nach oben

Engineering with Computers

Erschienen in:

30.03.2024 | Original Article

Isogeometric analysis for solving discontinuous two-phase engineering problems with precise and explicit interface representation

verfasst von: Emad Shakur

Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers | Ausgabe 6/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper presents a new computational method for solving two-phase engineering problems. The novelty of this approach lies in its ability to perform the analysis over the exact two-phase geometry. The geometry is defined by a spline-based representation and constructed based on the level-set method. The level-set-based geometry is mapped into a spline-based geometry using an untrimming technique that is newly developed in this paper. The spline-based representation is defined over unstructured meshes enabling precise representations of geometrically complex domains. An analysis-suitable mechanical model that accurately replicates the geometry is constructed and the governing equations are solved using the isogeometric analysis method. The interface between phases is explicitly represented by cubic B-spline curves, allowing for the evaluation of the solution field and various physical measures over its exact geometry. Additionally, algorithms that allow for changing the continuity of the solution field between the phases while precisely preserving the discontinuous two-phase domain are developed. Consistent analytical sensitivity analysis is formulated for generating the geometrical and mechanical models to allow for solving engineering problems with moving boundaries following the gradient-based approach. The proposed approach is tested for solving Poisson’s equation, linear elasticity, topology optimization involving linear elasticity for compliance minimization, and two-phase flow problems. The results expose the capability of the proposed approach to solve two-phase engineering problems while accurately representing the interface.

Vorheriger Artikel Higher order phase-field modeling of brittle fracture via isogeometric analysis

Nächster Artikel Goal-adaptive Meshing of Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love Shells

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Collins JB, Levine H (1985) Diffuse interface model of diffusion-limited crystal growth. Phys Rev B 31:6119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.6119CrossRef

Singer-Loginova I, Singer H (2008) The phase field technique for modeling multiphase materials. Rep Prog Phys 71:106501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/71/10/106501CrossRef

Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods: evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574799212404CrossRef

Sethian JA (2001) Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. J Comput Phys 169:503–555. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6657MathSciNetCrossRef

Saurel R, Pantano C (2018) Diffuse-interface capturing methods for compressible two-phase flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 50:105–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-050109MathSciNetCrossRef

Bourdin B, Chambolle A (2003) Design-dependent loads in topology optimization. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var 9:19–48. https://doi.org/10.1051/cocv:2002070MathSciNetCrossRef

Bourdin B, Chambolle A (2006) The phase-field method in optimal design. In: IUTAM symposium on topological design optimization of structures, machines and materials. Springer, London, pp 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4752-5_21

Folch R, Casademunt J, Hernández-Machado A, Ramirez-Piscina L (1999) Phase-field model for Hele–Shaw flows with arbitrary viscosity contrast. I. Theoretical approach. Phys Rev E 60:1724. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.1724CrossRef

Aranson I, Kalatsky V, Vinokur V (2000) Continuum field description of crack propagation. Phys Rev Lett 85:118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.118CrossRef

10.

Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:601–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5\(<\)601::AID-NME598\(>\)3.0.CO;2-S

11.

Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1%3C131::AID-NME726%3E3.0.CO;2-J

12.

Burman E, Fernández MA, Hansbo P (2006) Continuous interior penalty finite element method for Oseen’s equations. SIAM J Numer Anal 44:1248–1274. https://doi.org/10.1137/040617686MathSciNetCrossRef

13.

Burman E, Claus S, Hansbo P, Larson MG, Massing A (2015) CutFEM: discretizing geometry and partial differential equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 104:472–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4823MathSciNetCrossRef

14.

Villanueva CH, Maute K (2017) CutFEM topology optimization of 3D laminar incompressible flow problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 320:444–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.007MathSciNetCrossRef

15.

Andreasen CS, Elingaard MO, Aage N (2020) Level set topology and shape optimization by density methods using cut elements with length scale control. Struct Multidiscip Optim. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02527-1MathSciNetCrossRef

16.

Chessa J, Belytschko T (2003) An enriched finite element method and level sets for axisymmetric two-phase flow with surface tension. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58:2041–2064. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.946MathSciNetCrossRef

17.

Sauerland H, Fries T-P (2013) The stable XFEM for two-phase flows. Comput Fluids 87:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.017MathSciNetCrossRef

18.

Lawry M, Maute K (2015) Level set topology optimization of problems with sliding contact interfaces. Struct Multidiscip Optim 52:1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1301-5MathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Fries T-P (2008) A corrected XFEM approximation without problems in blending elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75:503–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2259MathSciNetCrossRef

20.

