Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 5/2018

09.05.2018 | Editorial

“Keep on Turkin’”?

verfasst von: John Hulland, Jeff Miller

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Over the past decade, there has been tremendous growth in academic research use of online samples, coupled with a shift away from traditional sample groups (especially undergraduate college students). In particular, researchers are turning to crowdsourcing platforms like Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to obtain convenient and inexpensive samples. Launched by Amazon in 2005, MTurk is “an online crowdsourcing labor market” (Levay et al. 2016). In their review of work published over four years in the Journal of Consumer Research (volumes 39–42), Goodman and Paolacci (2017) observed that 27% of all surveys and experiments in the journal were conducted using MTurk. Even more strikingly, this proportion of MTurk-based empirical work grew from 9% in the first of the four years they reviewed to 43% in the final year. Similar growth has been observed in other social science fields, including (Chandler and Paolacci 2017, p. 500) “more than 40% of papers published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and more than 20%” in Psychological Science. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
One primary reason for these differences in MTurk use is rooted in the fact that both JMR and especially JCR publish more experimental-based research. Nonetheless, increased use of MTurk can be observed in all four journals over time.
 
2
All three authors (McDonald, Mohebbi, Sostek) work for Google. However, their conclusions are based on substantial, credible statistical comparisons that demonstrate good measurement accuracy.
 
3
The sample sizes we employ in our field study are quite small. However, they are large enough to illustrate that significant differences in response incidence can be observed through the use of different data sources. The SSI sample size is larger in order to more accurately represent the underlying population.
 
4
Before GS became available, Burke used surveys of its own employees to obtain incidence estimates. It did this for cost reasons, despite recognizing the skewed nature of its workforce.
 
5
Levay et al. (2016) provide evidence that it may be possible to statistically correct—at least in part—for MTurk sample biases. Specifically, they suggest the use of nine “broad, measureable features”: age, race and ethnicity, gender, income, education, marital status, religion, ideology, and partisanship. In some cases this approach may provide a cost effective way to collect a representative sample while using MTurk.
 
6
With apologies to Robert Crumb.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.CrossRef Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler, J. J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are imposters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 500–508.CrossRef Chandler, J. J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Lie for a dime: When most prescreening responses are honest but most study participants are imposters. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 500–508.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chandler, J. J., Gabriele Paolacci, E., Peer, P. M., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Using nonnaive participants can reduce effect sizes. Psychological Science, 26, 1131–1139.CrossRef Chandler, J. J., Gabriele Paolacci, E., Peer, P. M., & Ratliff, K. A. (2015). Using nonnaive participants can reduce effect sizes. Psychological Science, 26, 1131–1139.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Downes-Le Guin, T., J. Meehling, and R. Baker (2006), “Great Results from Ambiguous Sources: Cleaning Internet Panel Data,” in ESOMAR World Research Conference: Panel Research 2006, Amsterdaam, The Netherlands: ESOMAR. Downes-Le Guin, T., J. Meehling, and R. Baker (2006), “Great Results from Ambiguous Sources: Cleaning Internet Panel Data,” in ESOMAR World Research Conference: Panel Research 2006, Amsterdaam, The Netherlands: ESOMAR.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196–210.CrossRef Goodman, J. K., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 196–210.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.CrossRef Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, M. S., House, L. A., & Gao, Z. (2015). Respondent screening and revealed preference axioms: Testing quarantining methods for enhanced data quality in web panel surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 687–709.CrossRef Jones, M. S., House, L. A., & Gao, Z. (2015). Respondent screening and revealed preference axioms: Testing quarantining methods for enhanced data quality in web panel surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 687–709.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1), 1–17.CrossRef Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1), 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wessling, S., Kathryn, J. H., & Netzer, O. (2017). MTurk character misrepresentation: Assessment and solutions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 211–230.CrossRef Wessling, S., Kathryn, J. H., & Netzer, O. (2017). MTurk character misrepresentation: Assessment and solutions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 211–230.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zwaan, Rolf A., Diane Pecher, Gabriele Paolacci, Samantha Bouwmeester, Peter Verkoeijen, Katinka Dijkstra, and René Zeelenberg (2018), “Participant Nonnaiveté and the Reproducability of cognitive psychology,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in press. Zwaan, Rolf A., Diane Pecher, Gabriele Paolacci, Samantha Bouwmeester, Peter Verkoeijen, Katinka Dijkstra, and René Zeelenberg (2018), “Participant Nonnaiveté and the Reproducability of cognitive psychology,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, in press.
Metadaten
Titel
“Keep on Turkin’”?
verfasst von
John Hulland
Jeff Miller
Publikationsdatum
09.05.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0587-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe