Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Brian Spalding: Some Contributions to Computational Fluid Dynamics During the Period 1993 to 2004 Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Large Eddy Simulation of Flows of Engineering Interest: A Review

verfasst von : S. Sarkar

Erschienen in: 50 Years of CFD in Engineering Sciences

Verlag: Springer Singapore

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The deeper insights of relationships between large and small scales lead to the development of large eddy simulation (LES), where large scales are explicitly resolved and small scales being universal are modeled. With the advent of high computing power, it is feasible now to successfully simulate the complex turbulent flows of engineering interest using LES. The paper starts with a brief discussion on features of turbulence leading to LES and subgrid-scale models. The evaluation of LES to resolve the physics of transitional and turbulent flows are made based on illustrations, where the few being previous studies of the author and his research group. Although results demonstrate an immense potential of LES to simulate the transitional and turbulent flows as an alternative to DNS with moderate computational cost, there exist several bottlenecks even today. The requirement of very fine meshes near walls is one of such bottlenecks in using LES at high Reynolds number flows. The hybrid LES-RANS, which was invented to eliminate the limitations, is also discussed here in brief. As a concluding remark, it can be stated that the method is particularly suitable and superior to RANS for situations, where unsteadiness and large-scale structures dominate the flow.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Studies on Mixed Convection and Its Transition to Turbulence—A Review
Nächstes Kapitel Brian Spalding and Turbulent Combustion
Literatur
1.
Akhavan, R., Ansari, A., Kang, S., & Mangiavacchi, N. (2000). Subgrid-scale interactions in a numerically simulated planar turbulent jet and implications for modeling. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 408, 83–120.MATHCrossRef
2.
Alam, M., & Sandham, N. D. (2000). Direct numerical simulation of short laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 410, 1–28.MATHCrossRef
3.
Anand, K., & Subrata, S. (2016). Features of a laminar separated boundary layer near the leading-edge of a model aerofoil for different angles of attack: An experimental study. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 139, 021201–021214.CrossRef
4.
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., & Reynolds, W. C. (1980). Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 80–1357.
5.
Breuer, M., Peller, N., Rapp, C., & Manhart, M. (2009). Flow over periodic hills-numerical and experimental study in a wide range of Reynolds numbers. Computers & Fluids, 38, 433–457.MATHCrossRef
6.
Cabot, W., & Moin, P. (1999). Approximate wall boundary conditions in the large-eddy simulation of high Reynolds number flow. Flow Turbulence Combustion, 63, 269–291.
7.
Chaouat, B. (2017). The state of the art of hybrid RANS/LES modeling for the simulation of turbulent flows. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 99(2), 279–327.CrossRef
8.
Cherry, N. J., Hiller, R., & Latour, M. E. M. P. (1984). Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 144, 13–46.CrossRef
9.
10.
Davidson, L., & Billson, M. (2006). Hybrid LES-RANS using synthesized turbulent fluctuations for forcing in the interface region. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 27, 1028–1042.CrossRef
11.
Davidson, L., Cokljat, D., Frohlich, J., Leschziner, M., Mellen, C., & Rodi, W. (Eds.). (2003). LESFOIL: Large eddy simulation of flow around a high lift airfoil. In Notes on numerical fluid mechanics (Vol. 83). Springer.
12.
Durbin, P. A. (1996). On the k–ε stagnation point anomaly. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 17, 89–90.CrossRef
13.
Foroutan, H., & Yavuzkurt, S. (2014). A partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for the simulation of turbulent swirling flow with vortex breakdown. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 50, 402–416.CrossRef
14.
Fransen, R., Morata, E. C., Duchaine, F., Gourdain, N., Gicquel, L. Y. M., & Vial, L. (2012). Comparison of RANS and LES in high pressure turbines (pp. 12–25). Toulouse: Safran Turbomeca, CERFACS.
15.
Frisch, U. (1995). Turbulence, the legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
16.
Fröhlich, J., Mellen, C. P., Rodi, W., Temmerman, L., & Leschziner, M. A. (2005). Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 526, 19–66.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
17.
Fröhlich, J., & von Terzi, D. (2008). Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 44(5), 349–377.
18.
Gaster, M. (1968). Growth of disturbances in both space and time. Physics of Fluids, 11(4), 723–727.CrossRef
19.
20.
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., & Cabot, W. H. (1991). A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Physics of Fluids A, 3, 1760–1765.MATHCrossRef
21.
Gritskevich, M. S., Garbaruk, A. V., Schütze, J., & Menter, F. R. (2012). Development of DDES and IDDES formulations for the k-ω shear stress transport model. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 88, 431–449.MATHCrossRef
22.
Hain, R., Kahler, C. J., & Radespiel, R. (2009). Dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at low-Reynolds-number aerofoils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 630, 129–153.MATHCrossRef
23.
Halstead, D. E., Wisler, D. C., Okiishi, T. H., Walker, G. J., Hodson, H. P., & Shin, H.-W. (1997). Boundary layer development in axial compressors and turbines—Part 1 of 4: Composite picture; Part 2 of 4: Compressors; Part 3 of 4: LP turbines; Part 4 of 4: Computations and analyses. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 119, 114–127, 426–444, 225–237, 128–139.
