Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. Knowledge Management, Power and Conflict

verfasst von : Helena Heizmann

Erschienen in: The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

There is a pervasive tendency in knowledge management (KM) research and practice to downplay, ignore and/or simplify issues of power and conflict. This chapter draws out perspectives on power in the wider social sciences to allow for a richer and more nuanced understanding of the topic. Four layers of power are discussed in relation to contemporary debates on power and conflict in KM. The argument put forward in this chapter is that KM literature may benefit, in particular, from paying greater attention to the deeper layers of power referred to here as ‘process power’, ‘meaning power’ and ‘systemic power’. An examination of KM through these lenses calls into question consensus-based approaches that may mask underlying tensions between multiple divergent interests and—crucially—preclude questions into how power/knowledge relations shape the ethics, inclusiveness and democracy of organisational knowledge cultures.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2001). Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995–1018.CrossRef Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2001). Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995–1018.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11(1), 149–175.CrossRef Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11(1), 149–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.CrossRef Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bergström, O., Hans Hasselbladh, H., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Organizing disciplinary power in a knowledge organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 178–190.CrossRef Bergström, O., Hans Hasselbladh, H., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Organizing disciplinary power in a knowledge organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 178–190.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.CrossRef Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bunderson, S. J., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5), 1182–1194.CrossRef Bunderson, S. J., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5), 1182–1194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735.CrossRef Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carnelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1442–1463.CrossRef Carnelo-Ordaz, C., Garcia-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1442–1463.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carter, C., & Scarbrough, H. (2001). Regimes of knowledge, stories of power: A treatise on knowledge management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(3), 210–220.CrossRef Carter, C., & Scarbrough, H. (2001). Regimes of knowledge, stories of power: A treatise on knowledge management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(3), 210–220.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2012). Phronesis, projects and power research. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science (pp. 66–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Clegg, S., & Pitsis, T. (2012). Phronesis, projects and power research. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science (pp. 66–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S., & Ray, T. (2003). Power, rules of the game and the limits to knowledge management: Lessons from Japan and Anglo-Saxon Alarms. Prometheus, 21(1), 23–40.CrossRef Clegg, S., & Ray, T. (2003). Power, rules of the game and the limits to knowledge management: Lessons from Japan and Anglo-Saxon Alarms. Prometheus, 21(1), 23–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage. Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18, 107–122.CrossRef Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18, 107–122.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Contu, A. (2013). On boundaries and difference: Communities of practice and power relations in creative work. Management Learning, 44(5), 1–28. Contu, A. (2013). On boundaries and difference: Communities of practice and power relations in creative work. Management Learning, 44(5), 1–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Contu, A., & Willmot, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.CrossRef Contu, A., & Willmot, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coopey, J. (1995). The learning organization, power, politics and ideology. Management Learning, 26(2), 193–213.CrossRef Coopey, J. (1995). The learning organization, power, politics and ideology. Management Learning, 26(2), 193–213.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coopey, J., & Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 869–885.CrossRef Coopey, J., & Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 869–885.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Courpasson, D. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination: Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies, 21(1), 141–161.CrossRef Courpasson, D. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination: Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies, 21(1), 141–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cunliffe, A. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.CrossRef Cunliffe, A. (2004). On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner. Journal of Management Education, 28(4), 407–426.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cunliffe, A. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87–101.CrossRef Cunliffe, A. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40(1), 87–101.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Easterby-Smith, M., & Araujo, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization. Developments in theory and practice (pp. 1–21). London: Sage. Easterby-Smith, M., & Araujo, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization. Developments in theory and practice (pp. 1–21). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.CrossRef Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson, J., & Taminiau, Y. (2014). Conflict and learning in inter-organizational online communities: Negotiating knowledge claims. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 886–904.CrossRef Ferguson, J., & Taminiau, Y. (2014). Conflict and learning in inter-organizational online communities: Negotiating knowledge claims. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 886–904.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Filstadt, C. (2014). The politics of sensemaking and sensegiving at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(1), 3–21.CrossRef Filstadt, C. (2014). The politics of sensemaking and sensegiving at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(1), 3–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, M. D., Dopson, S., Fitzgerald, L., Bennett, C., Ferlie, E., Ledger, J., & McGivern, G. (2016). Knowledge leadership: Mobilizing management research by becoming the knowledge object. Human Relations, 69(7), 1563–1585.CrossRef Fischer, M. D., Dopson, S., Fitzgerald, L., Bennett, C., Ferlie, E., Ledger, J., & McGivern, G. (2016). Knowledge leadership: Mobilizing management research by becoming the knowledge object. Human Relations, 69(7), 1563–1585.