Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik
Webinare Wirtschaft
Kongresse
Veranstaltungskalender
Podcasts
Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen beantragen
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Social Justice Research

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research 4/2020

14.10.2020

Lay Victims’ Conceptions of Environmental Crime and Environmental Injustice: The Case of the Chem-Dyne Superfund Site

verfasst von: Emmanuel A. Ogundipe, Ryan Gunderson

Erschienen in: Social Justice Research | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This project explores lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice through in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of people affected by, and former employees of, the Chem-Dyne Superfund site in Hamilton, Ohio, USA. Qualitative content analysis revealed that participants used the following criteria to define both environmental crime and environmental injustice: illegality, intentionality, harm and safety, and unfairness. These findings have important implications for studies of environmental crime and environmental injustice: (1) Lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are multidimensional concepts; (2) lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are mostly anthropocentric; (3) there is significant conceptual overlap between environmental crime and environmental injustice in lay victim accounts; and (4) lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are similar to, yet distinct from, formal and academic definitions.
Vorheriger Artikel Students’ Personal Belief in a Just World, Well-Being, and Academic Cheating: A Cross-National Study
Nächster Artikel Counterintuitive Effects of Individualistic Diversity Discourse on “Generation Bataclan”

Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
Participants were asked if they identified as Appalachian because Hamilton was one of the major Midwestern urban destinations of Appalachian migrants, an often marginalized and exploited population, from the 1950s through the 1970s (McCoy & Brown, 1981).
 
2
Hamilton was 94.2 percent white in 1970 (Bureau of the Census, 1973) and 92.7 percent non-Hispanic white in 1980 (Bureau of the Census, 1983). Although most participants were white, note that two are Native American.
 
