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)CrossRef

Bargh, M.S., Meijer, R., Choenni, S., Conradie, P.: Privacy protection in data sharing: towards feedback based solutions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance ICEGOV 2014, pp. 28–36. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2691195.2691279

Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., Loewenstein, G.: Misplaced confidences: privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(3), 340–347 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612455931CrossRef

Carey, T., Mansell, W., Tai, S.: A biopsychosocial model based on negative feedback and control. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 94 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00094CrossRef

Carver, C.S.: Control processes, priority management, and affective dynamics. Emot. Rev. 7(4), 301–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590616CrossRef

Chanchary, F., Chiasson, S.: User perceptions of sharing, advertising, and tracking. In: Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2015, pp. 53–67. USENIX Association, Ottawa (2015). https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2015/proceedings/presentation/chanchary

10.

Colnago, J., Guardia, H.: How to inform privacy agents on preferred level of user control? In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: UbiComp Adjunct 2016, pp. 1542–1547. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2968219.2968546

11.

Coppersmith, D., Mintzer, F.C., Tresser, C.P., Wu, C.W., Yeung, M.M.: Fragile imperceptible digital watermark with privacy control, vol. 3657, pp. 79–85 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.344705

12.

DeCew, J.: Privacy. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2018 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2018)

13.

Dinev, T., Xu, H., Smith, J.H., Hart, P.: Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 295–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.23CrossRef

14.

Doyle, J.C., Francis, B.A., Tannenbaum, A.R.: Feedback Control Theory. Courier Corporation (2013)

15.

Dwork, C.: Differential privacy: a survey of results. In: Agrawal, M., Du, D., Duan, Z., Li, A. (eds.) TAMC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4978, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79228-4_1CrossRefMATH

16.

Fried, C.: An anatomy of values: problems of personal choice (1970)

17.

Gong, Y., Wei, L., Guo, Y., Zhang, C., Fang, Y.: Optimal task recommendation for mobile crowdsourcing with privacy control. IEEE Internet Things J. 3(5), 745–756 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2512282CrossRef

18.

Griffin, C., Rajtmajer, S., Squicciarini, A.: Invited paper: a model of paradoxical privacy behavior in online users. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), pp. 206–211, November 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2016.037

19.

Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N.J., van den Berg, J.: Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(3), 241 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7CrossRef

20.

Hoyle, R., Das, S., Kapadia, A., Lee, A.J., Vaniea, K.: Viewing the viewers: publishers’ desires and viewers’ privacy concerns in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2017, pp. 555–566. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998288

21.

Jagacinski, R.J., Flach, J.M.: Control Theory for Humans: Quantitative Approaches To Modeling Performance. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003)

22.

Jiang, X., Landay, J.A.: Modeling privacy control in context-aware systems. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 1(3), 59–63 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2002.1037723CrossRef

23.

Jones, S., O’Neill, E.: Feasibility of structural network clustering for group-based privacy control in social networks. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security SOUPS 2010, pp. 9:1–9:13. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1837110.1837122

24.

Kitkowska, A., Wästlund, E., Meyer, J., Martucci, L.A.: Is it harmful? Re-examining privacy concerns. In: Hansen, M., Kosta, E., Nai-Fovino, I., Fischer-Hübner, S. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2017. IAICT, vol. 526, pp. 59–75. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92925-5_5CrossRef

25.

Knijnenburg, B.P., Kobsa, A.: Increasing sharing tendency without reducing satisfaction: finding the best privacy-settings user interface for social networks. In: ICIS (2014)

26.

Kowalewski, S., Ziefle, M., Ziegeldorf, H., Wehrle, K.: Like us on facebook! analyzing user preferences regarding privacy settings in Germany. Proc. Manuf. 3, 815–822 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.336. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978915003376. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences, AHFECrossRef

27.

Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., Hildebrand, T.: Online social networks: why we disclose. J. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 109–125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.6CrossRef

28.

Kupfer, J.: Privacy, autonomy, and self-concept. Am. Philos. Q. 24(1), 81–89 (1987). http://www.jstor.org/stable/20014176

29.

Li, N., Li, T., Venkatasubramanian, S.: Closeness: a new privacy measure for data publishing. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22(7), 943–956 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2009.139CrossRef

30.

Luenberger, D.G.: Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models, and Applications, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1979)MATH

31.

