Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Electronic Commerce Research
Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research 4/2018

18.01.2018

Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace

verfasst von: Yi Cui, Jian Mou, Yanping Liu

Erschienen in: Electronic Commerce Research | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Social commerce has rapidly developed as a new area in electronic commerce field and has risen the attention of both researchers and practitioners. This paper investigated the intellectual structure, development, and evolution of social commerce quantitatively to provide a systematic review of the current state of the social commerce literature. We used a visualization tool called CiteSpace and mapped our result into the I-model for classification. According to 503 articles focusing on social commerce with associated 12,089 references, we have identified the most influential authors, institutions, publications, keywords, and references in this field, as well as the hot topics and future trends. In addition, we have developed the visual network of these research elements through CiteSpace for a deep level analysis, especially for future research trends prediction. Finally, our combination of bibliometric methods and a systematic review makes for a better understanding in the development of social commerce for both researchers and practitioners.
Vorheriger Artikel Improving sparsity and new user problems in collaborative filtering by clustering the personality factors
Nächster Artikel A network based mechanism for managing decomposable tasks via crowdsourcing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Viel, F. (2011). The field-standardized average impact of national research systems compared to world average: The case of Italy. Scientometrics, 88(88), 599–615.CrossRef
2.
Anand, K. S., & Aron, R. (2003). Group buying on the web: A comparison of price-discovery mechanisms. Management Science, 49(11), 1546–1562.CrossRef
3.
Baethge, C., Klier, J., & Klier, M. (2016). Social commerce—State-of-the-art and future research directions. Electronic Markets, 26(3), 269–290.CrossRef
4.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.CrossRef
5.
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179–255.CrossRef
6.
Briggs, J. (2011). What you recommend may not be what I want. New Media Age.
7.
Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2016). Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1075–1088.CrossRef
8.
Che, T., Peng, Z., & Hua, Z. (2016). Characteristics of online group-buying website and consumers intention to revisit: The moderating effects of visit channels. Electronic Commerce Research, 16(2), 171–188.CrossRef
9.
Chen, A., Lu, Y., Chau, P. Y. K., & Gupta, S. (2014). Classifying, measuring, and predicting users’ overall active behavior on social networking sites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 213–253.CrossRef
10.
Chen, C. (2006). Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.
11.
Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608.CrossRef
12.
Chen, D., Liu, Z., Luo, Z., Webber, M., & Chen, J. (2016). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of emergy research. Ecological Engineering, 90, 285–293.CrossRef
13.
Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.CrossRef
14.
Chen, J., Chen, X., & Song, X. (2007). Comparison of the group-buying auction and the fixed pricing mechanism. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 445–459.CrossRef
15.
Chen, J., Chen, X., Kauffman, R. J., & Song, X. (2009). Should we collude? Analyzing the benefits of bidder cooperation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(4), 191–202.CrossRef
16.
Chen, Y. C., Wu, J. H., Peng, L., & Yeh, R. C. (2015). Consumer benefit creation in online group buying: The social capital and platform synergy effect and the mediating role of participation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), 499–513.CrossRef
17.
18.
Chui, M., Manyika, J., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., Sarrazin, H., et al. (2012). The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. McKinsey Global Institute report.
19.
Cui, Y., Mou, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research on e-commerce journals. In Proceedings of 19th international conference on electronic commerce.
20.
Curty, R. G., & Zhang, P. (2011). Social commerce: Looking back and forward. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1–10.CrossRef
21.
Curty, R. G., & Zhang, P. (2013). Website features that gave rise to social commerce: A historical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 260–279.CrossRef
22.
Dellarocas, C. (2004). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424.CrossRef
23.
Dennison, G., Bourdage-Braun, S., & Chetuparambil, M. (2009). Social commerce defined. White paper no. 23747, IBM, Research Triangle Park, NC, November.
24.
Duan, W., & Zhang, J. (2014). The impact of referral channels in online customer journey. In Proceedings of the 35th international conference on information systems.
25.
Eastin, M. S., Brinson, N. H., Doorey, A., & Wilcox, G. (2016). Living in a big data world: Predicting mobile commerce activity through privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 214–220.CrossRef
26.
Eder, L. B., & Shen, J. (2011). An examination of factors associated with user acceptance of social shopping websites. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 7(1), 19–36.CrossRef
27.
Etemad, H., & Lee, Y. (2003). The knowledge network of international entrepreneurship: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 20(1), 5–23.CrossRef
28.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRef
29.
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool. Scientometrics, 1(4), 359–375.CrossRef
30.
Hajli, M. N. (2014). Social commerce for innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 1–24.CrossRef
31.
Hajli, M. N. (2014). The role of social support on relationship quality and social commerce. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87(1), 17–27.CrossRef
32.
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047–2059.CrossRef
33.
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.CrossRef
34.
Hérubel, J. P. V. M. (1999). Historical bibliometrics: Its purpose and significance to the history of disciplines. Libraries and Culture, 34(4), 380–388.
35.
Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A close look at design features. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 246–259.CrossRef
36.
Hsu, C. L., Westland, J. C., & Chiang, C. H. (2015). Editorial: Electronic commerce research in seven maps. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 147–158.CrossRef
37.
38.
Jing, X., & Xie, J. (2011). Group-buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Management Science, 57(8), 1354–1372.CrossRef
39.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRef
40.
Kauffman, R. J., Lai, H., & Ho, C. T. (2010). Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 249–262.CrossRef
41.
Ke, C., Yan, B., & Xu, R. (2017). A group-buying mechanism for considering strategic consumer behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 721–752.CrossRef
42.
Kim, D. (2013). Under what conditions will social commerce business models survive. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 69–77.CrossRef
43.
Kim, M. C., & Chen, C. (2015). A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics, 104(1), 239–263.CrossRef
44.
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318–332.CrossRef
45.
Kim, S. B., Sun, K. A., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). The influence of consumer value-based factors on attitude-behavioral intention in social commerce: The differences between high- and low-technology experience groups. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 30(1–2), 108–125.CrossRef
46.
Kim, Y. A., & Srivastava, J. (2007). Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. In International conference on electronic commerce: The wireless world of electronic commerce (Vol. 258, pp. 293–302). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, August.
47.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2004). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.
48.
Lee, W. J., Xiong, L. N., & Hu, C. (2012). The effect of facebook users’ arousal and valence on intention to go to the festival: Applying an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 819–827.CrossRef
49.
Li, X., Ma, E., & Qu, H. (2017). Knowledge mapping of hospitality research—A visual analysis using CiteSpace. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 60, 77–93.CrossRef
50.
Liang, T., & Turban, E. (2011). Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 5–13.CrossRef
51.
Liang, T., Ho, Y., Li, Y., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90.CrossRef
52.
Mayr, P., & Scharnhorst, A. (2014). Scientometrics and information retrieval: Weak-links revitalized. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2193–2199.CrossRef
53.
Ma, F., & Xi, M. (1992). Status and trends of bibliometric. Journal of Information Science, 13(5), 7–17.
54.
McCain, K. W. (1989). Mapping authors in intellectual space population genetics in the 1980s. Communication Research, 16(5), 667–681.CrossRef
55.
Mustafee, N. (2011). Evolution of IS research based on literature published in two leading IS journals—EJIS and MISQ. In European conference on information systems, ECIS, Helsinki, Finland, June.
56.
Ng, S. P. (2013). Intention to purchase on social commerce websites across cultures: A cross-regional study. Information & Management, 50(8), 609–620.CrossRef
57.
Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148.CrossRef
58.
Qian, G. (2014). Scientometric sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(7), 1462–1467.CrossRef
59.
60.
Seyedghorban, Z., Matanda, M. J., & Laplaca, P. (2016). Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2664–2677.CrossRef
61.
Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62–93.CrossRef
62.
Shin, D. (2013). User experience in social commerce: In friends we trust. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(1), 52–67.CrossRef
63.
Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394–399.
64.
Stephen, A. T., & Toubia, O. (2010). Deriving value from social commerce networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 215–228.CrossRef
65.
Vries, N. J. D., & Carlson, J. (2014). Examining the drivers and brand performance implications of customer engagement with brands in the social media environment. Journal of Brand Management, 21(6), 495–515.CrossRef
66.
Wang, J. C., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The impacts of online lightweight interactions as signals. In Proceedings of the 34th international conference on information systems.
67.
Wang, C., & Zhang, P. (2012). The evolution of social commerce: An examination from the people, business, technology, and information perspective. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 31(5), 105–127.
68.
Wigand, R. T., Benjamin, R. I., & Birkland, J. L. H. (2008). Web 2.0 and beyond: Implications for electronic commerce. In International conference on electronic commerce (p. 7). ACM.
69.
Yang, H. (2013). A cross-cultural study of market mavenism in social media: Exploring young American and Chinese consumers’ viral marketing attitudes, eWOM motives and behaviour. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 8(8), 102–124.CrossRef
70.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Gao, P. (2015). Understanding group-buying websites continuance. Internet Research, 25(5), 767–793.CrossRef
71.
Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017–1030.CrossRef
72.
Zhang, K. Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95–108.CrossRef
73.
Zhang, P., & Benjamin, R. I. (2007). Understanding information related fields: A conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1934–1947.
74.
Zhang, Z., & Gu, C. (2015). Effects of consumer social interaction on trust in online group-buying contexts: An empirical study in China. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), 1–21.
75.
Zheng, X., Zhu, S., & Lin, Z. (2013). Capturing the essence of word-of-mouth for social commerce: Assessing the quality of online e-commerce reviews by a semi-supervised approach. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 211–222.CrossRef
76.
Zhou, L., Zhang, P., & Zimmermann, H. D. (2013). Social commerce research: An integrated view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(2), 61–68.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace
verfasst von
Yi Cui
Jian Mou
Yanping Liu
Publikationsdatum
18.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Electronic Commerce Research / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1389-5753
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9288-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Electronic Commerce Research 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

BriefCommunication

Why do young people use fitness apps? Cognitive characteristics and app quality

OriginalPaper

Investigating the total factor productivity changes in the top ICT companies worldwide

OriginalPaper

Time series analysis for C2C conversion rate

OriginalPaper

Influence of individual characteristics on whether and how much consumers engage in showrooming behavior

OriginalPaper

Assesing the success of private labels online: differences across categories in the grocery industry

OriginalPaper

Etsy and the long-tail: how microenterprises use hyper-differentiation in online handicraft marketplaces