Hansbo P, Larson MG, Zahedi S (2014) A cut finite element method for a Stokes interface problem. Appl Numer Math 85:90–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2014.06.009MathSciNetCrossRef

21.

Claus S, Kerfriden P (2019) A CutFEM method for two-phase flow problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 348:185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.01.009MathSciNetCrossRef

22.

Donea J, Huerta A, Ponthot J-P, Rodríguez-Ferran A (2004) Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods. In: Encyclopedia of computational mechanics

23.

Kagan P, Fischer A, Bar-Yoseph PZ (1998) New B-spline finite element approach for geometrical design and mechanical analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 41:435–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980215)41:3\(<\)435::AID-NME292\(>\)3.0.CO;2-U

24.

Kagan P, Fischer A, Bar-Yoseph PZ (2003) Mechanically based models: adaptive refinement for B-spline finite element. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57:1145–1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.717CrossRef

25.

Hughes TJ, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.008MathSciNetCrossRef

26.

Cottrell JA, Hughes TJ, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis: toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, LondonCrossRef

27.

Kim H-J, Seo Y-D, Youn S-K (2009) Isogeometric analysis for trimmed CAD surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:2982–2995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.05.004CrossRef

28.

Scholz F, Mantzaflaris A, Jüttler B (2019) First order error correction for trimmed quadrature in isogeometric analysis. In: Advanced finite element methods with applications: selected papers from the 30th Chemnitz finite element symposium 2017, 30. Springer, London, pp 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14244-5_15

29.

Meßmer M, Teschemacher T, Leidinger LF, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2022) Efficient CAD-integrated isogeometric analysis of trimmed solids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 400:115584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115584MathSciNetCrossRef

30.

Loibl M, Leonetti L, Reali A, Kiendl J (2023) Patch-wise quadrature of trimmed surfaces in isogeometric analysis. Preprint arXiv:2306.14521

31.

Lieu QX, Lee J (2017) A multi-resolution approach for multi-material topology optimization based on isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 323:272–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.009MathSciNetCrossRef

32.

Hosseini BS, Turek S, Möller M, Palmes C (2017) Isogeometric analysis of the Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard equations with application to incompressible two-phase flows. J Comput Phys 348:171–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.029MathSciNetCrossRef

33.

Yan J, Lin S, Bazilevs Y, Wagner G (2019) Isogeometric analysis of multi-phase flows with surface tension and with application to dynamics of rising bubbles. Comput Fluids 179:777–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.017MathSciNetCrossRef

34.

Schillinger D, Dedè L, Scott MA, Evans JA, Borden MJ, Rank E, Hughes TJ (2012) An isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 249–252:116–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.03.017. (Higher order finite element and isogeometric methods)MathSciNetCrossRef

35.

Wei X, Marussig B, Antolin P, Buffa A (2021) Immersed boundary-conformal isogeometric method for linear elliptic problems. Comput Mech 68:1385–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-021-02074-6MathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Jiang W, Annavarapu C, Dolbow JE, Harari I (2015) A robust Nitsche’s formulation for interface problems with spline-based finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 104:676–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4766MathSciNetCrossRef

37.

Elfverson D, Larson MG, Larsson K (2018) CutIGA with basis function removal. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 5:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-018-0099-2CrossRef

38.

Elfverson D, Larson MG, Larsson K (2019) A new least squares stabilized Nitsche method for cut isogeometric analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 349:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.011MathSciNetCrossRef

39.

De Luycker E, Benson DJ, Belytschko T, Bazilevs Y, Hsu MC (2011) X-FEM in isogeometric analysis for linear fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87:541–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3121MathSciNetCrossRef

40.

Ghorashi SS, Valizadeh N, Mohammadi S (2012) Extended isogeometric analysis for simulation of stationary and propagating cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 89:1069–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3277MathSciNetCrossRef

41.

Noël L, Schmidt M, Doble K, Evans J, Maute K (2022) XIGA: an extended isogeometric analysis approach for multi-material problems. Comput Mech 70:1281–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02200-yMathSciNetCrossRef

42.

Schmidt M, Noël L, Doble K, Evans JA, Maute K (2023) Extended isogeometric analysis of multi-material and multi-physics problems using hierarchical B-splines. Comput Mech 71:1179–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02306-xMathSciNetCrossRef

43.

Noël L, Schmidt M, Messe C, Evans J, Maute K (2020) Adaptive level set topology optimization using hierarchical B-splines. Struct Multidiscip Optim 62:1669–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02584-6MathSciNetCrossRef

44.

