nach oben

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Erschienen in:

16.08.2018 | Review

LCA of aquaculture systems: methodological issues and potential improvements

verfasst von: Florence Alexia Bohnes, Alexis Laurent

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

The aquaculture sector is the fastest growing food production industry. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) can be a useful tool to assess its environmental impacts and ensure environmentally sustainable development. Years ago, critical reviews of LCA methodology have been conducted in that field to evaluate methodological practice. However, how effective were these reviews in improving LCA application? Are there any remaining issues that LCA practitioners should address in their practice?

Methods

We tackle the above questions by critically reviewing all LCA cases applied to aquaculture and aquafeed production systems from a methodological point of view. A total of 65 studies were retrieved, thus tripling the scope of previous reviews. The studies were analysed following the main phases of the LCA methodology as described in the ISO standards, and the authors’ choices were extracted to identify potential trends in the LCA practice.

Results and discussion

We identified five main methodological issues, which still pose challenges to LCA practitioners: (i) the functional unit not always reflecting the actual function of the system, (ii) the system boundary often being too restricted, (iii) the multi-functionality of processes too often being handled with economic allocation while more recommendable ways exist, (iv) the impact coverage not covering all environmental impacts relevant to aquaculture and (v) the interpretation phase usually lacking critical discussion of the methodological limitations. We analysed these aspects in depth, highlighting trends and tendencies.

Conclusions

For each of the five remaining issues, we provided recommendations to be integrated by practitioners in their future LCA practice. We also developed a brief research agenda to address the future needs of LCA in the aquaculture sector. The first need is that emphasis should be put on the construction of aquaculture life-cycle inventory databases with a special need for developing countries and for post-farming processes. Additionally, method developers should develop and/or refine characterisation models for missing impact pathways to better cover all relevant impacts of seafood farming.

Vorheriger Artikel New ultralight automotive door life cycle assessment

Nächster Artikel Are there infinitely many trucks in the technosphere, or exactly one? How independent sampling of instances of unit processes affects uncertainty analysis in LCA

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdou K, Aubin J, Romdhane MS, le Loc’h F, Lasram FBR (2017a) Environmental assessment of seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and seabream (Sparus aurata) farming from a life cycle perspective: a case study of a Tunisian aquaculture farm. Aquaculture 471:204–2012CrossRef

Abdou K, Ben Rais Lasram F, Romdhane MS, le Loc’h F, Aubin J (2017b) Rearing performances and environmental assessment of sea cage farming in Tunisia using life cycle assessment (LCA) combined with PCA and HCPC. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1339-2 CrossRef

Arismendi I, Soto D, Penaluna B et al (2009) Aquaculture, non-native salmonid invasions and associated declines of native fishes in northern Patagonian lakes. Freshw Biol 54:1135–1147CrossRef

Aubin J (2013) Life cycle assessment as applied to environmental choices regarding farmed or wild-caught fish. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 8:1–10

Aubin J, Baruthio A, Mungkung R, Lazard J (2015) Environmental performance of brackish water polyculture system from a life cycle perspective: a Filipino case study. Aquaculture 435:217–227CrossRef

Aubin J, Fontaine C (2014) Impacts of producing bouchot mussels in Mont-Saint-Michel Bay (France) using LCA with emphasis on potential climate change and eutrophication. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector environmental, pp 64–69

Aubin J, Papatryphon E, Van der Werf HMG et al (2006) Characterisation of the environmental impact of a turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) re-circulating production system using life cycle assessment. Aquaculture 261:1259–1268CrossRef

Aubin J, Papatryphon E, van der Werf HMG, Chatzifotis S (2009) Assessment of the environmental impact of carnivorous finfish production systems using life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 17:354–361CrossRef

Avadí A, Fréon P (2015) A set of sustainability performance indicators for seafood: direct human consumption products from Peruvian anchoveta fisheries and freshwater aquaculture. Ecol Indic 48:518–532

Avadí A, Pelletier N, Aubin J, Ralite S, Núñez J, Fréon P (2015) Comparative environmental performance of artisanal and commercial feed use in Peruvian freshwater aquaculture. Aquaculture 435:52–66CrossRef

Ayer N, Martin S, Dwyer RL, Gace L, Laurin L (2016) Environmental performance of copper-alloy net-pens: life cycle assessment of Atlantic salmon grow-out in copper-alloy and nylon net-pens. Aquaculture 453:93–103CrossRef

Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH (2009) Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada. J Clean Prod 17:362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.002 CrossRef

Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH, Pelletier NL, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:480–487CrossRef

Baruthio A, Aubin J, Mungkung R et al (2008) Environmental assessment of Filipino fish/prawn polyculture using life cycle assessment. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector. Zurich, Switzerland, pp 242–247

Besson M, Aubin J, Komen H, Poelman M, Quillet E, Vandeputte M, van Arendonk JAM, de Boer IJM (2016) Environmental impacts of genetic improvement of growth rate and feed conversion ratio in fish farming under rearing density and nitrogen output limitations. J Clean Prod 116:100–109CrossRef

Bohnes FA, Hauschild MZ, Schlundt J, Laurent A (2018) Life cycle assessments of aquaculture systems: a critical review of reported findings with recommendations for policy and system development. Reviews in Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/RAQ.12280

Bijster M, Guignard C, Hauschild M et al (2017) USEtox 2.0 Documentation (v1)

Boissy J, Aubin J, Drissi A, van der Werf HMG, Bell GJ, Kaushik SJ (2011) Environmental impacts of plant-based salmonid diets at feed and farm scales. Aquaculture 321:61–70CrossRef

Bosma R, Anh PT, Potting J (2011) Life cycle assessment of intensive striped catfish farming in the Mekong Delta for screening hotspots as input to environmental policy and research agenda. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:903–915CrossRef

Boxman SE, Zhang Q, Bailey D, Trotz MA (2016) Life cycle assessment a commercial-scale freshwater aquaponic system. Environ Eng Sci 34:299–311CrossRef

Cabello FC, Godfrey HP, Tomova A, Ivanova L, Dölz H, Millanao A, Buschmann AH (2013) Antimicrobial use in aquaculture re-examined: its relevance to antimicrobial resistance and to animal and human health. Environ Microbiol 15:1917–1942CrossRef

Cao L, Diana JS, Keoleian GA (2013) Role of life cycle assessment in sustainable aquaculture. Rev Aquac 5:61–71CrossRef

Cao L, Diana JS, Keoleian GA, Lai Q (2011) Life cycle assessment of Chinese shrimp farming systems targeted for export and domestic sales. Environ Sci Technol 45:6531–6538CrossRef

Cashion T, Hornborg S, Ziegler F, Hognes ES, Tyedmers P (2016) Review and advancement of the marine biotic resource use metric in seafood LCAs: a case study of Norwegian salmon feed. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1106–1120CrossRef

Cashion T, Tyedmers P, Parker RWR (2017) Global reduction fisheries and their products in the context of sustainable limits. Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12222,18,1026,1037

Chaudhary A, Verones F, De Baan L, Hellweg S (2015) Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49:9987–9995CrossRef

Chen X, Samson E, Tocqueville A, Aubin J (2015) Environmental assessment of trout farming in France by life cycle assessment: using bootstrapped principal component analysis to better define system classification. J Clean Prod 87:87–95CrossRef

Clark M, Tilman D (2017) Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ Res Lett 12:1–11

Dekamin M, Veisi H, Safari E, Liaghati H, Khoshbakht K, Dekamin MG (2015) Life cycle assessment for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) production systems: a case study for Iran. J Clean Prod 91:43–55CrossRef

Diana JS (2009) Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 59:27–38CrossRef

Efole Ewoukem T, Aubin J, Mikolasek O, Corson MS, Tomedi Eyango M, Tchoumboue J, van der Werf HMG, Ombredane D (2012) Environmental impacts of farms integrating aquaculture and agriculture in Cameroon. J Clean Prod 28:208–214CrossRef

Emanuelsson A, Ziegler F, Pihl L, Sköld M, Sonesson U (2014) Accounting for overfishing in life cycle assessment: new impact categories for biotic resource use. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1156–1168CrossRef

Ellingsen H, Aanondsen SA (2006) Environmental impacts of wild caught cod and farmed salmon—a comparison with chicken. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:60–65CrossRef

FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations, Rome, IT

Forchino AA, Lourguioui H, Brigolin D, Pastres R (2017) Aquaponics and sustainability: the comparison of two different aquaponic 2 techniques using the life cycle assessment (LCA). Aquac Eng 77:80–88CrossRef

Ford JS, Pelletier NL, Ziegler F, Scholz AJ, Tyedmers PH, Sonesson U, Kruse SA, Silverman H (2012) Proposed local ecological impact categories and indicators for life cycle assessment of aquaculture: a Salmon aquaculture case study. J Ind Ecol 16:254–265CrossRef

Fréon P, Durand H, Avadí A, Huaranca S, Orozco Moreyra R (2017) Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants: toward a cleaner production. J Clean Prod 145:50–63CrossRef

García García B, Rosique Jiménez C, Aguado-Giménez F, García García J (2016) Life cycle assessment of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) production in offshore fish farms. Sustainability 8:1228CrossRef

Grönroos J, Seppälä J, Silvenius F, Mäkinen T (2006) Life cycle assessment of Finnish cultivated rainbow trout. Boreal Environ Res 11:401–414

Hellweg S, Mila i Canals L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344 (6188):1109–1113

Henriksson P, Rico A, Zhang W (2015) Comparison of Asian aquaculture products by use of statistically supported life cycle assessment—supporting information. Sci Technol 49:14176–14183CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Dickson M, Allah AN, al-Kenawy D, Phillips M (2017a) Benchmarking the environmental performance of best management practice and genetic improvements in Egyptian aquaculture using life cycle assessment. Aquaculture 468:53–59CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Kleijn R, De Snoo GR (2012) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture systems—a review of methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:304–313CrossRef

Henriksson PJG, Tran N, Mohan CV, Chan CY, Rodriguez UP, Suri S, Mateos LD, Utomo NBP, Hall S, Phillips MJ (2017b) Indonesian aquaculture futures - evaluating environmental and socioeconomic potentials and limitations. J Clean Prod 162:1482–1490CrossRef

Huijbregts M, Hauschild M, Margni M et al (2015a) USEtox 2.0 user manual: inorganic substances (v2)

Huijbregts M, Meent D van de, Margni M et al (2015b) USEtox 2.0 user manual: organic substances (v2)

Iribarren D, Dagá P, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012a) Potential environmental effects of probiotics used in aquaculture. Aquac Int 20:779–789CrossRef

Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010a) Revisiting the life cycle assessment of mussels from a sectorial perspective. J Clean Prod 18:101–111CrossRef

Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010b) Life cycle assessment of fresh and canned mussel processing and consumption in Galicia (NW Spain). Resour Conserv Recycl 55:106–117CrossRef

Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010c) Implementing by-product management into the life cycle assessment of the mussel sector. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1219–1230CrossRef

Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012b) Life cycle assessment of aquaculture feed and application to the turbot sector. Int J Environ Res 6:837–848

ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment - principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland

ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland

Jerbi MA, Aubin J, Garnaoui K, Achour L, Kacem A (2012) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two rearing techniques of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquac Eng 46:1–9CrossRef

Jolliet O, Antón A, Boulay A-M, Cherubini F, Fantke P, Levasseur A, McKone TE, Michelsen O, Milà i Canals L, Motoshita M, Pfister S, Verones F, Vigon B, Frischknecht R (2018) Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y

Jonell M, Henriksson PJG (2015) Mangrove-shrimp farms in Vietnam-comparing organic and conventional systems using life cycle assessment. Aquaculture 447:66–75CrossRef

Kluts IN, Potting J, Bosma RH, Phong LT, Udo HMJ (2012) Environmental comparison of intensive and integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems for striped catfish production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, based on two existing case studies using life cycle assessment. Rev Aquac 4:195–208CrossRef

Kümmerer K (2009) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment—a review—part I. Chemosphere 75:417–434CrossRef

Langlois J, Fréon P, Delgenes J-P et al (2012) Biotic resources extraction impact assessment in LCA of fisheries. In: 8th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector. Saint-Malo (France), pp 517–522

Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2012) Limitations of Carbon Footprint as Indicator of Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology 46(7):4100–4108

Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J et al (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems. Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–588CrossRef

