Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2013

01.01.2013 | CARBON FOOTPRINTING

Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting

verfasst von: Miguel Brandão, Annie Levasseur, Miko U. F. Kirschbaum, Bo P. Weidema, Annette L. Cowie, Susanne Vedel Jørgensen, Michael Z. Hauschild, David W. Pennington, Kirana Chomkhamsri

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Biological sequestration can increase the carbon stocks of non-atmospheric reservoirs (e.g. land and land-based products). Since this contained carbon is sequestered from, and retained outside, the atmosphere for a period of time, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is temporarily reduced and some radiative forcing is avoided. Carbon removal from the atmosphere and storage in the biosphere or anthroposphere, therefore, has the potential to mitigate climate change, even if the carbon storage and associated benefits might be temporary. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprinting (CF) are increasingly popular tools for the environmental assessment of products, that take into account their entire life cycle. There have been significant efforts to develop robust methods to account for the benefits, if any, of sequestration and temporary storage and release of biogenic carbon. However, there is still no overall consensus on the most appropriate ways of considering and quantifying it.

Method

This paper reviews and discusses six available methods for accounting for the potential climate impacts of carbon sequestration and temporary storage or release of biogenic carbon in LCA and CF. Several viewpoints and approaches are presented in a structured manner to help decision-makers in their selection of an option from competing approaches for dealing with timing issues, including delayed emissions of fossil carbon.

Results

Key issues identified are that the benefits of temporary carbon removals depend on the time horizon adopted when assessing climate change impacts and are therefore not purely science-based but include value judgments. We therefore did not recommend a preferred option out of the six alternatives presented here.

Conclusions

Further work is needed to combine aspects of scientific and socio-economic understanding with value judgements and ethical considerations.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
An exception is the PAS 2050 (BSI 2008), see Section 4.4.
 
2
Carbon neutrality is assumed only when carbon is emitted as CO2. If any carbon is emitted as CH4, this quantity is recognised as an emission.
 
3
If carbon would have been sequestered anyway, there would be no additional mitigation from undertaking this activity. Most offset schemes require an activity to be “additional to business as usual”, known as an “additionality test”.
 