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social sciences matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social sciences matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Foucault, M. (1988). In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock. Foucault, M. (1988). In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 853–867.CrossRef Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 853–867.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Garrick, J., & Clegg, S. (2000). Knowledge work and the new demands of learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 279–286.CrossRef Garrick, J., & Clegg, S. (2000). Knowledge work and the new demands of learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 279–286.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garrick, J., & Clegg, S. (2001). Stressed-out knowledge workers in performative times. A postmodern take on project-based learning. Management Learning, 31(1), 119–134.CrossRef Garrick, J., & Clegg, S. (2001). Stressed-out knowledge workers in performative times. A postmodern take on project-based learning. Management Learning, 31(1), 119–134.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barret, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39–59). London: Sage.CrossRef Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barret, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39–59). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRef Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436.CrossRef Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance? Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419–436.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giauque, D., Resenterra, F., & Siggen, M. (2010). The relationship between HRM practices and organizational committment of knowledge workers: Facts obtained from Swiss SMEs. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 185–205.CrossRef Giauque, D., Resenterra, F., & Siggen, M. (2010). The relationship between HRM practices and organizational committment of knowledge workers: Facts obtained from Swiss SMEs. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 185–205.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon, R., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2009). Embedded ethics: Discourse and power in the New South Wales police service. Organization Studies, 30(1), 73–99.CrossRef Gordon, R., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2009). Embedded ethics: Discourse and power in the New South Wales police service. Organization Studies, 30(1), 73–99.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.CrossRef Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C. (1985). The nature of unobtrusive power. Journal of Management Studies, 22(4), 384–399.CrossRef Hardy, C. (1985). The nature of unobtrusive power. Journal of Management Studies, 22(4), 384–399.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7, S3–S16.CrossRef Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7, S3–S16.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. (2006). Some dare call it power. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 754–775). London: Sage.CrossRef Hardy, C., & Clegg, S. (2006). Some dare call it power. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 754–775). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C., & Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451–483. Hardy, C., & Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451–483.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 299–316). London: Sage.CrossRef Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 299–316). London: Sage.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harman, K. (2011). Everyday learning in a public sector workplace: The embodiment of managerial discourses. Management Learning, 43(3), 275–289.CrossRef Harman, K. (2011). Everyday learning in a public sector workplace: The embodiment of managerial discourses. Management Learning, 43(3), 275–289.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Haugaard, M., & Clegg, S. (2009). Introduction: Why power is the central concept of the social sciences. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power (pp. 1–24). London: Sage. Haugaard, M., & Clegg, S. (2009). Introduction: Why power is the central concept of the social sciences. In S. Clegg & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power (pp. 1–24). London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Heizmann, H. (2011). Knowledge sharing in a dispersed network of HR practice: Zooming in on power/knowledge struggles. Management Learning, 42(4), 379–393.CrossRef Heizmann, H. (2011). Knowledge sharing in a dispersed network of HR practice: Zooming in on power/knowledge struggles. Management Learning, 42(4), 379–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heizmann, H., & Olsson, M. R. (2015). Power matters: The importance of Foucault’s power/knowledge as a conceptual lens in KM research and practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(9), 756–769.CrossRef Heizmann, H., & Olsson, M. R. (2015). Power matters: The importance of Foucault’s power/knowledge as a conceptual lens in KM research and practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(9), 756–769.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hislop, D. (2003). The complex relations between communities of practice and the implementation of technological innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 163–188.CrossRef Hislop, D. (2003). The complex relations between communities of practice and the implementation of technological innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2), 163–188.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hong, J. F. L., & Fiona, K. H. O. (2009). Conflicting identities and power between communities of practice: The case of IT outsourcing. Management Learning, 40(3), 311–326.CrossRef Hong, J. F. L., & Fiona, K. H. O. (2009). Conflicting identities and power between communities of practice: The case of IT outsourcing. Management Learning, 40(3), 311–326.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jayasingam, S., Ansari, M. A., & Jantan, M. (2010). Influencing knowledge workers: The power of top management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), 134–151.CrossRef Jayasingam, S., Ansari, M. A., & Jantan, M. (2010). Influencing knowledge workers: The power of top management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), 134–151.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kärreman, D. (2010). The power of knowledge: Learning from ‘learning by knowledge-intensive firm’. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1405–1416. Kärreman, D. (2010). The power of knowledge: Learning from ‘learning by knowledge-intensive firm’. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1405–1416.