Literatur
Barclay, E. M., & Bartel, R. (2015). Defining environmental crime: The perspective of farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 188–198.
Bell, S. E. (2015). Bridging activism and the academy: Exposing environmental injustices through the feminist ethnographic method of photovoice. Human Ecology Review, 21(1), 27–58.
Bell, S. E. (2016). Fighting king coal: The challenges to micromobilization in Central Appalachia. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boudon, R. (1992). Sentiments of justice. Social Justice Research, 5(2), 113–135.
Brisman, A. (2008). Crime-environment relationships and environmental justice. Seattle Journal of Social Justice, 6(2), 727–817.
Brook, D. (1998). Environmental genocide: Native Americans and toxic waste. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 57(1), 105–113.
Bullard, R. (1992). Environmental blackmail in minority communities. In B. Bryant & P. Mohai (Eds.), Race and the incidence of environmental hazards: A time for discourse (pp. 82–95). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Burge-Hendrix, B. (2007). The educative function of law. In M. Freeman & R. Harrison (Eds.), Law and philosophy (pp. 243–254). New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (1990). Causes of crime: Uncovering a lay model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(4), 410–419.
Clifford, M. (1998). Environmental crime: Enforcement, policy, and social responsibility. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publication.
d'Anjou, L., Steijn, A., & Van Aarsen, D. (1995). Social position, ideology, and distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 8(4), 351–384.
Eman, K., Meško, G., & Fields, C. B. (2011). Crimes against the environment: Green criminology and research challenges in Slovenia. VARSTVOSLOVJE: Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, 11(4), 574–592.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicagto Press.
Erickson, B. H. (1979). Some problems of inference from chain data. Sociological Methodology, 10, 276–302.
Fine, G. A. (2005). Collective memory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hall, M. (2015). Exploring green crime: Introducing the legal, social and criminological contexts of environmental harm. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hofrichter, R. (1993). Toxic struggles: The theory and practice of environmental justice. Philadelphia: New Society Publishing.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Lake, R. W. (1996). Volunteers, NIMBYs, and environmental justice: Dilemmas of democratic practice. Antipode, 28(2), 160–174.
Lewis, B. (2012). Human rights and environmental wrongs: Achieving environmental justice through human rights law. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 1(1), 86–98.
Lynch, M., & Stretesky, P. (2007). Green criminology in the United States. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology (pp. 248–269). Portland, OR: Willan.
Lynch, M. J., Stretesky, P. B., & Long, M. A. (2015). Environmental justice: A criminological perspective. Environmental Research Letters, 10(8), 085008.
McCoy, C. B., & Brown, J. S. (1981). Appalachian migration to Midwestern cities. In W. W. Philliber & C. B. McCoy (Eds.), The invisible minority: Urban appalachians (pp. 35–78). Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430.
Natali, L. (2010). The big grey elephants in the backyard of Huelva. In R. White (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives (pp. 193–209). Cullompton: Willan.
Natali, L. (2016). Eliciting narratives of the experiences of environmental victimization. In T. Spapens, R. White, & W. Huisman (Eds.), Environmental crime in transnational context: Global issues in green enforcement and criminology (pp. 250–267). New York: Routledge.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.
Nurse, A. (2016). An introduction of green criminology and environmental justice. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
Pellow, D. N. (2002). Garbage wars: The struggle for environmental justice in Chicago. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pellow, D. N. (2004). The politics of illegal dumping: An environmental justice framework. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 511–525.
Pellow, D. N. (2013). Environmental justice, animal rights, and total liberation: From conflict and distance to points of common focus. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 331–346). New York: Routledge.
Pinderhughes, R. (1996). The impact of race on environmental quality: An empirical and theoretical discussion. Sociological Perspectives, 39(2), 231–248.
Poje, G., Reilly, S., & Kleiman, H. (1986). Hometown in peril: A case of a Superfund Site [Motion picture]. Oxford, OH: Miami University Communications.
Roberts, J. V., Hough, M., & Hough, J. M. (Eds.). (2002). Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice. New York: Routledge.
Sabag, Ḳ., & Schmitt, M. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of social justice theory and research. New York: Springer.
Saha, R., & Mohai, P. (2005). Historical context and hazardous waste facility siting: Understanding temporal patterns in Michigan. Social Problems, 52(4), 618–648.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Qualitative analysis: What it is and how to begin? Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 371–375.
Sayre, F. B. (1932). Mens rea. Harvard Law Review, 45(6), 974–1026.
Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.
Shutkin, W. A. (1995). The concept of environmental justice and a reconception of democracy. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 14(4), 579–588.
Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (1999). Environmental crime: The criminal justice system's role in protecting the environment. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sollund, R. A. (2015). Introduction: Critical green criminology—An agenda for change. In R. A. Sollund (Ed.), Green harms and crimes: Critical criminology in a changing world (pp. 1–26). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
South, N., Brisman, A., & Beirne, P. (2013). A guide to a green criminology. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 27–42). New York: Routledge.
Tyler, T. R. (1987). Procedural justice research. Social Justice Research, 1(1), 41–65.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (1985). Enforcement decision document: Chem-Dyne, OH. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, S.W. 11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO. Washington, D.C. 20460
Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence, and politics. New York: Routledge.
Wendorf, C. A., Alexander, S., & Firestone, I. J. (2002). Social justice and moral reasoning: An empirical integration of two paradigms in psychological research. Social Justice Research, 15(1), 19–39.
White, R. (2007). Green criminology and the pursuit of social and ecological justice. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology (pp. 32–54). Portland, OR: Willan.
White, R. (2011). Transnational environmental crime: Towards an eco-global criminology. London: Routledge.
White, R. (2013). The conceptual contours of green criminology. In R. Walters, D. S. Westerhuis, & T. Wyatt (Eds.), Emerging issues in green criminology (pp. 17–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, R. (2016). Re-conceptualising folk crime in rural contexts. In J. F. Donnermeyer (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of rural criminology (pp. 299–307). New York: Routledge.
White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green criminology: An introduction to the study of environmental harm. London: Routledge.
Wilson, M. (1983). Folk crime: Patterns of accommodation. Deviant Behavior, 4(2), 123–140.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Designs and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Zilney, L. A., McGurrin, D., & Zahran, S. (2006). Environmental justice and the role of criminology: An analytical review of 33 years of environmental justice research. Criminal Justice Review, 31(1), 47–62.
Metadaten
Titel
Lay Victims’ Conceptions of Environmental Crime and Environmental Injustice: The Case of the Chem-Dyne Superfund Site
verfasst von
Emmanuel A. Ogundipe
Ryan Gunderson
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Social Justice Research / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0885-7466
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6725
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00359-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Social Justice Research 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

“Here, It’s Like You Don’t Have to Leave the Classroom to Solve a Problem”: How Restorative Justice in Schools Contributes to Students’ Individual and Collective Sense of Coherence

OriginalPaper

Societal Actors Shape Collective Identities of Minorities: Procedural Fairness Climate Effects on Identification, Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Health

OriginalPaper

Students’ Personal Belief in a Just World, Well-Being, and Academic Cheating: A Cross-National Study

OriginalPaper

Counterintuitive Effects of Individualistic Diversity Discourse on “Generation Bataclan”

Premium Partner

Pluta
    Bildnachweise