Skip to main content

2014 | Buch

James Tobin

verfasst von: Robert W. Dimand

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Buchreihe : Great Thinkers in Economics Series

insite
SUCHEN

Über dieses Buch

James Tobin, 1981 Nobel laureate in economics, was the outstanding monetary economist among American Keynesian economists. This book, the first written about James Tobin, examines his leading role as a Keynesian macroeconomist and monetary economist, and considers the continuing relevance of his ideas.

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Frontmatter
Introduction
Abstract
James Tobin, winner of the 1981 Royal Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Science in Memory of Alfred Nobel, was the outstanding monetary economist among American Keynesians. He is known to the public for the proposed Tobin tax to curb international currency speculation and to the economics profession for contributions ranging from the Tobit estimator for limited dependent variables and the Tobin separation theorem in portfolio choice through Tobin’s q in investment theory to the Nordhaus-Tobin Measure of Economic Welfare (a pioneering work of “green accounting”). Tobin vigorously upheld, first against Milton Friedman’s monetarism and then against New Classical economics, the Keynesian vision of an active role for government in stimulating output, employment, and growth and in preventing depressions in an economy that was not automatically self-stabilizing. In the first debate with Friedman (see, e.g., the exchange in Gordon 1974), Tobin largely persuaded the economics profession that money demand does respond to interest rates, and both monetary and fiscal policy matter for short-run aggregate demand. “In retrospect,” reflected Tobin (in Colander 1999, 120), “that controversy doesn’t look as important as the one between Keynesian economics and New Classical macroeconomics — about whether or not the actual economy is best described as a continuous full-employment solution.”
Robert W. Dimand
1. An American Keynesian
Abstract
In September 1936, when James Tobin was an 18-year-old sophomore taking “Principles of Economics” (Ec A) at Harvard, his tutor, Spencer Pollard (a graduate student who was also the instructor of Tobin’s Ec A section) “decided that for tutorial he and I, mainly I, should read ‘this new book from England. They say it may be important.’ So I plunged in, being too young and ignorant to know that I was too young and ignorant” to begin the study of economics by reading Keynes’s The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (Tobin 1988, 662). Pollard was right: the book did turn out to be important, not least for its lasting role in shaping Tobin’s intellectual development. Tobin (1992, 1993) remained proud to call himself an “Old Keynesian” in contrast to New Keynesian, New Classical, and Post Keynesian, and, when Harcourt and Riach (1997) edited ASecond Editionof The General Theory it was fitting that they invited Tobin (1997) to contribute the overview chapter, with the first part of the chapter written “as J. M. Keynes.”1 Although Sir John Hicks (1935, 1937, 1939) and Irving Fisher also influenced Tobin2, his approach to economics was always most deeply shaped by Keynes and by Tobin’s experience growing up during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
Robert W. Dimand
2. Transforming the IS-LM Model Sector By Sector
Abstract
James Tobin was one of the second generation of American “Old Keynesians” (Tobin 1992, 1993), the generation that first encountered economics in the Great Depression rather than, like Alvin Hansen or Seymour Harris, discovering Keynes after becoming economists. He played a leading role in the transformation of the IS-LM model with simple equations for the money market and the flow of investment into a modeling framework with a much more fully developed treatment of asset markets and investment, and mounted a spirited defense of this approach against New Classical critiques. After taking part as a student and post-doctoral fellow in Alvin Hansen’s reformulation of IS-LM, Tobin’s subsequent career centered on replacing the money market equilibrium equation and the investment function of the IS-LM model with what he termed a “General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory” (the title of Tobin’s 1969 contribution to the inaugural issue of the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking) replacing “the interest rate” with a menu of asset returns, and paying attention to stock-flow dynamics. This was a general equilibrium approach in the sense that equilibria in the various markets for stocks of assets were linked by the adding-up constraint on wealth (the demands for individual assets must add up to total wealth).
Robert W. Dimand
3. Consumption, Rationing and Tobit Estimation Tobin as an Econometrician
Abstract
Best known as a monetary and macroeconomic theorist, described by Willem Buiter (2003, F585) as “the greatest macroeconomist of his generation” (see also Purvis 1982, 1991, Myhrman 1982), James Tobin was also actively engaged in empirical economics from his second published paper and his dissertation onward (Tobin 1942, 1947) to such later empirical studies as Tobin and Brainard (1977, 1992). His dissertation and several of his early articles investigated savings decisions, both theoretically and empirically, rather than a monetary topic, and he made notable contributions to the study of demand for food and for consumer durables. A pioneer in pooling time-series data with cross-section budget studies, Tobin contributed to the development of new econometric techniques in the 1950s, notably the extension of probit analysis of limited dependent variables that Goldberger (1964, 253-255) named the “Tobit model” (Tobin 1955b, 1958b). A critic of some of the large “Keynesian” macroeconometric models of the 1960s (Brainard and Tobin 1968), he later championed an approach to empirical macroeconomic modeling, based on his “general equilibrium approach to monetary theory,” that contrasted sharply with New Classical models that interpreted general equilibrium quite differently (Backus, Brainard, Smith, and Tobin 1980).
Robert W. Dimand
4. Portfolio Balance, Money Demand, and Money Creation
Abstract