4
Emission delayed by x years gets a credit of 0.0076x (from 2 years to 25 years) and 0.01x (from 25 years to 100 years)
 
5
While midpoint modelling refers to the modelling of impacts (e.g. climate change) at a middle point in the cause–effect chain or environmental mechanism, endpoint modelling refers to that at the end of the cause–effect chain (i.e. damage to Human Health, Ecosystems or Natural Resources).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bird DN, Cowie A, Strømman AH, Frieden D (2011) The timing of greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy systems using financial type indicators and terminology to discuss emission profiles from bioenergy. In Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Berlin. 10.5071/19thEUBCE2011-VP5.2.6 Bird DN, Cowie A, Strømman AH, Frieden D (2011) The timing of greenhouse gas emissions from bioenergy systems using financial type indicators and terminology to discuss emission profiles from bioenergy. In Proceedings of the 19th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, Berlin. 10.​5071/​19thEUBCE2011-VP5.​2.​6
Zurück zum Zitat BSI (2008) PAS 2050:2008 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London BSI (2008) PAS 2050:2008 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London
Zurück zum Zitat BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011 Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution, London
Zurück zum Zitat Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conservat Recycl 53(8):434–447CrossRef Cherubini F, Bird ND, Cowie A, Jungmeier G, Schlamadinger B, Woess-Gallasch S (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conservat Recycl 53(8):434–447CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Stromman AH, Hertwich E (2011) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3(5):413–426CrossRef Cherubini F, Peters GP, Berntsen T, Stromman AH, Hertwich E (2011) CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy 3(5):413–426CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clift R, Brandão M (2008) Carbon storage and timing of emissions. University of Surrey. Centre for Environmental Strategy Working Paper Number 02/08. ISSN: 1464–8083, Guildford Clift R, Brandão M (2008) Carbon storage and timing of emissions. University of Surrey. Centre for Environmental Strategy Working Paper Number 02/08. ISSN: 1464–8083, Guildford
Zurück zum Zitat Courchesne A, Bécaert V, Rosenbaum RK, Deschênes L, Samson R (2010) Using the Lashof accounting methodology to assess carbon mitigation projects with life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 14(2):309–321CrossRef Courchesne A, Bécaert V, Rosenbaum RK, Deschênes L, Samson R (2010) Using the Lashof accounting methodology to assess carbon mitigation projects with life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 14(2):309–321CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dornburg V, Marland G (2008) Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:211–217CrossRef Dornburg V, Marland G (2008) Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:211–217CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2010b) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg European Commission (2010b) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2011) Recommendations based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors for Life Cycle Assessment in European context. ILCD Handbook—International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union EUR24571EN. ISBN 978-92-79-17451-3. Available at http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu European Commission (2011) Recommendations based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors for Life Cycle Assessment in European context. ILCD Handbook—International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union EUR24571EN. ISBN 978-92-79-17451-3. Available at http://​lct.​jrc.​ec.​europa.​eu
Zurück zum Zitat Fearnside PM (2002) Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 7(1):19–30CrossRef Fearnside PM (2002) Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 7(1):19–30CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fearnside P (2008) On the value of temporary carbon: a comment on Kirschbaum. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13(3):207CrossRef Fearnside P (2008) On the value of temporary carbon: a comment on Kirschbaum. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13(3):207CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fearnside PM, Lashof DA, Moura-Costa P (2000) Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5:239–270CrossRef Fearnside PM, Lashof DA, Moura-Costa P (2000) Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5:239–270CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Quin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basic. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234 Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Quin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basic. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog H, Caldeira K, Reilly J (2003) An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of ocean carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 59:293–310 Herzog H, Caldeira K, Reilly J (2003) An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of ocean carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 59:293–310
Zurück zum Zitat IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK IPCC (2007) Summary for policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Zurück zum Zitat IPCC (2009) Meeting Report of the Expert Meeting on the Science of Alternative Metrics. [Plattner G-K, Stocker TF, Midgley P, Tignor M (eds)]. IPCC Working Group I. Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, pp 75 IPCC (2009) Meeting Report of the Expert Meeting on the Science of Alternative Metrics. [Plattner G-K, Stocker TF, Midgley P, Tignor M (eds)]. IPCC Working Group I. Technical Support Unit, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, pp 75
