Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Applied experience of democratic participation during a multi-agent integrated planning, organized from the bottom up in a territorial mosaic of Vast Area. The debate was feed through the weaker and local actors of governance (understood as “conversation”, landscape), feeding awareness, and improve of endogenous processes of sustainable development. The Strategic Plan as a conscious mode to dilate time, and not like a final goal, a spontaneous harmonious link between hierarchies of the territorial attraction centers. A polycentrism of continuity and proximity to the creation of a territorial identity that leans on the environmental and cultural strategy to is determine. A real experience inspired by non-deterministic theoretical scientific approaches (and subordinated to the result); but it based on democratic ideals, while respecting the role of the institutions, ensuring a high value to the cardinal principle of consultation between the government bodies at various levels and encouraging their participation in the territory in a planned and orderly manner in respect of all local actors. The experience is certainly interesting for today’s and future operators who will contribute to enhancing the sustainable development of the area, finding utopian guide and inspiration for democratization processes, with the hope that it can become a concrete best practice for developing good democracy and the determination of a coordinated and strategic planning of territories within the European Economic Space.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
KRATOS is not a compact city (like Barcelona), but a compact management of resources (preventive approach), avoiding high environmental costs that are objected in the mature scientific debate about PS (Bertuglia et al. 2003). KRATOS is an early response to the phenomenon of De-urbanization (with phenomena of hourglass social structure) in relation to single city projections in the urban area of Cosenza. A way of solution for homogeneous redistribution of regular work, and trying to avoid the phenomenon of “haves not” (impossibility in having systems of communication in contemporary cities). Kratos can increase a gentrification (balanced) phenomenon in the historical centers depopulated orbiting the river Crati, and creation of valuable economic activities in the tertiary sector (very high cultural quality). Phenomenon driven by the growth of innovation in transport and communication (Detragiache 1995, 1998). Kratos does not debate on the urban environment but on the territory, as it declaims in the mature scientific debate of the PS (Tomazinis 1985, Bertuglia et al. 1998, Bertuglia et al. 2000), using the most correct supralocal scale (Peano et al. 2002). Kratos intersects urban factors and planning tools (Bertuglia 2002, Champion 2002, Davico et al. 2002, Guerois and Pumain 2002, Haag 2002, Peano et al. 2002). The PS Kratos is analogous to the PS ‘Area Nord of Milan and Piacenza (48 municipalities of the province involved) for reticular structuring between institutions ( www.asnm/www/futuro/index.HTML/Kratos’ approach is similar to the strategic plan of Turin (Torino Internazionale), but don’t have a financial speculative approach, because it seeks its own “sincere” approach to the principles of sustainability (Cavallaro 2000).
Partecipate process in communication (Pulsifier e Taylor 2005, Gibelli 1996, Ames 1998, Pumain, Saunders, Saint-Julien 1989, Pareglio 2000), and ability to self-criticism (Bobbio L. 1994) - Like PS of London 2008 in map of net for the green spaces london.gov.uk/thelondonplan; PS of Lione map educational and ecological urban area millenarie3.com; banner in Barcellona.bcn2000.es; brand map in PS of Rimini comune.rimini.it.
- Kratos 2020, Strategic Plan Great Valley of Crati River
Neuer Inhalt/© ITandMEDIA