Sangalli G, Takacs T, Vázquez R (2016) Unstructured spline spaces for isogeometric analysis based on spline manifolds. Comput Aided Geomet Des 47:61–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cagd.2016.05.004MathSciNetCrossRef

45.

Toshniwal D, Speleers H, Hughes TJ (2017) Smooth cubic spline spaces on unstructured quadrilateral meshes with particular emphasis on extraordinary points: Geometric design and isogeometric analysis considerations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 327:411–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.06.008MathSciNetCrossRef

46.

Kapl M, Sangalli G, Takacs T (2019) Isogeometric analysis with \(C^{1}\) functions on planar, unstructured quadrilateral meshes. SMAI J Comput Math 5:67–86. https://doi.org/10.5802/smai-jcm.52CrossRef

47.

Shakour E, Amir O (2021) Topology optimization with precise evolving boundaries based on IGA and untrimming techniques. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 374:113564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113564MathSciNetCrossRef

48.

Shakour E, Amir O (2022) Stress-constrained topology optimization with precise and explicit geometric boundaries. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03115-7MathSciNetCrossRef

49.

Gomes A, Voiculescu I, Jorge J, Wyvill B, Galbraith C (2009) Implicit curves and surfaces: mathematics, data structures and algorithms. Springer, LondonCrossRef

50.

Wenger R (2013) Isosurfaces: geometry, topology, and algorithms, an A K Peters book. CRC Press, LondonCrossRef

51.

Scott M, Simpson R, Evans J, Lipton S, Bordas S, Hughes T, Sederberg T (2013) Isogeometric boundary element analysis using unstructured T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 254:197–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2012.11.001MathSciNetCrossRef

52.

Sederberg TW, Zheng J, Bakenov A, Nasri A (2003) T-splines and T-NURCCs. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 22:477–484. https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882295CrossRef

53.

Scott MA, Borden MJ, Verhoosel CV, Sederberg TW, Hughes TJ (2011) Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of T-splines. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88:126–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3167CrossRef

54.

Scott M, Li X, Sederberg T, Hughes T (2012) Local refinement of analysis-suitable T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213–216:206–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.11.022MathSciNetCrossRef

55.

Takacs T (2023) Approximation properties over self-similar meshes of curved finite elements and applications to subdivision based isogeometric analysis. Preprint arXiv:2307.10403. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.10403

56.

Sukumar N, Chopp D, Moës N, Belytschko T (2001) Modeling holes and inclusions by level sets in the extended finite-element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:6183–6200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00215-8MathSciNetCrossRef

57.

Allaire G, Jouve F, Toader A-M (2004) Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method. J Comput Phys 194:363–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2003.09.032MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620240207MathSciNetCrossRef

59.

Donea J, Huerta A (2003) Finite element methods for flow problems. Wiley, LondonCrossRef

60.

Takacs T, Toshniwal D (2023) Almost-C1 splines: Biquadratic splines on unstructured quadrilateral meshes and their application to fourth order problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 403:115640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115640CrossRef

61.

Wang Y, Luo Z, Kang Z, Zhang N (2015) A multi-material level set-based topology and shape optimization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1570–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.11.002MathSciNetCrossRef

Titel: Isogeometric analysis for solving discontinuous two-phase engineering problems with precise and explicit interface representation
verfasst von: Emad Shakur
Publikationsdatum: 30.03.2024
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Engineering with Computers / Ausgabe 6/2024
Print ISSN: 0177-0667
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5663
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-024-01952-w

Image-to-mesh conversion method for multi-tissue medical image computing simulations

Open Access
Original Article

Parameterization, algorithmic modeling, and fluid–structure interaction analysis for generative design of transcatheter aortic valves

Open Access
Original Article

Automatic decomposition of protrusion volumes on thin-shell models for hexahedral mesh generation

Original Article

The generation of tetrahedral meshes for NURBS-enhanced FEM

Open Access
Original Article

Isogeometric analysis based mesh adaptation for time dependent problems

Original Article

Efficient inverse design optimization through multi-fidelity simulations, machine learning, and boundary refinement strategies

Open Access
Original Article

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Image-to-mesh conversion method for multi-tissue medical image computing simulations

Parameterization, algorithmic modeling, and fluid–structure interaction analysis for generative design of transcatheter aortic valves

Automatic decomposition of protrusion volumes on thin-shell models for hexahedral mesh generation

The generation of tetrahedral meshes for NURBS-enhanced FEM

Isogeometric analysis based mesh adaptation for time dependent problems

Efficient inverse design optimization through multi-fidelity simulations, machine learning, and boundary refinement strategies