24.
Harlow, F. H., & Welch, J. E. (1965). Numerical calculation of three-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surfaces. Physics of Fluids, 8, 2182–2188.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
25.
He, C., Liu, Y., & Yavuzkurt, S. (2017). A dynamic delayed detached-eddy simulation model for turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 146, 174–189.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
26.
Horton, H. (1969). A semi-empirical theory for the growth and bursting of laminar separation bubbles. HM Stationery Office.
27.
Jansen, K. (1996). Large-eddy simulation of flow around a NACA 4412 airfoil using unstructured grids. In Annual research briefs (pp. 225–232). Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University and NASA Ames.
28.
Jones, B. M. (1934). Stalling. Journal of Royal Aeronautical Society, 38, 753–770.CrossRef
29.
Kenjereš, S., & Hanjalić, K. (2005). LES, T-RANS and hybrid simulations of thermal convection at high Ra numbers. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 27, 800–810.
30.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1941). The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number. Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 30, 301.
31.
Krajnovic, S., & Davidson, L. (2005). Flow around a simplified car, Part II: Understanding the flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127(5), 919–928.CrossRef
32.
Launder, B. E. (1991). An introduction to the modeling of turbulence. In VKI lecture series 1991–02, March 18–21, 1991. Von Karman Institute of Fluid Dynamics.
33.
Leonard, A. (1974). Energy cascade in large eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Advances in Geophysics, 18, 237.CrossRef
34.
Lesieur, M., & Métais, O. (1996). New trends in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 28, 45–82.MathSciNetCrossRef
35.
Lilly, D. K. (1967). The representation of small scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences (Vol. 195).
36.
Lilly, D. K. (1992). A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Physics of Fluids A, 4, 633–635.CrossRef
37.
38.
39.
Liou, M.-S., & Steffen, C. J. (1993). A new flux splitting scheme. Journal of computational Physics, 107, 23–39.
40.
Liu, S., Meneveau, C., Katz, J. (1994). On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 275, 83–119.CrossRef
41.
Mary, I., & Sagaut, P. (2002). LES of a flow around an airfoil near stall. AIAA Journal, 40, 1139.CrossRef
42.
Mellen, C., Frohlich, J., & Rodi, W. (2003). Lessons from LESFOIL project on large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil. AIAA Journal, 41(4), 573–581.CrossRef
43.
Menter, F., Kuntz, M., & Langtry, R. (2003). Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 4.
44.
Michelassi, V. (1997). Shock-boundary layer interaction and transition modelling in turbomachinery flows. IMechE Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 211, 225–234.CrossRef
45.
Michelassi, V., Wissink, J. G., & Rodi, W. (2003). Direct Numerical simulation, large eddy simulation and unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of periodic unsteady flow in a low-pressure turbine cascade: A comparison. IMechE Part A Journal of Power and Energy, 217, 403–411.CrossRef
46.
Morinishi, Y. (1995). Conservative properties of finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. In Annual research brief (pp. 121–132). Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames/Stanford University.
47.
Nair, K. M., & Sarkar, S. (2017). Large eddy simulation of self-sustained cavity oscillation for subsonic and supersonic flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 139, 011102.CrossRef
48.
Patankar, S. V., & Spalding, D. B. (1972). A calculation procedure for the heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 15, 1787–1805.MATHCrossRef
49.
Piomelli, U., & Balaras, E. (2002). Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 34, 349–374.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
50.
Piomelli, U., Ferziger, J., Moin, P., & Kim, J. (1989). New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows. Physics of Fluids A, 1, 1061–1068.CrossRef
51.
52.
Richardson, L. F. (1922). Weather prediction by numerical process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.MATH
53.
Robert, S. K., & Yaras, M. I. (2005). Boundary layer transition affected by surface roughness and free-stream turbulence. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127(3), 449–457.CrossRef
54.
Rodi, W., Ferziger, J. H., Breuer, M., & Pourquié, M. (1997). Status of large eddy simulation: Results of a workshop. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 119, 248–262.MATHCrossRef
55.
Sagaut, P. (2000). Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: An introduction. Springer.
56.
Sagaut, P. (2013). Multiscale and multiresolution approaches in turbulence: LES, DES and hybrid RANS/LES methods: Applications and guidelines (2nd ed.). Imperial College Press.
57.
Samson, A., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Effects of free-stream turbulence on transition of a separated boundary layer over the leading-edge of a constant thickness airfoil. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 138(2), 021202(19).
58.
Sarkar, S. (2007). Effects of passing wakes on a separating boundary layer along a low-pressure turbine blade through large-eddy simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 221, 551–563.CrossRef
59.
Sarkar, S. (2008). Identification of flow structures on a LP Turbine due to periodic passing wakes. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130, 061103.CrossRef
60.
Sarkar, S. (2009). Influence of wake structure on unsteady flow in a low pressure turbine blade passage. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 131(041016), 1–14.