Tobin’s doctoral dissertation dealt with consumption and saving decisions, and the articles based on that dissertation (together with his econometric papers on food demand and rationing) put him on the path to receiving the John Bates Clark Medal in 1955, awarded by the American Economic Association every two years to an American economist under the age of 40 who has already made significant contributions to knowledge (the only previous winners were Paul Samuelson, Kenneth Boulding, and Milton Friedman). But in the late 1950s and the 1960s, Tobin’s main research interest turned from understanding saving (the S of the IS curve) to exploring the optimizing microeconomic foundations of the money demand (liquidity preference), money creation and asset market equilibrium underlying the LM (liquidity/money) curve, which lead to his writing some of his most influential articles (Tobin 1956, 1958a, 1961, 1963). Although the analysis in these articles was theoretical, Tobin was well aware of the policy relevance of the nature of the money demand function. Already in 1947 (in an article also noteworthy for its empirical estimation of a money demand function depending on income and interest), Tobin opened a critique of an article by pioneer monetarist Clark Warburton and of a book by William Fellner (later Tobin’s colleague at Yale) by declaring, “The contention of this paper is that the demand for cash balances is unlikely to be perfectly inelastic with respect to the rate of interest, and that policy conclusions which depend on the assumption that the demand for cash balances is interest inelastic are therefore likely to be incorrect” (1947–48, in Tobin 1971–1996, Vol. 1, p. 27, cf. Fellner 1946 and the articles collected in Warburton 1966).
Robert W. Dimand
5. Tobin’s q and the Theory of Investment
Abstract
As he indicated in the title of his Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity (1980) James Tobin’s contribution to monetary theory centered on how asset markets affect real economic activity. Tobin came to economics during the Great Depression of the 1930s and emerged from the Depression and his initial immersion in the economics of Keynes with an abiding concern for policy-relevant macroeconomic theory, looking for a channel allowing public policy to stabilize real economic activity and avoid a recurrence of the mass unemployment of the 1930s. Reflecting the formative influences of the 1930s Tobin always regarded large-scale unemployment as a social problem, rather than as voluntary investment in search and consumption of leisure, and shared Keynes’s view of the volatility of private investment as the force driving economic fluctuations.
Robert W. Dimand
6. Money and Long-Run Economic Growth
Abstract
James Tobin, while primarily identified with short-run Keynesian macroeconomics and monetary economics, is less well remembered as a growth economist, despite his continuing interest in growth throughout his career. Tobin’s early work placed him near the origins of modern growth economics. Robert Solow (2004, 657)1 recalls that Tobin “published ‘A Dynamic Aggregative Model’ at just the time when I was working on economic growth, so I recognized a master hand.” According to Tobin (Breit and Spencer 1990, 130-131), “My 1955 piece, ‘A Dynamic Aggregative Model,’ may be my favorite; it was the most fun to write. It differed from the other growth literature by explicitly introducing monetary government debt as a store of value, a vehicle of saving alternative to real capital, and by generating a business cycle that interrupted the growth process.”
Robert W. Dimand
7. To Improve the World: Limiting the Domain of Inequality
Abstract
James Tobin is best known as an “Old Keynesian” macroeconomist and monetary economist, as was emphasized in the 1981 Royal Bank of Sweden Nobel Prize citation. His keen devotion to the reduction of poverty, inequality, and discrimination is less well known. This commitment extended beyond academic research: at the Tobin memorial at Yale in April 2002, political scientist Robert Dahl recalled how he and Tobin had spent the “Freedom Summer” of 1964 in Mississippi, hoping that the presence of two Yale professors would afford some protection to the student volunteers in the civil rights movement (see Dahl and Tobin 1993). Tobin was acutely aware of living in the country’s richest state and in one of its ten poorest cities (see Tobin 1996a, 252, comparing incomes in New Haven and the rest of its county), a concern that also led him to chair New Haven’s City Plan Commission from 1967 to 1970.
Robert W. Dimand
8. Taming Speculation: The Tobin Tax
Abstract
James Tobin’s contributions to monetary macroeconomics, notably portfolio balance models and the q theory of investment, did not emphasize open-economy macroeconomics. To the wider public who are interested in economic issues without being professional economists, however, Tobin’s name brings to mind his proposal to tax quicksilver international capital flows, which from 1984 onward he linked to J. M. Keynes’s plan to inhibit stock market speculation by taxing securities trades. Tobin first suggested what became known as “the Tobin tax” in passing in 1972 during a series of lectures honoring his teacher, Joseph Schumpeter — lectures that Tobin chose to use to reflect on his experience on President Kennedy’s Council of Economic Advisers (published as Tobin 1974b).
Robert W. Dimand
9. Tobin’s Legacy and Modern Macroeconomics
Abstract
James Tobin (1974, 1) began his John Danz Lectures by reminding his audience that “John Maynard Keynes died in 1946, and his General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money was published ten years earlier. Yet Keynes and his book continue to dominate economics.” A very few years later such a claim could not be made: when Tobin opened his Eyskens Lectures at Leuven, Neo-Keynesian Monetary Theory: A Restatement and Defense (1982c, 1–2), about “the living tradition of Keynesian monetary theory, which has greatly revised the letter of Keynes’s own writings, while remaining true to its spirit,” he acknowledged that “Today of course the tradition is under strong attack from a classical counter-revolution, espousing the quantity theory, the real-nominal dichotomy, and the neutrality of money.” As the subtitle of his Eyskens Lectures indicates, he had moved to the defensive — even though the lecture series had been rescheduled because he had to go to Stockholm on the original date of the lectures to accept the Royal Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Science in Memory of Alfred Nobel.
Robert W. Dimand
Backmatter
Metadaten
Titel
James Tobin
verfasst von
Robert W. Dimand
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Electronic ISBN
978-1-137-43195-0
Print ISBN
978-1-349-49235-0
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431950