Laurent A, Weidema B, Bare J et al (2018) Methodological review and detailed guidance for the life cycle interpretation phase. Submitted to international journal of life cycle assessment (06/2018)

Lourguioui H, Brigolin D, Boulahdid M, Pastres R (2017) A perspective for reducing environmental impacts of mussel culture in Algeria. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1266–1277CrossRef

Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1269–1277CrossRef

McGrath KP, Pelletier NL, Tyedmers PH (2015) Life cycle assessment of a novel closed-containment salmon aquaculture technology. Environ Sci Technol 49:5628–5636CrossRef

Medeiros MV, Aubin J, Camargo AFM (2017) Life cycle assessment of fish and prawn production: comparison of monoculture and polyculture freshwater systems in Brazil. J Clean Prod 156:528–537CrossRef

Mungkung R, Aubin J, Prihadi TH, Slembrouck J, van der Werf HMG, Legendre M (2013) Life cycle assessment for environmentally sustainable aquaculture management: a case study of combined aquaculture systems for carp and tilapia. J Clean Prod 57:249–256CrossRef

Mungkung R, Udo de Haes H, Clift R (2006) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: a case study of Thai shrimp aquaculture product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:55–59CrossRef

Naylor R, Hindar K, Fleming IA et al (2005) Fugitive salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. Bioscience 55:427–437CrossRef

Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024CrossRef

Nhu TT, Schaubroeck T, Henriksson PJG, Bosma R, Sorgeloos P, Dewulf J (2016) Environmental impact of non-certified versus certified (ASC) intensive Pangasius aquaculture in Vietnam, a comparison based on a statistically supported LCA. Environ Pollut 219:156–165CrossRef

Ottinger M, Clauss K, Kuenzer C (2016) Aquaculture: relevance, distribution, impacts and spatial assessments - a review. Ocean Coast Manag 119:244–266CrossRef

Pahri SDR, Mohamed AF, Samat A (2015) LCA for open systems: a review of the influence of natural and anthropogenic factors on aquaculture systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1324–1337CrossRef

Pahri SDR, Mohamed AF, Samat A (2016) Life cycle assessment of cockles (Anadara granosa) farming: a case study of Malaysia. Environ Asia 9:80–90

Papatryphon E, Petit J, Kaushik SJ, Van Der Werf HMG (2004a) Environmental impact assessment of salmonid feeds using life cycle assessment (LCA). Ambio 33:316–323CrossRef

Papatryphon E, Petit J, Werf HMG van der, Kaushik SJ (2004b) Life cycle assessment of trout farming in France: a farm level approach. In: Proceedings from the 4th international conference, October 6–8, 2003, Bygholm, Denmark, pp 71–77

Parker R (2012) Review of life cycle assessment research on products derived from fisheries and aquaculture: a report for seafish as part of the collective action to address greenhouse gas emissions in seafood. Sea Fish Industry Authority, Edinburgh, UK

Parker RWR, Tyedmers PH (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of three products derived from wild-caught Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Environ Sci Technol 46:4958–4965CrossRef

Peeler EJ, Oidtmann BC, Midtlyng PJ, Miossec L, Gozlan RE (2011) Non-native aquatic animals introductions have driven disease emergence in Europe. Biol Invasions 13:1291–1303CrossRef

Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2007) Feeding farmed salmon: is organic better? Aquaculture 272:399–416CrossRef

Pelletier N, Tyedmers P (2010) Life cycle assessment of frozen tilapia fillets from indonesian lake-based and pond-based intensive aquaculture systems. J Ind Ecol 14:467–481CrossRef

Pelletier N, Tyedmers P, Sonesson U, Scholz A, Ziegler F, Flysjo A, Kruse S, Cancino B, Silverman H (2009) Not all salmon are created equal: life cycle assessment (LCA) of global salmon farming systems. Environ Sci Technol 43:8730–8736CrossRef

Phong LT, de Boer IJM, Udo HMJ (2011) Life cycle assessment of food production in integrated agriculture-aquaculture systems of the Mekong Delta. Livest Sci 139:80–90CrossRef

Roque d’Orbcastel E, Blancheton J-P, Aubin J (2009) Towards environmentally sustainable aquaculture: comparison between two trout farming systems using life cycle assessment. Aquac Eng 40:113–119CrossRef

Sala S, Anton A, McLaren SJ et al (2017) In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption. J Clean Prod 140:387–398CrossRef

Samuel-Fitwi B, Meyer S, Reckmann K, Schroeder JP, Schulz C (2013a) Aspiring for environmentally conscious aquafeed: comparative LCA of aquafeed manufacturing using different protein sources. J Clean Prod 52:225–233CrossRef

Samuel-Fitwi B, Nagel F, Meyer S, Schroeder JP, Schulz C (2013b) Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of raising rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in different production systems. Aquac Eng 54:85–92CrossRef

Samuel-Fitwi B, Schroeder JP, Schulz C (2013c) System delimitation in life cycle assessment (LCA) of aquaculture: striving for valid and comprehensive environmental assessment using rainbow trout farming as a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:577–589CrossRef

Santos AAO, Aubin J, Corson MS et al (2015) Comparing environmental impacts of native and introduced freshwater prawn farming in Brazil and the influence of better effluent management using LCA. Aquaculture 444:151–159CrossRef

Seghetta M, Romeo D, D’Este M et al (2017) Seaweed as innovative feedstock for energy and feed—evaluating the impacts through a life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 150:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.022 CrossRef

Seves SM, Temme EHM, Brosens MCC, Zijp MC, Hoekstra J, Hollander A (2016) Sustainability aspects and nutritional composition of fish: evaluation of wild and cultivated fish species consumed in the Netherlands. Clim Chang 135:597–610CrossRef

Smárason BÖ, Ögmundarson Ó, Árnason J et al (2017) Life cycle assessment of Icelandic Arctic char fed three different feed types. Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci 17:79–90

Sonesson U, Davis J, Flysjö A, Gustavsson J, Witthöft C (2017) Protein quality as functional unit—a methodological framework for inclusion in life cycle assessment of food. J Clean Prod 140:470–478CrossRef

Strazza C, Magrassi F, Gallo M, Del Borghi A (2015) Life cycle assessment from food to food: a case study of circular economy from cruise ships to aquaculture. Sustain Prod Consum 2:40–51CrossRef

Taelman SE, De Meester S, Roef L et al (2013) The environmental sustainability of microalgae as feed for aquaculture: a life cycle perspective. Bioresour Technol 150:513–522CrossRef

UN (2017) World population prospects the 2017 revision key findings and advance tables. New York, USA

Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R et al (2013) Data quality guideline for the Ecoinvent database version 3. The Ecoinvent Centre, St. Gallen, Switzerland

WHO (2018) Antimicrobial resistance. http://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/en/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018

Wilfart A, Prudhomme J, Blancheton JP, Aubin J (2013) LCA and emergy accounting of aquaculture systems: towards ecological intensification. J Environ Manag 121:96–109CrossRef

Winther U, Ziegler F, Hognes ES et al (2009) Carbon footprint and energy use of Norwegian seafood products. SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture

Yacout DMM, Soliman NF, Yacout MM (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of Tilapia in two production systems: semi-intensive and intensive. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:806–819CrossRef

Youngson D, Saroglia J (2001) Genetic interactions between marine finfish species European aquaculture and wild conspecifics. J Appl Ichthyol 17:153–162CrossRef

Ziegler F, Hornborg S, Green BG, Eigaard OR, Farmery AK, Hammar L, Hartmann K, Molander S, Parker RWR, Hognes ES, Vázquez-Rowe I, Smith ADM (2016) Expanding the concept of sustainable seafood using Life Cycle Assessment. Fish and Fisheries 17(4):1073–1093

Titel: LCA of aquaculture systems: methodological issues and potential improvements
verfasst von: Florence Alexia Bohnes
Alexis Laurent
Publikationsdatum: 16.08.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Elektronische ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1517-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

New ultralight automotive door life cycle assessment

Transition Towards a Net Zero Carbon Built Environment

Moving from completing system boundaries to more realistic modeling of the economy in life cycle assessment

LCM development: focusing on the LC promoters and their organizational problem-solving

Life cycle assessment of passively aerated composting in gas-permeable bags of olive mill waste

Responsibility in life cycle assessment practice