Malhotra, N.K., Kim, S.S., Agarwal, J.: Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): the construct, the scale, and a causal model. Info. Syst. Res. 15(4), 336–355 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032CrossRef

32.

Mansell, W., Marken, R.S.: The origins and future of control theory in psychology. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19(4), 425–430 (2015)CrossRef

33.

Mehta, V., Bandara, A.K., Price, B.A., Nuseibeh, B.: Privacy itch and scratch: on body privacy warnings and controls. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI EA 2016, pp. 2417–2424. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892475

34.

Moore, A.: Defining privacy. J. Soc. Philos. 39(3), 411–428 (2008)CrossRef

35.

Murmann, P., Fischer-Hbner, S.: Tools for achieving usable ex post transparency. a survey. IEEE Access 5, 22965–22991 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2765539CrossRef

36.

Parent, W.A.: Privacy, morality, and the law. Philos. Public Aff. 12(4), 269–288 (1983). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265374

37.

Patil, S., Hoyle, R., Schlegel, R., Kapadia, A., Lee, A.J.: Interrupt now or inform later?: Comparing immediate and delayed privacy feedback. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2015, pp. 1415–1418. ACM (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702165

38.

Patil, S., Schlegel, R., Kapadia, A., Lee, A.J.: Reflection or action?: How feedback and control affect location sharing decisions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2014, pp. 101–110. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557121

39.

Powers, W.T., Clark, R.K., McFarland, R.L.: A general feedback theory of human behavior: Part i. Percept. Mot. Skills 11(1), 71–88 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1960.11.1.71CrossRef

40.

Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A.L., Cranor, L.F.: A design space for effective privacy notices. In: Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security SOUPS 2015, pp. 1–17. USENIX Association, Ottawa (2015). https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2015/proceedings/presentation/schaub

41.

Schlegel, R., Kapadia, A., Lee, A.J.: Eyeing your exposure: quantifying and controlling information sharing for improved privacy. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2011, pp. 14:1–14:14. ACM, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2078827.2078846

42.

Sheridan, T.B., Ferrell, W.R.: Man-Machine Systems; Information, Control, and Decision Models of Human Performance. The MIT Press (1974)

43.

Shulman, Y.: Towards a broadening of privacy decision-making models: the use of cognitive architectures. In: Hansen, M., Kosta, E., Nai-Fovino, I., Fischer-Hübner, S. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2017. IAICT, vol. 526, pp. 187–204. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92925-5_12CrossRef

44.

Sivaraman, V., Gharakheili, H.H., Vishwanath, A., Boreli, R., Mehani, O.: Network-level security and privacy control for smart-home IoT devices. In: 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pp. 163–167, October 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiMOB.2015.7347956

45.

Smith, H.J., Dinev, T., Xu, H.: Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 35(4), 989–1016 (2011). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2208940.2208950CrossRef

46.

Solove, D.J.: A taxonomy of privacy. Univ. PA Law Rev. 154(3), 477–560 (2006)CrossRef

47.

Toch, E., et al.: Locaccino: a privacy-centric location sharing application. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing - Adjunct, UbiComp 2010 Adjunct, pp. 381–382. ACM, New York, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1864431.1864446

48.

Tsai, J.Y., Kelley, P., Drielsma, P., Cranor, L.F., Hong, J., Sadeh, N.: Who’s viewed you?: The impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2009, pp. 2003–2012. ACM, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519005

49.

Tsai, L., et al.: Turtle guard: helping android users apply contextual privacy preferences. In: Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017), pp. 145–162. USENIX Association, Santa Clara (2017). https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/technical-sessions/presentation/tsai

50.

Turow, J., Hennessy, M.: The tradeoff fallacy: how marketers are misrepresenting American consumers and opening them up to exploitation. SSRN Electron. J., 24 p. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2820060

51.

Vancouver, J.B., Weinhardt, J.M.: Modeling the mind and the milieu: computational modeling for micro-level organizational researchers. Organ. Res. Methods 15(4), 602–623 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112449655CrossRef

52.

Warren, S.D., Brandeis, L.D.: The right to privacy, pp. 193–220. Harvard law review (1890)CrossRef

53.

Westin, A.: Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York (1967)

Titel: Is Privacy Controllable?
verfasst von: Yefim Shulman
Joachim Meyer
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Privacy and Identity Management. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in the Age of Big Data
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16743-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-16744-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16744-8_15

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"