The authors have presented the key legal, technical and organizational assumptions related to conducting independent evaluations of the adequacy of the risk management process in the rail sector. Key problems related to change management in the railway sector have been defined. On the basis of a number of case studies, a few examples of the implementation of technical, organizational and operational changes have been presented. The authors have suggested their own approach to conducting independent evaluations of risk management processes in rail transport. The proposed approach can be applied successfully in other modes of transport.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Damodaran, A.: Ryzyko strategiczne, Podstawy zarządzania ryzykiem. Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, Warszawa (2009). Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
2.
Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community’s railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Directive on rail safety)
3.
Directive of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/110/EC of 16 December 2008 amending Directive 2004/49/EC on safety on the Community’s railways (Directive on rail safety)
4.
Directive of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/57/EC of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability of the rail system within the Community (Recast)
5.
Jabłoński, A., Jabłoński, M.: Implementation and managing of innovation in the conditions of legal and economic constraints on the based of rail transport. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) TST 2012. CCIS, vol. 329, pp. 423–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
CrossRef
6.
Jabłoński, A., Jabłoński, M.: Transfer of technology in the field of rail transport through cluster initiatives management. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) TST 2013. CCIS, vol. 395, pp. 58–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
CrossRef
7.
Koursi, E.M.E., Mitra, S., Bearfield, G.: Harmonising safety management systems in the european railway sector. Saf. Sci. Monit.
11(2), 1–14 (2007)
8.
PN-EN ISO/IEC 17020: 2012, Conformity assessment - General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection
9.
BS - IEC 300-3-9, reliability management, the guide of uses, risk analysis in technical systems
10.
Guide for the application of Commission Regulation on the adoption of a common safety method in risk evaluation and assessment referred to in Art. 6 paragraph 3 point A of the Directive on the railway safety, Reference no in ERA: ERA/GUI/01-2008/SAF
11.
Examples of risk assessment and any supporting tools to the Regulation on common safety methods (CSM) Reference no in ERA: ERA/GUI/02-2008/SAF
12.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 of 24 April 2009 on the adoption of a common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment
13.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1158/2010 of 9 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with requirements for obtaining railway safety certificates
14.
Regulation Commission (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorization
15.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 445/2011 of 10 May 2011 on the system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for freight wagons and amending Regulation (EC) No 653/2007
16.
Regulation of the Minister of Transport of 19 March 2007 on the safety management system in rail transport
17.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on a common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009
Über dieses Kapitel
Titel
Key Challenges and Problems in Conducting Independent Evaluations of the Adequacy of the Risk Management Process in Rail Transport
Die B2B-Firmensuche für Industrie und Wirtschaft: Kostenfrei in Firmenprofilen nach Lieferanten, Herstellern, Dienstleistern und Händlern recherchieren.
Unternehmen haben das Innovationspotenzial der eigenen Mitarbeiter auch außerhalb der F&E-Abteilung erkannt. Viele Initiativen zur Partizipation scheitern in der Praxis jedoch häufig. Lesen Sie hier - basierend auf einer qualitativ-explorativen Expertenstudie - mehr über die wesentlichen Problemfelder der mitarbeiterzentrierten Produktentwicklung und profitieren Sie von konkreten Handlungsempfehlungen aus der Praxis. Jetzt gratis downloaden!