Zurück zum Zitat ISO (2003) Environmental management—life cycle impact assessment—examples of application of ISO 14042. ISO Technical Report 14047. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva ISO (2003) Environmental management—life cycle impact assessment—examples of application of ISO 14042. ISO Technical Report 14047. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschbaum MUF (2003a) Can trees buy time? An assessment of the role of vegetation sinks as part of the global carbon cycle. Clim Chang 58:47–71CrossRef Kirschbaum MUF (2003a) Can trees buy time? An assessment of the role of vegetation sinks as part of the global carbon cycle. Clim Chang 58:47–71CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschbaum MUF (2003b) To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass Bioenerg 24:297–310CrossRef Kirschbaum MUF (2003b) To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels. Biomass Bioenerg 24:297–310CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kirschbaum MUF (2006) Temporary carbon sequestration cannot prevent climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:1151–1164CrossRef Kirschbaum MUF (2006) Temporary carbon sequestration cannot prevent climate change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:1151–1164CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Korhonen R, Pingoud K, Savolainen I, Matthews R (2002) The role of carbon sequestration and the tonne-year approach in fulfilling the objective of climate convention. Environ Sci Pol 5:429–441CrossRef Korhonen R, Pingoud K, Savolainen I, Matthews R (2002) The role of carbon sequestration and the tonne-year approach in fulfilling the objective of climate convention. Environ Sci Pol 5:429–441CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Deschênes L, Samson R (2010) Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ Sci Technol 44:3169–3174CrossRef Levasseur A, Lesage P, Margni M, Deschênes L, Samson R (2010) Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ Sci Technol 44:3169–3174CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (2010) Massachusetts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. Walker T (ed). Contributors: Cardellichio P, Colnes A, Gunn J, Kittler B, Perschel R, Recchia C, Saah D, Walker T, Natural Capital Initiative Report NCI-2010- 03. Brunswick, Maine Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (2010) Massachusetts Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study: Report to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources. Walker T (ed). Contributors: Cardellichio P, Colnes A, Gunn J, Kittler B, Perschel R, Recchia C, Saah D, Walker T, Natural Capital Initiative Report NCI-2010- 03. Brunswick, Maine
Zurück zum Zitat Marland G, Fruit K, Sedjo R (2001) Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environ Sci Pol 4:259–268CrossRef Marland G, Fruit K, Sedjo R (2001) Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environ Sci Pol 4:259–268CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meinshausen M, Hare B (2002) Temporary sinks do not cause permanent climatic benefits. Achieving short-term emissions reduction targets at the future’s expense. Greenpeace Background Paper, 7 pp Meinshausen M, Hare B (2002) Temporary sinks do not cause permanent climatic benefits. Achieving short-term emissions reduction targets at the future’s expense. Greenpeace Background Paper, 7 pp
Zurück zum Zitat Moura-Costa P, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration—description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5:51–60CrossRef Moura-Costa P, Wilson C (2000) An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration—description and applications in forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5:51–60CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Müller-Wenk R, Brandão M (2010) Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):172–182CrossRef Müller-Wenk R, Brandão M (2010) Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):172–182CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hare M, Plevin RJ, Martin JI, Jones AD, Kendall A, Hopson E (2009) Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environ Res Lett 4:024001CrossRef O’Hare M, Plevin RJ, Martin JI, Jones AD, Kendall A, Hopson E (2009) Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum. Environ Res Lett 4:024001CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Kanagawa, Japan. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Kanagawa, Japan. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Zurück zum Zitat Pingoud K, Cowie A, Bird N, Gustavsson L, Rüter S, Sathre R, Soimakallio S, Türk A, Woess-Gallasch S (2010) Bioenergy: counting on incentives. Science 327:1199–1200CrossRef Pingoud K, Cowie A, Bird N, Gustavsson L, Rüter S, Sathre R, Soimakallio S, Türk A, Woess-Gallasch S (2010) Bioenergy: counting on incentives. Science 327:1199–1200CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Richards KR (1997) The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:S279–S292CrossRef Richards KR (1997) The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 27:S279–S292CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Lüdeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenerg 8(4):221–234CrossRef Schlamadinger B, Spitzer J, Kohlmaier GH, Lüdeke M (1995) Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenerg 8(4):221–234CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J, Chameides W, Havlik P, Kammen DM, Likens GE, Lubowski RN, Obersteiner M, Oppenheimer M, Schlesinger WH, Tilman D (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326(5952):527–528CrossRef Searchinger TD, Hamburg SP, Melillo J, Chameides W, Havlik P, Kammen DM, Likens GE, Lubowski RN, Obersteiner M, Oppenheimer M, Schlesinger WH, Tilman D (2009) Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science 326(5952):527–528CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shine KP (2009) The global warming potential—the need of an interdisciplinary retrial. Clim Chang 96:467–472CrossRef Shine KP (2009) The global warming potential—the need of an interdisciplinary retrial. Clim Chang 96:467–472CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N (2005) Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Change 68:281–302. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-1146-9 Shine KP, Fuglestvedt JS, Hailemariam K, Stuber N (2005) Alternatives to the global warming potential for comparing climate impacts of emissions of greenhouse gases. Clim Change 68:281–302. doi:10.​1007/​s10584-005-1146-9
Zurück zum Zitat Shirley K, Marland E, Cantrell J, Marland G (2011) Managing the costs of carbon for durable, carbon-containing products. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(3):325–346CrossRef Shirley K, Marland E, Cantrell J, Marland G (2011) Managing the costs of carbon for durable, carbon-containing products. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(3):325–346CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka K, Peters GP, Fuglestvedt JS (2010) Multicomponent climate policy: why do emission metrics matter? Carbon Manag 1:191–197CrossRef Tanaka K, Peters GP, Fuglestvedt JS (2010) Multicomponent climate policy: why do emission metrics matter? Carbon Manag 1:191–197CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) IPCC Report on Land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) IPCC Report on Land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change
Zurück zum Zitat WRI and WBCSD (2011) Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Washington WRI and WBCSD (2011) Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Washington
Metadaten
Titel
Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting
verfasst von
Miguel Brandão
Annie Levasseur
Miko U. F. Kirschbaum
Bo P. Weidema
Annette L. Cowie
Susanne Vedel Jørgensen
Michael Z. Hauschild
David W. Pennington
Kirana Chomkhamsri
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0451-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe