nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen

verfasst von : Katharina Kiemer, Christina Wekerle, Ingo Kollar

Erschienen in: Handbuch Bildungstechnologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Um positive Effekte auf den Wissens- und Kompetenzerwerb von Lernenden zu bewirken, bedarf technologiegestütztes Lernen häufig einer sorgfältigen instruktionalen Anleitung. In kooperativen Lernsettings kann diese über die Vorgabe von Kooperationsskripts realisiert werden, die den Lernenden innerhalb einer Kleingruppe unterschiedliche Lernaktivitäten und/oder Kooperationsrollen vorgeben und auf diese Weise die Zusammenarbeit strukturieren. Dieser Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die empirische Forschung zu Kooperationsskripts für das technologiegestützte Lernen.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Videos in der Lehre: Wirkungen und Nebenwirkungen

Nächstes Kapitel Group Awareness-Tools beim technologieunterstützen Lernen

Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. D. (Hrsg.). (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (S. 1–25). New York: Springer.

Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010). Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 259–282.CrossRef

Asterhan, C. S., Schwarz, B. B., & Gil, J. (2012). Small-group, computer-mediated argumentation in middle-school classrooms: The effects of gender and different types of online teacher guidance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 375–397.PubMedCrossRef

Bär, D., Biemann, C., Gurevych, I., & Zesch, T. (2012). Ukp: Computing semantic textual similarity by combining multiple content similarity measures. Proceedings of the first joint conference on lexical and computational semantics-volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and volume 2: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on semantic evaluation (S. 435–440). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457.CrossRef

Bote-Lorenzo, M. L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Jorrín-Abellán, I. M. (2008). Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 155–172.CrossRef

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.CrossRef

De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2010). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 349–360.CrossRef

Demetriadis, S., Egerter, T., Hanisch, F., & Fischer, F. (2011). Peer review-based scripted collaboration to support domain-specific and domain-general knowledge acquisition in computer science. Computer Science Education, 21(1), 29–56.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Hrsg.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (S. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. Haake (Hrsg.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (S. 275–301). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Hrsg.), Technology-enhanced learning (S. 3–19). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325.CrossRef

Haake, J. M., & Pfister, H. R. (2010). Scripting e distance-learning university course: Do students benefits from net-based scripted collaboration? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 191–210.

Hadwin, A. F., Miller, M., & Webster, E. A. (2013). CSCL group planner (version 3.0). Victoria: University of Victoria.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.CrossRef

Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E. D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Ruiz-Requies, I., & Rubia-Avi, B. (2006). COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 58.

Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 71, 133–152.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 122–135.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive-situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39–51.CrossRef

King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl & J. M. Haake (Hrsg.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (S. 14–37). New York: Springer.

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.CrossRef

Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2), 211–224.CrossRef

Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (eingereicht). Methoden des Lernens. Erscheint. In D. Urhahne, M. Dresel & F. Fischer (Hrsg.), Psychologie für den Lehrerberuf. Berlin: Springer.

Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts–a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.CrossRef

Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708–721.CrossRef

Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36.CrossRef

Kollar, I., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2018). Scaffolding and scripting (computer-supported) collaborative learning. In F. Fischer, C. Hmelo-Silver, S. Goldman & P. Reinmann (Hrsg.), International handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.CrossRef

Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123–144.CrossRef

Laru, J., Järvelä, S., & Clariana, R. B. (2012). Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(2), 103–117.CrossRef

Miao, Y., & Koper, R. (2007). An efficient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment. In C. A. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 7th computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL 2007) conference ‚Mice, Minds, and Society‘, July (S. 502–511). New Jersey: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. (2015). Scripting and awareness tools for regulating collaborative learning: Changing the landscape of support in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 573–588.CrossRef

Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C., & Fischer, F. (2012). The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 285–305.CrossRef

Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106.CrossRef

Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223.CrossRef

Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J., & Mulder, M. (2017). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 1–24.

Pai, H. H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 79–102.CrossRef

Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43(5), 591–614.CrossRef

Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.CrossRef

Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, F. R., Wang, N., Scull, J., Seher, A., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432.CrossRef

Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRef

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22.CrossRef

Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D., & Raz-Fogel, N. (2006). Adopt & adapt: Structuring, sharing and reusing asynchronous collaborative pedagogy. In ICLS ’06: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (S. 599–605). Bloomington: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.CrossRef

Rummel, N., Mullins, D., & Spada, H. (2012). Scripted collaborative learning with the cognitive tutor algebra. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(2), 307–339.CrossRef

Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Seidel, N. (2013). Peer Assessment und Peer Annotation mit Hilfe eines videobasierten CSCL-Scripts. DeLFI 2013–Die 11. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., 83–94. Bonn: gesellschaft für informatik.

Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447.CrossRef

Stegmann, K., Weinberger, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer,F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learining environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323.

Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59–73.CrossRef

Strijbos, J. W., & De Laat, M. F. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 495–505.CrossRef

Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265–269.CrossRef

Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Hrsg.), Discourse, tools and reasoning (S. 361–384). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Group awareness support and argumentation scripts for individual preparation of arguments in Facebook. Computers & Education, 76, 108–118.CrossRef

Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 279–306.CrossRef

Wang, X., Kollar, I., & Stegmann, K. (2017). Adaptable scripting to foster regulation processes and skills in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 153–172.CrossRef

Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–39.CrossRef

Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2011). From guided to self-regulated performance of domain-general skills: The role of peer monitoring during the fading of instructional scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 746–756.CrossRef

Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). Lernen in Gruppen. In T. Seidel & A. Krapp (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 277–296). Weinheim: Beltz.

Weimer, M., Gurevych, I., & Mühlhäuser, M. (2007). Automatically assessing the post quality in online discussions on software. Proceedings of the 45th annual meeting of the ACL on interactive poster and demonstration sessions (S. 125–128). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506–515.CrossRef

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.PubMedCrossRef

Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. H. (Hrsg.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Titel: Kooperationsskripts beim technologieunterstützten Lernen
verfasst von: Katharina Kiemer
Christina Wekerle
Ingo Kollar
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Handbuch Bildungstechnologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54367-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-54368-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54368-9_29

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"