Zurück zum Zitat Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11(1), 149–175.CrossRef Kärreman, D., & Alvesson, M. (2004). Cages in tandem: Management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization, 11(1), 149–175.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knights, D., & Willmot, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4), 535–558.CrossRef Knights, D., & Willmot, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23(4), 535–558.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall, N., & Rollinson, J. (2004). Maybe Bacon had a point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 15, S71–S86.CrossRef Marshall, N., & Rollinson, J. (2004). Maybe Bacon had a point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 15, S71–S86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Knowledge exchange using web 2.0 technologies in NGOs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 159–176.CrossRef Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Knowledge exchange using web 2.0 technologies in NGOs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 159–176.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2003). Knowledge sharing hostility in Russian firms. California Management Review, 45(3), 59–77.CrossRef Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2003). Knowledge sharing hostility in Russian firms. California Management Review, 45(3), 59–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mørk, B. E., Aanestad, M., Hanseth, O., & Grisot, M. (2008). Conflicting epistemic cultures and obstacles for learning across communities of practice. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(1), 12–23.CrossRef Mørk, B. E., Aanestad, M., Hanseth, O., & Grisot, M. (2008). Conflicting epistemic cultures and obstacles for learning across communities of practice. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(1), 12–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mørk, B. E., Hoholm, T., Ellingsen, G., Edwin, B., & Aanestad, M. (2010). Challenging expertise: On power relations within and across communities of practice in medical innovation. Management Learning, 41(5), 575–592.CrossRef Mørk, B. E., Hoholm, T., Ellingsen, G., Edwin, B., & Aanestad, M. (2010). Challenging expertise: On power relations within and across communities of practice in medical innovation. Management Learning, 41(5), 575–592.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mørk, B. E., Hoholm, T., Maaninen-Olsson, E., & Aanestad, M. (2012). Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D. Human Relations, 65(2), 263–288.CrossRef Mørk, B. E., Hoholm, T., Maaninen-Olsson, E., & Aanestad, M. (2012). Changing practice through boundary organizing: A case from medical R&D. Human Relations, 65(2), 263–288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Oborn, E., & Dawson, S. (2010). Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams: Struggle, accommodation and privilege. Human Relations, 63(12), 1835–1857.CrossRef Oborn, E., & Dawson, S. (2010). Knowledge and practice in multidisciplinary teams: Struggle, accommodation and privilege. Human Relations, 63(12), 1835–1857.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Omrod, S., Ferlie, E., Warren, F., & Kingsley, N. (2007). The appropriation of new organizational forms within networks of practice: Founder and founder-related ideological power. Human Relations, 60(5), 745–767.CrossRef Omrod, S., Ferlie, E., Warren, F., & Kingsley, N. (2007). The appropriation of new organizational forms within networks of practice: Founder and founder-related ideological power. Human Relations, 60(5), 745–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Østerlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21(2), 91–107.CrossRef Østerlund, C., & Carlile, P. (2005). Relations in practice: Sorting through practice theories on knowledge sharing in complex organizations. The Information Society, 21(2), 91–107.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Oswick, C., & Robertson, M. (2009). Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 179–193.CrossRef Oswick, C., & Robertson, M. (2009). Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 179–193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock. Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
Zurück zum Zitat Politis, J. D. (2005). The influence of managerial power and credibility on knowledge acquisition attributes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(3), 197–214.CrossRef Politis, J. D. (2005). The influence of managerial power and credibility on knowledge acquisition attributes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(3), 197–214.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raelin, J. A. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7(2), 195–211.CrossRef Raelin, J. A. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7(2), 195–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raelin, J. A. (2012). Dialogue and deliberation as expressions of democratic leadership in participatory organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 7–21.CrossRef Raelin, J. A. (2012). Dialogue and deliberation as expressions of democratic leadership in participatory organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(1), 7–21.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raelin, J. A. (2013). The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization, 20(6), 818–839.CrossRef Raelin, J. A. (2013). The manager as facilitator of dialogue. Organization, 20(6), 818–839.