61.
Sarkar, S., Babu, H., & Sadique, J. (2016). Interactions of separation bubble with oncoming wakes by LES. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, 138(2), 021703–021712.CrossRef
62.
Sarkar, S., & Sarkar, Sudipto. (2010). Vortex dynamics of a cylinder wake in proximity to a wall. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 26, 19–40.MATHCrossRef
63.
Sarkar, S., & Voke, P. R. (2006). Large-eddy simulation of unsteady surface pressure over a LP turbine due to interactions of passing wakes and inflexional boundary layer. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 128, 221–231.CrossRef
64.
Schulte, V., & Hodson, H. P. (1998). Unsteady wake-induced boundary layer transition in high lift LP turbine. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 120, 28–35.
65.
Schumann, U. (1995). Stochastic backscatter of turbulence energy and scalar variance by random sub-grid scale fluxes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 451, 293–318.MATH
66.
Shur, M., Spalart, P., Strelets, M., & Travin, A. (1999). Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. Engineering Turbulence Modeling Experiments, 4, 669–678.CrossRef
67.
Shur, M., Spalart, P. R., Strelets, M. K., & Travin, A. K. (2008). A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modeled LES capabilities. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 29(6), 1638–1649.CrossRef
68.
Smagorinsky, J. (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 91, 99.CrossRef
69.
Spalart, P. R. (2009). Detached-eddy simulation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 181–202.MATHCrossRef
70.
Spalart, P. R., Deck, S., Shur, M., Squires, K., Strelets, M. K., & Travin, A. (2006). A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 20, 181–195.MATHCrossRef
71.
Spalart, P. R., & Strelets, M. K. (2000). Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 403, 329–349.MATHCrossRef
72.
Sreenivasan, K. R. (1991). Fractals and multifractals in turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 23, 539–600.MathSciNetCrossRef
73.
Sreenivasan, K. R., & Antonia, R. A. (1997). The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 29, 435–472.MathSciNetCrossRef
74.
Stadtmüller, P. (2001). Investigation of wake-induced transition on the LP turbine cascade T106 A-EIZ, DFG-VerbundprojectFo 136/11, version 1.0, University of the Armed Forces Munich, Germany.
75.
Stieger, R., Hollis, D., & Hodson, R. (2003). Unsteady surface pressures due to wake induced transition in laminar separation bubble on a LP turbine cascade. ASME Papar No. GT2003-38303.
76.
Strelets, M. (2001). Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. In 39th AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
77.
Tabor, G. R., & Baba-Ahmadi, M. H. (2010). Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review. Computers & Fluids, 39(4), 553–567.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
78.
Temmerman, L., Hadžiadbic, M., Leschziner, M., & Hanjalić, K. (2005). A hybrid two-layer URANS-LES approach for large eddy simulation at high Reynolds numbers. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 26, 173–190.CrossRef
79.
Tucker, P. G. (2011). Computation of unsteady turbomachinery flows: Part 2-LES and hybrids. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 47(7), 546–569.CrossRef
80.
Tucker, P., & Davidson, L. (2004). Zonal k-l based large eddy simulation. Computers & Fluids, 33(2), 267–287.MATHCrossRef
81.
Van Driest, E. R. (1956). On turbulent flow near a wall. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 23, 1007.MATHCrossRef
82.
Voke, P. R. (1996). Subgrid-scale modeling at low mesh Reynolds number. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 8(2), 131–143.MATHCrossRef
83.
Watmuff, J. H. (1999). Evolution of a wave packet into vortex loops in a laminar separation bubble. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 397, 119–169.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
84.
Wissink, J. G. (2002). DNS of separating, low Reynolds number flow in a turbine cascade with incoming wakes. In 5th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments (pp. 731–740). Mallorca, Spain: Elsevier.CrossRef
85.
Wu, X., & Durbin, P. A. (2001). Evidence of longitudinal vortices evolved from distorted wakes in turbine passage. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 446, 199–228.MATHCrossRef
86.
Wu, X., Jacobs, R. G., Hunt, J. R. C., & Durbin, P. A. (1999). Simulation of boundary layer transition induced by periodically passing wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 398, 109–153.MATHCrossRef
87.
Wu, X., & Squires, K. D. (1998). Numerical investigation of the turbulent boundary layer over a bump. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 362, 229–271.MATHCrossRef
88.
Xiao, X., Edwards, J., & Hassan, H. (2003). Inflow boundary conditions for LES/RANS simulations with applications to shock wave boundary layer interactions, Reno, NV, AIAA paper 2003-0079.
89.
Yang, Z. Y., & Voke, P. R. (2001). Large-eddy simulation of boundary layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 439, 305–333.MATHCrossRef
90.
Zang, Y., Street, R. L., & Koseff, J. (1993). A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows. Physics of Fluids A, 5, 3186–3196.MATHCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Large Eddy Simulation of Flows of Engineering Interest: A Review
verfasst von
S. Sarkar
Copyright-Jahr
2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Buch
50 Years of CFD in Engineering Sciences

Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2669-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-2670-1

Copyright-Jahr: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2670-1_11

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise