Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0511-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Kelly Haws served as Area Editor for this article.
Foods positioned as natural, all-natural, and 100% natural can be found across a wide variety of product categories. However, the FDA has not provided a formal definition of the term “natural,” and this has resulted in a surge in class action lawsuits filed against manufacturers due to the potentially misleading use of natural claims. Activation theory and the inferential processing literature serve as the conceptual foundation for three studies that examine the effects of natural claims on consumers’ attribute inferences and product evaluations. Results suggest that natural claims affect consumers’ attribute inferences, which in turn influence product evaluations. Furthermore, findings show that the provision of objective information regarding the ambiguity of natural claims moderates the effects of these claims on consumers’ attribute inferences and product evaluations. The implications for marketing management, those involved in litigation driven by potentially deceptive natural claims, and the policy community are discussed.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J., Wachenheim, C. J., & Lesch, W. (2006). Perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods and processes. AgBioforum, 9(3), 180–194.
Andrews, J. C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1998). Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 62–75. CrossRef
Andrews, J. C., Burton, S., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2000). Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? The role of nutrition knowledge, ad claim type, and disclosure conditions. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 29–42. CrossRef
Balasubramanian, S. K., & Cole, C. (2002). Consumers‘ search and use of nutrition information: the challenge and promise of the nutrition labeling and education act. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 112–127. CrossRef
Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D., & Shäfer, D. B. (2012). The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands: more hype than substance? Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1035–1043. CrossRef
Berry, C., Mukherjee, A., Burton, S., & Howlett, E. (2015). A COOL effect: the direct and indirect impact of country-of-origin disclosures on purchase intentions for retail food products. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 533–542. CrossRef
Brucks, M. & Mitchell, A. (1981). Knowledge structures, production systems and decision strategies. In K. B. Monroe (Ed.), NA - Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 8). Ann Abor, MI: 750–757.
Burton, S., Garretson, J. A., & Velliquette, A. M. (1999). Implications of accurate usage of nutrition facts panel and information for food product evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 470–481. CrossRef
Burton, S., Cook, L. A., Howlett, E., & Newman, C. L. (2015). Broken halos and shattered horns: overcoming the biasing effects of prior expectations through objective information disclosure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 240–256. CrossRef
Cao, Z., & Yan, R. (2016). Health creates wealth? The use of nutrition claims and firm performance. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35(1), 58–75. CrossRef
Chandon, P., & Wansink, B. (2007). The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: lower calorie estimates and higher side dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 301–314. CrossRef
Charles, D.. (2016). “Congress just passed a GMO labeling bill. Nobody's super happy about it,” National Public Radio, http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/07/14/486060866/congress-just-passed-a-gmo-labeling-bill-nobodys-super-happy-about-it.
Chrysochou, P., & Grunert, K. G. (2014). Health-related ad information and health motivation effects on product evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1209–1217. CrossRef
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. CrossRef
Consumer Reports National Research Center (Consumer Reports). (2014a). Food labels survey: 2014 nationally-representative phone survey. Retrieved from http://www.greenerchoices.org/pdf/consumerreportsfoodlabelingsurveyjune2014.pdf.
Consumer Reports National Research Center (Consumer Reports). (2014b). Organic food labels survey: 2014 nationally-representative phone survey. Retrieved from http://www.greenerchoices.org/pdf/CR2014OrganicFoodLabelsSurvey.pdf.
Cornucopia Institute. (2011). Cereal crimes: how “natural” claims deceive consumers and undermine the organic label–a look down the cereal and granola aisle. Retrieved from http://cornucopia.org/cereal-scorecard/docs/Cornucopia_Cereal_Report.pdf.
Darke, P. R., Ashworth, L., & Main, K. J. (2010). Great expectations and broken promises: misleading advertising, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation and consumer suspicion. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 347–362. CrossRef
Dimitri, C. & Greene, C. (2002). Recent growth patterns in the U.S. organic foods market. Agriculture Information Bulletin, Number 777.
Esterl, M. (2013). The natural evolution of food labels. The Wall Street Journal, p. B1.
Federal Register. (2015a). Use of the term “natural” in the labeling of human food products; request for information and comments. 80, 69905–69909.
Federal Register. (2015b). Use of the term “natural” in the labeling of human food products; request for information and comments; extension of comment period. 80, 80718–80719.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables with measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. CrossRef
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. CrossRef
Garretson, J. A., & Burton, S. (2005). The role of spokescharacters as advertisement and package cues in integrated marketing communications. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 118–132. CrossRef
Greenberg, P. & Czarnezki, J. J. (2016). It’s time for the FDA to define “natural.” Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4317988/fda-natural-definition/.
Hamilton, R. (2016). Consumer-based strategy: using multiple methods to generate consumer insights that inform strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 281–285. CrossRef
Hartman Group. (2010). Beyond organic and natural 2010: Resolving confusion in marketing food and beverages.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. CrossRef
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. CrossRef
Howlett, E., Burton, S., Tangari, A. H., & Bui, M. (2012). Hold the salt! Effects of sodium information provision, sodium content, and hypertension on perceived cardiovascular disease risk and purchase intentions. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31(1), 4–18. CrossRef
Kamins, M. A., & Marks, L. J. (1991). The perception of kosher as a third party certification claim in advertising for familiar and unfamiliar brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 177–185. CrossRef
Kees, J., Burton, S., & Andrews, J.C. (2015). Government efforts to aid consumers’ well-being: understanding federal health warnings and disclosures. In M. Norton, D. Rucker, & C. Lamberton (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 530–562).
Keller, S., Landry, M., Olson, J., Velliquette, A., Burton, S., & Andrews, J. C. (1997). The effects of nutrition package claims, nutrition facts panels, and motivation to process nutrition information on consumer product evaluations. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 16(2), 256–269.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kowitt, B. (2015). Is the largest natural-foods brand even sold at Whole Foods? Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2015/10/28/kroger-natural-organic-food/
Kozup, J. C., Creyer, E. H., & Burton, S. (2003). Making healthful food choices: the influence of health claims and nutrition information on consumers’ evaluations of packaged food products and restaurant menu items. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 19–34. CrossRef
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 13–25. CrossRef
Mason, K., Jensen, T., Burton, S., & Roach, D. (2001). The accuracy of brand and attribute judgments: the role of information relevancy, product experience, and attribute-relationship schemas. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(3), 307–317. CrossRef
Merriam-Webster. (2015). Natural. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/natural.
Nielsen. (2015). We are what we eat: Healthy eating trends around the world. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/eu/nielseninsights/pdfs/Nielsen%20Global%20Health%20and%20Wellness%20Report%20-%20January%202015.pdf.
Organic Trade Association. (2014). State of the industry. Retrieved from http://ota.com/sites/default/files/indexed_files/StateOfOrganicIndustry_0.pdf.
Petty, R. (2015). “natural” claims in food advertising: policy implications of filling the regulatory void with consumer class action lawsuits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(1), 131–141. CrossRef
Rao, A. & Wang, E. Y. (2016). Demand for ‘healthy’ products: the impact of false claims. Kilts Center for Marketing at Chicago Booth – Nielsen Dataset Paper Series 1–019.
Ross, W. T., & Creyer, E. H. (1992). Making inferences about missing information: the effects of existing information. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 14–25. CrossRef
Rozin, P. (2005). The meaning of “natural”: process more important than content. Psychological Science, 16(8), 652–658. CrossRef
Rozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A., & Wood, K. (2004). Preference for natural: instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite, 43(2), 147–154. CrossRef
USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service. (2012a). Labeling organic products. Retrieved from http://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Labeling%20Organic%20Products%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf.
USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service. (2012b). Organic 101: what the USDA organic label means. Retrieved from http://blogs.usda.gov/2012/03/22/organic-101-what-the-usda-organic-label-means/.
USDA, Food Safety and Inspection Service (2015). Meat and poultry labeling terms. Retrieved from http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/food-labeling/meat-and-poultry-labeling-terms/meat-and-poultry-labeling-terms.
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. CrossRef
Wansink, B., & Chandon, P. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity? Journal of Marketing Research, 43(4), 605–617. CrossRef
Wilkie, W. L., & Moore, E. S. (2012). Expanding our understanding of marketing in society. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 53–73. CrossRef
- It’s only natural: the mediating impact of consumers’ attribute inferences on the relationships between product claims, perceived product healthfulness, and purchase intentions
- Springer US
Best Practices für Web-Exzellenz im Online-Handel/© venimo | Fotolia