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders. Leadership, 12(2), 131–158.CrossRef Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders. Leadership, 12(2), 131–158.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rawas, M. Y. A., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. (1997). Management of conflict using individual power sources: A retailers’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 40, 49–64.CrossRef Rawas, M. Y. A., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. (1997). Management of conflict using individual power sources: A retailers’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, 40, 49–64.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rechberg, I., & Syed, J. (2013). Ethical issues in knowledge management: Conflict of knowledge ownership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 828–847.CrossRef Rechberg, I., & Syed, J. (2013). Ethical issues in knowledge management: Conflict of knowledge ownership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 828–847.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schultze, U., & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don’t know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 549–573.CrossRef Schultze, U., & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don’t know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 549–573.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.CrossRef Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, J. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, J. (2005). The politics of networked innovation. Human Relations, 58(7), 913–943.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2003). Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(2), 60–75.CrossRef Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2003). Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(2), 60–75.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2010). Organizational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(1), 64–79.CrossRef Swart, J., & Kinnie, N. (2010). Organizational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(1), 64–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teo, T., Nishant, R., Goh, M., & Agarwal, S. (2011). Leveraging collaborative technologies to build a knowledge sharing culture at HP analytics. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(1), 1–18. Teo, T., Nishant, R., Goh, M., & Agarwal, S. (2011). Leveraging collaborative technologies to build a knowledge sharing culture at HP analytics. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(1), 1–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson, M., & Willmot, H. (2016). The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice. Human Relations, 69(2), 483–506.CrossRef Thompson, M., & Willmot, H. (2016). The social potency of affect: Identification and power in the immanent structuring of practice. Human Relations, 69(2), 483–506.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.CrossRef Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.CrossRef Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–810.CrossRef Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27(6), 789–810.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vince, R. (2001). Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54(10), 1325–1351.CrossRef Vince, R. (2001). Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54(10), 1325–1351.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vince, R. (2004). Action learning and organizational learning: Power, politics and emotions in organizations. Bath: Carfax Publishing. Vince, R. (2004). Action learning and organizational learning: Power, politics and emotions in organizations. Bath: Carfax Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Vince, R., & Gabriel, Y. (2011). Organizational learning and emotion. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), A handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 331–348). Chichester: Wiley. Vince, R., & Gabriel, Y. (2011). Organizational learning and emotion. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. Lyles (Eds.), A handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 331–348). Chichester: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, C. C. (2004). The influence of ethical and self-interest concerns on knowledge sharing intentions among managers: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 21(3), 370–381. Wang, C. C. (2004). The influence of ethical and self-interest concerns on knowledge sharing intentions among managers: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 21(3), 370–381.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., He, J., & Mahoney, J. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantange. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 1265–1285.CrossRef Wang, H., He, J., & Mahoney, J. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantange. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 1265–1285.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations, 59(10), 1343–1370.CrossRef Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations, 59(10), 1343–1370.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Knowledge Management, Power and Conflict
verfasst von
Helena Heizmann
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_8